Premium Essay

Toy Time

In: Business and Management

Submitted By lxghasan
Words 767
Pages 4
It’s toy time

Educational products for developing minds

1. Executive Summary:
It’s toy time is a specialty toy retailer, operating in Banani 11 no. shop no.1. We are a company that helps to grow the creative power of our children.Our success is our employees and the unique service they render. The large variety of toys at lower prices, the fun-filled atmosphere and service is all that It’s toy time provides its customers.We are the only company who thinks about a childs mental development but not only entertainment.

2. Company Information: * Name: IT’S TOY TIME Inc. * Location: Shop no. 1, Banani 11 no. (Beside Mother Care) Dhaka, 1213 Bangladesh. (We chose it because we were looking for such an area which will help us increase our sales and eventually grow our profit consistently as this location can attract our target market as it’s beside MOTHER CARE) * Shop Size: 750 sq. feet * Rent Expense: 262,500 k ( including water expense) * Advance deposit: 30,00,000 k (for 3 years contract) * Electricity Expense: (2000-3000)k (depending on the usage) * Telephone Expensek with International roaming (depending on the usage) * Color Pattern of Showroom: Yellow, Baby pink and Sky Blue * Type: Privately held Company * Industry: Retail * Website: www.Its’toytime.co.bd * Logo: It’s toy time * Goal: * Short term: To provide innovative, educational toys and improve the learning curve of children of Bangladesh through the use of interactive toys. * Long term: Create a profitable company as well as improving creative power of Bangladeshi children.

* Mission statement: It’s Toy time's mission is to import the highest quality educational toys available. The more children that learn basic functions from our toys,…...

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Toys

...one point in time (Johansson 184). By finding local manufacturers/distributors then they will help the localization process and continue to stay own the retail market for leisure goods. ​As long as Toy’s “R” Us looks at the challenges they may be faced with for the future and they have a plan then we feel they will stay on top. Things Toy’s “R” Us needs to continue to be on the look out for are: competition, increasing cost, possible positioning problems, and the steady deterioration of the Japanese economy and consumer spending (Johansson 185). By being prepared and having a plan of action for all these setbacks they will be able to dominate the retail market in Japan. ​We feel that Toy’s “R” Us Japan had also made great decisions when entering the Japanese market. High barriers is something Toy’s “R” Us saw right away as a hurtle they had to get over. And to help them enter the country they decided on a joint-venture with McDonalds Japan with their 20%/80% relationship. In doing this joint-venture they were able to use McDonald’s successful international marketing research. This research is so important in order to enter foreign countries. The joint-venture gave them a great advantage and a strong foot in the door. ​Another positive aspect that Toy’s “R” Us Japan had on their side was the timing of their first opening. And as Dr. Tong always says “In order to be successful you have to come up with the right product, at the right place and the right time.” From......

Words: 383 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Big Time Toy Maker

...Submitted by Rob Lowe Individual Case Scenario: Big Time Toymaker | Read the “Theory to Practice” section at the end of Ch. 6 of the text.Answer Questions 1 through 6 based on the scenario in the “Theory to Practice” section, and complete the following in your response: * At the end of the scenario, BTT states that it is not interested in distributing Chou’s new strategy game, Strat. Assuming BTT and Chou have a contract, and BTT has breached the contract by not distributing the game, discuss what remedies might or might not apply. * Explain your answers and refer to Section 7-6 in Ch. 7 for support.Submit your answers. | 1. At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract? After reading the scenario, I believe there was a contract when BTT sent an email to Chau referencing the intital terms of agreement. Here’s the verbage from the scenario… “a BTT manager sent Chou an e-mail with the subject line “Strat Deal” that repeated the key terms of the distribution agreement including price, time frames, and obligations of both parties.” This is where the deal became legal binding. 2. What facts may weigh in favor of or against Chou in terms of the parties’ objective intent to contract? Mutual Assent. Both parties had verbally agreed to the deal. A reasonable person would have assumed the deal was going to go through because BTT paid Chau 25K for negotiation rights for a 90 day period. At this point there was an enforceable agreement......

Words: 745 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Big Time Toy Maker

...Big Time Toymaker (BTT) is a toy company that sells products to the United States, Canada and Mexico. Chou just created Strat an new strategy game. BTT is interested in distributing this game so they entered into a deal where Chou got $25,000 for negotiation rights for ninety days. This agreement specified that all contracts were to be in writing and there would be no verbal contract. Before the time was up BTT, sent Chou an email that detailed the specified the agreements reached upon their meeting, except for the agreement that Chou was to write up the draft, not BTT. Chou never responded and later BTT sent him a fax, asking for the draft, which Chou again never responded to. At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract? According to the scenario, both Big Time Toymaker and Chou did have a contract, when they meet and agreed on all the terms and conditions of the distribution, that would be a contract, but because they agreed that there would be no contract unless it was in writing then it can be assumed they never were in contract because there was never a document they both acknowledge and accepted as a contract. What facts may weigh in favor of or against Chou in terms of the parties’ objective intent to contract? The most important fact weigh in against Chou is that he did get a document before the ninety days expire, this document seemed to express everything that they wanted as agreed in their meeting yet he never responded. The reason why he did......

Words: 511 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Law421 Big Time Toy Maker

...Big Time Toy Maker Law / 421 Big Time Toy Maker 1. At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract? Yes, both parties had a valid contract when they agreed upon the terms of the deal. They both agreed upon the terms and Chou accepted the twenty five thousand dollars from Big Time Toymaker. A written agreement was not needed due to BTT being only a distributer and not a producer. 2. What facts may weigh in favor of or against Chou in terms of the parties’ objective intent to contract? Chou was paid twenty five thousand dollars by BTT for the negotiation rights to his house board game. This could have given Chou the impression that the contract was finalized. This would be considered a bilateral contract due to two promises and two performances. BTT would perform by distributing the product but would first promise to pay the twenty five thousand dollars. Chou promised to sell the negotiation rights and the performance was to turn them over to BTT for twenty five thousand dollars. 3. Does the fact that the parties were communicating by e-mail have any impact on your analysis in Questions 1 and 2 (above)? Since both parties were communicating through email, it does not have an impact on my analysis because of the factors stated earlier of a binding contract. The emails do reinforce the contract in the courts. 4. What role does the statute of frauds play in this contract? The statue of fraud applies to a sale of goods above 500 dollars. Since......

Words: 448 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Toys

... Jennifer Smith G.G. Toys: Case study #2 G.G. Toys was a toy manufacturer facing problems with productivity and profitability. The company found a profitable product in their Geoffrey doll and Specialty branded doll #106. Retailers could customize to the specifications and buying habits of their customer base. On average, the Geoffrey Doll cost $19.19 to produce, and the #106 doll $23.74. To access in a study of their overhead cost for both of their plants, research showed that: 1. A setup was performed in the Chicago facility each time a modification to the dolls was made. Additionally, each time a specialty-branded doll was produced, a separate setup was required to process the raw materials to the required specifications. 2. Workers in the Chicago facility often operated several machines simultaneously once they were set up. Thus, machine-related expenses might relate more to the machine hours of a product than to its production-run labor hours. Because each retailer required slight alterations to the Geoffrey doll's overall appearance, a new setup and production run was required for each design change. Retailers were found to be conservative in their ordering patterns, ordering fewer units more frequently. Thus increasing the number of setups required, causing increased labor and material cost. The research done by the external group did show an area of opportunity. Because setup is time consuming, labor intensive, and costly, it would be within reason (at......

Words: 430 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Big Time Toy Maker

...1. At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract? Upon reviewing this situation, Chou and Big Time Toymaker had participated in an oral agreement. During a conference between Chou and BTT a distribution agreement was reached, an e-mail was also directed by BTT to Chou confirming the significant terms of the verbal contract agreed upon during the conference. 2. What facts may weigh in favor of or against Chou in terms of the parties’ objective intent to contract? In Chou’s situation, these facts may be in favor for him would be the verbal agreement and email Chou received from BTT. These facts however, are working against Chou. There is never an actual written contract created by Chou or that Chou arrived into a private contractual rights agreement with a 90 day probation with it explicitly stating, “No contract exists unless it is in writing.” Finally, no transcribed contract was turned in within the original 90-day time frame specified in the private negotiation. 3. Does the fact that the parties were communicating by e-mail have any impact on your analysis in Questions 1 and 2 (above)? Of course, the e-mail received signifies the response by both Chou and BBT of the dispersal agreement made in the meeting even though the e-mail had failed to mention the word “contract.” 4. What role does the statute of frauds play in this contract? Fraud has a role in case and it applies to this situation. “Under the Uniform Commercial Code, the......

Words: 395 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Case Scenario Big Time Toy Maker

...Case Scenario Big Time Toy maker Aragon Week4 Instructor Rosale Lopez April 16, 2014 Level One Heading Option Contract and Distribution Agreement After reading this scenario, Big time toy maker and Chou did take part in an oral contract. In a meeting between BTT and Chou oral Documents were signed which bind both parties to fulfill certain obligations. A written contract was not necessary since this was a contract mainly dealing with services to disseminate the game, not a production contract or a sales contract Had it occupied a good contract to buy, sell which under which under the Statutes of Frauds would not be a contract until all the terms were not put in writing: that occurred when the supervisor from BTT emailed the terms which would have included his electronic signature and thus would have sealed the contract between the two. Furthermore whenever the contract is under (general) law besides the (mailbox) rule could say it went into effect when it was sent and not received. Into effect when was sent but not received. The analysis of the case verifies that the two parties were definitely not involved in a binding of the contract they never had a written contract or documented legal frame work. But the parties did have......

Words: 725 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Week 4 Big Time Toy Maker

...Big Time Toy Maker Could BTT avoid this contract under the doctrine of mistake? Explain. Would either party have any other defenses that would allow the contract to be avoided? Chou could take BTT to court for breach of contract. When BTT paid Chou $2,500 for, and Chou gave BTT exclusive negotiation rights for 90 days, they both mutually assented to a legally binding agreement. Under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), if the contract of the sale of goods is $500, or more, and any lease transactions for the sale of $1000, or more, the statute the statute of frauds apply (Melvin, 2011). The $2,500 Chao received met this requirement. When BTT sent Chou an email 3 days before the expiration of the 90 day agreement, which included the price, time frames, and the obligations of both parties, it signified to Chao that BTT still intends to do business with Chao, and meets all the requirement for a contract. Chao's intentions were to draft the contract as agreed upon, but Chao made a unilateral mistake, he had an erroneous belief that the email between BTT and Chao, with all the terms already in it, plus the mutual assent of the two parties, was the actual contract. Thirty days passed before BTT, requested the distribution agreement contract from Chao, by fax. Up to this point, Chao thought he already had an agreement through the email. By BTT sending the fax, it signifies to Chao that the BTT wishes to proceed with the business transaction. Chao sends the draft......

Words: 393 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Finance Play Time Toy Company

...I. Background Play Time Toy Company is a manufacturer of plastic toys for children that include toy cars, military toys, trucks, guns, animals, robots, action figures and such. These product categories are produced in a wide range of designs, colors and sizes. Play Time Toy Company was founded in 1973 by Henry Richards and Jonathan King. Manufacturing business for plastic toys was considered to be highly competitive due to the fact that this industry was populated by large number of companies. Though this kind of industry makes company experience a short on capital and management talent, it was easy for new competitors to start due to its minimal capital requirements and required technology (as compared with other business industry). Play Time Toy Company has experienced a rapid growth from the time it was founded. Accordingly, from 1973 until the early 1990’s, this toy company has specialized in seasonal manufacture, where they respond directly to the orders of their customers. However, there were a lot of problems that arose from this method of scheduling production. II. Problem Statement In order to provide the Play Time Toy Company with a more profitable operation, the production manager needs a scheduling production method that would help the company incur the smallest cost of goods sold, at equal level of sales, without jeopardizing the quality of the products. III. Objectives 1. To employ a scheduling production method that would: ......

Words: 2743 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Big Time Toy Maker Case Scenario

...Case Scenario: Big Time Toy Maker LAW/421 May 5, 2015 Case Scenario: Big Time Toy Maker At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract? The two parties, Big Time Toymaker and Chou entered into a contract when they came to the initial agreement where Big Time would pay $25,000 for exclusive negotiation rights for a 90 day period. What facts may weigh in favor or against Chou in terms of the parties’ objective intent to contract? The biggest factor in favor of Choe is that in the initial exclusive negotiation agreement, it was stated that no distribution contract existed unless it was in writing. Even though Chou never drafted an actual contract, the manager of Big Time sent an email with all of the details of a contract to him. Since all four parts of a contract existed, this is a contract, even though the email did not say so. Does the fact that the parties were communicating by e-mail have any impact? The fact that the parties are communicating by email gives tangible proof to the agreement being made and proof of the 4 parts to a contract. What role does the statute of frauds play in this contract? The Statute of Frauds requires contracts to have signatures. If this contract is found to fall in this category, which it may since the value is over five hundred dollars, it may be found invalid. Now, depending on what state, the fact that both parties responded via e-mail, their name signed at the end may be considered an electronic......

Words: 521 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Kb Toys

...KB Toys’ July 1, 2010 Abstract  Why did KB Toys fail? KB Toys was offering toys at a discounted price like consumers where looking for but was that enough? KB Toys did restructures as well as took help from investment companies which brought a profit for a short time. While all of this was a quick fix the revenue never stayed constant but continued to drop. The store stayed in the original idea but never moved forward with the changes of times. Toys where out dated and there was lack of organization.   KB Toys’ KB Toys started out as a candy wholesaler in 1922 (KB Toys, nd).Toys was not what the Kaufman Brothers, KB, where looking for however when a debt could not be paid by a client Kaufman Brothers inherited a wholesale toy company during the 1940s (KB Toys, nd). KB Toys changed their name a few times through out the company’s life span. Kay-Bee Toy & Hobby Stores was the first name to take life and sale items at discount prices. By 1977 the store had changed focus to just toys and it was such a big success the name was changed to Kay-Bee Toy and Hobby Shops, Inc. (KB Toys, nd). In 1981 the company is purchased by Melville Corporation and is a division known as Kay-Bee Toy Stores (KB Toys, nd). By 1996 the chains of stores are sold to Consolidated Stores Corporation (KB Toys, nd). Once Consolidated bought Kay-Bee the image of the company needed to be enhanced, thus the KB logo was created (KB Toys, nd). KB toys had a great idea with providing toys at a......

Words: 955 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Toys

...the popular toys in the 1990s, which are Tamagotchi, Barbie, and Lego. The first digital toy is the Tamagotchi Tamagotchi means a handheld digital device, which can be cared for as a digital pet including feeding, playing, and cleaning up after it. For example, the first Tamagotchi was created in Japan by Bandai in 1996. It went on to sell 76,000,000 units worldwide by 2010 (“Tamagotchi,” 2015). It was quite cheap with the price depending on the different versions available, in total there were 11 different variations, with prices ranging from $10 for the cheapest and up to $70 for the most expensive (“Tamagotchi Price,” 2015). The device was aimed at young children around the age of 6. It was aimed to promote nurturing instincts as the children would actually care for the digital pet, and if they failed at this the digital per would die (Baguley, 2013). Moreover, as there were strict laws governing ownership of pets in some countries, the Tamagotchi was an excellent solution for families unable to buy real pets for their children. This is why the device sold so many units. Some of the devices had communication abilities, which allowed children not only to play but also linguistically interact with the toys. This was seen as an educational component to the toy. As the toy was completely non-violent it became a popular choice for parents as a suitable toy for their children’s development. In summary, the Tamagotchi is the first digital toy. The second popular toy is Barbie......

Words: 824 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Big Time Toy

...Case Scenario: Big Time Toymaker Law 421 Name Here 1. At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract? This is a very interesting case. I think both parties should have had a lawyer present. The problem for Chou is it stated (The exclusive negotiation agreement Stipulated that no distribution contract existed unless it was in writing.) There was an email sent and Chou looked at the email as a form of a contract but in the legal terms nothing was signed or agrees too. Chou may have had a contract by legal terms because of the nature of the deal and dealing with a merchant. Imagine renting an apartment and the lease is not signed. Then you don’t have a lease agreement. I think Chou may be able to receive money for the verbal agreement in a private legal matter but nothing was ever signed. UCC Article 2 could apply because of the verbal agreement ( contract could be enforce in the court of law). I do think the emails help Chou in the court of law. 2. What facts may weigh in favor of or against Chou in terms of the parties’ objective intent to contract? I think the fact that both parties did reach a verbal agreement would help Chou. BTT was interested in distributing Strat and entered into an agreement with Chou whereby BTT paid him $25,000 in exchange for exclusive negotiation rights for a 90-day period. The exclusive negotiation agreement stipulated that no distribution contract existed unless it was in writing. Just three days before the......

Words: 1016 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Big Time Toy Maker

...Case Scenario: Big Time Toy Maker 1. At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract? Our textbook defines a contract as “a promise or a set of promises enforceable by law” (). A contract does not necesarily has to be in writing. A contract can be oral and enforceable. Big Time Toymaker and Chou took part in an oral contract. Big Time Toy Maker and Chou held a meeting where an oral distribution agreement was reached. In addition, Big Time Toy sent an email to Chou confirming the agreement. 2. What facts may weigh in favor of or against Chou in terms of the parties’ objective intent to contract? The facts that may weigh in favor of Chow are the exclusive negotiation rights for a 90-day period, the oral agreement that was reached at the meeting and the email he received from Big Time Toy. The facts against Chou would be that there is never an actual written agreement drafted by Chou. In addition, the exclusive negotiation rights agreement stipulated that no distribution contract existed unless it was in writing. Finally, no written agreement was turned in within the original 90-day period stipulated in the exclusive negotiation right agreement. 3. Does the fact that the parties were communicating by e-mail have any impact on your analysis in Questions 1 and 2 (above)? Yes, because the email represents the acknowledgment by both parties of the distribution agreement made in the meeting despite the e-mail failing to mention the word “contract.” In addition...

Words: 402 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Big Time Toy Maker

...Big Time Toymaker Ronda Bonny LAW/421 AUGUST 13, 2012 JAMES ZACCARIA Big Time Toymaker 1. At what point, if ever, did the parties have a contract? After reading the case scenario, I do not believe either of the two parties involved ever established a binding distribution contract. It is true an oral distribution agreement was achieved just three days prior to the 90-day deadline, which was a condition established in the original negotiating contract. However, as clearly stated in the original negotiating contract, there is not to be a distribution agreement, or contract, unless it is in writing. After the meeting, Chou volunteered to draft the distribution contract that would formalize their agreement. However, before Chou could finish the draft, he received an e-mail from the BTT manager. The e-mail with the subject line “Strat Deal,” focused on the key points of the distribution agreement between both parties, including the price, time frames, and obligations of both parties. After receiving this e-mail, Chou incorrectly assumed that BTT wanted to draft the contract. Thus Chou stopped working on the draft and a month passed by. This passage of time voided any previous agreement because of the 90-day clause to finalize the contract. What BTT and Chou had was not a binding or enforceable contract. 2. What facts may weigh in favor of or against Chou in terms of the parties’ objective intent to contract? The facts that prove there was no binding distribution......

Words: 734 - Pages: 3