Free Essay

Lockheed Case Study

In: Business and Management

Submitted By nickisdacube
Words 2458
Pages 10
2013

Lockheed TriStar Case Study

Group 6
Leon Krolikowski
Sitaram Koppaka
Brian Manning
Tushar Mahajan
Ryan Maggiorini
Nicholas Manning

UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSSETS
SUMMER 2013
SCH MGMT 640
PROFESSOR RAJ GUPTA

Table of Contents Executive Summary 2 Introduction/Motivation 3 Data Analysis and Results 4 Conclusion 8 Appendix 9 References 10

Executive Summary

Lockheed’s L-1011 Tri Star Airbus program was a long-term, capital-intensive endeavor projected to strongly position Lockheed to compete in the commercial aircraft market. The initial preproduction investments for the program were made in 1967, with continued investments occurring during the subsequent four years, until the program commenced production in 1972. However, during the intervening period, initial program assumptions began to unravel, and Lockheed, which was also a major contractor to the United States Department of Defense, was before Congress, requesting a $250 million bank loan guarantee to complete the L-1011 program. By 1971, over 80% of Lockheed’s market capitalization had already been lost.
During the ensuing debate that followed, it appeared that Lockheed had not taken due diligence in the planning for the project, and that initial unit sales and revenue estimates would fall woefully short of being what Lockheed’s CEO termed as a “commercially viable endeavor”. As the continued difficulties of the program unfolded before the public and the investment community, it became clear that no combination of increased revenues, reduced production costs, or increased market share yielded a realistic scenario by which the L-1011 could create shareholder value.
As this case was analyzed, it became apparent that achievement of an accounting break-even objective was simply unrealistic unless wildly optimistic assumptions about sales revenues, production cost reductions, industry growth rates and market share capture each occurred simultaneously. Even if these favorable outcomes were each achieved it is unclear as to whether it was possible to achieve true economic break-even for shareholders, as discounting eroded the present value of cash-flows which were heavily weighted toward the end of this ten-year capital investment project. It was next to impossible to justify a set of business conditions supportive of a positive net present value for the L-1011 project. In the end, perhaps not surprisingly, the L-1011 program did not meet unit sales projections and Lockheed common stock plummeted over 95% to $3.25 per share.
What happened? Was the L-1011 program undertaken without rigorous financial analysis? Were initial program assumptions simply erroneous? Did decision-makers at Lockheed and within Congress simply “double down” on a bad investment decision by considering the program’s cumulative sunk costs incurred between 1967 and 1971? Was it simply a political decision by the federal government to protect a valued defense contractor?
What is not entirely clear is why Lockheed did not heed a simple NPV/IRR analysis which shows that the TriStar was not viable from an investment perspective. Perhaps, Lockheed planned to pass along project costs to defense projects or wanted to be a “loss leader” and in turn reestablish itself within the commercial aircraft market (Reinhardt, 2001).
The analysis that follows will demonstrate that it was likely a combination of these factors that contributed to the failed L-1011 project. Proven principles of investment analysis were not undertaken (or were not undertaken based upon realistic business assumptions). On that basis, it is not surprising that the outcome was extremely damaging to Lockheed and its shareholders.
Introduction/Motivation
This is an interesting case since it raises two major mutually dependent issues one is the raging debate about federal bail outs of large corporations and the other about the value of money generated off these federal backed businesses that could justify the guarantees from government. It is truly amazing that we have the same discussion today that happened around 40 years ago.
The Lockheed L-1011 TriStar was a medium-to-long range, wide body trijet airliner. It was the third wide body airliner to enter commercial operations, after the Boeing 747 and the McDonnell Douglas DC-10. It was born when American Airlines approached Lockheed and competitor Douglas with a need for an aircraft smaller than the existing 747, but still capable of flying to distant locales such as London, the Caribbean, and Latin America. Lockheed having experienced difficulties with some of their military programs was eager to re-enter the civil market, and their response was the L-1011 TriStar (Lockheed L-1011 Tri Star, 2006).
In order to create a more advanced, quieter design aircraft, L-1011 exclusively tied up with Rolls-Royce for their RB2012 engine. TriStar had problems in the beginning when American Airlines opted for McDonald Douglas due to lower price. Also, Douglas beat TriStar production by a year. In addition, the high production costs of the RB2012 engine drove Rolls Royce to file for bankruptcy, halting L-1011 final assembly. The British government did not approve the large state subsidy used to restart Rolls-Royce operations until after the U.S. government had guaranteed the Lockheed loans previously provided to Rolls for the extensive engine contract (20th Century Aviation.com, 2012).
The company pleaded with the federal government, claiming that 60,000 American jobs were on the line, and narrowly won $250 million in loan guarantees from Congress (St. Petersburg Times, 1971). The bailout helped Lockheed bring the L-1011 TriStar to market in 1972. At the time of Lockheed’s CEO testimony, 103 firm orders were placed for the wide body commercial jet with an additional 75 options to buy. This was well short of the company’s break even estimate of 195-205 aircraft (Edleson, 1993).
We intend to study this case and perform analysis to investigate if it was a program worth federal backing. The analysis will include: * True value of the program * Accounting break even VS financial break even * Validity of growth projections * Impact of the expected growth on value of the program

Data Analysis and Results
From the given data and analysis we can gather enough information to show where Lockheed over estimated their abilities to sell their aircraft and ultimately took on a project that should have never made it to production. In 1968 when Lockheed was trying to secure federal guarantee for the bank credits required for their project they stated, in their favor, the following; * The Tri Star program was economically sound * The need for federal guarantee was simply due to reduction in other product lines, that this project was indeed profitable * Between 195-205 aircraft needed to be sold for total revenue to cover accumulated costs * Production would run from 1971 to the end of 1977 * Estimated output was around 210 aircraft * At states production levels production costs would be $14mm per aircraft * Sales revenue was estimated at $16mm per unit sold (25% of which was received roughly two years before delivery of the plane)

One point that puts the estimated breakeven sales figure into prospective is that Lockheed only had 103 firm orders with an additional 75 options to buy in place. Assuming that all buy options were exercised Lockheed would only have obtained 178 orders; this still fell short of their required breakeven sales by 17 aircraft at the company’s most optimistic values. Furthermore, from the information provided by Lockheed, the project had a net present value of over -$584 million dollars which indicates that this project should have never been considered from a financial perspective. Another indicating factor that lends itself to showing the poor return of Lockheed’s production plans is the projects internal rate of return (IRR). With the same information that was indicating a negative NPV the plan’s IRR is calculated at -9.09%.

Had the members of the Congressional hearing been aware of the enormous loss perhaps guaranteeing the bank loans would have never happened; instead Congress bought into their position and before long the true market conditions and realistic factors played out and proved Lockheed to be unable to obtain their far reached goals?
A few years later Lockheed was again defending their position and produced new market share numbers and new breakeven analysis, both were slowly starting to show how much more was needed to turn a profit on the new jetliner. In 1972 Lockheed announced revised projections with updated sales estimations, production costs, and market share estimates: * Breakeven sales around 275 aircraft * Production costs at this level would be roughly $12.5mm per unit * If sales were able to reach 500 units production costs might fall as low as $11mm per aircraft * Lockheed would hold 35-40% of market share for this particular type of product (roughly 270-310 planes) * Predicted a 10% annual growth in air travel creating a need for their product

With the new information given Lockheed was going to need to product a minimum of 70 additional aircraft to allow the revenue of those planes to cover the total cost invested in the product line, proving the original breakeven point to be drastically underestimated. Another estimate that later proved to be highly optimistic was Lockheed’s goal of obtaining 35-40% market share for wide body aircraft in an industry growing at 10% annually; more acceptable and more realistic estimates put the growth rate of air travel at a meager 5% per year. This overestimate created a demand for the aircraft that in reality did not exist. Regardless of the project’s pending doom the new figures painted a brighter picture for the company. NPV was lowered to only -$311 million and IRR actually turned positive and became 1.08%.

Given these new indicators, the project should still have never been taken on and the government should have never agreed to guarantee their bank loans. Net present value remained negative (Brealey, 2012).
Additionally, if we consider the projections by industry analyst, the scenario looks as follows:

In order to reach the true economic break-even, Lockheed would have to sell 480 aircraft while controlling per unit cost to $12.5M. In the most optimistic scenario, if Lockheed could sell 323 aircraft while controlling costs at $11 million per annum, it could have been able to generate true value of $25 million.

Conclusion
The group initiated its inquiry into the Lockheed Tri-Star case with the intention of analyzing two major issues: first, the debate about federal bail outs of large corporations; second, the value of money generated from federally-backed businesses that could justify the guarantees from government.
The NPV calculated at different scenarios are summarized in (See Appendix Exhibit One). Looking at these results, it is obvious that the Lockheed Tri-Star project was an overambitious project and should not have been kicked-off in the first place. At the onset, the program assumptions included the sale of 210 aircraft, over a period of six years. Unfortunately, these assumptions led to a plan that featured a negative NPV of approximately $500 million. Four years after the project kick-off, when Lockheed approached the federal government for a loan guaranty, the project was still not an attractive investment. As this analysis shows, in order to achieve true economic break-even, Lockheed would need to sell 480 aircraft, which ultimately proved to be unrealistic considering the total market for wide-body aircraft. As the results of this great failure, the common stock price of Lockheed plunged almost 94%, from $71 to $3.25 over the period of 6 years and investors lost around $765 million of marker value (See Appendix Exhibit Two).
Despite the dubious profit potential, Lockheed may have known the TriStar would be a loss and moved forward in the hope that lost costs would be covered by other defense projects or that they hoped to be a “loss leader” in their desire to re-enter the commercial airline industry (Reinhardt, 2001). Industry experts such as William F. Rockwell, the Chairman of a prominent aerospace company, stated: “…The only way that Lockheed could conceivably break even on the project is by getting the entire market for the airbus.” This strategy, of course, was not feasible and was never successfully realized. (Reinhardt, 2001).
The aforementioned analysis and evidence raise concerns as to the government deciding to provide a loan guaranty of $250 million. Why did the government intervene and protect Lockheed from free market economic forces? There are two probable reasons: (1) 60,000 jobs were dependent on the program and; (2) Rolls Royce was financially dependent on the Lockheed Program. In support of the notion that, “history repeats itself”, recent years have featured numerous federal government bailouts—most notably those of AIG, General Motors, as well as many financial institutions, all of which were not based on sound financial analysis. I
In the instant matter, the failure of the TriStar program, (which was not sound from an entry-level financial analysis perspective), private interest groups and government forces combined to make decisions that were not fact-based, financially sound decisions. Instead, decisions were made that led to a small group (contractors and subcontractors) seeing financial benefits while the public loses, which led to losses throughout the financial marketplace. Ultimately, poorly structured financial bailouts do more harm than good. The Tristar program was a poor investment for both Lockheed and the federal government—many smart people made bad decisions—hopefully a lesson learned.

Appendix
Exhibit 1: Summary of NPV calculated at different scenarios Scenario | Total Sales | $ Price (M) | $ Cost (M) | NPV (M) | Initial Plan | 210 | 16 | 14 | (584.05) | At the time of Federal bail-out | 276 | 16 | 12.5 | (311.15) | Expected sales forecast by industrial Analyst | 300 | 16 | 12.5 | (274.38) | Optimistic scenario with sales 323 and cost 11 M | 323 | 16 | 11 | 25.08 | Break-even by optimum sales and cost savings | 480 | 16 | 12.5 | 1.37 | Exhibit 2: Total value lost by investors Value lost by Investors | | Stock price before Lockheed project in Jan'68 | $71 | Stock price after Lockheed project in Jan'74 | $3.25 | Total value lost | $67.75 | Total number of stocks outstanding | 11,300,000 | Total value lost by investors | $765,575,000.00 |

References
Lockheed L-1011 Tri Star. (2006). Retrieved July 2013, from Aviastar.org - Virtual Aircraft Museum: http://www.aviastar.org/air/usa/lok_tristar.php
20th Century Aviation.com. (2012, June). What Happened to the Lockheed L-1011. Retrieved July 2013, from 20th Century Aviation.com: http://20thcenturyaviationmagazine.com/v-aircraft/what-happen-to-the-lockheed-l-1011/
Brealey, R. A. (2012). Fundamentals of Corporate Finance. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Edleson, M. (1993). Investment Analysis and Lockheed Tri Star. Harvard Business School, 3-6.
Reinhardt, U. (2001). Break-Even Analysis for Lockheed's Tri Star: An Application of Financial Theory. Journal of Finance.
The St. Petersburg Times. (1971, July 16). Why Lockheed Feels U.S. Should Cosign Its Loan. The St. Petersburg Times.…...

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Monopoly - Case Study

...U.S. Monopoly on Global Weapons Trade The 19th and 20th centuries have been the centuries of monopoly capitalism. As we move into the 21st century, there is a new cultural and economic phenomenon arising: monopoly militarism. That is the subject this case study attempts to explore “ U.S. monopoly on the militarization of the world” . The Global arms trade can effectively be referred to as “the global weapons monopoly." Cold war and after During cold war days, the United States did have a major competitor. For instance, the Congressional Research Service's data for 1990, the last year of the Soviet Union's existence, shows global weapons sales totaling $32.7 billion, with the United States accounting for $12.1 billion of that or 37% of the market.  For its part, the Soviet Union was responsible for a competitive $10.7 billion in deals inked that year.  France, China, and the United Kingdom accounted for most of the rest. However in 2008, according to report from the Congressional Research Service (CRS), $55.2 billion in weapons deals were concluded worldwide. Of that total, the United States was responsible for $37.8 billion in weapons sales agreements, or 68.4% of the total "trade." US agreements with all of its customers include not only sales of very costly major weapons systems, but also the upgrading and the support of systems previously provided. The arms agreements involving a wide variety of items such as spare parts, ammunition, ordnance, training, and......

Words: 1602 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Lockheed Tristar Case

... Lockheed Tristar (1) Should Lockheed have pursued the Tri Star project in 1967? What are the main concerns with their analysis of the project? There are multiple different factors to look at when deciding if Lockheed should have pursued the Tri Star project in 1967. There are 6 techniques that are generally applied to assist in this decision: Internal Rate of Return (IRR), Net Present Value (NPV), Payback Method, Discounted Payback Method, Accounting Rate of Return, and Profitability Index. The most frequently used alternative capital budget methods, IRR, NPV and Payback Method, were used to evaluate this project. The Payback Method is not a useful method in its own right, but may have been unwisely used by Lockheed management in deciding on the Tri Star project, and so is discussed here. Based upon Lockheed’s numbers at 210 units (see Table A attached), the resulting NPV of the net generated cash flows is -$584 million and the corresponding IRR is -9.09%. Considering the 10% discount rate is optimistic, the actual results could be worse. The Payback Period calculation shows the project does not achieve payback in the project’s lifetime even on a pure accounting basis. There are several flaws in Lockheed’s initial analysis of the project, besides failing to properly discount cash flows to present: too optimistic projections of sales potential (estimating capture of 35-40% of the market); highly generous discount rate at 10% (considering the risk); highly optimistic......

Words: 497 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Case Study Case Study Case Study

...This case study is an excellent example of how different types of parties can be brought together in a large scale transaction and how the original energy of those early meetings can be lost over time. I imagine that when Anthony Athanas was purchasing those old piers back in the 1960s many, if not all, of his colleagues, friends, and family members told him that he was off his rocker. I’m sure Athanas was looking at this land as his family’s ticket to financial prosperity and somewhat of a legacy that he could leave to his descendants for years and years to come. One of the items I wish the case would have divulged is the amount of money that Athanas had invested in the properties. For me this information would have given an insight to his net worth and how much he had riding on this investment. I assume it was substantial given his actions later in the process. Twenty years later Athanas’ dreams came true and all those naysayers were more than likely green with envy. The amount of pride Athanas’ had in his investment at that moment had to have been insurmountable. Being approached by a big time real estate development company and their extremely wealthy client, Hyatt Corporation, must have made Athanas feel larger than life and made him feel like something he isn’t, which is a developer himself. The case doesn’t give much insight into whether Athanas had any representation or anyone consulting him throughout the process. From the beginning, I saw this as matchup...

Words: 1190 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Lockheed Tri Star Case Study

...LOCKHEED   TRI STAR   Analysis & Recommendations                       Toby Odenheim      10‐OCT‐2013 Executive Summary With the L-1011 Tri Star program, Lockheed, well respected for military aircraft contracts, started to move into the civilian commercial aviation sector in direct competition with Airbus, McDonnell Douglas and Boeing. By 1971, having already invested $700 million in development costs, Lockheed was struggling with cash flow and sought $250 Million in federal loan guarantees, funding which was needed to complete development. Despite Lockheed’s assertion to the contrary, NPV analysis demonstrates that the project was never financially viable. However, given the sunk costs, Lockheed’s best option is to continue with production to minimize the project loss. Continuing to production yields an expected NPV loss of $584 million (assuming estimated sales of 210 aircraft) versus a loss of $900 million if production is scrapped outright. Recommendations:   Secure the needed $250 million in funding to complete R&D and move into production. Pursue every option possible to boost total sales, including o Adding an option to lease the aircraft rather than purchase outright. This could help more customers afford the L-1011 thereby driving up sales on reducing unit production costs. o Pursue possible sale of the L-1011 to military and (international) government buyers, rather than focuses exclusively on the commercial market. o Attempt to......

Words: 1539 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Case Study

...The Case Study Approach Linda P. Williams Liberty University Online Author Note Linda P. Williams, Department of Psychology, Liberty University Online Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Linda P. Williams, Department of Psychology, Liberty University Online, 1971 University Blvd, Lynchburg, VA 24515, E-mail: lwilliams91@liberty.edu The Case Study Approach Introduction At some point during the pursuit of a degree psychology, the time comes when a student must learn various research techniques. One of the many approaches is case study, which this paper will focus on. Areas of discussion include reasons for using a case study, advantages/disadvantages to the approach, and ways acquire information to perform a case study. The essence of a case study A case study is used to offer a mental accounting of a person, school, neighborhood, business, or group of individuals over the course of time, way of research. It is sometimes referred to as naturalistic observation, but does not always follow the same protocol. Mental accounting is done by means of observation of various behavior or mind sets operating in their natural environment. This is noteworthy, especially when participants have a distinct disorder worthy of being studied to further the cause of research and development. Depending on the purpose of the investigation, the case study may present the individual’s history, symptoms, characteristic behaviors, reactions to......

Words: 671 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Lockheed Case Study

...Case: L-1011 By Carlos Mateos Santander LOCKHEED Case Study Recommendation I recommend to Lockheed shut down the L-1011 project in which you are involved because in a realistic scenario in which they could sell 330-380 airplanes until 1980 and taking in consideration a cost reduction base on cost “learning curve” and their financial problem in two other project (Lockheed C-5 and the cancelation of AH-56A helicopter) their NPV would be -$85 mill. In this case our recommendation would be shut down your commercial aircraft project and try to keep being one of the best companies in military aircraft. This would be hard, but with the C-5 project and future projects that the government is going to give you would be easy fix this situation. Background and information: At the en of the 60´s Lockheed has three important projects in which are: * Lockheed C-5: This is a huge airplane that Lockheed is developing for US Government but they are having problem with the final price because it was more than the price that they expected but the government doesn’t want to pay more money, but it is sure that the US government is going to buy the airplanes that they request and it is possible that in the future they will do more orders. * Helicopter AH-56A: This is an amazing helicopter that Lockheed is developing for the US army, but the cost is going up and it is possible that US government cancel because they can not support that cost for one helicopter for......

Words: 877 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Violence in the Workplace: a Case Study

...Contemporary Management Class 48A Violence in the Workplace: A Case Study Problem Definition: Rising rates of violence in the workplace have reached epidemic levels, causing distress to its victims, their families, and the businesses. Steps should be taken to prevent future incidents of this nature, however there is no clear consensus on the best method. Problem Justification: Called by some a “National Epidemic”, workplace violence now affects nearly half of US workers. The exact numbers may vary, but were stated by the US Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) as 20,000 assaults and 792 homicides in 2005 alone. Clearly, this problem not only has negative effects on the victims of these incidents, but it also affects their families and communities in both financial and psychological ways. It also affects the companies where such incidents take place in multiple ways. It can lead to loss of morale between employees, and can lead to financial losses by the company for compensation to the affected parties. Most importantly, it sometimes has serious legal repercussions, as in the case of the lawsuit against Lockheed Martin in the aftermath of the Doug Williams shooting incident. So what can be done to prevent or reduce the prevalence of workplace violence? Possible Soultions: 1) Installing metal detectors in the workplace. 2) Employee screening process during the hiring process to avoid hiring at-risk individuals 3) Early detection and...

Words: 537 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Case Study

...shooting at the Toledo assembly plant was not an isolated incident. Just 2 years earlier, Doug Willaims, an employee at Lockheed Martin, left in the middle of an ethics meeting, went to his car, and came back with several guns. He then shot six coworkers to death and wounded eight others before committing suicide. Every year, nearly half of US workers report having faced aggression from coworkers, customers, or supervisors. And according to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), roughly 20,000 assaults and 792 homicides occurred at workplaces throughout the US in 2005. Such violence prompted the Center for Disease Control and Prevention to label workplace violence a “national epidemic”. In addition to the obvious devastation workplace violence causes victims and their families, businesses of the experience serious repercussions, including legal action. Lockheed Martin is still embroiled in a legal battle over whether the company should assume part of the responsibility for the shooting that took place at its plant. And Paul Medlen has filed suit against DaimlerChrysler and the plant’s security firm, alleging that both failed to provide adequate security. Given the tremendous damage that companies and employees face violent episodes, why aren’t businesses doing more to curtail workplace violence? According to a recent study by the American Society of Safety Engineers, only one percent of US businesses have formal antiviolence......

Words: 583 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Lockheed

...Lockheed Tri Star and Capital Budgeting Andrea Cunha D’ Arruda Financial Decision Making University of California San Diego – Extension Prof. George A. Haloulakos, CFA Executive Summary The commercial jet aircraft business is cyclical, and in need of huge amount of cash to invest and reinvest on its technology. During the 50’s Boeing, Airbus, and Lockheed were in a great competition for market share of the commercial and military aircraft market. This case illustrates the importance of NPV analysis in capital budgeting and the need of identification of competitive advantage with synergy with successful jet aircraft programs with new programs that can generate very large cash flows. The Lockheed TriStar Jet is a medium-to-long range wide-body trijet airliner and was the third to enter commercial operations, after Boeing 747 and DC-10. The program faced various issues during its operation, as the utilization of only one jet engine supplier (Rolls Royce), low estimated required rate of return 10%, and a misjudge of the break-even point of 210 aircrafts, that it is going to be shown on this analyzes that even with 300 aircrafts sold the project do not reach the break-even point. It is recommended by this study that the company need to embrace a business strategy of two end user, instead of only one, to the L1011 program. Concentrating only on the commercial market is not viable, but having the military market as a background of funds and positive cash flow can......

Words: 1396 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Lockheed Tri Star Case Write Up

...LOCKHEED TRI STAR CASE STUDY 10/18/2010 Group #8 Case Write-Up   Lockheed Tri Star Case Study EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Although highly regarded by the military, Lockheed sought to move into the lucrative civilian commercial aviation sector and compete with Boeing, McDonnell Douglas and Airbus. Lockheed began design and testing in 1966 on their entry, the “Tri Star”, which boasted a range of over 6,000 miles with nearly 400 passengers and speeds of close to 600 mph. They had already invested nearly $900 million in development costs. Carried by state of the art Rolls Royce turbofan engines, the L-1011 was by all accounts, a technological winner and might be the company’s ticket back to solvency. The summer of 1971 found the once formidable company on the brink of disaster. Despite the nearly a $1 billion in sunk costs, Lockheed was in need of $250 million more to bring the plane to market, but its bankers would not commit without federal loan guarantees. Spokespersons for Lockheed claimed before Congress that the Tri-Star program was economically sound and that their problem was mere liquidity crisis. However, opposition to the guarantee focused on estimated break-even sales – the number of jets that would need to be sold for total revenue to cover all accumulated costs. This case illustrates the importance of NPV analysis in capital budgeting. We examined the decision to invest in the Tri-Star project by forecasting the cash flow associated with the......

Words: 1913 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Case Study

...Case Study Complete Case History The patient in this case study reports being ‘sick with flu’ for 8 days. She has been vomiting, and cannot keep any liquids or food down. She also reports that she has been using antacids to help calm the nausea. After fainting at home, she was taken to the local hospital, severely dehydrated. Upon looking at her arterial blood gas result, it would appear that this patient would be suffering from metabolic alkalosis. This patient’s pH is greater than 7.45 (normal: 7.35-7.45) and her bicarbonate (HCO3) is greater than 26 (normal 22-26). Blood gases indicate that case study patient is suffering from hypochloremic metabolic alkalosis. Focused Assessment The case study patient reports being “sick with flu” for eight days. She reports vomiting several times a day and taking more the recommended dose of antacids. She reports that she fainted today at home and came to the hospital. The case study patient reports that this all started approximately eight days ago. The case study patient also reported taking excess amounts of antacids. Ingesting large amounts of this medication can cause metabolic alkalosis. When antacids are taken in large doses, the ions are unable to bind, and therefor the bicarbonate is reabsorbed and causes alkalosis (Lehne, 2013). Renal and Respiratory systems response Hypochloremic Metabolic alkalosis occurs when there is an acid loss due to prolonged vomiting which causes a decrease in the extracellular...

Words: 289 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Case Study: Investment Analysis and Lockheed Tri Star

...Case study: Investment Analysis and Lockheed Tri Star MGMTS-2700 Professor Hamza Abdurezak Harvard University Yang Zhon 1> A. Payback, NPV, IRR, Should purchase or not? Payback: $35,000/5000=7 year NPV: =Co+ C1…..n/(1+i)^1….n Co=-3,5000 CF1-CF15= 5,000; I= 12 Computing result is $-945.67 IRR: 11.49% NPV is negative and IRR is lower 12% so reject the proposal. B. NPV: =Co+ C1…..n/(1+i)^1….n NPV= -35000+(4500/.12) =2500 NPV is positive so should purchase the machine. C. NPV: =Co+ C1…..n/(1+i)^1….n = -35,000(4000/(0.12-0.04)) =-35,000+50,000 =15,000 NPV is positive so rainbow should reinvest the cost saving into the machine annually. 2. Cash Flow: Investment Y1 Y2 Y3 IRR NPV@15% 1. -75k44k44k44k34.63% 25,461.91 2. -50k23k23k23k18.01% 2,514.18 3. -125k70k70k 70k 31.21%34,825.76 4. - 1k12k13k14k1207.06%28,469.88 5. -125k67k67k 67k28.10% 27,976.08 1,Using IRR I recommend the (4) 2, Using NPV I recommend the proposal (3) 3,NPV is better! The NPV method is better because it shows the most cash flow as the highest. Because the discount rate is 15%, it is building a new both is prioritized higher. 4. 1, NPV=PV-Investment =210k-110k=100k 2. Assuming issue N shares when price is P. N*P=110,000(1) P=1,210,000/(10,000+N) (2) Then computing the result So N=1000 P=$110 3, Stock price rises up $10 Stock holder make the profit. Out cash flow in cash flownet cash......

Words: 341 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Case Studies

...Case studies Name: Tutor: Course: Institution: Date: Flying to the Auto Bailout on a Private Jet Basic problems In this case study, there is wastage of resources. The CEOs of the nation's three largest automobiles uses private jets to attend the corporate public relations congress. This is wastage of resources since they are using private jets to travel when their companies are struggling to stay afloat. Ignorance is another basic problem evident in this case study. These CEOs are very ignorant. They attend the corporate public relation congress in Washington unprepared and thus appear to know nothing about their problems. The three companies, GM, Ford and Chrysler, lack the concepts of public relations. The main issues American economy is melting down. Most of the workers are losing their jobs since the companies cannot handle many workers anymore. The companies have got inadequate cash. Bankruptcy is another main issue experienced in this case study. The General Motors Company and the Chrysler can no longer pay their debts. Key decisions * According to the case study, the leaders have to come up with a new public relations strategy. * The CEOs should correct any mistakes they have made before such as using private jets to travel. * Introduce innovation in products * The auto industry of the US should promote its products. * Ensure transparency in business operations. SWOT analysis Strengths * Availability of resources for the......

Words: 657 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Case Study

...ASSIGNMENT GUIDANCE – NRSG258 ASSESSMENT 1: CASE STUDY Dear students here are some guidelines to assist you in writing Assessment 1: Case Study. If, after reading through these, you still have questions please post on the relevant forum. If you are still unsure then please contact your campus specific lecturer to arrange to discuss your assignment. We ask that you bring these guidelines to any meeting and highlight the areas about which you are still unsure. In this case study you do not need an introduction or conclusion for this case study of 1500 WORDS ± 10% due by midnight 8th April Turnitin. Just answer the questions. Turnitin is located in your campus specific block. Although we suggest you do your background reading in the current textbooks for basic information, the case study also requires you to find current literature/research/articles to support your discussion throughout the case study. Do NOT use Better Health Channel, WedMed, dictionaries, encyclopaedias etc. These are NOT suitable academic sources. If you use these you will not meet the criteria for this question and you will lose marks. You must follow the APA referencing format as directed by ACU in your case study and in your reference list. The Library website has examples of how to do this referencing and you can find the correct format at the end of your lectures and tutorials as well as in the free Student Study Guide. This essay should have approximately 10 relevant sources.......

Words: 1111 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Lockheed Case

...should issue 1000 shares at $ 110 per share (1000 * 110). If VAI utilizes the capital raised for this project, the total values of the equity will raise to $ 1210000. This new equity consists of 1000000 market value of asset and 210000 from the cash flow. So, the value of each share will become = 1210000/11000 = $110. The previous share value was $ 100 per share and the new share is $ 110 per share. So, the existing gets an additional $ 10 from the share price. 5) Capital Budgeting Decision Making The investment decision made by Lockheed to pursue the Tri Star program was not a reasonable one. A true value analysis shows that at the production level of 210 units, the project would result in an economic loss of $530.95 million and an accounting loss of $480 million. In addition to miscalculating the break-even level of production, Lockheed management overestimated the growth rate of air travel industry. Because of this poor decision, Lockheed shares dropped from $70 per share to $3 a share....

Words: 714 - Pages: 3