Free Essay

Shouting

In: Business and Management

Submitted By fatimaAshour
Words 364
Pages 2
In fact, not all people who speak the English language speak it the same way. Moreover, it is very uncommon to find two people that speak the exact same English because there are many different forms of the language. This argument that Amy Tan makes in her story "Mother Tongue" written in 1990. Tan wrote about growing up in an Asian American home where English was not spoken correctly by her mother. The meaning of "mother tongue" is the first language learned at home in childhood. However, recently many researches showed the importance of correct English while speaking and how does it helps people while communicating. First of all, speaking correct English helps people while communicating. For example, if an Asian man wanted to apply for a job with a marketing major, the admiration might ask him to introduce himself and give them what he will develop in the marketing department; in fact, he must have an excellent English to introduce himself and to prove his point of development. So, speaking English correctly is important to impress and convince others in many situations. Second, learning correct English is beneficial for students for several reasons. For example, if a student in a English school or in a university with English language study, he will have troubles with studying the subjects if his English was week; Also, in this situation any student will face many problems in presentations,exams even understanding what the teachers are explaining and discussions in class. Finally, speak fluently in English will helps self-confidence. For example, many people are not fluent in English while traveling to a country that the original language is English, in this situation, they will face many problems while communicating with others in malls, hospitals, hotels and even in the streets. So with good English any one can deliver any idea in mind to others. In conclusion, learning English correctly is important for several reasons. First of all, speaking correct English helps people while communicating with others.second, learning correct English is beneficial for students because it helps them to get high levels in there academic courses. Finally, speak fluently in English will helps self-confidence.…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Shouting Fire!!

...Reading Summary/Critique “Shouting Fire!” Summary Alan M. Dershowitz talks about a law against shouting fire in a theater in his essay “Shouting Fire!” He discusses how people in America are protected by the First Amendment. He explains how he thinks, along with many Americans, that it isn’t right. Dershowitz uses an example of a person who shouts FIRE in a crowded movie theater when there is obviously no fire. He says how the saying is misused for example the case Falwell vs. Hustler. Dershowitz says Jerry Falwell won a lawsuit against Hustler Magazine but the Supreme Court overturned it in the end. He also explains how he feels about the use of bomb threats and pulling fire alarms. He brings up a couple different examples to show us his view on freedom of speech and how the First Amendment doesn’t actually cover the right of someone wrongly using “Fire” and that is should not cover someone who makes an offensive statement that is not true. Dershowitz ends with telling us he feels the government should withhold and speech that is about nuclear weapons, military movements or undercover agents. Logos, Ethos, Pathos. Dershowitz uses logos by using facts of real court lawsuits and judgments. Examples such as Falwell vs. Hustler and Schenck vs. United States. Ethos was also used because he gives us his on research and is a reliable source as a writer. Evidence and Counterargument. I feel like Dershowitz uses great evidence and does a great job proving his points. I......

Words: 271 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Business Admin

...------------------------------------------------- Answer: The answer to the question. ------------------------------------------------- URL(s): Addresses where you found the answers ------------------------------------------------- Engine/Site(s): The search engines (if any) you used. ------------------------------------------------- Keyword(s): Any keywords you used in the search. EXAMPLE ------------------------------------------------- 10. ------------------------------------------------- Answer: TYPING AN ENTIRE SENTENCE IN ALL CAPITAL LETTERS is considered SHOUTING. It is bad netiquette to TYPE IN ALL CAPS, especially in e-mail. ------------------------------------------------- URL(s): http://www.netlingo.com/lookup.cfm?term=SHOUTING ------------------------------------------------- Engine/Site(s): Google ------------------------------------------------- Keyword(s): shouting internet 1. Find three anti-spyware programs that could be used on a PC. 2. Find at least two websites that can perform a “speed test” on your internet connection. Run the tests. Are the reported speeds the same for both sites? Is your connection speed about what you thought it should be? 3. Using an ASCII Table online, what is the decimal code for the character “A”? 4. Inputting drawings into a computer might best be accomplished using a “graphics tablet.” Before buying a tablet, though, you should investigate them. After finding and reading articles about......

Words: 792 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Road Rage

...Road rage is fairly well known to the most of us, either through direct experience or news reports. According to epidemiological data, about one-third of citizens admit to committing road rage at one time or another. While most of these incidents involve shouting and gesturing at other drivers, a small minority of encounters escalate to direct and damaging contact. Offenders are most often young and male. Factors of road rage may include various environmental factors, psychological factors, and Axis I and II psychiatric disorders. Road rage encompasses a variety of aggressive behaviors by the driver of a motor vehicle, which seem well beyond the perceived offence committed by the victim. These behaviors range from shouting, screaming, and yelling at another driver to using a weapon, including the vehicle, to incite damage to the victim or the victim’s vehicle. While road rage is an intuitively recognized phenomenon for most of us, for research purposes, a consistent definition of the term seems to be lacking. As a working definition for this paper, road rage may be described as a constellation of thoughts, emotions, and behaviors that occur in response to a perceived unjustified provocation while driving. Road rage may also be defined as those driving behaviors that endanger or potentially endanger others and are accompanied by intentional acts of aggression towards others, negative emotions while driving, and risk-taking. Interestingly, one author has said that road rage......

Words: 602 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Intentional Torts

...Intentional Tort of Defense Introduction to Tort June 7, 2012 Facts On a Saturday night there were an incident between two males and a female in a bar called Bottom’s Up. A man name John had too much to drink and was intoxicated. He was shouting obscenities toward a lady name Jane that was sitting at a table next to another guy name Leroy, which he was a frequent customer. However, Jane ignored John and continued to drink her beer. When she ignored him than he approached her looking disturbed. Leroy asked John over to the bar for a drink, but John told him to mind his own business. John grabbed Jane’s wrist and when he did Leroy grabbed John’s wrist and put him in a neck hold. John was protesting Leroy to let go of him, but Leroy did not let go. Leroy placed John in a chair and told him not to make a move or he will punch him. After the incident happen Jane told Leroy that John was her husband. Issue 1) Why was Leroy taking upon his self to defend Jane, even though she was a complete stranger? 2) Why did Leroy even put his hands on John, especially if John didn’t touch him? 3) In what ways did assault, battery and false imprisonment come into play in this case? Rules In this case it is considered defense of persons in which is a legal justification for assault, battery and false imprisonment. Assault is someone that intentionally puts another in fear and battery is when someone using force against another person. False imprisonment is someone that is......

Words: 702 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

In Re John V. Jane

...In re John v. Jane Daniel L. Brown Kaplan University PA 165 Professor Dean July 18, 2013 In re John v. Jane FACTS Leroy McPhillen frequented a pub called Bottom's Up! Late one Saturday night, an intoxicated man named John began shouting obscenities at a woman sitting at the table next to Leroy's. The woman, Jane, ignored the man and continued to drink her beer. John approached Jane, looking ominous. Answer this criminal threatening is the crime of intentionally or knowingly putting another person in fear of imminent bodily injury. Leroy stood and asked the fellow over to the bar for a drink. John grumbled that Leroy should mind his own business. John reached out and grabbed Jane's wrist, and Leroy neatly twisted John's other arm behind his back while restraining him with a neck hold. John protested vehemently, but Leroy did not let go. Leroy placed John firmly into a chair and told him not to move, or else Leroy would have to punch him. That’s when Jane told Leroy that the man was her husband. ISSUES 1. Whether John willfully and intentionally committed a crime is a question? 2. Whether shouting obscenities at someone is a crime? 3. Whether approaching someone ominously is a crime? 4. Whether grabbing someone’s wrist and limiting their movement is a crime? 5. Whether or not if Leroy committed a crime by twisting John’s arm was a crime? 6. And holding in a neck hold was a crime? 7. Whether when Leroy placed John firmly into a chair......

Words: 427 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Case Study

... Case Study: PSYMHNP Specialty Daniel Reyes CSULB Advance Pharmacology NSG 520 Dr. Kathryn Deitch December 14, 2013 Case Study: PSYMHNP Specialty Scenario #6 R.S., a 30 y/o obese male, was brought to the ER after he was found walking on the freeway, shouting obscenities at the oncoming traffic. He states, “Leave me alone, I am the perfect physical specimen.” R.S. is a graduate student and has been under treatment for Bipolar D/o for the past 6 years with good results until several weeks ago. His roommate reports that he has been “up all night” for the past few days and has a “hairbraned scheme to win the Nobel Prize.” R.S.’ mother suffers from chronic depression. R.S. admits to drinking 5-6 beers daily. Meds: Lithium Carbonate 600mg TID and Imipramine 50mg TID Allergies: Sulfa drugs Physical Examination: GEN: Obese, well-developed, well-nourished male who appears hostile and agitated. V.S.: B/P – 140/90, HR – 95, RR – 20, T – 100.4 F, Wt. – 100kg (220lb.) HEENT: PERRLA; HEART: RRR; CHEST: clear to A & P ABD: soft, non-tender, non-distended; GU: WNL; RECT: no masses, guaiac negative EXT: WNL; NEURO: CNS intact, no focal findings Lab: Na – 137; K – 3.4; Cl – 100; HCO3 – 26; Cr – 1.0; LDH – 150; Hct – 42; Alk. Phos – 1.67; Hbg – 15; Glucose – 120; AST – 60; Cholesterol – 300; BUN – 20; ALT – 80; Hgb A1C – 7.9 CBC morphology & differential, UA, CXR, ECG: all WNL Total Cholesterol (4 months ago): 290 Lithium level: 0.5 Imipramine level: pending 1. Develop a......

Words: 869 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Shooting Fire

...Shouting "Fire!" by Alan M. Dershowitz ..... hen the Reverend Jerry Falwell learned that the Supreme Court had reversed his $200,000 judgment against Hustler magazine for the emotional distress that he had suffered from an outrageous parody, his response was typical of those who seek to censor speech: "Just as no person may scream 'Fire!' in a crowded theater when there is no fire, and find cover under the First Amendment, likewise, no sleazy merchant like Larry Flynt should be able to use the First Amendment as an excuse for maliciously and dishonestly attacking public figures, as he has so often done." Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes's classic example of unprotected speech—falsely shouting "Fire!" in a crowded theater—has been invoked so often, by so many people, in such diverse contexts, that it has become part of our national folk language. It has even appeared—most appropriately—in the theater: in Tom Stoppard's play Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead a character shouts at the audience, "Fire!" He then quickly explains: "It's all right—I'm demonstrating the misuse of free speech." Shouting "Fire!" in the theater may well be the only jurisprudential analogy that has assumed the status of a folk argument. A prominent historian recently characterized it as "the most brilliantly persuasive expression that ever came from Holmes' pen." But in spite of its hallowed position in both the jurisprudence of the First Amendment and the arsenal of political discourse...

Words: 2139 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Discourse and Gender

...use of overly polite forms, the use of question tags, rising intonation in declaratives, the avoidance of expletives, a greater use of diminutives and euphemisms. An example of using particular items are “adorable, charming, and sweet” (woman’s language) versus “terrific, great, and cool (neutral language). According to mean’s (2001) she shows a similar example from the use of language with men’s and women’s football teams to’ do gender’ and to confirm masculine identity. She talks about sporting as a male category where values such as power and aggressiveness are highly valued. She found speed, loud talk and shouting to be ways in which these values were expressed in the male referee’s language, she also found the male referees used fast continuous talk in ways that never occurred in women’s football matches. In this extract louder talk is in italics and shouting is in capitals, (.) represents a pause of less than a second. Example: go on lads (.) keep going keep going OH keep going lads keep going lads just inside carry on (.) inside (.) keep going (.) (Whistle blown) (.) Go on play lads (.) play lads. The male referees in mean’s data also frequently referred to the male players with address term such as ‘lads’ ‘fellas’ and mates’ as a way of showing group membership and solidarity with them. No one of the female referees used address term in this way....

Words: 362 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Essay of English

...dfodffsodmf dsffsdfosdmf Some words they can’t be spoken only sung, So hear a thousand voices shouting love. There’s a place, there’s a time in this life when you sing what you are feeling, Find your feet, stand your ground, don’t you see right now the world is listening to what we say? Sing it louder, sing it clearer, knowing everyone will hear you, Make some noise, find your voice tonight. Sing it stronger, sing together, make this moment last forever, Old and young shouting love tonight. To sing we’ve had a lifetime to wait (wait, wait, wait) And see a thousand faces celebrate (together celebrate) You brought hope, you brought life, conquer fear, no it wasn’t always easy, Stood your ground, kept your faith, don’t you see right now the world is listening to what we say? Sing it louder, sing it clearer, knowing everyone will hear you, Make some noise, find your voice tonight. Sing it stronger, sing together, make this moment last forever, Old and young shouting love tonight. Some words they can’t be spoken only sung, To hear a thousand voices shouting love and life and hope. Just sing; just sing; just sing; just sing. Sing it louder, sing it clearer, knowing everyone will hear you, Make some noise, find your voice tonight. Sing it stronger, sing together, make this moment last forever, Old and young shouting love tonight. Hear a thousand voices shouting love....

Words: 263 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Shouting Fire

...Shouting "Fire!" by Alan M. Dershowitz ..... When the Reverend Jerry Falwell learned that the Supreme Court had reversed his $200,000 judgment against Hustler magazine for the emotional distress that he had suffered from an outrageous parody, his response was typical of those who seek to censor speech: "Just as no person may scream 'Fire!' in a crowded theater when there is no fire, and find cover under the First Amendment, likewise, no sleazy merchant like Larry Flynt should be able to use the First Amendment as an excuse for maliciously and dishonestly attacking public figures, as he has so often done." Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes's classic example of unprotected speech—falsely shouting "Fire!" in a crowded theater—has been invoked so often, by so many people, in such diverse contexts, that it has become part of our national folk language. It has even appeared—most appropriately—in the theater: in Tom Stoppard's play Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead a character shouts at the audience, "Fire!" He then quickly explains: "It's all right—I'm demonstrating the misuse of free speech." Shouting "Fire!" in the theater may well be the only jurisprudential analogy that has assumed the status of a folk argument. A prominent historian recently characterized it as "the most brilliantly persuasive expression that ever came from Holmes' pen." But in spite of its hallowed position in both the jurisprudence of the First Amendment and the arsenal of political discourse,......

Words: 2139 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

Story

...There was once a boy who always treated his mother horribly, shouting at her, insulting her. It didn't matter to him how sad he made her. One day, without knowing how, he woke up in an immense and lonely place. He was sitting on a rock from which four huge pillars rose up into the sky, appearing to support the entire world. He was all alone, but soon an enormous flock of crows with beaks made of steel landed on the rock, and set about violently chipping away at it. After the crows left, a mysterious door in one of the pillars opened, and through it came a charming and pretty girl. -"Have you come to help us? That's great! We need all the people we can get." The boy was puzzled, and spotting his confusion, the little girl explained. -"So you don't know where you are? This is the centre of the Earth. These pillars support the whole planet, and this rock keeps the pillars in place." -"And how can I help you?" said the boy, confused. -"Well, to help look after the rock, of course. Anyone can see by your face that you're the best person for the job," answered the girl, -"The birds you saw are only increasing in number, and if we don't look after this rock it will eventually crumble and everything will come crashing down.” -"And what do you see in my face?!" exclaimed the boy, surprised. -"I've never looked after a rock in my whole life!" -"But you'll learn how, even if you've never done it. Here, look in this mirror," said the girl, holding one in......

Words: 610 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Khalefah

...Alan M. Dershowitz talks about a law against shouting fire in a theater in his essay “Shouting Fire!” He discusses how people in America are protected by the First Amendment. He explains how he thinks, along with many Americans, that it isn’t right. Dershowitz uses an example of a person who shouts FIRE in a crowded movie theater when there is obviously no fire. He says how the saying is misused for example the case Falwell vs. Hustler. Dershowitz says Jerry Falwell won a lawsuit against Hustler Magazine but the Supreme Court overturned it in the end. He also explains how he feels about the use of bomb threats and pulling fire alarms. He brings up a couple different examples to show us his view on freedom of speech and how the First Amendment doesn’t actually cover the right of someone wrongly using “Fire” and that is should not cover someone who makes an offensive statement that is not true. Dershowitz ends with telling us he feels the government should withhold and speech that is about nuclear weapons, military movements or undercover agents. Logos, Ethos, Pathos. Dershowitz uses logos by using facts of real court lawsuits and judgments. Examples such as Falwell vs. Hustler and Schenck vs. United States. Ethos was also used because he gives us his on research and is a reliable source as a writer. Evidence and Counterargument. I feel like Dershowitz uses great evidence and does a great job proving his points. I agree that is was unfair and that people shouldn’t......

Words: 264 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Intentional Tort Paper

...obscenities at a woman sitting at a table near Leroy. Though the woman ignored the man’s shouting the man began to approach her in an aggressive manner. Mr. McPhillen stopped the man before he reached the woman’s table and invited him for a drink at the bar. The man refused, telling Mr. McPhillen that he should mind his own business, and grabbed the woman by her wrist. It was then that Mr. McPhillen twisted the man’s other arm behind his back carefully and restrained him with a neck hold. John ordered the man to release him, but Mr. McPhillen refused his request to release him. Mr. McPhillen then seated John firmly in a chair and ordered him to remain seated or he would punch him. It was after this that the woman informed Mr. McPhillen that John was her husband. ISSUE: (1) Which intentional torts were committed and (2) what are the defenses available to the tortfeasors? Short answer: John and Leroy are both guilty of committing intentional torts. However, both parties have arguable defenses. More information is needed in regards to the events that took place prior to the man assaulting the woman and the amount of time that John was confined by Mr. McPhliien. Prior to determining the appropriate statues and the defenses each party may present, each intentional tort committed must first be explained. Intentional Torts: The first intentional tort was committed by John when he began shouting at the woman, approaching her in an aggressive manner, and by grabbing......

Words: 1129 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

English Traditions

...because in the old times wool made England rich and powerful. In the House of Commons you will see two rows of benches for the two parties: the government on one side and the opposition — on the other. In front of the benches there is the strip on a carpet and when a member speaking in the House puts his foot beyond that strip, there is a shout “Order!”. This dates from the time when the members had swords on them and during the discussion might want to start fighting. The word “order” reminded them that no fighting was allowed in the House. Another old custom remains from the time when there was a lot of robbers in London. In those days the shouting “Who goes home?” was often heard in the Houses of Parliament and the members went in groups along the dark narrow streets of the old city. In modem London with its well-lit streets the shouting “Who goes home?” is still heard....

Words: 286 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Watergate Scandal

...This vision of Malcolm X, being assassinated, On the afternoon of Feb. 21, 1965, I went to the Audubon Ballroom to hear Malcolm X speak. When I got to the ballroom, things were very unusual, there were no cops. Normally, Malcolm’s meetings were crawling with cops. I took a seat, left of the stage. When Malcolm approached the podium, he gave the normal Muslim greeting for peace. At that point a disturbance occurred in the room. Two men were standing about halfway back in the room and to the right of Malcolm on stage. One was shouting, Get your hand out of my pocket. Malcolm was trying to calm things down, when the men started running down the aisle shouting and firing a pistol at Malcolm and ran out the exit doors by the stage, to the right of Malcolm X. Suddenly I heard gunshots fired from all over the place, and I hit the floor. When I looked up, I saw Malcolm X standing up and glaring down at one of his assassins. At that point, from the corner of my eye, nearby to my left, I saw a flash from a gun as I watched Malcolm X fall down and back about 10 feet. In that instant, as Malcolm died before my eyes, I suddenly realized how big he was and I realized that he was gone. The loud screams of his wife will forever haunt me. The fatal blast came from a shotgun, came from the area where I had seen the large Black man with a navy blue-gray trench coat! When I left the hall, Malcolm’s bodyguards told me that they had caught two of the assassins. I can’t prove it but I know that the...

Words: 428 - Pages: 2