Free Essay

Net Neutrality

In: Other Topics

Submitted By burbinator
Words 2518
Pages 11
Your internet provider provides you with everything from the internet. They essentially are like a highway to your computer. But what if this highway had a toll booth with three options; an extremely expensive ipass allowing rich websites to pass easily to your desktop, a normal priced toll with no ipass slowing down poorer sites, and the toll could turn away any website they like. Internet service providers are trying to push for this kind of internet, a money based internet where they don’t have to show any competitors websites at all. This doesn't sound like a good thing for the internet we know and love. In order to protect the fundamental principle that the internet was based on, and small web-based companies, net neutrality Must be protected and preserved. To understand why Net Neutrality must be preserved first you have to understand it, the economics of it, the arguments against the system, and the effect its change would have on small web-based companies. Net Neutrality can be defined very simply, that all websites are treated equally and distributed to the consumer or business equally. According to Tim wu, a professor at Columbia law School, he says on his personal website article Network Neutrality FAQ “The idea is that a maximally useful public information network aspires to treat all content, sites, and platforms equally.” What he is saying here is that basic concept of Net Neutrality is that no matter what provider, or platform (computer, tablet, or phone e.t.c) all content must be treated with equal delivery privileges. In other words, large companies can’t buy the top internet delivery speeds, leaving small web-based companies in the dust. However the United states Government has introduced bills, specifically The Internet Preservation Act, that do allow for Q.O.S (quality of service) discrimination. Which means that the Consumer can purchase better internet speeds and quality, across the board. However this does not mean that the provider can discriminate content, they are only aloud to do this based on the consumers subscription contract.
Your internet provider provides you with everything from the internet. They essentially are like a highway to your computer. But what if this highway had a toll booth with three options; an extremely expensive ipass allowing rich websites to pass easily to your desktop, a normal priced toll with no ipass slowing down poorer sites, and the toll could turn away any website they like. Internet service providers are trying to push for this kind of internet, a money based internet where they don’t have to show any competitors websites at all. This doesn't sound like a good thing for the internet we know and love. In order to protect the fundamental principle that the internet was based on, and small web-based companies, net neutrality Must be protected and preserved. To understand why Net Neutrality must be preserved first you have to understand it, what the current definitions are, and kinds of Net Neutrality. Alongside this, you must understand the Pro's to the current system, the arguments against the system, and the effect its change would have on small web-based companies. Net Neutrality can be defined very simply, that all websites are treated equally and distributed to the consumer or business equally. According to Tim wu, a professor at Columbia law School, he says on his personal website article Network Neutrality FAQ “The idea is that a maximally useful public information network aspires to treat all content, sites, and platforms equally.” What he is saying here is that basic concept of Net Neutrality is that no matter what provider, or platform (computer, tablet, or phone e.t.c) all content must be treated with equal delivery privileges. In other words, large companies can’t buy the top internet delivery speeds, leaving small web-based companies in the dust. However the United states Government has introduced bills, specifically The Internet Preservation Act, that do allow for Q.O.S (quality of service) discrimination. Which means that the Consumer can purchase better internet speeds and quality, across the board. However this does not mean that the provider can discriminate content, they are only aloud to do this based on the consumers subscription contract.
Your internet provider provides you with everything from the internet. They essentially are like a highway to your computer. But what if this highway had a toll booth with three options; an extremely expensive ipass allowing rich websites to pass easily to your desktop, a normal priced toll with no ipass slowing down poorer sites, and the toll could turn away any website they like. Internet service providers are trying to push for this kind of internet, a money based internet where they don’t have to show any competitors websites at all. This doesn't sound like a good thing for the internet we know and love. In order to protect the fundamental principle that the internet was based on, and small web-based companies, net neutrality Must be protected and preserved. To understand why Net Neutrality must be preserved first you have to understand it, what the current definitions are, and kinds of Net Neutrality. Alongside this, you must understand the Pro's to the current system, the arguments against the system, and the effect its change would have on small web-based companies. Net Neutrality can be defined very simply, that all websites are treated equally and distributed to the consumer or business equally. According to Tim wu, a professor at Columbia law School, he says on his personal website article Network Neutrality FAQ “The idea is that a maximally useful public information network aspires to treat all content, sites, and platforms equally.” What he is saying here is that basic concept of Net Neutrality is that no matter what provider, or platform (computer, tablet, or phone e.t.c) all content must be treated with equal delivery privileges. In other words, large companies can’t buy the top internet delivery speeds, leaving small web-based companies in the dust. However the United states Government has introduced bills, specifically The Internet Preservation Act, that do allow for Q.O.S (quality of service) discrimination. Which means that the Consumer can purchase better internet speeds and quality, across the board. However this does not mean that the provider can discriminate content, they are only aloud to do this based on the consumers subscription contract.
Your internet provider provides you with everything from the internet. They essentially are like a highway to your computer. But what if this highway had a toll booth with three options; an extremely expensive ipass allowing rich websites to pass easily to your desktop, a normal priced toll with no ipass slowing down poorer sites, and the toll could turn away any website they like. Internet service providers are trying to push for this kind of internet, a money based internet where they don’t have to show any competitors websites at all. This doesn't sound like a good thing for the internet we know and love. In order to protect the fundamental principle that the internet was based on, and small web-based companies, net neutrality Must be protected and preserved. To understand why Net Neutrality must be preserved first you have to understand it, what the current definitions are, and kinds of Net Neutrality. Alongside this, you must understand the Pro's to the current system, the arguments against the system, and the effect its change would have on small web-based companies. Net Neutrality can be defined very simply, that all websites are treated equally and distributed to the consumer or business equally. According to Tim wu, a professor at Columbia law School, he says on his personal website article Network Neutrality FAQ “The idea is that a maximally useful public information network aspires to treat all content, sites, and platforms equally.” What he is saying here is that basic concept of Net Neutrality is that no matter what provider, or platform (computer, tablet, or phone e.t.c) all content must be treated with equal delivery privileges. In other words, large companies can’t buy the top internet delivery speeds, leaving small web-based companies in the dust. However the United states Government has introduced bills, specifically The Internet Preservation Act, that do allow for Q.O.S (quality of service) discrimination. Which means that the Consumer can purchase better internet speeds and quality, across the board. However this does not mean that the provider can discriminate content, they are only aloud to do this based on the consumers subscription contract.
Your internet provider provides you with everything from the internet. They essentially are like a highway to your computer. But what if this highway had a toll booth with three options; an extremely expensive ipass allowing rich websites to pass easily to your desktop, a normal priced toll with no ipass slowing down poorer sites, and the toll could turn away any website they like. Internet service providers are trying to push for this kind of internet, a money based internet where they don’t have to show any competitors websites at all. This doesn't sound like a good thing for the internet we know and love. In order to protect the fundamental principle that the internet was based on, and small web-based companies, net neutrality Must be protected and preserved. To understand why Net Neutrality must be preserved first you have to understand it, what the current definitions are, and kinds of Net Neutrality. Alongside this, you must understand the Pro's to the current system, the arguments against the system, and the effect its change would have on small web-based companies. Net Neutrality can be defined very simply, that all websites are treated equally and distributed to the consumer or business equally. According to Tim wu, a professor at Columbia law School, he says on his personal website article Network Neutrality FAQ “The idea is that a maximally useful public information network aspires to treat all content, sites, and platforms equally.” What he is saying here is that basic concept of Net Neutrality is that no matter what provider, or platform (computer, tablet, or phone e.t.c) all content must be treated with equal delivery privileges. In other words, large companies can’t buy the top internet delivery speeds, leaving small web-based companies in the dust. However the United states Government has introduced bills, specifically The Internet Preservation Act, that do allow for Q.O.S (quality of service) discrimination. Which means that the Consumer can purchase better internet speeds and quality, across the board. However this does not mean that the provider can discriminate content, they are only aloud to do this based on the consumers subscription contract.
Your internet provider provides you with everything from the internet. They essentially are like a highway to your computer. But what if this highway had a toll booth with three options; an extremely expensive ipass allowing rich websites to pass easily to your desktop, a normal priced toll with no ipass slowing down poorer sites, and the toll could turn away any website they like. Internet service providers are trying to push for this kind of internet, a money based internet where they don’t have to show any competitors websites at all. This doesn't sound like a good thing for the internet we know and love. In order to protect the fundamental principle that the internet was based on, and small web-based companies, net neutrality Must be protected and preserved. To understand why Net Neutrality must be preserved first you have to understand it, what the current definitions are, and kinds of Net Neutrality. Alongside this, you must understand the Pro's to the current system, the arguments against the system, and the effect its change would have on small web-based companies. Net Neutrality can be defined very simply, that all websites are treated equally and distributed to the consumer or business equally. According to Tim wu, a professor at Columbia law School, he says on his personal website article Network Neutrality FAQ “The idea is that a maximally useful public information network aspires to treat all content, sites, and platforms equally.” What he is saying here is that basic concept of Net Neutrality is that no matter what provider, or platform (computer, tablet, or phone e.t.c) all content must be treated with equal delivery privileges. In other words, large companies can’t buy the top internet delivery speeds, leaving small web-based companies in the dust. However the United states Government has introduced bills, specifically The Internet Preservation Act, that do allow for Q.O.S (quality of service) discrimination. Which means that the Consumer can purchase better internet speeds and quality, across the board. However this does not mean that the provider can discriminate content, they are only aloud to do this based on the consumers subscription contract.
Your internet provider provides you with everything from the internet. They essentially are like a highway to your computer. But what if this highway had a toll booth with three options; an extremely expensive ipass allowing rich websites to pass easily to your desktop, a normal priced toll with no ipass slowing down poorer sites, and the toll could turn away any website they like. Internet service providers are trying to push for this kind of internet, a money based internet where they don’t have to show any competitors websites at all. This doesn't sound like a good thing for the internet we know and love. In order to protect the fundamental principle that the internet was based on, and small web-based companies, net neutrality Must be protected and preserved. To understand why Net Neutrality must be preserved first you have to understand it, what the current definitions are, and kinds of Net Neutrality. Alongside this, you must understand the Pro's to the current system, the arguments against the system, and the effect its change would have on small web-based companies. Net Neutrality can be defined very simply, that all websites are treated equally and distributed to the consumer or business equally. According to Tim wu, a professor at Columbia law School, he says on his personal website article Network Neutrality FAQ “The idea is that a maximally useful public information network aspires to treat all content, sites, and platforms equally.” What he is saying here is that basic concept of Net Neutrality is that no matter what provider, or platform (computer, tablet, or phone e.t.c) all content must be treated with equal delivery privileges. In other words, large companies can’t buy the top internet delivery speeds, leaving small web-based companies in the dust. However the United states Government has introduced bills, specifically The Internet Preservation Act, that do allow for Q.O.S (quality of service) discrimination. Which means that the Consumer can purchase better internet speeds and quality, across the board. However this does not mean that the provider can discriminate content, they are only aloud to do this based on the consumers subscription contract.…...

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Net Neutrality

...Current policies and practices pertaining to “net neutrality” in the Canadian context. Why or Why not is “net neutrality” an important principle? Orlando Desmond D’Souza 103455783 Dr. Valerie Scatamburlo-D'annibale Introduction to Media and Society: 40-101-01 Tuesday October 25, 2011 Net Neutrality also known as Network Neutrality is one of the most highly debated topic of the century. The debate is fundamentally based on the future of the Internet and the role it would play in the society. It has received a great deal of attention from various people including telecommunication experts, certain political representatives as well as the press. It mainly states that Internet Service providers (ISP’s) must treat all data sources equally. In other words it means that the users of the internet must have the freedom to access the internet without any restrictions put upon them by the ISP’s. The term ‘net neutrality’ is defined in a number of ways by different communities, companies and individuals. Barratt and Shade stressed upon another condition that; there are no means by which centralized mechanisms can be used to control the Internet. Moreover Moll and Shade argued that the corporations that own networks have no control of the information that runs through them (Moll & Shade, 2008: VIII). Many organizations and companies try to use it in various forms. There are several examples on net neutrality with respect to Canada with one of them being the Telus issue....

Words: 1109 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Mis Net Neutrality

...  Interactive Session: Organizations: Should Network Neutrality Continue?Case Study Questions:1. What is network neutrality? Why has the Internet operated under net neutralityup to this point in time?  Network neutrality is the idea that Internet service providers must allow customers equalaccess to content and applications regardless of the source or nature of the content.Presently the Internet is indeed neutral: all Internet traffic is treated equally on a first-come, first-serve basis by Internet backbone owners. The Internet is neutral because itwas built on phone lines, which are subject to ‘common carriage’ laws. These lawsrequire phone companies to treat all calls and customers equally. They cannot offer extra benefits to customers willing to pay higher premiums for faster or clearer calls, a modelknows as tiered service. 2. Who’s in favor of network neutrality? Who’s opposed? Why? Those in favor of network neutrality include organizations like MoveOn.org, theChristian Coalition, the American Library Association, every major consumer group,many bloggers and small businesses, and some large Internet companies like Google andAmazon. Some members of the U.S. Congress also support network neutrality. Vint Cerf,a co-inventor of the Internet Protocol also favors network neutrality saying that variableaccess to content would detract from the Internet’s continued ability to thrive. This groupargues that the risk of censorship increases when network operators can......

Words: 417 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Net Neutrality - Case Study

...Case Study 5: Net Neutrality Q2. Do some Internet research to identify the current status of Net Neutrality legislation being considered by Congress. Briefly summarize the content of the legislation. Net Neutrality in the United States has been an increasingly heated issue since the Internet blossomed. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has power to regulate "interstate and international communications by radio, television, wire, satellite and cable in all 50 states, the District of Columbia and U.S. territories" (FCC, n.d.). It would, therefore, seem a natural fit to include the Internet as another means of regulated communication. Currently, FCC regulations shape Net Neutrality more than laws. However, the FCC has recently been deemed by the court to lack the authority to enforce Net Neutrality. It's Open Internet Order, a set of policies prohibiting the blocking or charging of services by ISPs, was largely struck down in early 2014 in the ruling of Verizon v. Federal Communications Commission (Weil, 2014). The reasoning of the court was that the FCC cannot regulate the broadband providers because they are defined as data services, not telecommunication services. Since that ruling, the FCC has been considering policies involving tiered Internet access, but has yet to act. Since the court struck down FCC rule of network neutrality, there have been several attempts to enact laws regarding Net Neutrality. These include: • S. 1981, The Open Internet......

Words: 1237 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Net Neutrality

... The Internet has come a long way since being brought up around the world. Millions of people access the internet for many uses such as communicating with friends and family, accessing vital information, paying bills, online shopping, and the list goes on and on. But there is now one phenomenon that many people are unaware of, net neutrality. Net neutrality is the paradigm where ISP providers and governments restrict the access from certain Internet web sites to the public. Web sites should be open to everybody browsing on the Internet and not be restricted. We can look in depth to this dilemma by using ethical theories to help us out. When it comes to utilitarian position regarding net neutrality, many sites should be restricted because it is the greatest good for the greatest number of people. But when it comes to the deontologist position regarding net neutrality all sites should be able to be accessed with no restrictions because it should adhere to the obligations and duties of ISP providers and governments (Boulos, 2008). Utilitarian ethics has the basis to get the greatest good for the greatest number of people. When it comes to net neutrality this means blocking or restricting many web sites to the millions of users. These decisions are made by ISP providers and by governments. For example Verizon has been paying money to ISP companies to make their bandwidth larger so it could be faster than other competing companies, giving them the upper hand (Bloomberg News,......

Words: 963 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Net Neutrality

...Net Neutrality Internet users are under threat by the rules and regulations demanded by Internet service providers. The implication of this act is the deprivation of our right to free internet access. Hereafter, FCC Tom Wheeler fought back by releasing a plan to defend net neutrality and preserve our rights. Net Neutrality gives Internet users the freedom to access and enjoy any kind of content on the web and protect free speech without any restrictions or limitations. It provides a platform for innovative ideas, which the internet thrives of. This guiding principle is supported by the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) Open Internet Order, which was specifically issued to prevent Internet Service Providers (ISP) from blocking or impeding user’s connections to online content. In defense, without the Net Neutrality, Internet Service Providers would be able to strategize new ways to charge users more for access and services, which would hinder online communication. Without Net Neutrality, Internet Service Providers would be allowed to censor content and speech that does not cater to their taste, reject applications that is in competition with their own offerings and prioritize Web traffic. This paper will be written in the defense of net neutrality, in terms of importance for business and communities of color, etc., and our right to free internet access on behalf of all Internet users. There are a number of reasons why net neutrality is important to us. Net neutrality...

Words: 1011 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Ethics and Net Neutrality

...Memo To: XXXXXX From: XXXXXXXX Date: July 1, 2015 Re: Ethics and Net Neutrality Ethics and Net Neutrality This article attempts to look closely into Net Neutrality and focus on the concept of whether or not it is fair and/or ethical. Net Neutrality has been described by Wikipedia as “the principle that Internet service providers should enable access to all content and applications regardless of the source, and without favoring or blocking particular products or websites.” (Wikipedia, 2015). The idea that some providers could restrict the flow of data based on who pays more is troubling to many people. Other opinions state that the providers should be able to do as they like since it is their equipment and business to do with as they like. The author’s conclusion is that it is simply not a case of black and white. There are some instances where it would not be a good idea. His examples lists potential issues such as universities not being able to throttle data for students who are overwhelming the network with peer to peer file sharing, or perhaps private firms who provide internet access for their employees. Malware, phishing sites and other forms of malicious traffic should not have free reign on the internet. (Crenshaw, 2015) He goes on further to state that “(h)aving a blanket Network Neutrality seems problematic because there are times when it is just to discriminate against certain types of traffic.” (Crenshaw, 2015) There are also times when it......

Words: 487 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Net Neutrality

...you are one of India’s active netizens, it is unlikely that the words Net Neutrality have escaped your daily dose of social media updates and news. The debate, which gained pace post AIB’s video on the topic and news of the Airtel Zero programme, has seen some of the biggest names in the Internet and media industries give their take on the issue. More importantly, last month India’s telecom regulator TRAI came out with a consultation paper on the growth of Over-the-top (OTT) players like WhatsApp or Skype and is looking at exploring a regulatory framework for these apps. In essence, Net Neutrality implies that all Internet data pack should be treated equally, that there should be no fast or slow lanes for Internet, or that users should pay differently for accessing some websites. While online activists and even big Internet companies in India like ClearTrip, Flipkart, have come out to support Net Neutrality, the debate isn’t really as simple when it comes to India. He says the telecos’ argument about loss revenue due to rise of OTT’s isn’t a legitimate one but adds that instead of going for more regulation TRAI can look to reduce some differential regulations for telecos to make things easier for them. There’s also a growing belief that TRAI hasn’t acted fairly when it comes to its paper on OTTs. The Internet and Mobile Association of India (IAMAI) has slammed TRAI saying OTTs are already regulated and governed by the IT Act. A statement issued by IAMAI President Subho......

Words: 1110 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Net Neutrality

...The idea of net neutrality has been around since the invention of the telegram and telephone system. This idea of neutrality led to the passage of the Communications Act of 1934 which regulates telecommunications by prohibiting preferential treatment and unfair consumer costs (The Communications Act of 1934). However, the term “net neutrality” as it pertains to the internet was first used by Tim Wu in 2003 in his article “Network Neutrality, Broadband Discrimination” (Wu, 2003). In March of 2005, the concept became more well known when the internet service provider (ISP) Madison River Communications was caught blocking all of its subscribers from using a voice over internet protocol (VoIP) service called Vonage. The company blocked this service because their own telecommunications service was competing against Vonage’s lower prices, made possible by utilizing customers’ internet connections instead of telephone lines (Ante & Crockett, 2005). Vonage made a complaint to the FCC, and Madison River Communications had to pay a $15,000 fine (Regan, 2005). Later in 2005, the FCC released an internet policy statement, which outlined support for an early version of net neutrality. This statement was meant to “encourage broadband deployment and preserve and promote the open and interconnected nature of the public Internet” by adopting the following principles: • allowing consumers access to the lawful internet content of their choice, • allowing consumers access to run......

Words: 2517 - Pages: 11

Free Essay

Net Neutrality

...2015 Net Neutrality The purpose of this research paper is to discuss how net-neutrality regulations will hinder competition and innovative growth. The research paper starts with an introduction of net neutrality then proceeds to the main argument of the topic. The paper will examine how net neutrality regulations have posed threats to internet use while reviewing some the work done different scholars. At the end of this part, an argument will be presented to show how threat to internet use will hinder competition and innovation growth. To strengthen the argument and stand of this paper, the paper will also examine the importance of net neutrality in businesses and communities which are core for development and show how this regulations will hinder innovation and competition to businesses and communities due to lack of information. The paper shall close with a conclusion part that will sum up the ideas discussed in the paper and bring to light how net neutrality will hinder competition and innovation. A research done by Bauer, Johannes, and Woohyun on "Regulation and innovation in Telecommunications" revealed that more than any other innovation or invention of our time, the Internet has opened potential outcomes we could barely imagine of a generation ago (Bauer 9). The research provided major reasons we have seen such extraordinary development and advancement as most Internet providers have treated Internet traffic in an equal manner. That is the principle known as "net......

Words: 2041 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

Net Neutrality

...Net Neutrality is the principle that internet service providers should enable access to all content and applications regardless of the source, and without favoring or blocking particular products or websites. The internet was all new territory so it was not properly regulated when the Internet was invented. The providers abused the system and would prioritize larger businesses over the smaller businesses. In a lot of people’s eyes, they were bordering on unethical business practices. These net neutrality problems, ironically, lead to an uprising on the internet and thousands of people started to recognize the inconsistencies in the fine print. This was mainly brought on by what happened to Netflix. In order to force Netflix to buy a more expensive service, Comcast slowed down the speeds for Netflix customers by an incredible amount. I have Comcast and have experienced these slowed speeds first hand. At one point my videos spent more time buffering then the video lasted. This uproar on the internet lead to the Obama administration approving very strong net neutrality rules. President Obama even thanked Reddit, the self-proclaimed “Front Page of the Internet”, for its community activism on the issue. However, even though the rules have been approved, Telecom and many cable companies are challenging the Obama Administration’s actions in court. This issue is far from Net Neutrality can be good for a business in a lot of ways. For example, a small stock broking firm that has......

Words: 562 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Net Neutrality

...Are you in favor of legislation enforcing network neutrality? Why or why not? I am in favor of legislation enforcing network neutrality. As stated in the first CNET news video, without legislation broadband providers would be able to block or slow down access to certain applications or websites on the internet and it would essentially turn into what we see our cable companies in the US doing. I cannot tolerate the way our cable companies operate in the US and refuse to pay for such a service. Cable providers have turned into a closed system where they control or have a say in all of the content that you view. Without net neutrality, internet service providers would be able to charge excess fees to larger companies that require more data use and would essentially hurt the customer. It would hurt the customer because with these larger companies like Netflix and Amazon having to pay excess fees, they would be forced to put the burden of those fees on us, the customers. No net neutrality will hurt future online companies trying to emerge into successful businesses. Online businesses will become scarce due to high barriers being introduced by internet service providers. This is not something I want to see happen. I personally do a lot of business online. Selling products on eBay, purchasing products from other websites. One of the few fears I do have about this new net neutrality bills is how it will affect the way the internet operates down the road. With the internet......

Words: 497 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Net Neutrality

...Are you for or against Net Neutrality? I am in favor of Net Neutrality. I believe in Net Neutrality and the freedom of speech on the Internet. Content within a site should be free to the public. By protecting open Internet, it will insure that the Internet is not own by only a hand full of key players in the industry like Google, Verizon, Comcast dominating the Internet. What are your thoughts concerning this? My major concern about net neutrality is that few key companies would dominate the Internet. It might means pushing small companies out of business due to key players in the industry would take control over the cost of Internet, speed of the Internet, and even take control of access to information over the Internet. Internet became a part of our lives and in past 10 years most of our offline activities like banking, shopping, and professional recruitment are following the trends and move to the online world. For better or for worse, the Internet is changing the way we are evolving. At “The Future of the Internet” public hearing, FCC Commissioner Mignon L. Clyburn said “New and innovative media companies are constantly starting-up today, citizen journalism is on the rise, blogs have an increasing influence on public discourse, and media providers from broadcast networks to newspapers are shifting their strategies online. For these reasons and more, I say without hesitation, that an open Internet is indeed the great equalizer. It enables......

Words: 356 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Net Neutrality

... Browse Essays/Technology Net Neutrality This essay Net Neutrality is available for you on Essays24.com! Search Term Papers, College Essay Examples and Free Essays on Essays24.com - full papers database. Autor: anton • November 11, 2010 • 680 Words (3 Pages) • 326 Views Page 1 of 3 As someone who has had some sort of web presence for over ten years , I am completely and unequivocally in favor of net neutrality. Google defines net neutrality as "the principle that Internet users should be in control of what content they view and what applications they use on the Internet. " What net neutrality means to me, is that the content I have to share (however mundane it may be) has an equal opportunity of reaching any Internet user as any other content on any other web site. There are some interesting videos on You Tube discussing this topic most notably Robin Miller's video which talks about how net neutrality benefits individuals like you and me. However, the threat to net neutrality impacts everyone--small businesses, large businesses, and individuals . If we lose the battle to maintain net neutrality it could stifle competition amongst businesses online with the only companies remaining being the ones who can afford to pay premiums to broadband service providers for prioritization. Technologies like packet shaping (not necessarily a bad technology depending on what it is used for) are paving the way for such discrimination. Small businesses will find it more difficult to......

Words: 2945 - Pages: 12

Free Essay

Net Neutrality

...pages, but it’s not as easy as it sounds. With placing restrictions on the internet another major issue arises that of net neutrality. What is net neutrality? , The term net neutrality means that the users should have the full access to the internet and they should have the full authority to decide what to view and what not to view rather than the service providing companies (Sutherland, 2010) (2). With Net neutrality as our main perspective we can discuss the deontologist and utilitarian side of it. The principle of deontologist states that the moral worth of a cause is independent of the consequences resulting due to it. It also states that the most important act is to adhere to the duties and nothing else (Boulos, 2008) (3). In other words for our every decision we have a reason and what is more important is to go ahead with it if it is based on our duties and principals. This is the theory of Kant which is applied universally. If we apply Kant’s theory to net neutrality then we come up with the result that the basic duty of the internet providing companies is to provide internet to its user. This service has to be provided to all the users equally without a biased approach. The consequences of doing so are irrelevant as the companies are adhering to their primary duty of proving access to internet without any restrictions. Many cases regarding net neutrality are recently being published in main stream media. One of such cases is the case regarding the downloading speed......

Words: 977 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Net Neutrality

...Johnny Everly Ms. Phillips Composition II 03/14/2011 The Battle for Neutrality The internet today is a global system of interconnected networks that serves billions of people worldwide. The internet is one of the most popular means for communication and information in the twenty-first century all over the world. Whether the internet is accessed from an office location, a home residence, a school, or even a mobile phone there is a connection being made with an Internet Service Provider (ISP). An Internet Service Provider maintains the infrastructure that allows different devices to be connected to networks that make the internet. As of today all information or “packets” are treated equally; and consumers pay for the connectivity of the interne. Some consumers pay for a faster connection rate, but do not get faster delivery for a specific type of content just faster for all types of information. This is why the internet today is vastly growing as one of the most popular innovations on the planet, all made possible by Net Neutrality. The argument that is going on states; that service providers can charge websites a fee for faster data transmission then others. Net neutrality states consumers should have access to lawful internet content; run applications and services of their choice; use equipment of their choice without interference from the provider. In the argument on net neutrality it is stated that people should have access to lawful internet at any time. As it...

Words: 829 - Pages: 4