Free Essay

The Future of Railroads

In: Business and Management

Submitted By millarl
Words 5841
Pages 24
The Resilience of the Railroad Industry

Lindsay Millar, Jessica Settlecowski & Mike Gawel
MGT 674
March 23, 2013
The history and resilience of the railway industry is rather remarkable as it has helped shape the landscape and the formation of the United States. Railways allowed colonies to settle in the West and the country suddenly became connected from coast to coast. This encouraged the exchange of goods and stimulated the development of towns and communities along track lines. Soldiers were shipped directly to the forefront of battleground lines and supplied with a constant flow of ammunition. Most importantly, trains were the steam engine that fueled the industrial revolution. The railway industry’s history is rich with experience and wise with age, as it has survived many seemingly insurmountable obstacles, including: the Great Depression, civil war, the advent of automobiles and airplanes and federal regulation. Federal regulation took the largest toll on the industry as it restricted the ability of the industry to adapt to future demands and market requirements. The growth of rail was stunted by 100 years of federal regulation and since the Staggers Act of 1980 which led to deregulation, the industry has been struggling to recover. After the implementation of the Staggers Act the industry has undergone serious reconstruction which has increased the overall performance and reliability of rail. As service levels improve the demand for low rates and large capacity hauls has skyrocketed. One study suggests that by 2035 the demand to move tonnage by railroads will increase by 88 percent, requiring a $135 billion investment to meet this increased demand (Nealer, Matthews, & Hendrickson, 2012). The increase in demand is a result of growing environmental consciousness and extreme scrutiny on the trucking industry. Rail provides long term environmental sustainability and this factor affords rail the potential to transform the transportation sector. Throughout this essay we intend to provide an analysis of the North American railway industry through the discussion of the economic and environmental benefits of rail and its potential weaknesses, while highlighting the industry’s unrealized potential.
Railways have helped shaped the formation of the United States, as abandoned tracks still scar urban areas providing a constant reminder of the historical importance of this now perceived archaic form of transportation. The first common carrier and class one railway in the United States was the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad (B&O) in 1830. The B&O railway proved to be particularly advantageous during the American Civil War between 1861 and 1877, as it was used to deliver ammunition, guns and eager soldiers onto the battle grounds. However, during the civil war the B&O was deemed collateral damage as confederate forces destroyed it in an effort to cut off supply lines. Into the 19th century railways became the primary method of land transport, peaking in importance in the early 1900s (Rodrigue, 2008). Market share subsequently declined in the face of competition from cars and aviation, although rail was still able to retain a modest level of passenger and freight transport (Rodrigue, 2008). The Staggers Rail Act of 1980 was a major development in the US railroad industry and led to the vitality and subsequent resurgence of the industry (Winston, 2005). The Staggers Act ushered in a new era where federal regulatory control over the entire industry was released. Railroad companies were able to abandon unprofitable lines, form mergers and acquisitions and adjust rates, placing the entire industry on a secure financial footing. Railway operating efficiency began to flourish as a result of regulatory freedom and several major improvements were developed, including: the switch from steam to diesel engines and electric traction; containerization with a focus on long-haul and unit-train freight operations (Rodrigue, p. 233, 2008).
Since the deregulation of rail, the industry’s infrastructure has exponentially expanded to create the largest rail network in the world. The C.I.A’s publication of The World Factbook (2007), has reported that the U.S railway is composed of 139,679 miles of track, doubling the second highest ranked country Russia, which has 54,156 rail miles. The 139, 679 miles of United States railroad ships 30 percent of the countries grain, 70 percent of all automobiles and 65 percent of all coal (Freightrailworks 2013). Wheat, corn, beer, potatoes, wine and many other staple foods make it to tables countrywide courtesy of rail. In addition, a large portion of all paper and raw materials travel through rail, including: lumber, steel, fuel and cement (Association of American Railroads, 2012).
As the effects of global climate change become increasingly apparent the desperation to find alternative modes of transportation which do not irreparably scar the planet is vital. The accelerated consumption of fossil fuels is changing the face of our planet and directly contributing to climate change. The transportation sector claims 20 percent of fossil fuel usage and is responsible for 33 percent of total US carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions (Armstrong & Preston, 2011). As the awareness of environmental damage caused by the transportation sector raises, public pressures to increase corporate social responsibility grow. The long term sustainability of the transportation sector is the key to future viability, as affordable fossil fuels are becoming increasingly scarce. Armstrong and Preston (2011) argue that “oil production will peak within the coming decades and may already have reached a plateau; this is likely to cause comparative scarcity and increased prices, if demand is maintained at current levels, or as seems likely, continues to increase” (p. 1572). The future sustainability of rail is this sectors most advantageous strategic quality, as rail claims a low environmental burden compared to truck or air. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) claims that for every ton-mile a truck emits roughly three times more nitrogen oxide and particulates than a locomotive (CSX, 2012). The CSX class one railroad boasts that a train can move one ton of freight 500 miles with one gallon of diesel fuel (CSX, 2012). The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials estimates if 10 percent of intercity freight transported by truck were shifted to rail it would save 2.5 million tons of CO2 per year (Nealer, Matthews & Hendrickson, p. 589, 2012). Rail is not only a less costly solution for the shipment of freight, but the use of this transportation sectors aligns a company with green initiatives and reveals an organization that is making strides to improve corporate social responsibility.
Since 1980 the railway sector has improved fuel efficiency by 61 percent, while the trucking industry has witnessed a 75 percent reduction in cost efficiency (Ampuja, 2013). The fuel efficiencies of rail create economic savings which are directly transferred into the pockets of shippers, as shipping rates are a reflection of fuel efficiencies. In the last decade, the trucking industry has become slaughtered by rising costs in fuel, higher wages, labor shortages and congestion on roadways. All of these variables are cannibalizing the trucking industry’s profits and making it extremely expensive for shippers to move freight. Rail is comparatively 4.3 times more energy efficient (455 ton-miles per gallon), has 4.7 times the capacity (216 million tons per mainline per year) and 1.8 times less costly (2.7 cents per ton-mile) than trucking (Armstrong & Preston, p. 1575, 2011).
Rail productivity has largely increased due to the deregulation of rail transport in the early 1980s by the Staggers Act. Deregulation allowed firms greater freedom to adjust rates, to merge with other firms, and to abandon or sell unprofitable lines. These freedoms allowed firms to change the structure of the industry and to alter their operating characteristics. For example, partial deregulation permitted firms the unprecedented freedom to customize their rate structures. The negotiation of contract rates allows railroads the ability to tailor their services to shipper’s preferences and for both parties to share the resulting gains in productivity (Da1vis & Wilson, p. 5, 2003). Gains in productivity and efficiency were also realized by offering shippers incentives through rate reductions by enticing them to consolidate shipments over longer distances in labor-saving unit trains, which allowed railroads to exploit unrealized economies of traffic density and services (Davis & Wilson, p. 866, 2003). Additionally, shippers who required service to and from a given destination would receive a reduced rate because it eliminated an empty backhaul for the railroad (Davis & Wilson, 2003). As efficiency improved labor demands decreased and industry employment fell by 60 percent, reducing overall variable costs and improving profit margins (Davis & Wilson, 2003). Financial viability became quickly restored within the railway industry and the sector is now able to compete with other modes of transportation.
In North America, mergers and acquisitions within the railroad sector allowed the industry to become more efficient and better able to withstand an environment that is flooded with competition from other modes of freight shipment (i.e. air, truck, sea). Before deregulation, roughly 70 percent of total car miles consisted of interline services (i.e. involving two or more carriers) (Harris & Winston, 1983). Interline services generates congestion on the track which ultimately increases transit time and total cost of shipment. The problem with freight car supply and distribution is complex because it involves not only the vertical relationship of shippers to carriers (the rail service) but also, the horizontal relationship among railroad firms (freight car interchange) (Berglund, p. 4, 1977). The absorption of Conrail by Norfolk Southern and CSX in 1999 left the United States with four large (Class I) railroads: Norfolk Southern and CSX in the East, and Burlington Northern-Santa Fe and Union Pacific-Southern Pacific in the West (Winston, p.8, 2005). These vertical mergers reduced interline services thereby simplifying the supply chain which allowed rail companies to efficiently manage their own systems (Harris & Winston, 1983). The minimization of interline services permitted increased visibility of shipments and improved organization and optimization of carriers. For example, vertical mergers enable a rail firm to pre-block trains at their intermediate yard for their ultimate destination, reducing car miles, car hours and classification tie (Harris & Winston, p. 35, 1983). The consolidation of the physical network allowed companies to decrease the total number of carriers on a track which in turn, decreased transit time resulting in the reduction of overall shipment costs. Mark DePaul the Solutions Manager of Canadian National (CN), in a recent phone interview stated that, “the recent purchase of Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railroad (which operates in the Chicago area) by the Canadian National railway has alleviated the congestion around the Chicago area, making deliveries much more efficient and reducing overall costs” (DePaul, 2013). In a surprising turn of events, railway companies have passed the cost savings onto shippers offering lower rates and significantly improved service times and reliability (Armstrong & Preston, 2011). Total shipment costs via rail have decreased by 65 percent between 1980 and 2008 (Armstrong & Preston, 2011). The cost savings resulting from the reduction in the number of carriers on the track are immense for rail companies and as variable costs plummeted their profit margins began to swell. With a modest 33 percent reduction in carriers per route, the predicted cost savings are between 9-18 percent of variable costs (Harris & Winston, p. 35, 1983). The resulting cost savings have been diverted into diversifying railway company’s portfolios through the investment of various assets. For example, The Canadian National Railway has purchased trucks and warehouses in an attempt to develop a robust business model. Instead of contracting a third party logistics provider (3PL), CN is able to use their own resources to reduce the overall cost while simultaneously allowing the company greater visibility of their supply chain.
Horizontal mergers provide additional unrealized benefits for the industry and shippers. Horizontal mergers involve the merger of parallel railroads serving the same markets, thereby reducing the number of routes in a market (Harris & Winston, 1983). Horizontal mergers enable railroads to consolidate train traffic and make better use of equipment. For instance, companies can avoid congestion on routes by rerouting traffic, reducing car-miles by choosing the shortest routes and dedicating routes to specialized services (Harris & Winston, p. 35, 1983). With shipment costs and total transit time decreasing consumer satisfaction is flourishing. Improved railroad service has enabled railroads to increase total market share. Since reaching a postwar low in the mid-1980s, carloads have grown from 19.5 million in 1985 to 27.9 million in 2002 (Winston, 2005). Overall deregulation of the railroad industry allowed the sector to improve efficiency which has resulted in an estimated $2-$3.3 billion in cost savings (Winston, 2005).
The resulting cost savings have been allocated to advancements in technology in order to better manage the supply chain. The advent of new technologies within the railway sector has created efficiency and optimization within the supply chain. Extensive development in computer information systems now permits precise tracking of shipments and routing of cargo (Winston, p. 9, 2005). In addition, video cameras that were once placed in rail yards to monitor freight cars have been replaced with electronic scanners that automatically record each car’s arrival (Winston, p. 9, 2005). The most notable development in the railway sector is containerization and double stacking measures which permits trains to carry the equivalent of 280 tractor trailer trucks (Winston, 2005). In an attempt to improve safety conditions the railway sector has employed Positive Train Control Technology (PTC) technology. The Congressional Research Service has designed PTC which aims at minimizing the potential accidents through errors made by train operators and dispatchers (Price, 2006). The train receives information about its location and its surroundings using GPS systems and subsequently transmits this information to the operator presenting the safest way to travel (Price, 2006). Equipment on board the train enforces safe maneuvers by preventing perceived unsafe movement of the train (Price, 2006). The technology has resulted in in the reduction of rail worker injuries and accidents resulting from separations and collisions (Price, 2006).
The unrealized market potentials of the railway sector are inhibiting the industry’s ability to dominant the market. The rail industry has additional opportunity to swallow up a larger portion of the market share through the movement of short hauls. There is a common misperception in the transport industry that trucks are more efficient than rail for low-density short hauls. This generalization does not take into account shipment size and the congestion of roadway traffic. The dissolution of this misguided perception provides an opportunity for rail to secure a previously untapped market. According to Erikson (2001), truck is superior for low-density moves, but rail is superior for short hauls where density (lot size and complementary volume) is sufficient (p.1). The urban movement of freight between short distances is a market that has yet to be exploited by freight. Urban areas can easily satisfy the movement of rail freight where the lot size only has to house a small amount of railcars. Erickson (2011) argues that there should be a niche market for lower-purchase-price, lower-capacity rail equipment such as the bygone 40-foot boxcar of 3,700-cubic-foot capacity. There is a large portion of the $300 billion worth of ground transportation now moving in truckload volumes to and from urban areas which can be supported by rail through minimum right-of-way maintenance and daily switching service. (p. 2).
Currently rail is accepting the perceived superiority of trucks for short hauls and is submissively backing away from this opportunistic market that would further secure the future viability of rail. The substitution of rail freight for trucks would create a remarkable transformation of the urban landscape, where private enterprises would be paying for the maintenance of congestion-free freight access and where roadways are less congested resulting in the reduction of traffic accidents (Armstrong & Preston, 2011). According to data from the U.S. Department of Transportation (2011), 140,215,987,089 fatal and non-fatal tractor-trailer accidents occur every year, which causes approximately 89,000 injuries and 5,000 fatalities throughout the country. Reducing the number of tractor-trailer vehicles on the road should be a primary goal of politicians and environmentalists as these vehicles are threatening the health and safety of US citizens in terms minimizing the potential risk of traffic accidents and reducing carbon dioxide emissions. Additionally, the overabundance of tractor-trailers is eroding the conditions and usability of roadways. A Federal Highway Administration study estimated that 60 percent of urban interstate paving is in "fair" condition and $43 billion is needed within a 10 year span just to maintain these poor conditions (Erikson, p. 7, 2011). Rail provides a viable alternative to trucks and is economically, environmentally and logistically a superior mode of transportation for a variety of parties (i.e. shippers, politicians, government officials, environmentalists, urban planners).
The growth in international trade has driven up the demand for national shipments coming from ocean ports to distribution centres located across the United States. The resulting growth in national shipments is creating a market which is best served by rail. The trucking industry is restricted by rising fuel costs, capacity of tractor-trailers and traffic congestion which is stunting the potential growth of this industry. Rail has the capacity, cost savings and decreased transit time to fulfill the needs of this growing market. Particularly in the area of cost, rail provides astronomical economic benefits to shippers in comparison to truck. For example, for containerized shipments it costs about $1,500 to move a 40 foot container from the West Coast to Chicago by rail, while the same shipment costs $3,000 by truck (Rodrigue, p. 235, 2008). National haul lengths have risen by 24 percent (775 km) for the trucking industry and 18.7 (1380 km) percent for rail between 1990 and 2003 (Rodrigue, p. 235, 2008). The trucking industry cannot feasibly accommodate anymore growth in haul length due to additional labor demands, energy and labor costs and empty backhauls these distances create (Rodrigue, p. 235, 2008). Over 25 percent of freight is carried over distances of more than 640 km which accounts for approximately 130 million loads per year (Rodrigue, 2008). Page Siplon, executive director of the Georgia Center of Innovation for Logistic stated that, “U.S. companies are expected to create more than 115,000 truck driver jobs per year by 2016, but the number of Americans getting trained to fill those jobs each year is barely 10 percent of the total demand” (Bynum, p. 4, 2012). While the trucking industry is looking rather dismal, this could in turn advocate more business toward the railroad sector. The opportunities for rail in the future to absorb the majority of shipments and steal market share from the trucking industry are immense.
The longer and more complex global and national supply chains demand efficiency and organization. Gateways which provide exchanges between maritime shipments and domestic shipments are overflowing as the demand for out-sourcing sores. The large volume of containerized traffic handled at gateways is creating capacity constraints which the trucking industry cannot efficiently manage. In an attempt to cope with incoming volumes of containerized shipments, distributors send in additional trucks which only further compounds the problem, as increased traffic congestion creates delays and disorganization. As the expansion of the Panama Canal is underway, trucks cannot be expected to efficiently serve the increased volume of shipments this construction expects to generate for the Eastern seaboard. The expansion of the canal, according to Mark DePaul means, “a greater business opportunity for rail by creating more activities in the supply chain by using the existing infrastructure of rail to service more customers” (DePaul, 2013). The Panama Canal expansion is not only predicted to bring in larger volumes of containerized shipments, but larger capacity shipments. As bottleneck traffic jams are delaying loading processes and creating disorganization, the only suitable remedy to handle the increased capacity and volume of containers is trains. The logistics of rail is logically superior, as it is possible to fit three 53 foot tractor trailers into an 86 rail box car (Erickson, 2011). With double stacking measures employed, one train can carry the equivalent of 280 tractor trailer trucks (Erickson, 2011). This only further proves that inland distribution is best served at ports by intermodal rail, as this transportation method is immune to capacity constraints and truck congestion. Intermodal rail simplifies the supply chain, has the potential to speed up transit time and allows for a greater capacity of goods to be shipped, thereby reducing overall costs to shippers. However, intermodal rail freight demands rigorous optimization in order to remain the superior transport choice. Rolling stock companies need to effectively manage their supply chain (including maintenance crews, drivers and trains) in an attempt to shatter the misperceptions regarding trains unreliability and timeliness.
A major opportunity for North American rail is available through the investment into high-speed technologies. For the past 30 years the European nations have heavily invested in high-speed rail (i.e. trains reaching speeds of 150 mph) and the result has given rise to an economically stable and profitable industry. High-speed railroads have become the backbone of European society, as they are responsible for transporting 397.8 billion passengers per kilometre, compared to the United States measly 17.2 billion passengers (Vassallo & Fagan, 2007). The difference in passenger rail is no doubt accredited to technologically advanced infrastructure of European rail which creates a logistically effortless movement of passengers and freight. The lack of maintenance on US railways remains a major cause for concern, as the current infrastructure was graded with a C- (Dovell, 2012). This grade signifies that $200 billion in investment is required by 2035 in order to satisfy projected future demands of rail (Dovell, 2012). Mark DePaul (2013) attested to the poor safety and track conditions present within the industry and stated that safety is key issue which requires attention. The venture towards updating the existing infrastructure of US rail, in addition to placing electrically-powered high speed cars on the track will not only drastically reduce the nation’s oil dependency, but it would also generate previously unimaginable profits. The increased transit time of rail is the industry’s primary obstacle to growth, as it prohibits the shipment of perishable goods. High-speed rail can easily accommodate the low transit time required for perishable goods which opens up the rail industry to a previously unattainable market. California’s Caltrain recognizes the potential benefits of this endeavour, as the company is looking to invest $750 million on a new rail corridor that could reach speeds of 200 mph between San Francisco and San Jose (Geoghegan, 2011). This system is expected to cut Caltrain's operating costs in half and reduce greenhouse gas emissions by more than 90 percent (Geoghegan, 2011).
Additional opportunities for advancement are available to the US through an analysis of Chinese rail. The Maglev is a Chinese railroad system within Shanghai that operates using electronic magnets that hover above the track. The magnetic levitation of railcars allows trains to reach staggering speeds of up to 268 mph (Geoghegan, 2011). This operating system creates an immense strategic advantage for the rail sector, as this type of technology is not dependent on fossil fuels. NBC news reported that the $4.4 billion dollar railway system will cut travel time from Shanghai to Hangzhou down to 30 minutes, a trip which previously could take up to two hours (Maglev, 2006). The Maglev highlights that the opportunities for United States rail to advance are never-ending and that the industry has immense unrealized potential. However, the current weaknesses of the United States rail industry are proving to be a major hindrance for growth. The barriers to entry are virtually insurmountable obstacles, as the capital expenditure that is required to properly maintain and operate rail is enormous. On average, 18 percent of total revenue is accredited to capital expenditures which are needed to fund rising property taxes, over compensated workers and constant maintenance on tracks (Rodrigue, 2008). Rodrigue (2008) argues that the rail sector is prone to risks and many potential investors are unwilling to commit capital for infrastructure projects since potential returns are uncertain and may benefit one mode more than the other (p. 7). Fortunately, savvy investors like Warren Buffet exist who are seeking opportune investments. Warren Buffet understands the unrealized potential of the railway industry and has recently purchased the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) for $26 billion (Wile, 2013). Following the transaction, BNSF claims that the company will boost crude-oil shipments by 40 percent this year (an increase of 700,000 barrels per day) in an effort to combat the lost sales on coal haulage (Wile, 2013).
The recent drop in cold temperatures during the winter has negatively impacted the consumption of coal. With 43.3 percent of rail tonnage attributed to the shipment of coal totaling 24.7 percent of revenue, the industry has taken a major blow (Wile, 2013). According to the Association for American Railroads, the decline in coal shipments between 2008 to 2011 is over 80 million tons (Association of American Railroads, 2012). The railways industry’s dependence on coal to generate a significant portion of their revenues is economically risky and makes the industry extremely vulnerable. A higher level of coordination with other commodities within the supply chain will generate greater volume in shipments thereby securing stability, which will in turn reduce the need for capital costs and financial returns will improved. The reduction in risks and improved financial returns will lead to attraction of more investors and hopefully produce the resurgence and importance of rail. The potential for rail to improve overall environmental conditions and optimize the logistics of national supply chains is all too often overlooked. As public demands for social corporate responsibility grow so too will the market share of railroads. The foreseeable future holds a bright outlook for the rail sector, as it has the potential to become the dominant mode of transport for freight shipments. The railway industry’s comparatively low rates, capacity volumes and low environmental burden make it an increasingly attractive transport method. However, railroads still have a long “track” ahead of them to optimize service times and become fully responsive to shippers needs. Technological advancements will propel the industry’s success in the 21st century, as the current infrastructure is archaic and inefficient. The reform of the transportation and shipping industry is underway and while regulation may have caused railroads to start late out of the gate, the industry’s sustainability will propel it past its competition.

Association of American Railroads. (2012, June). Mergers Have Led to More Efficient, Lower
Cost U.S. Freight Railroads. Retrieved from:

Association of American Railroads. (2012). Railroads and Coal. Retrieved from: Ampuja, J. (2013, February). SCM Trends. MGT 641. Niagara University, Niagara Falls,
New York.

Armstrong, J. & Preston, J. (2011). Alternative Railway Futures: Growth and/or Specialisation.
Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 19, 6, pp. 1570-1579. Retrieved from:

Association of American Railroads. (2011). Association of American Railroads: Environment.
Retrieved from:

Berglund, M. (1977). Institutional Impediments to Efficiency: The Case of Rail Freight Car
Supply. Land Economics, vol. 53, 2, pp. 157-171. University of Wisconsin Press. Retrieved from:

Bynum, R. (2012). Truck Driver Jobs Hard to Fill Even in Bad Economy.
Retrieved from:

Central Intelligence Agency, (2007). Country Comparison: Railways. The World
Factbook. Retrieved from:®ionCode=noa&rank=1

Chapin, A. & Schmidt, S. (1999). Do Mergers Lead to Efficiency? Journal of Transport
Economics and Policies, vol. 33, 2, pp. 147-162. Retrieved from:

Clifford, S., & Schwartz, N. (2012). A Storm-Battered Supply Chain Threatens
Holiday Shopping. Retrieved from

CSX (2012). Environmental Leadership. Retrieved from: Daniels, W. (1924). A Forecast of the Future of American Railroads. The Quarterly Journal of
Economics. vol. 38, no. 3, pg. 361-383. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from:

Davis, E. & Wilson, W. (2003).Wages in Rail Markets: Deregulation, Mergers, and Changing
Network Characteristics. Southern Economic Journal, vol. 69, 4, pp. 865-885. Southern Economic Association. Retrieved from:

DePaul, M. (2013, March 19). Future of Freight Railway. Interview by Jessica Settlecowski
[Phone Interview]

Dobbin, F. (1994). Forging Industrial Policy: The United States, Britain and France in the
Railway Age. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from:

Dovell, E. (2012). U.S. Rail Infrastructure. Retrieved from:

Ellig, J. (2002). Railroad Deregulation and Consumer Welfare. Journal of Regulatory
Economics vol 21, issue 2, 143-167. Retrieved from:

Ellison, R. (1985) The Impact of Transportation Deregulation in the United States on Canadian-
U.S. Distribution Channels. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Sceince vol 13, issue 3, 134-145. Springer-Verlag. Retrieved from:

Erickson, T (2001). Urban Freight Economics: A New Rail Paradigm for Large Lots.
Transportation Journal 4 (3), pg. 5-15. American Society of Transportation and Logistics Inc. Retrieved from:

Geoghegan, T. (2011). Could the U.S. Crack High-Speed Rail? BBC News.Retrieved from: Harris, R. & Winston, C. (1983). The Potential Benefits of Rail Mergers: An Economic Anaylsis of the Network Effects on Service Quality. The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 65, 1, pp. 32-40. The MIT Press. Retrieved from:

Hausman, J. & Myers, S. (2002). Regulating the United States Railroads: The Effects of Sunk
Costs and Asymmetric Risk. Journal of Regulatory Economics, vol. 22, issue 3, 287-310. Retrieved From:

Hilmola, O.P., Ujvari, S., & Szekely, B. (2007). Deregulation of Railroads and Future
Development Scenarios in Europe: Analysis of the Privatisation Process Taken Place in the USA, the UK and Sweden. World Review of Intermodal Transportation Research. Interscience Publishers vol 1, no. 1, 146-169. Retrieved from:

McFarland, H. (1989). The Effects of United States Railroad Deregulation on Shippers,
Labor, and Capital. Journal of Regulatory Economics, vol. 1, issue 3, 259-270. Retrieved from: (2006). Maglev Trains Offer High Speed, Big Cost. Retrieved from: trains-offer-high-speed-big-cost/

Nealer, R., Mattews, S. & Hendrickson, C. (2012). Assessing the Energy and Greenhouse Gas
Emissions Mitigation Effectiveness of Potential US Modal Freight Policies. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, vol. 46, 3, pp. 588-601. Retrieved from:

Peters, J. C., & Frittelli , J. (2012). Positive train control (ptc): Overview and policy issues. CRS
Report for Congress. Retrieved from:

Price, J (2006). Positive Train Control Systems. Journal of Accident Investigation, vol. 2, 1, pg.
72-79. Retrieved from:

Schwarz-Miller, A. & Talley, W. (2002). Technology and Labor Relations: Railroads and Ports.
Journal of Labor Research, vol. 23, issue 4, 513-533. Springer-Verlag. Retrieved from:

Rodrigue, J. (2008). The Thurport Concept and Transmodal Rail Freight Distribution in North
America. The Journal of Transport Geography vol. 16, 4, pp. 233-246. Retrieved from:

United States Department of Transportation (2011). Commercial Motor Vehicle Facts. Federal
Motor Carrier Safety Administration. Retrieved from:

United States Department of Transportation (2011). Federal Highway Administration. Report
Identifyinf State Highway Capital Outlay and Maintenance Expenditures. Office of Highway Policy Information: Highway Finance Data Collection. Retrieved from:

Vassallo, J. & Fagan, M. (2007). Nature of Nurture: Why do Railroads Carry Greater Freight share in the United States than in Europe? Journal of Transportation vol. 34, issue 2, 177-193. Kluwer Academic Pulishers Plenum. Retrieved from:

Wile, R. (2013, January 9). Warren Buffett Bought the Right Railroad. Retrieved from: Winston, C. (2005). The Success of the Staggers Rail Act of 1980. Joint Center AEI-Brookings
Joint Center for Regulatory Studies. Retrieved from:…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay


...Case Analysis: Clark v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Company The court case was held in Montgomery, MO. The verdict was decided December 23, 1903. Mr. Clark, the plaintiff, armed himself with a big club about six feet long and said: “I very often take a club if I am after stock.” Jim Housman was in the lead, next came George, then Mr. Clark and they were on the railroad track which was on top of a fifteen foot embankment which was so steep that when you ran down the embankment the momentum of the body carried the person over the level space at the foot of the embankment and into the borrow pit. Mr. Clark was a section hand who worked for the railroad for the past four years. Part of his duties as a section hand were to clean up and take care of live animals transported by the railroad and to clean up around the tracks whenever there was a mess. On the night of the accident he was called to come help retrieve some cattle that got loose. Along with two other hands (sons of the foreman) they collected all the cattle, except one, and drove them into a pen. He was ordered, along with the others, to find and return the last steer, and then Mr. Clark and the foreman’s sons started walking to look for the steer. He said: “it was dark and not yet daylight…” when he was ordered along with the others to get the other steer. Mr. Houseman, the defendant, was called by the conductor of the train that there was an accident and some steers were loose in the area and......

Words: 1771 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay


...1.) Dave Keller is faced with two problem areas at NOGO Railroad Company that has affected the company as a whole. The reduction of current employee expenses necessary to run the day to day operation, and the improving attitude of the employees to except the necessary changes to increase productivity and the continued growth of NOGO Railroad Company. With the current operation system at NOGO Railroad Company, the threat of layoffs could be in the near future. 2.) Dave Keller doesn’t seem to be receiving any backing from management to help him solve the current problems in his department at NOGO Railroad Company. David doesn’t have the authority to make such changes. He is missing the motivational force of his manager and the company owner to implement these changes. The current issue he is faced with has been ongoing and has not been handled by the previous manager. Currently at NOGO Railroad Company low morale has also been an issue. Most employees don’t feel that have to do extra work, so other employees are overworked. 3.) What needs to change is reduce crushing employee expenses, and improve the attitude of employees to accept necessary changes. 4.) I would start with training and development programs: adequate training must be provided to all the employees to ensure that there is smooth functioning of operations. Human resource planning and forecasting: HR planning will ensure that right number of people are available in the organization at the right......

Words: 1372 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Nogo Railroad

...CASE NO. 1 NOGO RAILROAD NOGO RAILROAD CASE ANALYSIS FORM I. PROBLEM Dave Keller, the new Communications Manager, has seek for external perspective on how to address the challenges in Nogo Railroad. After hearing the facts from Dave, we have identified the problem is “How will Nogo Railroad effectively address its employees’ concerns that will bring about a reduction in labor expense?” There are Macro and Micro Level problems to be considered. When these are effectively addressed, Nogo Railroad may be able to resolve problem mentioned earlier. A. MACRO 1. Innovation and Modernization. The company lacks the desire to innovate and modernize operations which tolerated inefficient and ineffective processes or practices. It is not a surprise to see Nepotism and Featherbedding. 2. Union Contracts. Poor negotiation of union contracts has left the company with liabilities. Changing the job description to make it relevant to times, is a restricted/limited by these outdated contracts. 3. Culture towards change. Resistance to change is not only prevalent in its employees. This also transcends in management (see problem#1). The leaders should embrace change and support its employees affected by the change. B. MICRO 1. Personal Doubts. The apprehension felt by Dave Keller needs to be address. His concerns towards his promotion and purpose should be resolved by Allan Yates. The new Communications Manager will only be effective if......

Words: 1029 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

The No-Go Railroad

...Morale problems are imminent due to acceptance of change, featherbedding and reduction in expenses | |Technical: removal and combination of jobs may lead to covert and organized work slowdown. In addition, clerks are not currently allowed to travel | |more than 30 miles to work so there are too many clerks for the available work | |Managerial: Dave’s new responsibilities include negotiations with 2 unionized parties as well as eliminate obsolete practices and modernize the | |railroad against opposition internally – all job descriptors that Dave has little experience of. Dave must also reduce these employee’s expenses. | |Overall Goals and Values: No extra responsibilities accepted by employees, resistance to change and lack of good communication all negate good | |future goals for the company. The company is wholly reactive not proactive. | Alternatives |Training and development – train clerks to become telegraph operators and allow them to travel in that role, allocate this new combined position a | |better salary than clerk and look for volunteers in present clerk pool | |HR Planning – especially of clerks. Better planning would ensure coverage for vacations and reduce numbers. ...

Words: 683 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Railroads and Cities

...Which cities were established due to the growth in the railroads? During the period of expanding railroads, several cities were established. As the expansion of the railroad systems increased across the country, cites close to, New York, Chicago, Baltimore, Washington and Massachusetts were some of the larger cities that were affected by the railroad. What social and economic changes transpired from the growth of the railroad and the establishment of new cities? There were several social and economic changes transpired from the expansion of the railroads and the establishment of new cities. Railroads improved business with steel, coal, wood, glass, rubber, and brass, which enhanced the economy with economic growth (Davidson, 2006). The industrial system which helped to expand economic growth, as a result more people were able to settle farther West, traveling by train. Freight was also transported by train, bringing mail and other things to further parts of the country. How were the social and economic changes significant to growth in the United States? All the changes brought by the growth of the railroads, improved the U.S. extensively bringing new resources across the country when until that time was nearly impossible. People were able to set up communities in areas were it was hard to transport to, correspond easily, and grow socially due to the expansion of the Railroads across the country. Railroads led the way to the country to grow in a variety......

Words: 276 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Nogo Railroad

...CRANEFIELD COLLEGE OF PROJECT AND PROGRAMME MANAGEMENT INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT MODULE 2 CASE: “The NoGo Railroad” DECLARATION “I hereby declare that this assignment is entirely my own work, and that it has not previously been submitted to any other Higher Education Institution. I also declare that all published and unpublished sources have been fully acknowledged and properly referenced. This includes figures, tables and exhibits. Where modified by me, this has also been indicated.” CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2. FINDINGS 3.1. About Dave Keller 3.2. The Temporary Position Issue 3.3. The Company Mission/Vision or Core Value 3.4. Outcomes, KPI’s and Goals 3.5. The Project Budget and Time Constraint 3.6. The Authority, Accountability and Responsibility Issue 3.7. Bound by Contract 3.8. Old Practises 3.9. Upskilling 3.10. The Human Resource Dilemma 3.11. The Morale Issue 3.12. Featherbedding and Nepotism 3.13. Top Management Support 3.14. The Transformation 3. RECOMMENDATIONS 4.15. About Dave Keller 4.16. The Temporary Position Issue 4.17. The Company Mission/Vision or Core Value 4.18. Outcomes, KPI’s and Goals 4.19. The Project Budget and Time Constraint 4.20. The Authority, Accountability and Responsibility Issue 4.21. Bound by Contract 4.22. Old Practises 4.23. Upskilling ......

Words: 5997 - Pages: 24

Premium Essay

The Undergound Railroad

...Writing 231 Ms. Fleres 11/23/09 The Underground Railroad For the better part of their lives, slaves lived under constant threat of whip administered by rough overseers and their masters, who punished them at the slightest offence. An attempt to disobey the whip sometimes could lead to death. These, combined with more than thirteen hours of intense labor every day under scorching sun are some of the reasons as to why the slaves, so badly needed to escape in search of freedom and a better life. Methods of escape were as many and as ingenious as the thousands of slaves who had already made up their minds and decided that it was time to move on and look for freedom. Before slaves escaped, they needed to ensure that they had enough supplies food, water, and clothes because the journey up north was long and tough (Borderwich 25). An escape needed thorough planning with outside contacts on how and when one would leave the compound and what their first destination would be. This would ensure that the slave would arrive in time at the next destination where he or she would meet the people who would help him or her to move on from there. Most runaway slaves escaped from plantations by foot, carefully choosing the ‘safest’ paths that would deliver them to the next point, from which they would now join their helpers (Borderwich 27). The plantations were vast and finding a way out to a safer place was no easy task. Escape from the plantations needed to be done at a...

Words: 3190 - Pages: 13

Free Essay

Railroad Classification Yard

...Railroad Classification Yard Guylee Washington Coastal Pines College February 25, 2015 Railroad Classification Yard Do you know what a railroad classification yard consist of? In railroad freight transportation, shipments are consolidated to benefit from economies of scale. Railroad classification yards, also called shunting yards, play an important role as consolidation nodes in rail freight networks. At classification yards, inbound trains are disassembled and the railcars are sorted blocks. Through this procedure, railcars can be routed through the network in a series of blocks moving on trains in such a way that every destination pair can be served while avoiding a large number of end-to-end connections. Due to the complexity of terminal operations, computer simulation offers a flexible and credible technique to identify more opportunities for yard performance improvements. However, the use of simulation technique to model terminal operations is not a common practice in freight railroads. Throughout this report I will be explaining key factors that depicts the typical operations in a railroad hump yard and performance measurements that are used to gauge the efficiency of yard operations. In North America, railroad classification yards are classified into two main types: hump yards and flat yards. Did you know that “More than half of the hump yards in North America have closed in the past 25 years? From 152 operating classification yards in 1975, the number......

Words: 1223 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Nogo Railroad

...Overview This case explains the problems NOGO RAILROAD faced when they tried to implement organizational change to increase their efficiency and stay afloat in their economy. Problems Macro: 1. One of the major issues NOGO faced was that workers did not accept the changes the organization was trying to implement on them. For example, assigning additional duties to workers so that they may not sit idle most of the time. 2. Another issue they faced was the financial cost of paying so many workers, even though most of them didn’t work at all. In other word there was an overabundance of clerks without enough work to keep them all busy. Micro: 1. The clerks were mostly women and their contract stated that they could not be sent for more than 30 miles away from home for assignments. In rural districts, this led to having a large of clerks who could not cover for vacations and emergencies. 2. The telegraph operators could be sent anywhere, but could only replace telegraph operators. Clerks could only replace other clerks. It was not uncommon during major derailments for telegraph operators to be hundreds of miles from their home, on overtime, living on expenses paid by the railroad, yet working next to clerks having nothing to do. Causes 1. The morale problem had been created by a recruitment process which traditionally favored the hiring of relatives, nepotism. Resistance to change this was high, especially when the cooperation could result in loss of employment for one......

Words: 684 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Railroads, Industrial Revolution

...Impact of the Railroad: Portugal vs. Europe Cullen Jones Econ 30423 Dr. Lovett December 3, 2013 Railroads first came around in the early 19th century. It is common knowledge that the railroad helped the economy and the people living in that time; but to what extent? This paper will examine the railroad in greater detail to determine how revolutionary the invention actually was. An intricate railway system helped make shipping more economical as well as changed population habits. Sources indicate that these changes could have affected the economy of a country. The railroad became prominent in different countries at different rates and at different times. This paper will also discuss this and try to find any repercussions of a delayed start to the widespread use of the rail road. There is some evidence to support that the railroad affected a countries current economic standing. A primary country that will be observed is Portugal. The statistics and information on Portugal is relevant to what is being discussed. Portugal will be compared to countries like the United Kingdom and Spain to see how each was affected by the railroad. There are a significant amount of difference between the railroad, including how they took on the process of building a system and how that affected the country as a whole. Economic Impact of the Railroad: Portugal vs. Europe Cullen Jones Railroads first came around in the early 19th century. It is common knowledge that the railroad......

Words: 4794 - Pages: 20

Premium Essay

Nogo Railroad

...Cronbach’s alpha test for reliability. Then, the descriptive statistics for work stress, self-leadership and locus of control will be given. Then, the research hypothesis and questions will be answered. Chapter 8 will be a presentation of conclusions made and recommendations, advanced with reference to the study. The chapter will begin with a summarized version of the literature review earlier discussed. Then, there will be a discourse on the research methodology, selection of respondents, and data gathering methods. Moreover, explanations on the results obtained will be discussed, and a summary provided. This will be followed by the value of the study, some limitations of the study, as well as possible recommendations for future studies. 1.8 SUMMARY The primary focus of this section was to introduce work stress and explain why it is a prominent issue in the workplace. The chapter also sort to explain why self-leadership and locus of control were chosen as variables which could alleviate work stress. This was followed by the problem statement which explained why work stress is a problem among managers. Then, the research questions, objectives, and hypothesis were stated. Lastly, the methodology, rationale for the study, and an outline of the study were provided. [14] CHAPTER TWO WORK STRESS 2.1 INTRODUCTION Stress is a multi-dimensional construct which can be perceived from various perspectives. Stress originates from the Latin word......

Words: 58744 - Pages: 235

Free Essay

B&O Railroad

...The B&O Railroad By: Jaime Lewis For: Professor Knutson November 26, 2013 CON 101 Abstract The construction of the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad started in July of 1828. The city of Baltimore came up with the idea to build this railroad from Baltimore to Ohio because of the competition throughout the popular seaports in the United States. Baltimore was already a popular city, but adding a train that could carry people as well as goods would make more people travel to Baltimore, and other places along the train’s route, bring goods into Baltimore, and help keep Baltimore alive. The B&O railroad was always expanding. The railroad is best known for being the first railroad in the United States that used a steam locomotive. B&O Railroad Why was there a need for the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad? The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad was built due to competition throughout the main seaports in the United States. Due to the fact that Baltimore is at the top of the Chesapeake Bay, it had many advantages over other ports. Another way for goods to be transported from Baltimore all they way to Ohio was a great idea for Baltimore, therefore causing the plan for the B&O Railroad. During this time Baltimore was flooding with business. They constantly had ships coming into the harbor as well as trucks riding the highways. Baltimore was (and still is) such a popular and thriving city, so the railroad made sense to help keep business, and the city, alive. Baltimore had......

Words: 2781 - Pages: 12

Free Essay

Transcontinential Railroad

...The Transcontinental Railroad was the first railroad that spanned the nation from east to west. The railroad was comprised of the Central Pacific and the Union Pacific railroad companies. Together these two railroads were able to bring the nation together, and the railroads contributed to the economic success of a growing nation. In 1839, the Corps of Topographical Engineers was created as a unit of the United States Army.[1] The purpose of this branch was to explore the continent with the hope of achieving the concept of manifest destiny. In 1853, Congress sent out a group of people to explore the west and to find a suitable route for a transcontinental railroad. However, there were other groups that went out on private expeditions. One of the members of this group was John C. Fremont, who made five major expeditions into the west.[2] Once California became a state in 1850, the government wanted to ensure that California did not break away from the Union.[3] One way to ensure this was to build a transcontinental railroad to provide transportation and communication between the eastern and western states. Since an effective route for the railroad had not been officially decided Congress appointed this job to Jefferson Davis, who was the Secretary of War, on March 3, 1853. Congress gave Davis the task of finding the potential route along four different lines of latitude. The people involved in the expeditions faced many problems including Indian attacks, long......

Words: 3279 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

Railroad Systems

...After the establishment of the Railroad System and the expansion of big business, the role of business and its’ influence became the central debate among the influential thinkers of that time. Charles Darwin’s The Origin of Species (1859), just 40 years prior advocated that let nature run its’ course and whoever survives is the better organism. This same thinking was advocated in big business; where even the European concept of governmental noninterference suggested that, let the workings of the economy take its own course. Professor Francis Bowen of Harvard wrote this same sentiment in his American Political Economy (1870).1 Concepts such as, “let the buyer beware,” and “you cannot wet-nurse people from the time they are born until the time they die.”2 These were actually recipes of disaster to come because big business was in full control of the workers. Adam Smith, the famous economist’s Wealth of Nations (1776) referenced this very notion as well, cloaked behind the “invisible hand” concept, where he explained why free competition among businesses advanced the common good of the people as a whole.3 These sentiments of the time met strong intellectual opposition in the pens of influentials like Henry George (1879), and Edward Bellamy (1888). Henry George was a California journalist, who wrote Progress and Poverty, in direct opposition to how the wealth was unevenly distributed.4 George suggested that we should tax property owners who are sitting idly and collecting......

Words: 293 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Csx Railroad

...class 1 railroads operating in the United States. The railroad industry doesn’t compete in a real free market. They tend to be somewhat monopolistic due to their size and scope, and for this reason they are regulated by the government. But as with any other business, the state of the economy is a factor on their profitability. With a continuingly slow economy the railroad services will remain lower in demand than CSX would like. As with mostly all of the other transportation services, the cost of fuel is a major contributing factor towards CSX’s bottom line. CSX and much of the railroad industry have implemented and continue to implement new technology to help keep their costs down, which allows them to be more competitive. According to the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, freight moved on trains would cost shippers an additional $70 billion on standard trucks.  Fuel efficiency is not the only technological advancement being made in the railroad industry. As with many other businesses in the field of logistics, GPS and other wireless technologies continue to add efficiency. New technologies are being applied to increase safety. Over the last 5 years CSX has had a 40% improvement in the rate of train accidents. Being a regulated industry, railroad is at sometimes more than others, highly connected to the political environment. When the regulations are loosened, the rail industry tends to be much more profitable. The future of railroad......

Words: 458 - Pages: 2