Premium Essay

Should the Abolishment of Capital Punishment in the United States Should Be Applied

In: Religion Topics

Submitted By khiconxinh92
Words 1238
Pages 5
Introduction Nowadays, the death penalty debate is a heated issue in many countries, especially in the United States. The death penalty or the capital punishment is a sentence imposed by the law, which remove the legal life of the person who commit or is suspected of having committed a serious crime. The history of death penalty in the U.S is long and ruthless and the first recorded execution was in 1608. There are many kinds of death penalty which have been used in US such as shooting, electric chair, hanging, lethal injection. Some people believe that it is never ethical and justifiable to carry out the death penalty as means of punishment by the law. Nowadays, approximately 2/3 of all countries have banned the death penalty included 18 states of the United States. Most executions take place in the Southern states, according to this source, until 2008, 930 out of 1136 executions took place there, with Texas having carried out 422 (The pros and cons of the death penalty in the USA, n.d). This research will indicate whether the death penalty in the U.S should be abolished.

Body Paragraph
Reasons for the abolishment of Capital Punishment in the U.S It is possible to argue that the death penalty in the U.S should be eliminated because of inviolable human rights, unjust punishment and faint correlation between executions and crime rates. Firstly, inalienable human-rights are against the death penalty in all over the world because no one can decide who could be alive. Against Capital Punishment (n.d) argues that “everyone has a right to live and no one deserves to be tortured or subject to any cruel, degrading punishment”. Hence, sentencing a person to death and executing them violates human-rights and it might never be ethical to take away a human’s life for any reason. Secondly, sometimes innocent people could get killed because of mistakes in the…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Should Capital Punishment Be Abolished?

...The Abolishment of Capital Punishment Desmond Tutu, a South African activist, once famously said, "To take a life when a life has been lost is revenge, not justice." I cannot emphasize enough how much I concur with his statement, and how much I feel against the death sentence. After all, it clearly sends out the wrong message: Why kill people who kill people to show that killing is wrong1? The use of capital punishment, frequently known as the death penalty, has extended to the beginning of recorded history. Used by nearly all societies, it has served as a punishment for the most heinous of crimes; ranging from murder to rape, from treason to espionage and even corruption2(Yes, in China!). Through the years, capital punishment has evolved and there were extensive movements towards a less painful and more humane execution. However, can the use of capital punishment ever be justified? There is no doubt it has served its duty of crime deterrence(partly), but I deeply believe that it is time we walk out of the dark history of mankind and into civilisation. As a Singaporean, I am ashamed to say that capital punishment is still legal in my country. Just last year, four people were sentenced to the gallows; two for murder and the other two for drugtrafficking. Despite pressing calls from the public to abolish the death penalty, the government has repeatedly reiterated its position, saying that ‘it is only reserved for very serious crimes3.’ Until the time when capital punishment is......

Words: 1559 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

What Should the Government Do to Create Jobs in the United States?

...What should the government do to create jobs in the United States? The rate of unemployment in the U.S needs to be addressed by the federal government in order to arrive at a long term solution to the problem. Over the years, Americans have been urging the government to create new employment opportunities for the growing population. The U.S economy has indicated great recovery over the past decade but the unemployment problem is yet to be settled. The major problem is that the working population is constantly increasing but the creation of new jobs does not run parallel to it. Jobs are very scarce in the nation. This has caused the rates of unemployment to increase gradually. This paper focuses on what the U.S government can do to create jobs. An increase in government spending will definitely translate to creation of more job opportunities for the growing work force. This is mainly because as the government increases its projects across the states, it will need more people to work on the projects. The government requires a lot of labor on its projects and therefore, an increase in the government spending will create a labor deficit that will be filled in by a good number of the currently unemployed people. The government can attain this by expanding firms that will need more raw material suppliers and laborers. The initial expansion plan would also create jobs during the construction process. Building and maintenance of infrastructure can also create jobs for the people......

Words: 1190 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Should America Continue to Use Capital Punishment

...Heather Burrus GE 217 11/27/13 Project Part E Should America Continue to Use Capital Punishment? Capital punishment can have many different affects on people, depending on the circumstances at hand. No one really knows if they are for or against capital punishment until something personally happens to them or a family member which makes them see the issue in a whole different light. My own personal experience has made me look at capital punishment a completely different way. I have very mixed emotions on the death penalty; a part of me believes that if a person takes another person’s life that they should get the death penalty and than there is the other part of me that believes that the person should spend the rest of their life in prison without parole, so they can suffer the consequences of there actions. There are numerous families and loved ones of murder victims that support alternatives to the death penalty for many reasons. For instance, the death penalty process has a traumatizing experience on the families, which is often requires them to relive the pain and suffering of the death of their loved one for many years. Having life without parole provides certain punishment without the endless reopening of wounds. “There are hundreds of millions of dollars that are spent on the death penalty each year. If we were to replace the death penalty with life in prison without parole, we would save million of dollars which than could be......

Words: 985 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Capital Punishment Should Be Stopped

...another, s/he will be punished with capital punishment. This basic proposition has been accepted by most of the earlier human societies and it has not been questioned until the modern humanitarian movement has taken momentum. Capital punishment is a relevant issue for every human society and it constitutes a “dilemma of hidden human divinity versus hubristic capital punishment.” The concept of a right to life is central to debates on the issues of capital punishment, euthanasia, self defense, abortion and war. In 1948, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted by the United Nations General Assembly declared in article three: “Everyone has the right to life, liberty, and security of person.” A central principle of a just society is that every person has an equal right to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” Within that framework, an argument for capital punishment can be formulated along the following lines: some acts are so vile and so destructive of community that they invalidate the right of the perpetrator to membership and even to life. Those who violate the personhood of others, especially if this is done persistently as a habit must pay the ultimate penalty. This punishment must be inflicted for the sake of maintaining the community whose foundation has been violated. We can debate whether some non-lethal alternative is a fitting substitute for the capital punishment. But the standard of judgment is whether the punishment fits the crime and......

Words: 3503 - Pages: 15

Premium Essay

Capital Punishment Should Be Illegal

...Capital Punishment Should Be Illegal Capital Punishment Should Be Illegal Capital punishment has been legal, illegal, and as of now is legal again, under certain circumstances and depending on the location. These circumstances can vary from state to state and the federal government may also decide they have grounds to seek capital punishment, even if the crime is in a state that doesn’t allow the death penalty. With such uncertainty about whether capital punishment should be legal or illegal, it is important to take a closer look at some of the reasons why it should be illegal which include; the risk of innocent people being executed, evidence of racial bias in regards to sentencing for the death penalty, and the cost of the death penalty in comparison to the cost of life in prison without parole. In the end you will see that an eye for an eye is not the answer. Bedau set out to provide the information to show why the death penalty should be illegal. Bedau started out looking at the questions that have caused argument throughout the years in regard to the death penalty. The questions he sought to answer were: Is the death penalty more of a deterrent than imprisonment, is there racial bias when it comes to administering the death penalty, what are the risk that someone who is innocent could be prosecuted, and what is the risk that someone who is convicted of a capital offense will commit again? During Bedau’s research to determine if capital punishment is no more of a......

Words: 911 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Should the United States Government Further Regulate Drones?

...Drones are unmanned aerial vehicles. Domestic Drones are drones that are used by government agencies and commercial companies. They operate like homeland security drones and law enforcement drones. They can be highly weaponized. Within the next decade, the Federal Aviation Administration will enact a law that regulates UAVs. The government should regulate drones that are on government property and other state regulated sites. One of the main reasons for this is public safety. The uses of drones can invade private property and space. Drones are being used for law enforcement purposes, but will be regulated if the FAA enacts a law. Public safety is a major reason for the laws and regulations that the FAA makes. The FAA was established after two planes collided in mid-air, killing 128 people. “The FAA said its mission was safety” (Berry). The FAA is focusing all of their resources and time to improve safety of the aeronautics industry then why are they making the slowest decision about this. “A study by the European Aviation Safety Agency warns that if the current accident rate suffered by remotely piloted aerial systems (RPAS) – or drones – remained unchanged the spike in collision rates between drones and manned aircraft would be ‘unacceptable.’”(Turner). Europe would have a 400% increase in life threatening crashes if the accident-prone technology was allowed to operate in its airspace. If that same thing were to occur in the U.S, then the FAA would have to create laws to......

Words: 264 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Should the United States Allow More People to Immigrate Here Legally?

...Between the years of 2005-2010 6,721,3701 people were granted legal permanent residency in the United States, on top of that another 6,706,8931* people were admitted here as temporary workers or trainees. With the U.S. experiencing such a large surge in immigration many are concerned about what type of affects such an influx of immigrants will have on our economy and if should we continue to allow so many foreign born people to settle or work here? In an effort to counter these concerns some will argue that immigration actually benefits our economy and therefore we should treat immigration the same as we do international free trade and not limit it. Nevertheless, research has shown that on average when immigration levels are too high the average wage of workers is lowered. Considering the high current unemployment rate not only does this negatively affect native born Americans but also incoming immigrants, thus immigration levels should be reduced. A study done by Harvard Economist George J. Borjas shows that, “immigration lowers the wage of competing workers: a 10 percent increase in supply reduces wages by 3 to 4 percent.”2 According to Borjas this wage decrease can be primarily explained by applying the basic economic theory of supply and demand. This theory states that if the supply of a product increases and demand does not, then the price for that product must decrease as a result. This principle also holds true for labor market as well, if the amount of people able......

Words: 902 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Should the United States Have Mandatory Military Conscription?

...manage, and to defend the country from other countries. In order to defend or protect the country, the United States has to have a military, including all branches of the Army, Navy, and Air Force. The establishment of the military will be different in other countries. In some countries, they require military service or call conscriptions. In this field, there are some countries that require it; such as, Brazil, Germany, Israel, Switzerland, South Korea, Mexico, and Russia (Gill 3). However, in other countries, they just have volunteers to join in armies, including Australia, Canada, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States. In both types, supporting or attempting to disprove, try to convince the population in this country by showing facts, opinions, and also research. This essay focuses on some good reasons for having a mandatory military, and good reasons for having a volunteers. Mandatory military provides so many opinions from the opposite sides; such as, immoral, little motivation to properly serve in the armed forces, and also saving money for the country (Gilroy 20). However, the draft would increase the standards for recruitment, expand the Army to the sufficient size, provide sufficient forces to fight in the wars, and gives a chance for young people to develop their future (Yingling 15). In the beginning, conscription or popularly known in the United States as "The Draft" means compulsory enrollment of persons for military or naval service requested by......

Words: 1413 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

United States Should Stop Acting as a Policeman for Other Countries

...United States Should Stop Acting as a Policeman for Other Countries The race to become the global dominant leader has intensified over the past couple of decades. It is common practice of human nature to overpower the weaker one and show power to dominate and to exploit. The first human war dates back thousands of centuries back and ever since wars and battles have continued between different tribes, races and countries. In a nutshell we could say that almost all of the wars were fought to dominate and gain superiority over your opponents. In the 20th century a new terminology termed as “Global Leadership” has emerged onto the global scenario. This policy has been one of the most crucial yet the most secrete policy of America. Ever Since United States of America won the World War 2, the desire to control and dominate has been constantly increasing among the Americans. The question of whether the United states should act as a policeman for other countries has been long debated over the past couple of decades, On one side there are people who support the quest of Usa being given the role of the world peace maker and on the other majority are those who question; “Who is USA to control or act as a policeman for other countries?” History of wars to dominate other cultures, creeds, races and nations goes back to thousands of years. As over the centuries resources have become limited and the fight and the desire to control the world’s resource has intensified. Relations......

Words: 4602 - Pages: 19

Premium Essay

Should Canada Share Its Freshwater with the United States?

...Course: Term Paper: Taking Position on Water Issues Student Name: Student Number: Tutor: Topic: Should Canada share its freshwater with the United States? Semester 1: 2011/12 Table of Contents Introduction 3 Fresh water in Canada 4 Water in the US 5 The Ethics of water 5 Conclusion 7 References 9 Introduction The earth is a watery planet; three-quarters of earth’s surface is covered with water. And this is as it should be; the earth is the only known plant that supports life which is dependent on water. Water is found in oceans, rivers, lakes, glaciers, under-ground and in the atmosphere. (The Atlas of Canada, 2011) However 97% of the earth’s water is salty, and cannot support land based life which occupies a quarter of the earth’s surface. Therefore land based life has a disproportional amount of fresh water for its usage at only 3% compared to sea life. Water naturally occurs in three states: solid- glaciers, ice, snow; liquid - surface water, groundwater, soil moisture; groundwater and; gas- as water vapor that normally cools and drops to the ground as rain, snow or fog. Fresh water is defined as water that has less than 1000 milligrams per litre of the solids that dissolve in water. Of the worlds freshwater, about 99 % of the fresh water in the world is found in glaciers, ice-fields, or underground. This further decreases the amount of fresh water available to land based life (Environment Canada,...

Words: 1522 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Should Capital Punishment Be Reintroduced?

...Capital punishment is actively practiced in 58 countries and 35 countries have abolished it de facto. The death penalty has in the past been practiced by most societies as a punishment for murder, political or religious dissidents. Yet, since the 19th century tolerance and respect for life has become of great importance. In this essay I will seek to answer if capital punishment should be reintroduced. Some people say that capital punishment acts as a deterrent. Facing this punishment a murderer may think twice before committing the crime. If one takes somebody’s life he has forfeit his own right to life. However, statistics show that crime rates in countries that practice capital punishment have not gone down. In fact, the United Stated murder rate is 6 times bigger than that of Britain or Australia. Neither country has the death penalty. Texas and Oklahoma have historically executed the most number of inmates who were sentenced to death, though in 2003 their murder rate was higher than the national average. ”I have never heard a murderer say they thought about the death penalty as consequence of their actions prior to committing their crimes” says Gregory Ruff, police lieutenant in Kansas. The life imprisonment, for some anti-death penalty activists, would be the best way to deter crime. On the other hand, assaults in prisons all over the US have more than doubled in the past decade, according to statistics gathered by the Criminal Justice Institute in Middletown,......

Words: 696 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Should Capital Punishment Continue to Be a Part of the U.S. Justice System?

...Running head: SHOULD CAPITAL PUNISHMENT CONTINUE TO BE A PART OF THE U.S. JUSTICE SYSTEM? Should Capital Punishment Continue to be a Part of the U.S. Justice System? Siddiqui Carter Research Process Outline Paper University of Phoenix RES 341 Dr. Frank Poter January 1, 2005 Week 2 Should Capital Punishment Continue to be a Part of the U.S. Justice System? Capital punishment has long been a part of the American criminal justice system and the topic has created much debate on if this punishment is appropriate for the U. S. society. Many believe capital punishment is a necessary punishment for those who commit capital offenses and acts as a deterrent to violent criminals. Essentially, Americans that support the death penalty believe that it contributes to the overall wellbeing of U. S. society. Activists still desire to eliminate the punishment. Though, this country’s founding fathers broke away from England they did not completely disagree with everything they believed. When it came down to capital punishment, they adopted it from British common law. Even as history is reviewed, debate over capital punishment can be seen as far back as the American Revolution Debates over capital punishment continued from the Civil War until the 1960’s. During this period some states abolished and later reinstated the death penalty, but from 1968 to 1976, due to public out cry, no executions took place in the U.S. In 1972 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against the......

Words: 1563 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Capitial Punishment in the United States

...Capital punishment which is also known as the death penalty is the pre-meditated and planned taking of a human in response to a crime committed by that legally convicted person. Although the death penalty can be a bit brutal, it can be needed for certain situations. Capital punishment is for prisoners who committed crimes that led to murder. Even with the death penalty is only in certain states it has its pros and cons. Capital punishment in the United States has cost tax payers a lot of money. According to the LA Times, Taxpayers have spent more than $4 billion on capital punishment in California since it was reinstated in 1973. In those years only thirteen individuals who were convicted of murder was killed by the capital punishment system. Two out the thirteen were killed by the gas chamber while the others were by lethal injection. Lethal injection came along in 1993 and was given as a choice for people sentenced to death but the year after it was made as the only way. Although lethal injection is a less painful way of being executed it’s still costing tax payers every year. The good thing about the death penalty is that it’s faster than it was when they used the gas chambers and even when they hung people. Studies show that a federal court in California found that the gas chamber was very cruel and unusual punishment so that’s what led to the lethal injection system. The Way the lethal injection system works is that they fill your body with different chemicals that......

Words: 502 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Drug Testing Should Be Mandatory to Receive Social Assistance in the United States of America

...The topic as to whether or not drug testing should be mandatory to receive social assistance in the United States of America is a highly controversial, hotly debated topic that is sure to draw a lot more attention in years to come. After much consideration and personal debate, I still find it hard to choose one side 100 percent on the issue. While I strongly believe we should both respect and honor the United States Constitution, I also believe that our society, not to mention the technology that drives it has changed so much from the time it was drafted and upheld with the blood of many Americans. If we go by what the constitution states then drug testing would most certainly violate the 4th amendment right against unreasonable search and seizure. When our class first started preparation, I would have solidly stated I was on the con side. This is because I strongly believe that the less government and the more freedoms we have as citizens of this great country the better off we are. The federal government is already much more involved in our lives than the constitution ever intended. Our founding fathers and families left the European countries mostly because of exactly what we are experiencing here in the country today that being the government is too involved in our lives and wants to know everything about us and control what we do and influence how we even think. That being said I certainly can see what people on the con side of this issue think and can relate......

Words: 700 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Should Capital Punishment Be Abolished or Retained

...2009 Should capital punishment be abolished or retained? Capital punishment, or the death penalty, has been using for thousands of years. In the last two centuries, as people have realized the importance of human rights, debates over capital punishment have never stopped. More and more people join the campaign against capital punishment, while the others defend it. However, either abolishing the death penalty or retaining it has inextricable problems. The writer’s opinion is that capital punishment will vanish from this planet someday in the future, but for a long span of time from now, to abolish it or not depends on the social situations of different countries. People who are against capital punishment, and advocate replacing it with lifetime imprisonment, list five reasons why they condemn it. Right to life is the first punch. In The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 3 says, “Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person” (1). Among all the human rights, right to life is the cornerstone and the carrier of all the other human rights. Deprivation of the right to life is equivalent to deprivation of all the rights, which is inhumane in modern society. On the other hand, capital punishment is a product of the old barbaric concept “an eye for an eye, a life for a life;” and it is actually vengeance killing. Nowadays, most societies do not agree with vengeance killing. Such a brute act does nothing but more harm. Criminals should......

Words: 2159 - Pages: 9