Premium Essay

Philosophical Approaches

In: Other Topics

Submitted By jones5
Words 1000
Pages 4
Beliefs

According to the dictionary theology is defined as “the field of study and analysis that treats of God and of God's attributes and relations to the universe; study of divine things or religious truth; divinity”. (Theology, n.d) The term theology derives from two Greek words when joined means “the study of God.” Theology studies focus on the nature of God and different religious beliefs. Whereas, philosophy focuses on the study or creation theories of the more simple things in life. The term philosophy is also derived from two words, which stands for love and wisdom. According to the dictionary philosophy is defined as “the rational investigation of the truths and principles of being, knowledge, or conduct”. (Philosophy, n.d) For example, thought and how we should live, and the existence of nature. So, basically theology is becoming familiarized with GOD and concentrating on how and when he functioned as he did. Philosophy, on the other hand, is focusing on the more expanded meanings and positions. Ethics is the study of the general nature of morals and of the specific moral choices to be made by a person; moral philosophy (Ethics, n.d). There are three schools when determining and understanding the process of ethics. The three schools of ethics are virtue, consequentialist, and deontological. Each of these schools holds importance but are nothing without the other. All three of these are needed to come to the best ethical decision. When talking about religion and ethics we have to consider one person’s personal beliefs. Just because I may think it is ethically right to believe a certain way another group may not. “A major advantage of a philosophical approach to ethics is that it avoids the authoritarian basis of law and religion as well as the subjectivity, arbitrariness and irrationality that may characterize cultural or totally personal…...

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Postmodern Approaches

...POSTMODERN APPROACHES Solution-Focused and Narrative Therapies Key Terms: Alternative story- a story that develops in counseling in contradiction to the dominant story that is embedded in a problem. Co-authoring- a co-joint process where client and counselor share responsibility for developing alternative stories. Deconstruction- exploring meaning by taking apart/unpacking the taken-for-granted categories and assumptions underlying social practices that are guised as truths. Dominant story- understanding a situation that is accepted within a culture that appears to represent reality. Dominant stories are developed through conversations in social and cultural contexts and these stories shape how people construct and constitute what people see, feel, and do. Exception questions- SF counselors inquire about times when the problem(s) have not been problematic. Shows that problems are not ever existing and always overpowering. Externalizing conversation- a way of speaking about a problem as if it is a distant entity, separate of the person. Based on the premise that people who view themselves as the problem limit themselves to the extent they cannot effectively deal with the problem. Formula first session task- observation homework given that must be completed between first and second session. They must observe what is happening in their lives that they want to continue to happening. Mapping-the-influence questions- a series of questions asked about a......

Words: 1255 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Philosophical Ethics

...Philosophical Ethics 1. Show how Kant arrived at the conclusion that a good will is the highest good. Kant believes that good will is the highest good, because an advantage can be use for evil means. Example: Slavery Europeans, not having good will to guide them, and the pursuit of wealth, used their advantages in education, weapons, and ship building to enslave the people of Africa. A person with intelligence, Witt, and judgment must have goodwill to guide them. Kant also believed that fortune and wealth, if not solidify by good will and can lead to evil intentions. Wealth can lead to a life of arrogance and envy. A person with wealth can use their wealth to purchase the evil services of others. 2. State the Categorical Imperative and recapitulate in a step-by-step fashion how Kant arrived at it as the basis of all moral action. The Categorical Imperative – according to Kant – is the conviction that one should act so that the Maxim of his or her action can be a universal law. In a step by step fashion, good will is defined as a will motivated by a sense of duty. - What is Duty? Duty is defined as reverence or respect for the law. - What type of law? Moral law; This can be looked at as the same as the golden rule “do onto others as you would like them to onto you” 3. Why, for Kant, are good and generous deeds not in themselves virtuous? Kant believes that good and generous deeds are not in themselves virtuous because......

Words: 455 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Philosophical Fields

...Philosophical Fields Philosophy is a wide-ranging discipline because it deals with various dimensions of human experience. In order to have a better, complete and deeper understanding of philosophy which is broad in nature we should analyze first its components, parts and fields. We study these parts separately, show there interrelationship as well as their relation as a whole. The two philosophical categories are theoretical and practical philosophy. Theoretical philosophy deals with the acquisition of truth and knowledge while practical aims not only to learn the truth but as well as the application of truth or knowledge to benefit and be useful to mankind. Philosophical fields are classified under theoretical philosophy; epistemology-knowledge, cosmology-physical universe, metaphysics-reality, being and existence, ontology- particular existing things, psychology-mind and consciousness, theodicy- God and Divine doctrine. Therefore theoretical deals with knowing things, aiming knowledge or truth and reflects about nature as well as the relation of things. Under practical philosophy include; semantics- linguistic meanings, logic- thinking and argument, ethics-behavior and good life, aesthetics- art and beauty and the last is axiology-values. This kind of philosophy, concern to the things which perceptible and useful. Its goal is not just finding the truth but applying the knowledge gained for the benefit of the mankind. As life in this world becomes more complicated, it......

Words: 375 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Evaluating Philosophical Approaches for Ethical Decision Making

...Running Head: EVALUATING PHILOSOPHICAL APPOACHES FOR ETHICAL DECISION MAKING Evaluating Philosophical Approaches for Ethical Decision Making Wayne Lambeth ACC 260 Donna Adams November 4, 2012 My classmates as well as I were required to evaluate philosophical methods that were used in Appendix B. Evaluating these methods would consist of whether or not a course of action that was taken made sense. I will discuss the philosophical approaches and determine whether or not that the course of action were ethical decisions and was it the best decision for the correct reasons in addition to determining the reasons are ethical. There are three key factors to evaluating philosophical approaches and they consist of consequentialism, deontology, and virtue ethics. Consequentialism is the theory of the value especially the moral value that would be judged by its consequences. Deontology is slightly different due to focusing on moral responsibility as well as the obligation of motivating the decisions that are made or the actions of the consequence. Virtue ethics has to deal with moral within a community as well as the integrity of an individual. The following scenarios has an ethics dilemma that be addressed. Scenario 1 The mayor is faced with building a new development that will create new jobs and economic stability to a community that really needs it and the dilemma is that it has to be built where the community center for the elderly is located and......

Words: 942 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Individual: Critiquing Philosophical Approaches to Ethical Decision Making

...Week 4 Individual Paper Angela Tai ACC 260 May 10, 2013 Douglas Kildsig Critiquing Philosophical Approaches to Ethical Decision Making Three philosophical approaches are taken when ethical decisions are being made. These approaches include consequentialism, deontology, and virtue ethics. Consequentialism focus on the consequences associated with the decision that was made. When an individual uses this approach, that individual should ensure that they are fully knowledgeable of the problem in order to make an ethical decision. It is crucial that the person has the ability to examine the affects both negative and positive that will occur because of the decision. When using the deontology approach, one focuses on if it was a right decision or not instead of focusing on the consequences. With this method, all of the questions about ethics and principles arise. The last method is called the virtue ethic approach. This method strives on keeping the morals and integrity of both the community and the individuals. By keeping the morals and integrity of a community when making decisions, it ensures that the decision will be made using the personality traits of the individual. These traits include honest, generosity, wisdom, intuition, and common sense. Is the course of action really the most ethical choice? Scenario One The mayor made the most ethical choice by refusing the proposal and scarifying the development of hundred jobs and million dollars to be able to......

Words: 1097 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Theoretical Approaches

...Theoretical Approaches Susan McKee PSY/405 Theories of Personality July 29, 2013 Les Binnix Theoretical Approaches In the world of psychology there are numerous personality theories. Many people have heard of Maslow with the hierarchy of needs or the dispositional theories with types and traits. Both of these theories attempts to understand and explain human thoughts and behaviors through different perspectives. The focus of this paper is to compare and contrast these two different theories. Humanistic and existential theory of personality looks at the individual in a holistic and optimistic manner; this includes Abraham Maslow's hierarchy of needs and Carl Rodger's theory of self. The dispositional theories started with a comprehensive definition of personality by Gordon Allport and went on to the investigations of thousands of descriptive words dealing with personality characteristics. Measurements of these characteristics led to the big five or the five factor theory. Both of these major theories are complex, optimistic, and help increase understanding of personalities through different lenses. The purpose of this paper is to examine the personality characteristics attributed to these theories, explain the interpersonal relational aspect associated, and describe the role of personality in affecting situational behavior. Humanistic and existential theory of personality. The humanistic and existential theory of personality is also known as the "Third Force"......

Words: 1806 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Philosophical Views

...Philosophical views on Freedom and Free will. The first philosophical position is scientific determinism in which it states that free action is seen as an event having to do with person’s intention that is without a cause. For scientific determinism, Universal causality denies that there can be any such events. They deny that man is really free. The second is indeterminism or sometimes called as libertarians which they believe that man is in fact free. They are similar with scientific determism in such a way that they think that free act as an event involving body or mind, that corresponds to person’s intentions and yet happen without a cause. In contrasted to the views of scientific determinist, they insist that man is really free. They deny the truth of Universal causality. They believe that there are uncaused free actions. The third is compatibilism, defines free action as an event with an inner cause. They believe that free act is any event, involving the body or mind of a person that is caused by an inner state that person. For them event have cause, they maintain, but if the cause of your action is an appropriate inner state of your own mind, then your act is free. The last philosophical position is agency theory, which they define free will as any event, involving body or mind of a person that is caused by an agent. For them, the principle of universal causality maybe true or untrue. In agency theory they believe that man is really free. In my own personal stand,......

Words: 364 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Philosophical Dialogue

...Philosophical Dialogue (from Philosophy Pages) Verbal discussion of serious topics is in no way tangential to the practice of philosophy. From Socratic gatherings to the philosophical conventions of today, thinking things through out loud—and in the presence of others—has always been of the essence of the philosophical method. (Most philosophical texts embody this give-and-take, either in explicit use of dialogue form or by a more subtle alteration of proposal, objection, and reply in expository prose.) Your philosophical education demands that you enter into the great conversation of Western thought. A few suggestions may help: Be prepared Productive dialogue presupposes informed participants. This means that during every class session, each of us will have read the material assigned for the day, we will pay careful attention to what others have already said, and we will think carefully before speaking. Of course, each of us will often be mistaken, but none of us should ever speak randomly. Respect others Joint participants in dialogue show a deep, personal respect for each other. We owe it to each other to listen well and to give each other the benefit of doubt in interpreting charitably what has been said, trying always to see the worthwhile point. Although we will rarely find ourselves in total agreement on the issues at stake, we will never attack or make fun of each other personally. Expect conflict Disagreement with an expressed opinion and criticism of its...

Words: 494 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Philosophical Approaches to Ethical Decision Making Matrix

...Philosophical Approaches to Ethical Decision Making Matrix Determine the ethical course of action for the following three scenarios from the perspective of each of the three philosophical approaches: consequentialism, deontology, and virtue ethics. Then, complete the matrix below by writing a few sentences stating the ethical course of action and the reasoning from that approach’s perspective. Clearly differentiate the reasons for each of the three approaches. Keep in mind that, although rationale might differ, the ethical course of action for a given scenario might be the same for each philosophical approach. Be sure to state the ethical course of action as well as the rationale behind it, according to the philosophical approach. Scenario 1 The mayor of a small seaside town faces a tough decision. A prominent developer has submitted a proposal to build a large mall and resort in the town. This development is estimated to bring $150 million in tourism each year and several hundred new jobs to the community, which badly needs the economic boost. The proposed location of the new development, however, is a site that now houses the only nursing home and senior citizens’ recreation center in the area. Both the nursing home and recreation center would have to be demolished, affecting 100 seniors and 30 employees. There is no other location in town where the new development can be built. How should the mayor decide: in favor of economic prosperity or in defense of his......

Words: 1008 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Philosophical Essay

...Philosophical Essay (tolerance and Justice) William Touvell Ohio Christian University Ph2000 Introduction to Philosophy Van Kuiken May 9, 2011 Tolerance Tolerance is defined as the capacity for or practice of respecting and recognizing another person’s opinions, practices, behaviors, or beliefs. (editor), 1976). Tolerance can cross into many categories of life from different cultures, the type of music we like, moral issues, religion and many others. More and more these days they are teaching our children in school that we must practice tolerance with all groups of people. I have also heard it described as just agreeing not to disagree; so you avoid any arguments or hurt feelings. The other thing that tolerance can be tied into is that of ethical relativism. Nash defines ethical relativism as the belief that moral beliefs that are conflicting at times can be true at the same time in the same sense. (Nash, 1999). The problems with ethical relativism, is that it’s really confusing and it gives way to numerous paradoxical consequences. The biggest one is when one accepts this way of thinking, that there can be no moral code we use that is better than another. Nash put it this way “if there is no transcendent, objective grounds for moral criticism, no side can be more right than the other.” (Nash, 1999). Some of the other points made are that if we accept this belief than why do we strive to become better people, when no human is any better than his fellow man? ......

Words: 932 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Approaches

...In business there are several different aspects that a manager and or partners should focus on. Some of these approaches makes running the business a little more efficient in handling issues in a better satiation than others. A few of these approached that will be covered include: sociotechnical theory, quantitative management, organizational behavior, and systems theory. Understanding the different approaches will give a better understanding of the competitive environment. When getting into business having social systems set in place sets standards and guidelines to go by. Let’s take the first approach for example. Sociotechnical theory “an approach to job design that attempts to redesign tasks to optimize operation of a new technology while preserving employees’ interpersonal relationships and other human aspects of the work”. (Bateman pg. 35) As defined this theory is set in stone to give personnel the tools and skills needed to work efficiently to produce those goods and services for consumers. Secondly there is Quantitative Management which differs from that of sociotechnical by way of management skills. Quantitative management is set in business environments to keep leaders from failing not only themselves, but their employees as well. This is a good tool to have when needing to operate a facility and personnel properly and in the correct manner. Which leads into Organizational Behavior. This approach is a very key stone for managers or any one in a leader position.......

Words: 276 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Philosophical Mind

...In Lesson 2, we explored a number of reasons why it is important to develop a philosophical mindset. In this assignment I want you to take one of those reasons and elaborate on it. In at least 250 words, explain why it is important for you to develop the philosophical mindset. Why develop a philosophical mindset? The definition of a philosophical mindset is reason enough for me. An attitude or approach to life that involves the critical examination of beliefs to ascertain what they mean, if they are true, and what value they have. I don’t understand people who just believe things because that’s what other people believe. The depth of critical examination on a certain belief points to the level of commitment you have to that belief. Without critical examination one can’t truly grasp or lean on a belief. Without true beliefs that one can lean on, life becomes vain and unfulfilling. Look at the church for an example. If you have ever attended a church long enough to get to know its members outside the church walls, then this example will make sense. Many church members say they believe in God, that they are saved through Christ and that they are going to heaven when they die. They say that they believe the whole Bible is God’s truth and holy word, including Matthew 7:17 which states; “By their fruits ye shall know them. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles?”, and Matthew 7:20 which states, “Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast......

Words: 349 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Acc 260 Week 4 Critiquing Philosophical Approaches to Ethical Decision Making

...ACC 260 Week 4 Critiquing Philosophical Approaches to Ethical Decision Making Get Tutorial by Clicking on the link below or Copy Paste Link in Your Browser http://hwguiders.com/downloads/acc-260-week-4-critiquing-philosophical-approaches-to-ethical-decision-making/ For More Courses and Exams use this form ( http://hwguiders.com/contact-us/ ) Feel Free to Search your Class through Our Product Categories or From Our Search Bar (http://hwguiders.com/ ) As a student we are required to evaluate the philosophical approaches for each scenario from Appendix B. Evaluating whether or not the reasoning for the course of action listed makes sense. While working on the evaluation of the philosophical approaches we will discuss if the course of action is the most ethical, the best reasons for making the choices, and the reasons for believing this alternative is ethical. Consequentialism is the intent to maximize the usefulness of a decision. For this the relevance of this act depends on its consequences. For this approach it is essential to have a good ethical decisions and perception of it. With this it is important for students to analyze a decision in how the harmful and/or the benefits. This many philosophers’ debate ht consequences should count Deontology is different because it focuses on the obligation or duty in motivating the decision or the actions of the consequences. This depends on the respect, rights, and fairness. This approach brings up issues related......

Words: 6500 - Pages: 26

Premium Essay

Reasoning as Philosophical

...Nicolas, Fatima May D. 2014-45876 Spec. Thought WFY, Mr. Romulo Banares What Constitutes Reasoning as Philosophical? Philosophy consists of a very long history of arguments, counter- arguments, thesis, and theories; thus we can also see questions, and answers that lead to more questions and so on. Like most sciences, philosophy has its own procedures and its own approach to inquiries about the world. One of the central objectives of this discipline is to learn and make use of those procedures to understand the mysteries behind existence and reality. It is also a study that aims to find out the nature of truth and knowledge and to discover what is of basic value and the significance of life. As established by its founding fathers the basic business of philosophy is to know what truly exists and the relation among these existents. Reason is a method in which people acquire knowledge and understanding by means of thinking in an organized and clear way. It has played a big role in the progress of different branches of philosophy (e.g. epistemology, metaphysics, etc.) throughout the years. Some of philosophy’s longest running problems are based on reason but reason also paves way for the solution to these problems. In this paper, I will address different examples that exhibit the being philosophical of reason. REASON IN THE ONTOLOGICAL ARGUMENTS Ontological arguments are arguments that assert the existence of a God by......

Words: 1037 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Philosophical Approached

...Running head: PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACHED TO ETHICAL DECISION 1 Philosophical Approaches to Ethical Decision-Making Donald McCoy Strayer University PHILOSOPHICAL APPROACHED TO ETHICAL DECISION 2 Philosophical Approaches to Ethical Decision-Making The problem of freedom can be understood in two distinct meanings; however we will take a more philosophical approach (N.A Berdyaev, 2011). We will define the problem of freedom as choice of good and evil, which conquers and which they conquer not. Also in order to understand the problem of freedom we have to add Free will. Free will has as much to do with making choices and participating in actions as morality fitting into the equation (N.A Berdyaev, 2011). Morality dictates that we have freedoms to be moral and make moral decisions. The chances are if we were to remove free will form the equation then we could not be held responsible for our moral decisions. Another factor of the problem of freedom is responsibility, which is the direct path to freedom. This analogy puts it in to perspective the more freedom we have; the more responsible we are for it. When freedom is involved the words choice and free are synonymous of each other. You can’t have one without the other (Williams & Arrigo, 2008). One would state that we couldn’t choose if we are not free to do so. We would not do the word freedom justice unless we look at ethical decision-making. Freedom when discussed...

Words: 988 - Pages: 4