Free Essay

Order Code 81593300 Aristotle's and Plato's Beliefs About the Soul

In: Philosophy and Psychology

Submitted By davekim
Words 455
Pages 2
Name:
Course:
Institution: Prof:
Date:

When it comes to the theories about the soul, no one comes close to the right thing than two ancient philosophers Plato and Aristotle, they both had strong beliefs about the soul and body. They both had different views on the idea of soul and body, Plato’s way of viewing this was that the soul was one of the most important and yet single parts of a person which had its core values in the moral concept with ideas, he also believed in the afterlife of a being. But this was not the case with Aristotle, who was more interested in the world as a physical structure and its forces that came with it, he was more observant in his theories which were different from Plato’s view that was basically based on the mere functions of the physical things and their performance.
In Plato’s philosophy, he was more of a dualist and totally believed in the entity of body and soul and that the two were separate (Schofield, M. (Ed.), 2013). He stated that the soul was just but immaterial and was the property of the world and its many forms, and that it was given to man and ever since it has been trying to return to the world of forms. He explained I that the soul so not mortal and it would never change in any way.
In Aristotle views, he tried to show that the body and soul were two and dependent parts that were found in human beings, they both worked together and supported each other, in other words, his views of the two entities was that they relied on each other and were greatly intertwined.
In my interaction with a group of five deferent individuals, the first one tried to see in that he believed that the soul is similar to what he knew Aristotle tried to stand for, this is because he knew if the soul would leave our body we would be dead. The second one had his views alongside with Aristotle too but did not believe in a singularity of a being or cell having the potential to have a soul. The third one tried to reason that the soul has its purpose for us to try and make us good people. Coming to the fourth on he stated that Plato was making some truth, he put it out that the soul was our ethical guide. The last individual also agreed with Plato views that it is our very own souls that help us differentiate between the rights from wrong.

References
Schofield, M. (Ed.). (2013). Aristotle, Plato and Pythagoreanism in the first century BC: new directions for philosophy. Cambridge University Press.…...

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Explain Plato’s Teaching About Reality in His Analogy of the Cave?

...The Analogy of the Cave was used by Plato, who was a classic Greek philosopher, in his work of ‘The Republic’ to illustrate “our nature in its education and want of education”. The Analogy of the Cave is a fictional story created by Plato’s teacher ‘Socrates’ and Plato’s brother ‘Glaucon’. The Analogy of the Cave is related to Plato’s theory of the Forms - Plato believed that behind every concept (e.g. beauty) or object (e.g. a flower) in the visible world, there is an unseen reality, which he calls its Form. There is, for example a form of beauty and a form of a flower. The forms may be seen as ideal blueprints for the particular earthly examples of beauty or flowers, and so on, which Plato calls particulars. Plato’s analogy of the cave:- Three prisoners had been chained deep inside a dark cave for their entire lives. They were chained so tightly that all they had ever seen or experienced was the grotesque shadows that were cast on to the wall from a fire that was burning behind them. This was the only reality they had ever known. Then one day, a prisoner was set free. He was blinded at first by the bright sun shine and he was amazed to see a completely new reality of people, animals, and objects casting the shadows in to the cave. He hurried back to the cave to tell the other prisoners the news but to his dismay, the prisoners did not believe his story of the world outside the cave. The shadows were the only reality the prisoners had ever known, and therefore to them,...

Words: 996 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Beliefs About Leadership, Administration, and Learning

...Beliefs about Leadership, Administration, and Learning Petunia Wainwright Grand Canyon University: EDA 575 April 24, 2013 Beliefs About Students | Opposite Belief About Students | Educators can recognize that all students learn differently and we must provide students a variety way of instructional approaches. | Educators do not recognize that all students learn differently and we do not provide students with a variety of ways of instructional approaches. | Operationalized Through Actions | Might Be Operationalized | Educators implement visual aids, audio, hands on activities, rubrics, individual work, etc. into their lessons to make sure they meet the eight different learning styles in their classrooms. | Educators only provide student learning through lecture and the work is always individual work. Students cannot interact or move around the classroom. | 8 – 10 Beliefs about Leadership, Administration, or Learning *Administrators lead with a vision and communicate the vision to everyone who is involved in the learning environment (teachers, students, parents, stakeholders).*Administrations state their vision in their handbooks, the vision is posted and reviewed in every classroom, and they are installing that vision into their teachers, students, and parents. | *Administrators do not lead with a vision and they do not promote their vision as much as they should.*Administrators do not speak to their teachers, students, parents, or stakeholders about the......

Words: 1423 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Beliefs About Teaching

...Beliefs about Teaching The main purpose of education is to develop students’ ability to think critically and integrate ideas. For this to take place teachers must have a desire to educate young people, act as positive role models, and have an ability to work with students from diverse backgrounds as well as strong interpersonal and organizational skills. Teaching is a challenging job with many unique frustrations, but the rewards of teaching are numerous. Teachers get incredible joy in seeing the difference they make as students gain new insight. Teachers foster creativity, develop character and provide students with the skills they need to reach their potential. As a teacher, you see the fruits of your efforts everyday as you use your intelligence and creativity to help students become excited about learning. As teachers we are capable of wide variation in our performance as role models, and we can demonstrate both positive and negative behaviors in a single encounter. We should therefore impart essential concepts about life and learning in a beneficial approach to improving performance. Effective interpersonal relationships and organization skills are equally as important. The teacher-child relationship plays a significant role in facilitating social skill development. Children demonstrate higher interpersonal and learning-related skills in classrooms where teachers provide organization and guidance. It is my belief that teachers are lifelong learners and should......

Words: 267 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

The Guardians in Plato's Republic

...particular person just. The virtues of wisdom, courage and moderation are common to both a just and the fictional just city of Kallipolis. This artificial city has the pre-determined virtue of being just – he does this in order to understand what justice is for the individual because Plato thinks that ‘a just man won’t differ at all from a just city in respect to the form of justice; rather he’ll be like the city.’ (Republic 435b) In the just city Plato creates three classes: the producers, the guardians and the rulers. Each of these three classes has a certain virtue it has to display to fulfill the ‘just city’ pre-requisite that Plato has placed upon Kallipolis. The rulers are required to exhibit wisdom so that ‘a whole city established according to nature would be wise because of the smallest class and part in it, namely the governing or ruling one. And to this class, belongs a share of the knowledge that alone among all the other kinds of knowledge is to be called wisdom.’ (428e-429a) The wisdom enjoyed by the rulers would be used to ensure that the city has ‘good judgement and [be] really wise.’ (428d) The guardians (soldiers) of Kallipolis would be educated in order to absorb the laws in the finest possible way (430a) – ‘so that their belief about what they should fear and all the rest would become so fast that even such extremely effective detergents such as pleasure, pain, fear and desire wouldn’t wash it out.’ Their ability to remain focused is the virtue of......

Words: 6303 - Pages: 26

Premium Essay

Plato’s Argument for Three Parts of the Soul

...Introduction Plato argues that the soul comprises of three parts namely rational, appetitive, and the spirited. These parts also match up the three ranks of a just community. Personal justice involves maintaining the three parts in the proper balance, where reason rules while appetite obeys. According to Plato, the appetitive part of the soul is the one that is accountable for the desires in people. It is accountable for the effortless cravings required to stay alive like hunger, thirst, and for pointless cravings like desire to over feed. The desires for essential things should be limited by other sections of the soul, while illegitimate desires ought to be limited entirely by other elements of soul. The rational soul on the other hand is the thinking element in every human being, which decided what is factual and merely obvious, judges what is factual and what is untrue, and intelligently makes sensible decisions. Finally, the spirited soul produces the desires that love victory and honor. In the just soul, the spirit acts as an implementer of the rational soul, making sure that the rules of reason are adhered to. Emotions like indignation and anger are the impact of the disappointment of the spirit. Someone might respond to the claim that the soul comprises of three parts. Argument Plato argued that a community has three parts which are guardians, producers, and soldiers and each part performs a particular function. For a community to be just, every element has...

Words: 828 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Soul

...PHL 210: Introduction to Philosophy Final Project: Is there such a thing as a Soul? 6/5/2014 The topic that I have chosen for my essay is, Is there such a thing as a “Soul”? Is the soul something different from the brain? Does the soul survive after our physical death? There has been much speculation on if humans truly do have a soul, if the soul is the same as our brain, what happens after we die?  Does our soul continue on to become something else in an afterlife? What do different religions believe happen in the afterlife? Do we stay the same just without our physical body, or is it really the end?  The definition of a soul as defined in the Merriam Webster dictionary is ("Soul," 2014): 1. The spiritual part of a person that is believed to give life to the body and in many religions is believed to live forever 2. A person's deeply felt moral and emotional nature 3. The ability of a person to feel kindness and sympathy for others, to appreciate beauty and art, etc. When thinking of the difference between the brain and the soul. The soul is one nonphysical dimension of a person. A human person is a spiritual entity that has an involvement with a particular physical body. The brain is an essential organ that is of more than usual interest and is one part of the embodied dimension of the human body (Willard, 2002). There are many variations as to what occurs when our life comes to an end. In each religion there is some form of afterlife, some of these......

Words: 1046 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

The Soul

...SOUL The question of the truth and knowledge of soul and its peculiarity in form is a highly debated issue in philosophy. Does the soul exist? How can one find their souls? Since the soul is not physical, can we connect with it? Numerous theories of nature and existence of the soul have come up as an attack on the belief in its existence after death. In his Republic, Plato argues that the soul consists of three basic energies which animate human beings: Reason, Emotion, and Appetite. Reason is given the greatest value, while Emotion and especially Appetite are regarded as the lower passions. The soul that is ordered is governed by Reason, and therefore keeps one’s emotions and one’s appetites under control. The lower passions must submit to the dictates of Reason. According to Plato, the soul is placed inside the body at birth, after it has travelled from the realm of the forms. When it arrives in the body, it forgets the forms which enable a person to be moral and live a meaningful life. Plato’s idea sounds convincing. However, a soul can be many different things depending on where you live, religion or beliefs you adhere to. For me it’s an interchangeable work of some sort of spirit. In fact, not because it sounds so attractive doesn’t mean it exists. That might be the very reason why it was invented in the first place. I for one would love to have a soul. I would love to be assured that some part of me lives eternally after I die or get reincarnated into something else...

Words: 885 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Beliefs About Binge Drinking and Related Violence

...Beliefs about Binge Drinking and related violence Abstract This study was designed to understand the beliefs people hold about binge drinking and related violence. 342 Males and 436 females who came from various cultures, backgrounds, education levels, and relationship status participated in a survey comprised of demographical and socio-demographic questions. The hypothesis for this study was partially upheld as it was hypothesized that age, gender, being European, how many times in the course of a typical month an individual would consume more than four standard drinks on a single occasion, and had the individual been a victim or know a victim of binge drinking related violence would show a positive correlation with the criterions ‘Frequency and Severity’, and ‘Interventions’. However, gender did not yield a positive correlation when examining ‘Frequency and Severity’. When ‘Interventions ‘were examined only age, gender, and drinking patterns showed a positive correlation. An individual’s age and drinking pattern appears to be the most significant predictors when considering binge drinking and related violence beliefs. Beliefs about Binge Drinking and Related Violence The National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (2004) has described binge drinking as the consumption of over four drinks for men and three drinks for women. Binge drinking, which is most common among adolescents and young adults, has been associated with violent acts such as domestic violence,......

Words: 6642 - Pages: 27

Free Essay

Plato's Beliefs

...Plato believed there to be a sharp distinction between the world of perceivable objects and the world of forms. A form is what makes something to be that of what it is, or its essence. The form is that in which all members of the same kind have in a common type class. For example; if we were talking about pencils, a pencil would be an individual while pencil would be a form. In the dialogue “Meno,” Socrates opens not with the question of “what is virtue?” but rather “how and if virtue can be taught.” He then attempts to discover an exact definition of virtue because before one can discuss the subsequent questions about it, one must have an exact definition. Plato brings forth the idea of anamnesis, which states the soul is eternal and already knows everything, and in order to learn one must simply recollect what they already know. Throughout the dialogue Meno proposes many definitions of virtue, all of which are turned down by Socrates because he tends to use the word he is defining in the definition. As a result, the question is raised of whether it is even possible to seek for something one does not know yet, attempting to find a definition of virtue. By the end of the dialogue the two come to the conclusion that they still do not have a clear definition; however, they do not now that they do not know. This introduces the objection proposed by Meno discussing the entire definitional search in the form of what has been called “The Paradox of Inquiry.” The argument......

Words: 638 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Plato's and Aristotle's Views on Knowledge

...Anthony Pulliam Humanities 09/17/2010 Plato's and Aristotle's Views on Knowledge Plato and Aristotle view knowledge and the process whereby it is obtained. They both point out that many epistemological concepts which they believe where knowledge comes from and what it is actually. Most of them have been astonished me in certain ways, but I found that rationalism and "wisdom consists in knowing the cause which made a material thing to be what it is" make the most sense to me regarding the nature of knowledge. As the following, we will discuss about why these two philosophical viewpoints are superior and the others are inferior. Aristotle believes that sensory perception of material objects is knowledge and he says, "Our senses begin the process of finding the answer, because they are physically close to our minds." However, sensations and feelings are very subjective, and the results of sensation vary from person to person and even within the same person, depending on the circumstances. What to one person is cold might be warm to another, one person may be more fatigued in the afternoon than in the morning, so that his or her perceptions may temporarily less accurate. Therefore one cannot claim that sensations provide sure knowledge for human beings. | On the other hand, Aristotle sustains that the perceptions of the senses form the foundation which leads to true knowledge. The senses "give the most authoritative knowledge of particulars" (individual material......

Words: 1414 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

The Soul

...The Soul The concept of the soul is an integral point of concern in the writings of both Plato and Aristotle. Plato views the soul as beyond the body, something that must be released from the grip of mortality. Despite being the student of Plato, Aristotle has his own line of reasoning in regards to the soul, tying the existence of the soul to the existence of life. I will endeavor to show the differences between their thoughts on the soul and its purpose in their philosophical ideology, with the purpose of explaining how Aristotle’s beliefs on the matter of the soul are preferable. One of Plato’s clearest exposition on the soul occurs during the recounting of the death of Socrates, wherein Socrates tells of how “the wise man will want to be ever with him who is better than himself” and further that “the real philosopher has reason to be of good cheer when he is about to die” (Plato). These statements on death will serve as an opening for the rest the Plato’s theories on the soul; the idea that for true knowledge to be grasped, the soul must be freed from the prison of the body. Plato argues that the soul, as an immortal expression of being, is capable of existing beyond the mortal world. He asserts that the body is a detriment to the pursuit of pure knowledge, that it “is a source of endless trouble to us…” (Plato), leading to the idea that purity can only be achieved once the soul is freed. One of the arguments Plato employs as his reasoning for the idea of the Soul......

Words: 1173 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Body and Soul Distinction

...is a contentious area of philosophy, and has created a debate known as “the mind, body problem”. Such philosophers as Plato take a dualist view and try to offer evidence to suggest a distinction between the body and soul. Plato saw the body and soul as two separate entities. The soul that most closely resembles the divine and immortal. While the body resembles the human and mortal, which is endlessly changing and can be broken down. Plato was not trying to suggest the soul was perfect as it joined the body which it is inhibited by, however, he explains that by taking care of the soul the person can develop knowledge. Plato used evidence such as the “world of the forms”. He suggested that by taking care of the soul and ignoring physical pleasures the soul can return to the word of the forms when the body dies. For the body to survive it must meet its basic needs such as food, reproduction and physical pleasure. On the other hand for the mind to be stimulated it has other needs that are met through deep thought and learning. However, there is a flaw to Plato’s theory, how can you have two completely different substances that are the same thing? Plato’s theory suggests the body and soul can work together to achieve a higher level of existence, but if the body and soul are completely different there is no evidence to suggest they would be compatible. Cartesian duality formed by Rene Descartes, describes the mind and body as being separates and is based on the phrase “ I think......

Words: 1533 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Plato's Cave

...Explain the analogy of the cave in Plato’s republic (25 marks) Plato, 428-347 B.C., was an Athenian philosopher who lived in Ancient Greece. In 407 B.C. he became a pupil and friend of Socrates. After living for a time at the Syracuse court, Plato founded (c.387 B.C.) near Athens the most influential school of the ancient world, the Academy, where he taught until his death. The “Republic” is one of Plato’s greatest books that he has written. Plato’s presents one of the most famous analogies in philosophy: the cave. This analogy illustrates the effects of true knowledge. True knowledge moves the philosopher through life without any distractions, which in due course brings him to the Form of the Good. He tells the Allegory of the Cave as a conversation between his teacher Socrates who inspired many of Plato's philosophical theories and Glaucon. In the dialogue between Socrates and Glaucon, Socrates asks Glaucon to imagine a cave, in which prisoners have been kept since their childhood, and each of them is held where they are all chained so that their legs and necks are unable to turn or allow them to move. This leaves them in a predicament where they’re forced to look at a wall in front of them. Behind the prisoners is a fire and between the fire and the prisoners is a raised walkway (bridge), on which people can walk. These people are shadow play, and they are carrying objects, in the shape of human and animal figures, as well as everyday items. The prisoners could only......

Words: 1315 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Aristotle and the Soul

...Aristotle and the Soul Versus Health Care Ashley Pagan Introduction to Philosophy Dr. J May 26, 2012 Aristotle and the Soul Versus Health Care While Aristotle did not believe in a supernatural Creator or God, he did believe in the human soul. However, Aristotle’s beliefs concerning the human soul differed from the thoughts of those of Plato under whom he studied. Aristotle believed that the soul or “ultimate purpose” describes one’s unique purpose within the natural order (Chaffee, 2011). Unlike Plato, Aristotle’s views concerning the soul were in no way supernatural. He believed that everything consisted of matter and form. Matter was the stuff that makes up the material universes and form refers to the essence that makes things what they are (Chaffee, 2011). Taken together it is matter and form creates formed matter or substance and requires each other in order to exist. With that being said Aristotle believed that the soul was the formal element of the body, giving it shape and purposeful direction (Chaffee, 2011). Along with his theory of the existence of the soul, Aristotle also hypothesized the contents and necessary conditions of the soul. He argued that there are natural bodies, some are living and others are not. In his argument Aristotle calls attention to the fact that whatever has a soul, in the human sense, displays life. Aristotle believed that a besouled natural body could grow, decay and at the same time provide itself with nutrition; the soul is......

Words: 732 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Plato's Allegory

...Plato’s Allegory Plato is known today as one of the greatest philosophers of all time, allowing him a prominent place in the history of philosophy. To fully appreciate Plato's ideas and viewpoint, it is important to understand his contributions to rationalism and his perception of human knowing. It is also essential to know and appreciate how his Allegory of the Cave depicts rationalism and human knowing, and parallels Christian thought. Finally, comparing and contrasting Plato’s worldview with that of his students Aristotle will provide a broader understanding of rationalism and human knowing, and Plato’s allegory. Plato made many important contributions to philosophy as well as to the rationalist tradition. Rationalism is the philosophy that knowledge is acquired by reason without resort to experience (Princeton, n.d.). The first thing Plato taught was that our concepts and knowledge are gained independently of sense experience (Stanford, 2004). This teaching does not resonate with me, and I believe that while this may apply to some people, it does not apply to everyone—including myself. The second element he argued is that reason is superior to sense perception because sensation is incapable of providing the necessary elements which are present in knowledge (Nash, 1999). I partially agree with the reasoning of this element; however, I do believe that intuition—a sensory experience—can trump knowledge at times. Sometimes you may not have the knowledge to understand a......

Words: 1017 - Pages: 5