Premium Essay

The Indian Removal Act of 1830

In: Historical Events

Submitted By mtuero
Words 1123
Pages 5
THE INDIAN REMOVAL ACT OF 1830

Migdalia Tuero

HIST101: American History to 1877
Professor Kathleen Davis
February 13, 2014

There are several historical events and issues that have impacted the contemporary political development among American history. In the history of America one of these groups are the Native Americans. The white man throughout the South called for a removal of the Indian peoples. They wanted the Native Indians to be resettled to the west because their presence created a problem for the white man who needed additional land for settlement. “The status of Native American peoples posed an equally complex political problem” (Henretta, Edwards, Self 2012, 302). Therefore, Andrew Jackson posed the Indian Removal Act of 1830. This Act was passed on May 28, 1830 in order to authorize the president to give unsettled land in the west to the eastern state Indians as part of the removal from their land. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 removed the Native Americans from their rightful lands and it also is responsible for the deaths of 4000 Native American Indians.
In 1830, the population in the states of Georgia, Tennessee, Alabama, Mississippi and, Florida amongst other southern states, were growing rapidly, therefore it appeared that the “removal to the West seemed the only way to protect Indian peoples from alcoholic devastation and financial exploitation and to preserve the Indians’ culture” (Henretta et al. 2012, 302). However, this was not the case and the Native Indians did not want to leave their ancestral lands. They had multiple treaties signed by the United States and the Indian tribes, yet settlers were beginning to move into the land of the Indian nation. In order to persuade the Indians to move from their lands, the American government officials promised that they and their children would receive new lands that were rich in soil and…...

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Indian War

...ultimately helped form our Nation into what it is today. One of these new leaders was President Andrew Jackson. Upon inauguration in 1829, Jackson wanted to settle the ongoing issue of the Indians and the land that they held within the states; as a result most of the energy and resources of his administration were focused on settling the dispute and moving on with the Nation. Within Jacksons first year in office he had plans to relocate the Indians to west of the Mississippi. With the relocation, Americans would be free to settle the land vacated by the Indians. Jackson’s stance on the issue is that if the Indians are not willing to adapt they had to be removed and relocated. Jackson wanted to preserve the Indian nation, however with expansion of the United States quickly approaching Indian Territory, the Indians needed to be moved instead of killed off. Ultimately this led to the Indian Removal Act of 1830. The act was written and in theory was supposed to represent a voluntary movement of the Indians and relocate them so that the white settlers could settle the farm the Indian’s fertile soil. But in reality it was to force Indian off their land and be push them further back into the interior of North America, even more then they had previously been sent. The Indian tribes as a whole were being forced off their land from which their fathers before them have lived on for generations. As Jackson saw it there were three options for the Native......

Words: 1186 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Indian Act

...Agreements: The Indian Act and Canadian Treaties In modern society the question of why the aboriginal population receives benefits often arises. Much of today’s youth does not understand that the Native American people were often stripped of their rights in the past in order to gain these advantages. Two main incidents were established in the Aboriginal history, the first was the treaties that spread across Canada and the second incident was the Indian Act of 1876. The main difference between the Indian Act and treaties were the aboriginal’s role in the decision-making. Treaties allowed for a compromise between the Natives and the government that allowed for benefits on both ends whereas the Indian act was imposed on the Native culture by the Canadian government without any arrangement with the aboriginals. This paper will first describe the history of treaties and what they entail for both parties and also look at the formation of the Indian Act. Then, this paper will look at how each had affected the Aboriginal people in similar and different ways. Finally this paper will look at the relation in today’s society that the treaties have in Canada and what life would be like if the Indian Act was still a large part of how First Nations people would have been treated if the Act was not changed following World War II. After these points, a reader should have a better understanding of a topic that they may know little about. By looking at both the Indian Act and Canadian......

Words: 2505 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Indian Contract Act

...THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872 The Law of Contract Constitutes the most important branch of mercantile or commercial law. It affects everybody, more so, trade, commerce anq industry. It may be said that the contract is the foundation of the civilized world. The law relating to contract is governed by the Indian Contract Act, 1872 (Act No. IX of 1872). The preamble to the Act says that it is an Act "to define and amend certain parts of the law relating to contract". It extends to the whole of India except the State of Jammu and Kashmir. The Act mostly deals with the general principles and rules governing contracts. The Act is divisible into two parts. The first part (Section 1-75) deals with the general principles of the law of contract, and therefore applies to all contracts irrespective of their nature. The second part (Sections 124-238) deals with certain special kinds of contracts, e.g., Indemnity and guarantee, bailment, pledge, and agency. The term contract has been defined by various authors In the following manner: "A contract is an agreement creating and defining obligations between the parties". -Salmond "A contract is an agreement enforceable at law, made between two or more persons, by which rights are acquired by one or more to acts or forbearances on the part of the other or others". -Anson "Every agreement and promise enforceable at law is a contract". -Sir Fredrick Pollock The Indian Contract Act has defined contract...

Words: 27228 - Pages: 109

Free Essay

Indian Healthcare Improvement Act

...IHS Affirmative Observation One: Inherency 2 Advantage One: Health 5 Advantage Two: Indigenous Economy 9 Observation Two: Solvency 14 Only federal action can solve the case- denying Indian health care furthers an ongoing policy of American Indian genocide 17 Inherency – Lack of Funding 18 Inherency – Lack of Funding 19 Inherency – Lack of Funding 20 Inherency – Lack of Funding 21 Health Impacts – Disease/Death 22 Health Impacts – Disease/Death 23 Health Impacts – Disease/Death 24 IMPACT: Mental Health and Suicide 25 IMPACT: Mental Health and Suicide 26 Extensions to Genocide/Racism Impact 27 Extensions to Genocide/Racism Impact 28 IMPACT: Moral Obligation/Human Rights 29 Solvency Extension - IHCIA/IHS Solves 30 Solvency Extension - IHCIA/IHS Solves 31 Solvency Extension - IHCIA/IHS Solves 32 Solvency Extension - IHCIA/IHS Solves 33 Solvency Extension - IHCIA/IHS Solves for cultural sensitive health 34 Solvency Extension – Congress Key 35 Solvency Extension – Federal Government Key 36 A2: I.H.S. is Racist 37 A2: Transportation 38 A2: “Structural/Distribution Barriers” 39 A2: No Qualified Professionals 40 A2: Bureaucrats 41 A2: IHS has arbitrary eligibility standards 42 A2: Blood Quantum 43 A2: Medicaid Solves 44 AT: Medicaid Solves 45 AT: Medicaid Solves 46 A2: IHS doesn’t use traditional......

Words: 29491 - Pages: 118

Premium Essay

The Indian Contract Act, 1872

...THE INDIAN CONTRACT ACT, 1872 The law relating to contract is governed by the Indian Contract Act, 1872. The Act came into force on the first day of September, 1872. It extends to the whole of India except the State of Jammu and Kashmir. The Act is by no means exhaustive on the law of contract. It does not deal with all the branches of the law of contract. Thus, contracts relating to partnership, sale of goods, negotiable instruments, insurance etc. are dealt with by separate Acts. What is contract? The term contract has been defined by various authors in the following manner: “A contract is an agreement creating and defining obligations between the parties”. —Salmond “A contract is an agreement enforceable at law, made between two or more persons, by which rights are acquired by one or more to acts or forbearances on the part of the other or others”. —Anson “Every agreement and promise enforceable at law is a contract”. —Sir Fredrick Pollock The Indian Contract Act has defined contract in Section 2(h) as “an agreement enforceable by law”. These definitions indicate that a contract essentially consists of two distinct parts. First, there must be an agreement. Secondly, such an agreement must be enforceable by law. To be enforceable, an agreement must be coupled with an obligation. A contract therefore, is a combination of the two elements: (1) an agreement and (2) an obligation. Thus Contract = Agreement +enforcement......

Words: 16603 - Pages: 67

Premium Essay

Divisive Political Events of the 1830s

...During the 1830s and 1840s in America, there were several political events that divided the nation. Three of these were the abolishment of the Second Bank of the United States, the signing of the Indian Removal Act, and the abolitionists' antislavery offensive in 1835. One point of national controversy was regarding the existence of a national bank. The First Bank of the United States was a centralized, national bank chartered in 1791 for a term of 20 years. Its purpose was to hold federal funds and help stabilize the country's finances. When the bank's charter expired in 1811, Congress created a Second Bank of the United States whose charter was to expire in 1836. President Jackson was distrustful of banks and was very much opposed to having a federal bank. When Senator Henry Clay proposed an early rechartering of the bank in 1832, the bill was passed in Congress but vetoed by President Jackson. According to Jackson, the federal bank was unauthorized by the Constitution and destructive to states' and individual rights. This was the beginning of what came to be known as the Bank War. Those who were in favor of the bank tended to be bankers, developers, and those in the business community. Since the wealthy were the ones who had the most to gain by having a national bank, the bank gained a reputation for being pro-aristocracy and against the common man. Those in the Senate who supported the bank were angered by this move and censured Jackson, but the censure was eventually......

Words: 747 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Indian Removal

...The condition and ulterior destiny of the Indian tribes within the limits of some of our States have become objects of much interest and importance. It has long been the policy of Government to introduce among them the arts of civilization, in the hope of gradually reclaiming them from a wandering life. This policy has, however, been coupled with another wholly incompatible with its success. Professing a desire to civilize and settle them, we have at the same time lost no opportunity to purchase their lands and thrust them farther into the wilderness. By this means they have not only been kept in a wandering state, but been led to look upon us as unjust and indifferent to their fate. Thus, though lavish in its expenditures upon the subject, Government has constantly defeated its own policy, and the Indians in general, receding farther and farther to the west, have retained their savage habits. A portion, however, of the Southern tribes, having mingled much with the whites and made some progress in the arts of civilized life, have lately attempted to erect an independent government within the limits of Georgia and Alabama. These States, claiming to be the only sovereigns within their territories, extended their laws over the Indians, which induced the latter to call upon the United States for protection. Under these circumstances the question presented was whether the General Government had a right to sustain those people in their pretensions. The Constitution declares that......

Words: 633 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Tender of Performance Indian Contract Act

...implied contract. It is always difficult to prove the terms of an oral or implied contract than those of a written one. There are many important points that have to be kept in mind while forming a valid contract; after making the offer to the promisee, the contract will be formed when the promisee communicates his acceptance to the contract. The person making the offer is free to withdraw the same before the acceptance of the offer. Once the agreement is made, the following clauses should be present in the same. 1. There should be some consideration offered for the agreement. 2. The parties should be competent to contract. 3. The consent to the agreement should be free. 4. The object of the agreement should be lawful. The Indian Contract Act, 1872 Preamble: "whereas it is expedient to define and amend certain parts of the law relating to the contracts; " It is hereby enacted as follows :-- Preliminary clauses followed by sections. PERFORMANCE OF CONTRACTS Definition of TENDER OF PERFORMANCE with respect to contract law is that, "It is an offer or attempt to do what is required under a contract or under the law." or "An offer to perform an obligation in satisfaction of the terms of a contract is called tender of performance." Let us define a 'tender' and 'performance' first. Tender means , "An offer to carry out work, supply goods, or buy land, shares, or another asset at a stated fixed price." To 'perform' means to carry out, or to accomplish, or to......

Words: 2942 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

The Debate over Indian Removal

...The condition and ulterior destiny of the Indian tribes within the limits of some of our States have become objects of much interest and importance. It has long been the policy of Government to introduce among them the arts of civilization, in the hope of gradually reclaiming them from a wandering life. This policy has, however, been coupled with another wholly incompatible with its success. Professing a desire to civilize and settle them, we have at the same time lost no opportunity to purchase their lands and thrust them farther into the wilderness. By this means they have not only been kept in a wandering state, but been led to look upon us as unjust and indifferent to their fate. Thus, though lavish in its expenditures upon the subject, Government has constantly defeated its own policy, and the Indians in general, receding farther and farther to the west, have retained their savage habits. A portion, however, of the Southern tribes, having mingled much with the whites and made some progress in the arts of civilized life, have lately attempted to erect an independent government within the limits of Georgia and Alabama. These States, claiming to be the only sovereigns within their territories, extended their laws over the Indians, which induced the latter to call upon the United States for protection. Under these circumstances the question presented was whether the General Government had a right to sustain those people in their pretensions. The Constitution declares that......

Words: 4132 - Pages: 17

Premium Essay

Indian Reorganization Act of 1934

...The Indian Reorganization Act of 1934, also known as the Wheeler Howard Act or the IRA, had a major impact on the everyday lives of Native American Tribes that were scattered across the United states. The Indian Reorganization Act provided the means and tools for tribes to form their own governments and constitutions. The IRA stopped the general allotment act that was put into effect by the Dawes of 1887. The Indian Reorganization Act granted the Secretary of Interior a tremendous amount of power over Native American affairs ranging from land, livestock, employment, government, etc. According to the reorganization plan, after a tribe or nation voted to accept the IRA, it would draw up a constitution and bylaws, submit it to a referendum, have the Secretary of the Interior certify the results, and then start operating as a corporate tribal council. Of the 181 tribes accepting the Indian Reorganization Act between 1934 and 1945, only ninety-six adopted a tribal constitution, and only seventy-three tribes ever received corporate business charters. Seventy-seven tribes with a population of 86,365 members rejected the Act outright. Several of these were large reservation groups, such as the Klamath Indians of Oregon and the Crows of Montana. An especially bitter blow to Collier was the rejection of the IRA by the Navajo Nation. With 98 percent of the eligible Navajo voting, the tribe rejected the Act by 419 votes. The Navajo had not forgiven the Collier administration for its......

Words: 1456 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Indian Removal

...Tennessee, Mississippi, Kentucky, and North Carolina. In 1830, President Jackson helped pass the “Indian Removal Act.” The act gave the president the power to negotiate treaties with the Indian tribes that lived east of the Mississippi. The removal was supposed to be peaceful, but some of the southeastern tribes resisted and Jackson forced them to move. Out of the Creeks, Chickasaws, Choctaws, and Cherokee it can be argued that the Cherokee had it the hardest. The Cherokee were tricked into signing the Treaty of New Echota. Led by Chief John Ross, the Cherokee signed a petition protesting the treaty, but the Supreme Court ignored them and ratified the treaty in 1836. The government gave the Cherokee two years to migrate, and by 1838 only 2,000 of 18,000 of the tribe members migrated. The government sent in about 7,000 troops that forced the Cherokee to move and march thousands of miles without giving them time to gather any of their belongings. This was known as the Trail of Tears which led to around 4,000 Cherokee people dying from cold, hunger, and disease. The state of Georgia passed five laws that restricted Cherokee authority over their land. One of the laws required all whites living in Cherokee Indian Territory to obtain a state license to live there. Samuel Worchester was a missionary who lived in Georgia, he was also postmaster of the Cherokee capitol New Echota, and he opposed Cherokee removal. He refused to obtain a state license for living there,......

Words: 443 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Pledge - Section 176 of Indian Contract Act

...PLEDGE A pledge is a special type of bailment in which a person temporarily transfers the possession or ownership of his/her property in order to secure a loan from the other person. It is defined as in the Indian Contract Act, 1872, as “The bailment of goods as a security for the payment of a debt or performance of a promise is called pledge. The bailor in this case is called a Pawner and the bailee is called a Pawnee.” Essentially, when the purpose of the bailment is to secure a loan, it is called a pledge. This article is concerned specifically with Section 176 of the Indian Contract Act, which deals with the pawnee’s right to sue or right of sale in case of the pawner’s default. The essential ingredients that are required to constitute a pledge are as follows: 1. Delivery of possession – As in bailment, the delivery of possession is essential in a pledge. Thus, in the case of Revenue Authority vs Sudarsanam Pictures, a film producer borrowed a sum of money from a financier and agreed to deliver the final prints of the film when they were ready. This was held not to be a pledge because there was no delivery of possession at the time of the agreement. It is also possible to let the pawner keep the physical goods even though the legal possession is transferred to the pawner. Thus, in Bank of Chittor vs Narsimbulu, a cinema hall equipment was pledged to the bank but the bank allowed the hall owner to keep the equipment to show the movies. The hall owner then sold......

Words: 1097 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Law - Indian Contract Act

...The Indian Contract Act, 1872 is the law relating to Contracts in India. It came into force on September 1, 1872 and is extended to the whole of India except to the state of Jammu and Kashmir. The Indian Contract Act, 1872 initially also dealt with Sale of Goods, Indemnity and Guarantee, Law of Bailment, Agency and Partnership. However, in 1930, a separate Act on the Sale of Goods was passed. The Indian Partnership Act was passed in 1932. Interpretation of The Indian Contract Act, 1872 1. When one person signifies to another his willingness to do or to abstain from doing anything, with a view to obtaining the assent of that other to such act or abstinence, he is said to make a proposal; 2. When the person to whom the proposal is made signifies his assent thereto, the proposal is said to be accepted. A proposal, when accepted, becomes a promise; 3. The person making the proposal is called the "promisor", and the person accepting the proposal is called the "promisee"; 4. When, at the desire of the promisor, the promisee or any other person has done or abstained from doing, or does or abstains from doing, or promises to do or to abstain from doing, something, such act or abstinence or promise is called a consideration for the promise; 5. Every promise and every set of promises, forming the consideration for each other, is an agreement; 6. Promises, which form the consideration or part, of the consideration for each other are called reciprocal promises; 7. An......

Words: 4010 - Pages: 17

Premium Essay

Indian Removal

...assassinated in Washington April 15, 1865. He descended from a family of Quakers Virginia passed in Kentucky. His father, Thomas Lincoln married Nancy Hanks in 1806, also Virginian, passed in 1816 in Indiana, where his wife (October 1818) died. He remarried to a widow. The young Abraham entertained the most affectionate relations with his stepmother. Very vigorous, he helped his father run the farm and did not follow the school for six months. He kept a keen taste for reading and composed a book of selected passages. Abraham Lincoln was soon as famous for his cheerfulness, his eloquence, telling stories or uttering speeches, for his strength and skill. He was six feet four inches high. In 1828 he went to New Orleans with a cargo. In March 1830, he spent with his family in Illinois where he built a house north of the Sangamon, 16 kilometers west of Decatur. Abraham Lincoln worked with neighbors and made ​​his first public speech. In 1831, he went down again by raft to New Orleans: it saved him from grounding by inventing a machine, and later, in 1849, he was to take a patent on this. It is this journey that began in 1831 the horror of Abraham Lincoln for slavery. On his return, he was then employed in New Salem. After the bankruptcy of his boss, he joined a company of volunteers for the campaign against Black Hawk (the Black Hawk). He was elected captain (1832). He then presented to the legislative elections in Illinois, hesitating between the Whigs and Jackson, he was......

Words: 2384 - Pages: 10

Free Essay

The Indian Succession Act, 1925

...THE INDIAN SUCCESSION ACT, 1925 ACT No. 39 OF 1925 1* [30th September, 1925.] An Act to consolidate the law applicable to intestate and testamentary succession 2*; WHEREAS it is expedient to consolidate the law applicable to intestate and testamentary succession 2*; It is hereby enacted as follows:-PART I PRELIMINARY 1. Short title..-This Act may be called the Indian Succession Act, 1925. 2. Definitions.- In this Act, unless there is anything repugnant in the subject or context,-(a) "administrator" means a person appointed by competent authority to administer the estate of a deceased person when there is no executor; (b) "codicil" means an instrument made in relation to a will, and explaining, altering or adding to its dispositions, and shall be deemed to form part of the will; 3* [(bb) "District Judge" means the Judge of a principal Civil Court of original jurisdiction;] (c) "executor" means a person to whom the execution of the last will of a deceased person is, by the testator's appointment, confided; 4* [(cc) "India" means the territory of India excluding the State of Jammu and Kashmir;] (d) "Indian Christian" means a native of India who is, or in good faith claims to be, of unmixed Asiatic descent and who professes any form of the Christian religion; (e) "minor" means any person subject to the Indian Majority Act, 1875 (9 of 1875.), who has not attained his majority within the meaning of that Act, and any other person who has not completed the age of eighteen years; and...

Words: 55484 - Pages: 222