Free Essay

To What Extent Do Conservatives Believe in Traditon and Continuity

In: Other Topics

Submitted By Becka158
Words 959
Pages 4
To what extent do conservatives believe in tradition and continuity?

* Tradition refers to ideas, practices or institutions that have endured over time and been inherited from earlier periods. Its very nature creates continuity between the past, present and future. The very name ‘conservatism’ suggests that followers of the ideology believe in the maintenance of tradition and the preservation of continuity. * There are certainly numerous examples in which it is evident that conservatives believe in tradition and continuity; its very development was based on preserving the pre-Puritan traditions. * Despite it being a fundamental part of the ideology, however, history dictates that conservatives have on numerous occasions abandoned such belief in favour of realistic pragmatism, * Such as Disraeli’s identification of the Two Nations and the Conservative government of 1950, following the establishment of the National Health Service in 1946, chose to maintain this popular institution regardless of conservatives originally favouring the traditional method of private healthcare. * It can even be argued that such pragmatism has created a modern Conservative party that bares little, if no resemblance of, conservative ideology; whereas tradition conservatives stressed on tradition, the New Right and modern conservatism has rejected this notion. * The belief in tradition and continuity was given great importance by traditional conservatives. The original conservative thinkers regarded tradition as reflecting religious faith, fashioned by God, meaning traditional institutions constitute ‘natural law’, and it would be blasphemous for this tradition to be broken. * Most traditional conservatives by the Enlightenment and afterwards disregarded this as the reason for the belief in tradition. Thinkers such as Edmund Burke believed tradition to be the key to social order, and therefore the maintenance of which prevents such chaos as Burke predicted would follow the upheaval of all French values and institutions during the French Revolution. * He claimed “No generation should ever be so rash as to consider itself superior to its predecessors”, overtly stating his belief in tradition and continuity being the preservation of the wisdom of the past that created the society the new generation lives in. * G.K. Chesterton described this as the democracy of the dead, or as Burke put it, democracy should be “a partnership between those who are living, those who are dead and those who are to be born”. Tradition provides this continuity to bind all three. * Conservatives are also naturally suspicious of the pure reason behind schemes of radical reform, as Stanley Baldwin put it: “You will find in politics that you are much exposed to the attribution of false motive." * Traditional conservatives believe it is human nature to prefer the sense of identity tradition gives a society through established customs and practices and change is feared as an uncertain and insecure journey into the unknown. * By the twentieth century, although this belief in tradition remained in the hearts of conservatives, pragmatism was favoured. This move towards pragmatism had begun at the end of the nineteenth century * This was seen through such notions as Benjamin Disraeli’s identification of Two Nations that need to be joined to prevent revolution. * Following the Second World War, a consensus of socialist tendencies had developed, which led to reforms in healthcare and social policy that the conservatives pragmatically adapted to in order to have some hope of electoral victory. * By the time the New Right developed in the 1970s, the term consensus was one sneered at by conservatives. Margaret Thatcher described consensus as “the process of abandoning all beliefs, principles, values and policies” describing the people in her party who believed in consensus as “Quislings, as traitors”. * In many ways, the New Right upheld traditional values that had been disregarded during the era of consensus, whilst simultaneously destroying it. Neo-conservative values firmly believed in the traditional forms of a nuclear family and a ‘tough on crime’ policy. * Economic libertarianism can also be regarded as a traditional form of economics, dating from the late eighteenth century with the publication of The Wealth of Nations by Adam Smith. However, the attempts to fuse neo-liberalism and neo-conservatism created radical and reactionary features as well as tradition. * The New Right’s radicalism saw the ‘roll back’ of interventionist government, which in itself was a conservative move forward to the traditional belief in government interfering as little as possible with the lives of the individual. * However, the rational theories and abstract principles of the New Right such as economic monetarism, privatisation and opposition to the ‘dependency culture’ dismiss tradition. * Modern conservatives also disregard tradition in favour of pragmatism, hence why David Cameron described himself as “the heir to Blair” – he was more liberal that conservative in his beliefs. * One clear example of Cameron’s lack of belief in tradition is seen in his claim “I support gay marriage because I am a conservative.” True conservatives who believe in tradition and continuity do not support gay marriage as it disregards the religious traditions and is a radical change in society. * In conclusion, it is clear that the fundamental belief in traditional conservatives is tradition and therefore continuity. According to Michael Oakeshott, “To be conservative, then, is to prefer the familiar to the unknown”. That is the essence of conservatism and cannot be denied. * However, modern conservatives have recognised that purely believing in the preservation of tradition will not lead to electoral success, therefore have turned towards a pragmatic approach to politics. * Even Oakeshott concedes that modern conservatives prefer innovations which appear to grow out of the present in response to a specific defect, such as suffrage for the working man in the nineteenth century and suffrage for women in the early twentieth. To a modern conservative, slow change is better than revolutionary. This is how traditional principles and institutions can be maintained in a way that also benefits and improves society.…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

What Do I Believe

...I believe that the sun shines after the rain I believe if you don't get hurt you'll never gain I believe in not doing things the easy way I believe that being selfish doesn’t pay I believe in a second chance I believe in a life long romance I believe there is life after death And standing up to a life of mess I believe in love at first sight I believe that revenge isn’t right I believe that first impressions last And there is nothing better then a good laugh I believe that dreams do come true, I believe there's destiny for me and you, I believe something good comes from something bad I believe everyone has one true love I believe there's destiny for me and you I believe that good things come to those who wait I believe love never arrives too late I believe something good comes from something bad I believe that for tears of happiness there are tears of sad I believe everyone has a guardian angel And the good you do will be rewarded well I believe absence makes the heart grow fonder I believe you will lose if you sit and wonder I believe every experience teaches you a lesson And nothing cures better then a drinking session I believe everyone has one true love I believe sometimes we need a little shove I believe the whole world is a stage I believe we only get better with age I believe that to learn you have to live I believe that to love someone you have to......

Words: 379 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

On What Grounds Have Conservatives Supported Tradition and Continuity?

...On what grounds have conservatives supported tradition and continuity? “A state without the means of some change is without the means of conservatism.” This is the idea, quoted from Burke, that conservatism is not opposed to change, only radical reform. Conservatism developed out of the desire to avoid revolutions such as the one in France and was a reaction to the growing pace of political, social and economic change. The term “conservatism” comes from the word “conserve” which was derived from the Latin “conservare”; to keep and guard. A prominent core theme in conservative ideology is that of tradition, continuity and preservation. These underpinning concepts refer to the ideas, practices and institutions that have been inherited from an earlier period. However, as UK conservatism has been based rather heavily on the ideas of Edmund Burke, there is a general willingness to ‘change in order to conserve’ rather than a blind resistance to change itself. One way in which the majority of conservatives support tradition is through the maintenance of the aforementioned institutions and practices which have been ‘tried and tested’ over a long period of time. This, in a way, almost reflects Darwinism and ‘natural selection’, in the belief that the institutions that have in fact survived thus far have done so because they have been found of value and to function sufficiently. Therefore it is considered that they ought to be preserved for the benefit of the current living society...

Words: 734 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

To What Extent Do Different Electoral Systems Produce Different Outcomes?

...To what extent do different electoral systems produce different outcomes? In this essay I will assess the outcomes of Additional Member system, First Past the Post system and the Closed Party List system. The F-P-T-P system is used to elect the members of House of Commons and local government in England and Wales. Voters select candidates, and do so by marking his or her name with an ‘X’ on the ballot paper. This reflects the principle of ‘one person, one vote’. The Additional Members system is used in Scottish parliament, Welsh assembly, and Northern Ireland Assembly and Greater London assembly. It is a mixed system made up of F-P-T-P and party-list elements. The Regional party list (or the closed party list) is used to elect the European Parliament. There are number of large multimember constituencies. Political parties compile lists of candidates to place before the electorate, in descending order of preference. Electors vote for parties not for candidates, parties are allocated seats in direct proportion to the votes they gain in each regional constituency. In this essay I will argue that electoral systems produce different outcomes. One of the ways in which first-past-the-post voting system produces different outcomes to other parties is that it leads to no clear correlation between number of vote’s casts and seats won. For example in 2005 general election Labour received 40.7% of the votes but won 413 seats and also during the 2010 general elections Conservatives......

Words: 1057 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

To What Extent Is the Conservative Party Still Committed to Its Traditional Principles?

...TO WHAT EXTENT IS THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY STILL COMMITTED TO ITS TRADITIONAL PRINCIPLES? Since 1979 the conservative party has undergone significant changes from the traditional conservative party which focused on ideas about human nature, order and pragmatism, first with new right conservatism under Thatcher then with the current conservative party. The current conservative party however, can be seen to still be committed to its traditional conservative principles such as Euro-scepticism and that they remain largely traditionalist. However there are many ways in which the conservative party has changed such as taxation, education and the welfare state. One way the conservative party has changed is through taxation. Traditionally, the conservative party was known as believing in low tax however the current conservative party, seems to have changed certain parts of their policies about this perhaps shifting to a more central position on taxation proposing a new tax scheme where people earning under ten thousand pounds a year pay no tax and there would be bigger and more severe crack downs on top earners in offshore bank accounts. This signifies a deviation from traditional conservative principles, perhaps due to the modernisation of the party since Cameron became leader. One way the party has stayed committed to its conservative principles is through continued euro-scepticism. Traditionally the party has been very euro-sceptic initially not wanting to join the EU and......

Words: 661 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

To What Extent Do Urban Areas Modify Their Climate

...To what extent do urban areas modify their climates? (40 marks) Urban areas climate is often significantly different to the surrounding rural areas, this is why urban areas are often described as having their own “micro climate” the differences in urban climates are due to number of different factors. Urban areas often experience a phenomenon known as a heat island, this is a zone of hot air around and above an urban area which has higher temperatures than the surrounding rural areas consequently cities tend to be warmer than rural areas and the temperature becomes lower progressively as you move towards the rural area with the highest temperatures being in the city centre. Heat islands form due to a variety of factors which are present within cities and not commonly found in rural areas, firstly building material such as concrete and tarmac absorb large quantities of heat during the day, due to their dark colours, and when temperatures are cooler, at night, the heat is released gradually warming up the surrounding area, this is why the effects of the heat island are more visible at night time because the city remains warm whilst the rural areas are much cooler. There are a large amount of buildings with glass windows within the urban areas, these have a high reflective capacity and reflect heat towards the streets were it is absorbed. Another factor influencing towards to the heat island formation is the heat energy being emitted from industry due to the combustion of......

Words: 887 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

To What Extent Do Referendums Strengthen Democracy?

...To what extent do referendums strengthen democracy in the UK? Democracy is defined in Greek as government by the people. Referendums are undermining of the authority given to the people through a representative. The use of referendums in the UK allows for an increased participation from the electorate. This encourages direct democracy and therefore strengthens the basic principle of a democratic governing body. However, participation is a key part of the strengthening of democracy. In recent years we have seen a growth in the number of referendums held in the UK. Referendums are usually held to conclude on an important issue, such as devolution and issues regarding the changing of a constitutional law. It has become increasingly problematic that there has been a decline in the turn-out for referendums, a clear example of this is the Welsh national; assembly referendum held in 2011. The turnout for the Welsh national assembly referendum was 33%, with a 65% voting in favour of further devolved powers for the assembly. Although the vote was a majority decision 67% of the electorate did not vote, which undermines the result and therefore democracy is weakened without active participation by the electorate. As mentioned, the Welsh assembly referendum resulted in 67% of the electorate not voting, which means that these individuals will still get a devolved set of powers. Therefore unless you have a 100% turnout a referendum will forever be undemocratic. This can be......

Words: 558 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

To What Extent Has the Roberts Court Witnessed a Revival of Conservative Activism?

...To what extent has the Roberts Court witnessed a revival of conservative activism? Judicial Activism: An approach to the law where the judiciary feel less constrained by precedents and interpret the law with the aim of pursuing social change. Evidence would be if the court overturned past decisions, legislation or executive actions in order to promote conservative or liberal objectives. | In the 1950s the Warren Court were seen to follow a liberal agenda and be judicially active. With a liberal and activist majority on the court the Warren Court expanded civil rights, civil liberties, judicial power, and the federal power in dramatic ways. Warren Court Cases | 1954 Brown vs the Board | Based on 14th Amendment- ended segregation and overturned Plessey vs Fergusson | Baker v. Carr and Reynolds v. Sims 1962-4 | Based on the 14th Amendment- asserted the right of all votes to be of equal value- and lead to reapportionment across the USA. | Gideon v. Wainwright,1963  Miranda v. Arizona, 1966 | Right to legal representation and to be informed of rights. The ‘Miranda warning’ |  Engel v. Vitale 1962 | Outlawed school prayer. Based on First Amendment. | Griswold vs Connecticut | Found a ‘right of privacy ‘in the 14th Amendment | Warren’s successor Warren Burger 1969-1986 appointed by Nixon as a conservative, extended some of Warren’s precedents most famously Roe vs Wade used the precedent set by the Griswold case.  In Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of......

Words: 817 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

To What Extent Are the Conservatives Committed to Their Traditional Principles [25 Marks]

...To what extent are the Conservatives committed to their traditional principles [25 marks] Since 1979 the conservative party has undergone significant changes from the traditional party which first focused on ideas about human nature, order and pragmatism with new right conservatism under Thatcher. The current conservative party however, can be seen to be retaining traditional conservative principles and that they remain largely traditionalist. However there are many ways in which the conservative party has changed such as taxation, education and the welfare state. One way in which the conservative party has changed is through taxation. Traditionally the conservative party was known for believing in lower taxation rates. However the current conservative party has changed some of their policies and perhaps become more centralist on taxation. An example of this is proposing a new taxation scheme where people who earn under ten thousand pounds a year are exempt from paying tax; also a bigger ‘crack down’ on people who earn a larger salary. Therefore this means that they would pay more tax. This signifies deviation from traditional conservative principles; this can probably be labelled as part of the modernization of the party since Cameron has become leader. Another way the party has deviated from traditional conservative principles is through education. In contrast with the traditional condescending view on education by the conservatives, under......

Words: 1055 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

To What Extent Do Liberals Disagree over Freedom

...To what extent do liberals disagree over freedom? (15) Liberals believe that each human being is an individual who is rational. Therefore implying that each individual should have freedom. However the extent to this freedom causes a divide within liberals, as shown by Isiah Berlin who distinguished between ‘negative’ liberty and ‘positive’ liberty. Liberals disagree over the extent and nature of freedom. ‘Negative’ liberty supported by classic liberals implies that individuals should be free from constraint, free from external restriction and a lack of interference allowing for freedom of choice therefore a need for the rolling back of the state. This firm belief in individualism-as humans are rational, leads to the classic liberal belief that individuals can flourish without state intervention as human beings are self-interested creatures who are self-reliant and therefore create an atomistic society. This freedom supported by classic liberals allows individuals to act as they wish whatever the consequences as the consequences can’t be said to limit freedom (as that would be against their belief of complete freedom) but are bad luck, not caused by the state therefore the objects that interfere with the classic liberals ideas of freedom include state legislations not natural occurrences that can’t be stopped. Therefore they believe in the silence of the laws to ensure freedom. Modern liberals on the other hand who believe in ‘positive’ freedom have a different idea of......

Words: 594 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

What Extent Do Liberals Support Democracy

...To what extent do liberals support democracy (45 marks) Democracy is the ultimate political form of ideological liberalism. It refers to the ideal form of state, and is common to both classical and modern liberals. In the 19th century, liberals often saw democracy as threatening or dangerous. Political theorists such as Plato and Aristotle viewed democracy as being a system of rule at the expense of wisdom and property. The principle that the will of the majority should prevail over the minority may have negative effects. In Northern Ireland, a very divided religious country, if the 51% get their way, the other 49% will be in outrage. Democracy thus comes down to the rule of the 51%, as French politician Alexis De Tocqueville described it, ‘tyranny of the masses’. Individual and minority can be crushed in the name of the people. Another reason why liberals are wary of democracy is it gives a voice to the uneducated, ignorant and property less. Robert Lowe saw democracy as a potential threat. Linking rationality with education, he wanted to restrict democratic rights to those qualified to use them. This echoes the views of J.S Mills who believed political wisdom was unequally distributed, and so educated people should get more votes. Examples of this was in the UK when up until 1948 certain ‘educated’ people were allowed more than one vote. The Spanish social thinker Ortega y Gass in his book ‘The revolt of the Masses’ warned that the arrival of mass democracy had......

Words: 712 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

To What Extent Do Pressure Groups Undermine Democracy?

...To what extent do pressure groups undermine democracy? Pressure groups can play an important part in the way policies and proposals are brought into action in the UK government. As well as providing a vehicle for the peoples’ views they also have the potential to undermine the democracy of a government. Firstly, to clarify the definition of a pressure group, it is a formal or informal association whose purpose is to put forward the views and interests of a specific part of society, typically operating on a small range of issues. They aim to influence the decisions made by government. Secondly, democracy (from dēmos kratos - Greek for rule by the people) can take many different forms and is harder to define. Full democracy is understood as the fair representation in government of all citizens. In a democratic government the people vote in order to represent their views on an issue. Pressure groups have been seen to undermine this system of government in many ways but the also can enhance democracy in many ways. Some aspects of pressure groups are considered to undermine the nature of democracy. Disproportionate influence is an issue that many argue subverts democracy. This is where some pressure groups have more political influence than their issue may warrant. Some sectional groups appear to have a larger influence in government than others with a larger demographic. This is considered to be undemocratic, as it is not fair in the way it represents the people......

Words: 839 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

To What Extent Do the Groupings of Nations Benefit Their Populations

...countries. There are both advantages and disadvantages for citizens of member countries as well as their governments. The offered policies have a direct effect on the population of a country and often help their country move forward and develop at a quicker rate. The EU is a grouping that includes most European countries, the point of which is to offer member countries free trade as a result of being part of a single market trade organisation. This means that, because goods don’t have to travel over economic boarders, otherwise existing trade tariffs do not have to be paid by countries trading with each other. This is an economic benefit to being a member of the EU. This makes it much more cost effective for businesses that trade in physical goods, to trade with other EU members. Such benefits have attracted foreign companies like Japans, Toyota motor company to move their production lines to EU member countries like the UK. They do this so that they can easily move people, products and money around Europe. This brings about big benefits for the population of a country as a TNC like Toyota will employ thousands of people to work on their assembly lines and more advanced job opportunities for graduates, for example. Large TNC’s that offer products like cars trade huge amounts of produce, so avoiding tariffs can save TNC’s a huge amount of money over smaller businesses. It is these large companies that employ the most people so luring them into EU countries with the promise......

Words: 1315 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

To What Extent Do Conservatives Believe in Tradition and Continuity

...passed through time and has been produced from its earliest of origins. Conservatives stress the importance of tradition as it allows continuity between different time frames, traditional conservatives are against change so tradition creates a bases of society staying the same for examples, in terms of being hierarchical. The terms of tradition has caused conflict within conservatism as the New Right – the neoliberals and neoconservatives, have avoided placing any importance of tradition and continuity needed in society thus showing tradition and continuity is less followed by conservatives now. Traditional conservatives support and defend the idea of tradition and continuity on many different grounds. For example, tradition provides a basis of religious faith that is shaped by God who is the creator of the Earth. This therefore means that traditional institutions provide natural law – tradition is seen as having accumulated wisdom from the past, these institutions and practices has been able to be “tested by time” and therefore they should be preserved for the benefit of those living now and for future generations. This means that society is based on a relationship between those who are living, those who are dead and those who are to be born – the dead always has the upper hand over society as they are the “democracy of the dead” – providing a structure for the present society to follow. Tradition and continuity also delivers a sense of identity for individuals and society......

Words: 1149 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

To What Extent Do Pressure Groups Undermine Democracy

...To What Extent do Pressure Groups Undermine Democracy A pressure group in a group that doesn’t hold candidates for election into parliament but still aim to influence legislation passed by government that takes their aims and objectives into consideration. It can be argued that Pressure groups are undemocratic due to the leaders and all members being unelected. However pressure groups have higher and ever increasing participation levels than political parties, meaning that membership to a pressure group may be the contemporary method of being involved in politics. It can be argued that Pressure Groups are a positive thing for democracy because of the extent to which they inform the public on important issues through their campaigning for members or signatures, having the public more informed and knowledgeable on issues such as climate change or immigration is beneficial due to the fact that they will understand parties policies better and be more confident in who they vote for. On the other hand Pressure Groups can be criticised due to them only informing the public of their biased, one-sided opinion which could be viewed as misinformation. Cause/promotional groups that are involved in issues such as climate change or wildlife preservation can be viewed as democratic because their objective aren’t solely for the benefit of its own members but also the wider community. Though this is democratic, some pressure groups such as financial groups would be better funded and have...

Words: 864 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

What Do I Believe About Abortions

...Argument Essay Drafts Step #1: Prewriting & Outline Directions: Complete all of the elements of the prewriting; otherwise, the content of your piece will not be accurate. My Topic: What do I believe about abortion. My Attitude: Abortion should be a decision that a female should make for herself. My Purpose: To inform women that it’s your choice to choose. My Thesis Statement: Abortion should be a woman’s choice. It’s her body, she shouldn’t be forced to feel that abourtion is murder. My Audience: 1. How much does my audience know about my subject? I feel my audience know a little bit about my subject. 2. Age? Gender? Race? Social Status? Location? Religion? Women ages 18-30 all races, social status, and religion. All over the world. 3. Where does my audience stand on the issue; are they Opposed or Neutral? My audience is neutral, not sure. Outline: 1. Abortion can be applied per the situation. A. Rape B. Too young/not ready 2. Bringing a child into this world, that’s unwanted for whatever reason can suffer. A. Child can be mistreated B. Abuse/not love 3. A right to choose is a very important right. A. It’s her body B. Her choice 4. Abortion other then adoption is a good option to me. A. Some women can’t afford children. B. The children will end up in a crowed foster home unwanted. 5. Step #2: Argument Essay......

Words: 1260 - Pages: 6