Free Essay

The Individual in the Society

In: English and Literature

Submitted By tlpowell13
Words 1955
Pages 8
May 17, 2010
English 10 H
The Individual in The Society The Merriam-Webster dictionary definition of the word individuality is: total character peculiar to and distinguishing an individual from others. The novel The Catcher in the Rye by J.D. Salinger, play The Crucible by Arthur Miller and the poem “Barbie Doll” by Marge Piercy all have underlying themes of the society influencing a character’s individuality. In each text, each character struggles with the difficulty of the society’s impact on their lives. Through each text we see the struggles and stress “the society” puts upon people. In “Barbie Doll,” the main character struggles with her self image, whereas in Catcher, Holden struggles with the society’s pressure to become materialistic. In The Crucible, every character is under the microscope and pressured to stay in order and not to step out of perfection. If they do not do as told or what is thought to be the correct way to act they will be accused of witchcraft even if innocent. The society has such a large impact on each and every one of these characters, that without a doubt each character has been influenced one way or another. In The Catcher in the Rye, Holden faces the pressure of the society alone and struggles with the ability of keeping his individuality from slipping out of his grips. The society in this novel brings upon the pressure of having everything, even if it means really having nothing at all. Holden feels he cannot be himself in the society surrounding him, his school tries to change him, his parent’s values aren’t the same as his, and he hates everyone because everyone is alike; they all have the same personality, without single trace of individuality. The schools that he attends and then runs from all have the same modus operandi, or method of operating. They all want to shape Holden into the people he hates the most; a phony. “It's full of phonies, and all you do is study so that you can learn enough to be smart enough to be able to buy a goddam Cadillac some day, and you have to keep making believe you give a damn if the football team loses, and all you do is talk about girls and liquor and sex all day, and everybody sticks together in these dirty little goddam cliques.”(Salinger 131). This is what Holden struggles with; the pressure of his school trying to make him just like the others. His parents’ values are, again, not what he wants to become. His parents are rich, have everything and have given everything to, or tried to give to Holden. They send him away to those schools to try to reform him and yet he still runs away. Holden’s father is lawyer, which is why Holden feels he is a phony too; he feels that his father’s occupation parallels to his personality - unchanging and becoming weaker. However, when he describes his mother, he makes her sound predictable and insincere, two qualities that he associates phonies have, also. What he saw as he grew up made him question everyone and eventually analyze them to the point where he grows to hate them even more. When he talks about his brother, D.B., he gets more aggressive. Holden explains, “Now he’s out in Hollywood, D.B., being a prostitute.” (Salinger 2) This quote really explains the way that Holden feels about his family, and the people that aren’t related to him but are part of this society. He believes that anyone who isn’t true to themselves, is phony. The poem “Barbie Doll” by Marge Piercy, is about a young girl who feels inadequate at all times and she never sees herself as beautiful ever. She has very harsh standards for herself because in society and in the media that is all she sees. The society has such a jarring view on and standards for everyone that makes them all feel inadequate. The only way that she could feel beautiful was to basically “redo” herself by seeing a doctor about her “imperfections.” In lines 15-19 Piercy writes, “Her good nature wore out/ like a fan belt/ so she cut off her nose and her legs/ and offered them up.” These lines show the beginning of the end for her, she didn’t believe in herself and the society definitely didn’t either. The society gives the belief that if you are just like everyone else, you’ll finally be happy. As Piercy writes at the end, “Consummation at last./ To every woman a happy ending.” (Piercy 24-25) she portrays the thought that once you give yourself to society and give up your own beliefs, that you will finally be happy. That shouldn’t be the way it happens, happiness isn’t seeing someone different in the mirror, it should be how you look inside, not to be “phony” as Holden Caulfield would say. In both Catcher and “Barbie” both main characters show the lack of strength to love themselves the way they are. However, Holden doesn’t ever give in to the society and their materialistic ways but instead sticks to his own values. In “Barbie Doll” the young girl eventually gives up because she can’t take being unlike everyone else. She then gives herself up by creating a new person through surgeries. The only way to be yourself is to stick to your own values and not letting anyone change you. In The Crucible, Arthur Miller portrays the children and adults as straight-forward and upright; the entire society of Salem, Massachusetts, consists of adults constricting the activities of everyone and all children around them. When Miller was talking about Parris, he wrote, “He regarded them as young adults, and until this crisis he, like the rest of Salem, never conceived that the children were anything but thankful for being permitted to walk straight, eyes slightly lowered, arms at the sides, and mouths shut until bidden to speak.” (Miller 1258) The way that every adult looked at a child was completely and utterly wrong. The children are never allowed to have fun, nor were they allowed to even speak unless spoken to. How could that ever be acceptable for them? The society in this play is so controlling that a child or even adult was bound to step out of their straight lines to try and be happy. Societal views were so tight and “correct” that no matter what you tried to do you were always shut down or accused of witchcraft. Arthur Miller points out in this play the strict values of the society when he wrote, “Their creed forbade anything resembling a theater or ‘vain enjoyment.’ They did not celebrate Christmas, and a holiday from work meant only that they must concentrate even more upon prayer.” (Miller 1259) The society in this community of Salem, MA, is wrapped so tightly that the the consequences of repressing human activities and desires are more drastic than if they had been allowed to do what they wanted in the first place. The girls that are dancing in the forest and then accused of witchcraft is a crazy idea. If the girls were allowed to have the least bit of fun and activity in their lives then they wouldn’t have to hide it all. The hold that the society has on people in that town is so strict that these girls were scared out of their minds. They didn’t want to be accused of witchcraft when they were just dancing. No one should be kept on lockdown as teenagers. The similarities that The Crucible has to Catcher and “Barbie” is that they all had trouble with the abilities of being strong in their own selves. All of society’s pressure to be perfect makes everyone eventually go insane. However, the girls in The Crucible do go against the society by dancing in the forest but eventually when they are caught they don’t have enough strength to fight against the courts so they then conform and blame others to stay out of trouble. The girls used the society to their advantage so that they wouldn’t get into trouble and they could put the blame on someone else. Society’s intention in all three readings are exactly the same: to get the characters to be confined to everyone else’s ideas. Identity is not involved, it is better to not know who you are and to be just like everyone else than to actually have an individual personality. The critic Jean-Marie Bonnet wrote that the society of The Crucible is, “Such an adamantly rigid society of course implies that any form of individuality will be considered subversive and dangerous...individuals trying to assert their individuality are strangled by the web of social constraints.” Her critique is absolutely correct; the way that the society in Salem acted when the girls were caught was exactly wrong. The girls weren’t do anything wrong, the only one that was doing anything bad was Abigail. The children shouldn’t be treated with so much responsibility, kids are kids and they have energy to release. Keeping them cooped up doing adult activities will obviously cause one of them to crack; and when one cracks, they all crack. Society has such a hold on people now, too, everyone looks the same, and there is no individuality anymore. In The Catcher in the Rye, Holden struggles with finding who he is and how to keep away from the materialistic worlds. Critics Alan Blackstock and Adrienne Pilon wrote about Holden saying, “It is here that Holden expresses most clearly what is bothering him: the inevitable loss of innocence involved in growing up. Other than the children, the only people Holden respects completely(outside books) are the two nuns, who have managed to remain unstained by the world.” (2251) This quote hits the nail right on the head with how Holden really feels and sees the world. The way that Holden sees the world is that the only people deserve his respect is the kids that haven’t had to grow up and see the real world. As a result of his opinions of people he can’t respect anyone that needs “things.” Holden Caulfield is a boy that doesn’t want to give up his innocence, he doesn’t want to grow up and into someone that he doesn’t recognize anymore. The fact that the society has such a large impact on everyone that they change to the point of no return isn’t how Holden wants his world to be. The three books, poems and plays that have been analyzed throughout this entire paper all had the underlying theme of society’s impact on their individuality. Each character struggled but eventually at the end found what they were looking for. In The Cather in the Rye, Holden finds that who he is, is who he will always be no matter what people try to say and do to him. In “Barbie Doll,” she changes herself to better her image and to better her heart but also falls under the spell of being perfect and like everyone else is what life is all about. Lastly, in The Crucible, the girls end up blaming everyone else for what they’ve done which is again what their society showed them to do. Nobody really ends up happy but they all put an end to their own lives in some way. The reason that everyone struggles with their images and their personalities is that of the impact of the society and media in our lives. If we didn’t see all of those “perfect” girls in our communities or on television, we’d all be happy with the way we were born and raised.…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Pros & Cons of Union Representation from Individual, Organizational and Society Perspective

...Pros & Cons of Union Representation from Individual, Organizational and Society Perspective The rise of unions from the 1930s through the early 1950s was due to the convergence of a number of events, an economic policy that attempted to restrict competition beginning in the 1930s, the belief that labor markets were noncompetitive and that individual workplaces were unfair and union premiums were low. The passage of favorable legislation, in the form of the Wagner Act, was a reflection of the idea that unions could actually improve the functioning of labor markets and serve as a countervailing power to big business. Over the past several decades, union membership has declined because government policy became pro-competitive, it became clearer that labor markets were relatively competitive, HR practices developed that reduced the amount of opportunistic behavior of employers, and unions increased the percentage premium they enjoyed in industries where rents were available. In this environment, the public-good aspect of labor unions and their ability to improve the functioning of labor markets was being questioned. The passage of amendments to the NLRA that were unfavorable to unions was a reflection of this changed sentiment as to the public good aspect of unions as well as to the adoption of pro-competitive market policies in general. Consequently the future trend in union mass will depend on the competitiveness of the economy and on the related question of the number......

Words: 1613 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Assess Sociological Views of the Functions of the Family Both for the Individual and for Society

...Murdock, a functionalist believes that the family structure is like a sub system to society. He says that the family performs four essential functions to meet the needs of society and it's members. These functions are: successful socialisation of the young into society's shared norms and values, the members of the families economic needs are met regularly e.g food and shelter, stable satisfaction of the sex drive with the same partner and finally the reproduction of the next generation without which society would struggle to continue. However, there are many criticisms of Murdock's theory. Other sociologists have argued that his 'rose tinted' harmonious consensus view that the family meets the needs of both wider society and all members of the family is foolish and nieve. Feminists argue that the family was only created to serve the needs of men and oppress the women whilst marxists argue that although the structure of the family meets the needs of capitalism, it doesn't meet the needs of the family itself or society as a whole. Another functionalist known as Parsons, proposes the 'functional fit' theory. This theory states that the functions the family performs will depend on the kind of society in which it is found and that the functions the family is required to perform will effect its 'shape'. Parsons distinguishes between two kinds of family structure: The nuclear family consisting of just parents and dependant children and the extended family of three generations...

Words: 1038 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

The Inevitable Tensions Between the Individual and Society Are the Foundations for the Most Engaging Moments in Hamlet.

...The inevitable tensions between the individual and society are the foundations for the most engaging moments in Hamlet. Consider YOUR understanding of Hamlet and how this statement affirms or challenges YOUR response to the play. The most engaging moments within Hamlet have been founded by the inevitable tensions encountered between the individual and society. Hamlet explores the tragic consequences of attempting to unite the two opposing forces of personal morality and societal corruption. The deception and political corruption within Denmark has detrimental effects upon an individual’s sense of self. Due to the corruption of the society around him, Hamlet’s values of integrity, loyalty, trust and honesty are destabilised, thus showing the vulnerability of the human character. Hamlet is a universal play as it transcends through both time and context with Hamlet resinating with modern audiences due to Hamlet’s confusion, he faces a struggle when asserting his morality against the disease and deceit inherent in Denmark. Shakespeare’s exploration of Hamlet’s consciousness of his own mortality and questions of his identity haunting him throughout the play lead to his inevitable death at the closing of the play. Hamlet’s loss of identity is due to his mother’s incestuous relationship with Claudius and also by the death of his father, a man he saw as an idol, with his distress and grief being demonstrated through his actions and the response of characters towards his actions.......

Words: 1518 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Individual Will vs Society

...Marshall Dennis Professor Kay Mizell ENGL 1302 S34 13 September 2014 Individual versus Society A society is defined as a collection of people living together in a community. An individual is the required element to populate a society. The question is, will an individual’s will be dictated by society? Individual will is a person’s ability to follow through with self-made decisions, unconstrained by outside influences. Society will always be the higher authority over individual will, because society produces a direct change in individual will through anonymity. George Orwell uses a personal life story to show how society has an impact on individual will in his book Shooting an Elephant and Other Essays (1950). In the reading George is a police officer in Burma. He explains how the town population shares a widespread hatred for him, partly because he is English and partly because he is a police officer. The story leads to Orwell encountering an elephant which broke free. The elephant was wreaking havoc on the locals, already killing one man by the time Orwell arrived. Orwell sends for a rifle to be used for his own personal protection. “I had no intention of shooting the elephant – I had merely sent for the rifle to defend myself if necessary.” (724). After speaking with more locals he finds the elephant peacefully eating grass in a paddy field, not harming anyone or their property. He explains his initial reaction with this statement; “As soon as I saw the......

Words: 978 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

What Are He Impact of It (Good, Bad, and Ugly) on Individual, Organization, and Society.

...What are he Impact of IT (good, bad, and ugly) on Individual, Organization, and society. 1. What is SIS? Strategic Information Systems (SIS) is basically a viable strategy that seeks to obtain competitive advantage in an industry. Now more than ever with frequent changes in technologies in a global market; new business models are created or modified. All this idea entangles, changing customer’s demands, online competitors, pressures for better quality products and services, higher supplier cost,, demands for superior customer service, etc. SIS changes the way a company competes in the market, it seeks to be innovative, and it also accompanies some degree of risk when implemented. 2. What happens if SIS is not aligned with Organization Mission and goals? One thing for sure, the core of business has not changed and that is to make a profit and survive. The goal is to link organizational goals with its systems. The question is not what if SIS are not aligned; the statement is, both should be related. Implementation of SIS should be treated as an investment. It should be perceived as the step needed to achieve competitive advantage. In many instances the mission and beliefs of an organization reflect the values of its top management. In all, the objective of a company should always contribute to its mission and it should not compromise it. The consequences can be devastating. For a good example we can refer to the case of Xerox and CEO, Anne Mulcahy. Mulcahy took over......

Words: 468 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Examine the Extent to Which Religion Can Still Be Said to Be Functional for Individuals and Society

...can still be said to be functional for individuals and for society (18 marks) Functionalists define religion as promoting social solidarity and integration. This can be described using the biological analogy- each segment of society performs a function, this maintains an equilibrium, without which society would disintegrate. Functionalists see religion as contributing positively to society, as it performs functions for the individual as it creates a sense of purpose for life, both religion for society and the individual then creates equilibrium. Durkheim argued that society worships the sacred and the profane, “The scared” are objects that set religions apart, and they are used to inspire individuals and bring other individuals together, an example of this is The Bible, The Bible is a sacred object for Christians, The Bible can bring the Christian community together as it is something that the religion worships. Durkheim believes that when people worship their sacred objects they are worshipping society. This is shown in Toteism religion, the worship of objects influence the tribe, the Aruntas, way of life. This reinforces solidarity and cohesion. Some can also say religion creates a “Collective Conscience”, as the sacred symbols can reflect society, the rituals of the religion maintains the social solidarity, and gives a sense of belonging as others share the same values and norms. This therefore suggests it has a function for society through the theory of collective......

Words: 1300 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Assess the Functionalist View That Religion Benefits Society as a Whole and as Its Individual Members

...Assess the Functionalist view that religion benefits both society as a whole and its individual members? (18) Functionalists see religion in a positive light and as it is a key institution of society. This differs from the Marxist and Feminist view that religion is there to simply reinforce the oppression. For functionalists, society’s key need is for social solidarity and order enabling members to cooperate. Religion ensures that this is maintained, and individuals do not pursue their own selfish desires alone as this would cause society to disintegrate. Durkheim acknowledged that the key feature of religion was not a belief in the Gods but the apparent distinction between the sacred and the profane which is found in all religions. Sacred being things that are set apart which give feelings of awe and wonder and profound being things which have no significance and are ordinary and mundane. In Durkheim’s study of an Australian Aboriginal tribe signified these differences. When the group practised their rituals, through prayer to the sacred, this was done collectively as a social group which binds individuals together reminding them that they are part of a community in which they owe their loyalty to. Durkheim’s view on sacred symbols represents societies collective consciousness, the shared norms and values, shared value beliefs and our knowledge that make a harmonious society and social solidarity possible. In contrast, responding to Durkheim’s claims Worsley maintains......

Words: 865 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Assess Sociological Perspectives That Suggest That Religion Serves to Benefit Both Individuals and Society.

...importance to a large group of people. However the real question is whether religion serves to benefit both the individual and society in this ever evolving postmodern world. One perspective that suggests that religion does serve to benefit both the individual and society as a whole is Functionalism, which believes that religion maintains value consensus by creating social solidarity and keeping social order in place. Marxism however believes religion creates class division in society, by acting as an “opium of the people” and a “spiritual gin”, which in turn creates the false class consciousness and illusory happiness, which leads to people being subordinate and not challenging their place in society, as religion helps to explain their place and maintains social order. A core argument from the Functionalist perspective, put forward by Durkheim, was society’s distinction between the “sacred” (things set apart,special,inspire feelings of awe and wonder) and the “profane” (things that have no special significance,ordinary or mundane). Durkheim argued that the reason why scared symbols or festivals in religion evoke such powerful feelings in individuals is because they represent a greater power, this in Durkheim’s opinion could only be society itself. Therefore in Durkheim's view when members of society are worshipping sacred symbols, they’re merely worshipping society and all that it stands for, thus uniting society’s members into a single, moral community creating value......

Words: 1488 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

The Powerless Protagonist - a Reflection on the Powerlessness of the Individual in Modern Russian Society Through the Film "Durak" (the Fool)

...reflection on the powerlessness of the individual in modern Russian society through the film “Durak” (The Fool) INTRODUCTION “You must obey the law, always, not only when they grab you by your special place.” Vladimir Putin I grew up on American movies built around stories portraying an underdog protagonist (ex. Erin Brockovich) who against all odds through hardship and danger manages to beat all sources of antagonism, fight injustice, save the day, and ride off into the sunset with cash and a high sense of self-achievement, reaching a full transformation circle in his/her character development. In contrast, after watching “The Fool” by Yuri Bykov, and “Leviathan” by Andrey Zvyagintsev I couldn't help but noticing the exact opposite. Namely, the stories revolve around an underdog protagonist, who in a toxically decaying environment, never seem to change or learn anything while battling against either corruption, injustice or both, ending up with the protagonist being ruined in every way imaginable, losing practically everything including his family and hope, his efforts ridiculed, and he himself severely physically punished. The two protagonists are of course very different, however, one needs to be reminded that behind every movie script there is an individual writer with a goal of conveying a statement to his audience. In the film “the Fool” through Dima, the powerless protagonist, the writer/director describes a society that is deeply in......

Words: 3311 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

Assess the Functionalist View That Religion Benefits Both Society as a Whole and Its Individual Members (18 Marks)

...Functionalists believe that religion is beneficial for both society as a whole and its individual members, this is because it unifies society and creates consensus, which in turn gives each individual member a source of support when they need it. However some theorists disagree with the functionalist ideology. Firstly, functionalist claim religion benefits society in a number of ways, it creates a sense of social solidarity, meaning a shared sense of identity, history, norms and values (a collective conscience). This is supported by item A, ‘religion's contribution to value consensus and social integration’. Functionalist explain that if all of a society's members are part of the same religion then they all share the same belief system, resulting in consensus between all of its members. The religious institution will teach its members the norms and values of the society they are in and the collective worship will bind societies members closer together, for example, people in Muslim countries who are part of the faith of Islam, understand it is normal to stop and pray 5 times a day and also that no-one should work on Friday however people in Christian countries understand the day of rest to be Sunday. Functionalist therefore claim members of a society have a collective conscience, they think in the same way, due to their shared norms and values. Functionalists also believe that religion unifies people; the functionalist Emile Durkheim studied an aboriginal tribe the......

Words: 847 - Pages: 4

Free Essay


...MY IDEAL SOCIETY Free will is a property of human nature that depends solely on the individual. Every individual in a free society has the ability to make any decision that impacts his or her own life. This means that any one person can use their own free will to alter or hamper the ideals possessed by another individual within the society. This notion goes against the grains of the idea of an ideal society. An ideal society would have to provide the ideal conditions for all those who lived within it. The principles and standards of the inhabitants within the society would determine these ideal conditions. If an individual within this model society could alter the life of another individual within the society, the ideals of the second individual may be broken; this consequently undermines and destroys the concept of an absolute ideal society. Thomas More’s Utopia carries the premise that everyone within the utopian society does what is necessary for the good of the society, and that one’s free will would consist of only what is beneficial to the culture. This, in itself, is limiting free will by excluding the possibility of freely doing what is not beneficial to the culture. More said, the citizens, “(do) not waste their time in idleness or self-indulgence,” but who’s to say that they cannot? Absolute free will gives each citizen the ability to do whatever they feel inclined to do, even perhaps, idle or self-indulge. In Dr. King’s “I Have a Dream” speech, the idea of free......

Words: 1238 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

The Impact of Drugs on Individual Society

...Impact of Drugs on Individual Society The Impact of Drugs on Individual Society As the nation grows, so does the impact of drugs within society. Social and cultural factors have helped to influence the supply and demand of drugs. In some social circles, drugs have had a major influence over behaviors, choices, and attitudes. Everyday stressors, such as work and family life, can help to increase drug usage. Individuals, who use drugs, believe that escaping their daily problems of life. The impact that drugs have had on individual society has been negative because it has increased criminal activities, health issues, addictions, and overcrowded the criminal justice system. Even though many organizations and groups have stepped forward to start anti-drug groups and have encouraged members of society to become drug free, the process has been slow. Throughout life, there will continue to be individuals who will always struggle with their interpersonal conflicts and think that using drugs is a way to solve their problems. There are ongoing studies and methods of research that view the perspectives of drug usage and its effect on society. Some people even feel that if drugs are legalized, then they would become less desirable. Actually, an addict will only stop once they feel that they had a need to do so. Drugs, within society, possess the thoughts of the addict and continue to allow for them to not realize their problem until it is too late. Society realizes......

Words: 301 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Society and Individual

...1) Bring out the relationship between society and individual Individual separation Modern social rules encourage individuality and separation. Social touching is increasingly forbidden as a suspected sexual advance. The rights of the individual often take precedence over society. Capitalism has largely defeated Communism. We are progressively more alone. Science does not help either, as we are encouraged to be objective to the point when we stand outside ourselves. Emotional Intelligence is lauded as a good thing. The traditional separation But are individuals separate from society or a part of society? Is either or both an illusion? Individuals in society are not 'free agents' as they are constrained by social rules. Many people feel individual and separated, and this has echoed through history. Descartes said 'cogito ergo sum'. Leibnitz described a self-view of 'windowless monads'. Kant talked of us as 'who from his aprioristic shell can never quite break through to the 'thing in itself' '. A classic email .sig is 'At the center of the known universe'. Much social research still separates the individual and society. Society is seen as a unity of its own, implying boundaries. Individuals are seen as free and independent, acting a closed systems. Homo philosophicus, the rational philosopher, was never an adult arrives as an adult with clear logic and no disturbing past. Elias (1968) describes homo clausus (based in homo philosophicus and many other such models) a......

Words: 562 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay


...Social Roles in Society June 18, 2011 Social Roles in Society Social roles are patterns of behavior expected from people in various social positions. The concept of social role provides a way to name individuals interdependencies. The expectations that society puts on an individual, socialization is combined with changes in social behavior and organization. Psychology can help identify the components of the development of attitudes and how they change. Many psychologists subscribe to the belief that we take on, and act out certain roles because of cultures and societies (Social Roles and Expectations, n.d.). In 1971 Psychologist Philip Zimbardo along with his colleagues conducted a study that was focused on becoming a prisoner or prison guard. More than 70 applicants answered a newspaper ad and were given application and screening to eliminate people with psychological problem, medical disabilities, and a history of crime or drug abuse (Stanford Prison Experiment, n.d.). A prison environment was assembled in the basement of the Stanford University Psychology Department building. The planned two week investigation ended after only six days, due to the guards and questioning of its morality by Christina Maslach, who was a recent Stanford Ph.D. Social influence is a change in a person’s behavior conducted by the presence or actions of others (Coon & Mitterer, 2010). Stereotyping patterns can easily be identified, when referring to Zimbardo’s Prison, social......

Words: 1333 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Relationship Between the Individual and Society

...Relationship Between the Individual and Society From the late Qing Dynasty to the early Republic of China, China was in the social transformation era. More accurately, people was in the alternating period of the feudal traditional conservative ideology and emerging modern thoughts. Hence, the authors always wrote the stories about how individuals reacted to such social changes. Like three stories, Lu Xun’s “A Madman’s Diary,” Yu Dafu’s “Sinking,” Mao Dun’s “Spring Silkworm” which depict how the individuals’ respond when they face two totally different ideologies or moral codes. These three stories show three different conditions, three different choices, and lead to three different results. One common thing is that all protagonists are suffering in that old society. First, Lu Xun’s “A Madman’s Diary” describes a madman who is the first rebel in modern literary history. The madman was born in the feudal scholar-bureaucrat family, everyone lived around him was bound by the feudalism. However, he was not one of them, he had modern thoughts and yearn for a just society. Unfortunately, he could not find a person with a like-minded goal, and everyone else saw him as a madman. He thought that society was an “eat people” world. For example, he read history intently half the night until he saw the whole book was filled with the two words “eat people”. He thought the history were all wrote about how the powerful people oppress the poor. And he felt sorrow that such merciless......

Words: 1355 - Pages: 6