Premium Essay

Law and Evidence Case Brief

In: Other Topics

Submitted By eco296
Words 327
Pages 2
Brian Eco Law 202 Law & Evidence
Title of Case: In Re Winship
Legal Citation: 397 U.S. 358, 90 S. Ct. 1068, 25 L. Ed. 2d 368 (1970)
Procedural History: The District Federal Court found the defendant guilty due to the evidence that was obtained and showed during the trial. The Circuit Court of Appeals over ruled the Federal District Courts ruling because of lack of proof beyond reasonable doubt which 99% of probable cause is needed. The United States Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Circuit Court of Appeals that the need of proof beyond reasonable doubt is under the Due Process Clause which is under the fourteenth amendment.
Questions: Is it necessary to need proof beyond a reasonable doubt for Due Process when a juvenile delinquent is charged with a crime that is considered an adult offense?
Facts: Mr. Winship was charged with a crime of Larceny. However, Mr. Winship is a twelve-year-old boy so he would be considered as a juvenile and that larceny crime would never be charged to him. However, Mr. Winship was found guilty of the Larceny as an adult. The Circuit Court of Appeals ruling was overruled due to the lack of proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
Decision: The United States Supreme Court ruled in favor of the defendant split decision to show proof beyond a reasonable doubt even being a juvenile charged with an adult offense.
Judgement: The Courts found that the lesser court’s decision was correct because of the constitutional requirements for juveniles as well as adults.
Concurring Opinion: Justice Harlan states that despite the age of the defendant, the courts should not use lesser punishments in the juvenile system.
Dissenting Opinion: Justice Black stated that the Due Process Clause found under the fourteenth amendment would explicitly protect the defendant but not in cases of proof beyond reasonable doubt.
Principal of Law: Proof beyond a…...

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Case Brief

...Case Brief #1 Name: Thompson v. Clear Springs Foods, Inc., 148 Idaho 697; 228 P.3d 378; 2010 Ida. LEXIS 40 (2010) Facts: Judy Thompson, the claimant, has been an employee for the past 12 years at Clear Spring Food Inc. The company’s regulations state that during her two 15-minute breaks and 30-minute lunch break she must use a time punch card and notify her supervisor if she leaves the facility. During one of her 15-minute breaks Judy decided to go out and move her car “to avoid the risk of not being able to drive up the hill on the country road due to snow.” In the past she had bad experiences with not being able to drive back home after it snowed. However, she didn’t notify her supervisor and failed to punch her time card, despite her good reasoning for moving her car. On her way back to the facility, she slipped and acquired an injury due to hazardous street conditions. According to the supervisor the roads had already been scraped, sanded and clear of snow. Since she didn’t follow company regulations her boss gave her a reprimand that was signed by the manager and Claimant. The claimant still decided to file for compensation claim in order to receive benefits for her injury, but failed due to lack of evidence supporting her claim that her injury was caused by the irresponsibility of the company for having hazardous roads. Issue: The issue to be decided is whether or not the claimant’s injuries are caused by work related problems and if her actions fell......

Words: 443 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Law Case Brief

...U.S. v Bruce Dolan Closing statement In a Final attempt to please the court, your Honor , Ladies and Gentleman of the jury. I would like to point out the prosecution has presented unfair persuasion, unreliable sources better known as twists, and has shown variance in trial. The prosecution contradicts its view in seeking out rightful justice, due to the fact prosecution made a plea bargain with all witnesses who admit to committing higher crime for their testimony against my client Mr. Dolan. Evidence of Mr. Dolan's drug activity came from testimony of government witness. Lacks sufficient indicia of reliability to ensure accuracy of witnesses drug activity. Prosecution has failed to state elements of crime including in fact that there is no knowingly and volunteered evidence that Mr. Dolan participated in the conspiracy to distribute. Conspiracy always involves two or more people because one cannot conspire by himself. Also all statements of witnesses who should be labeled as“ co-conspirators” fall under exception of hearsay rule found in Fed. R. Evid. 801(d)(2)(e). Tom cord admitted to purchasing pounds of methamphetamine a month over a course of a year and a half; which is approximately thirty six pounds he solely distributed. Mr. Rodney Mack admits to being close friend to Mr. Dolan, is that probably cause to believe Mr. Mack is one of the distributors he speaks of. Which would mean he has access to Mr. Dolans resisdence? Is in fact Mr. Mack the true owner...

Words: 819 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Case Brief

... Bourland 724 F. 2d 1142 Case Brief Instructions Please note that, unlike the case you have been assigned, the cases in the text have been stripped down to a fundamental legal issue related to the chapter of study and do not contain much of the procedural aspects you may find in your case. DECIDE ON A FORMAT AND STICK TO IT: Structure is essential to a good brief. It enables you to arrange systematically the related parts that are scattered throughout most cases, thus making manageable and understandable what might otherwise seem to be an endless and unfathomable sea of information. There are, of course, an unlimited number of formats that can be utilized. However, it is best to find one that suits your needs and stick to it. Consistency breeds both efficiency and the security that when called upon you will know where to look in your brief for the information you are asked to give. Be mindful that the operative word is “brief”; ideally the case brief should be about one page in length and never over two pages. Nevertheless, it is important that a brief contain the following: TITLE AND VENUE: Identify the case name and citation in the correct format. RULE OF LAW: A statement of the general principle of law that the case illustrates in the form of a statement. Determining the rule of law of a case is a procedure similar to determining the issue of the case. Avoid being fooled by red herrings; there may be a few rules of law mentioned in the case excerpt, but usually only...

Words: 1396 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Case Brief

... Case Brief Revised Jean Harshman-Beasley PA 401 August 6, 2013 Prof. V Corbo Case Brief Revised Civil v. I.N.S., 140 F.3d 52 (1st Cir. 1998) FACT; The petitioner, Lucienne Yvette Civil, sought political asylum under section 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a), on the well-founded fear if returned to Haiti, she would face persecution for her political beliefs. After being denied, Lucienne Yvette Civil appealed the Board of Immigration Appeals ("Board" or "BIA") decision affirming an Immigration Judge's denial of her application for political asylum. Agreeing with the findings of the Immigration Judge ("IJ"), the Board found that petitioner did not have a well-founded fear of persecution. ISSUE; Whether or not at the time Ms. Civil filed for asylum was her reason for being fearful of persecution well-founded under the Immigration and Nationality Act, § 208(a)? RULES: 8 U.S.C.A. § 1158 (a): Safe third country; shall not apply to an alien if the Attorney General determines that the alien may be removed, pursuant to a bilateral or multilateral agreement, to a country (other than the country of the alien’s nationality or, in the case of an alien having no nationality, the country of the alien’s last habitual residence) in which the alien’s life or freedom would not be threatened on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion, and where the alien would have access to a full and fair procedure for determining...

Words: 1036 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Law Case Brief

...and dismissing Jones’ claim for damages. An appeal was granted and heard on September 29, 2011, to address the issue of Ontario law not recognizing the tort of breach of property. The following is a briefing of the court report released January 18, 2012, summarizing the primary facts, issues, and conclusions as detailed by Robert J. Sharpe J.A. FACTS Jones and Tsige were both employees of BMO, with Tsige in a position to access the personal account information of clients. Tsige and Jones were not known to each other, although Tsige was involved in a financial dispute with Jones’ former husband. Over the course of four years, Tsige accessed Jones’ account records at least 174 times, with the intention of determining whether Jones’ former husband was paying child support. Tsige admitted that this was not a legitimate reason for invading Jones’ privacy, apologized, and was subsequently disciplined by BMO. No action was made to directly compensate Jones, who asserted that her privacy protection in financial matters had been “irreversibly destroyed,” and claimed damages totalling $90,000. Justice Kevin M.V. Whitaker dismissed Jones’ claims, holding that Ontario law does not recognize a cause of action for invasion of privacy. ISSUES The primary issue is whether Ontario should recognize a common law right of action regarding cases involving the “intrusion on seclusion.” While Ontario judges have often refused to dismiss claims based on violations of......

Words: 718 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Presumption Under Law of Evidence

...by legal evidence to the satisfaction of the tribunal. Presumptions are drawn from the course of nature for instance, that night will follow day, the seasons follow each other, death ensues from a mortal wound, and the like; or from the course of human affairs from a familiarly with the ordinary springs of human action, from the usages of society, domestic relationship and transactions in business [Norton, p 97; see post, s 114].J Shortly speaking, a presume is an inference of fact drawn from other known or proved facts. It is a rule of under which courts are authorized to draw a particular inference from a particular fact unless and until the truth of such inference is disproved by other evidence. Divisions of Presumption: Presumption according to English test-written are: (a) Presumptions of fact or natural presumption: (b) Presumptions of law (rebuttable and irrebuttable); and (c) Mixed presumptions. Conclusive presumption : Presumption of fact or natural presumptions are inferences which are natural drawn from the experience and observation of the course of nature, the constitution of human mind, the springs of human action, the usages and habits of society. Those presumptions are generally rebuttable. Conclusive presumption : Conclusive presumptions or irrebuttable presumptions are interences which the law makes so peremptorily that it will not allow them to be overturned by any contrary however strong. Fictions of law are ......

Words: 6963 - Pages: 28

Premium Essay

Case Brief

...Aubrey Grudowski Criminal Law Case Brief STANFORD v. KENTUCKY, 492 U.S. 361 (1989) 492 U.S. 361 STANFORD v. KENTUCKY 
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF KENTUCKY JUSTICE SCALIA FACTS Petitioner in No. 87-5765 was about seventeen years and four months of age when he committed murder in Kentucky. After a juvenile court and several hearings he went to trial as an adult in a category for those who have committed Class A felonies or those under age sixteen who have been charged with a felony. This Petitioner was sentenced to death due to the fact he commit murder in the first degree. The death sentence was agreed upon, his contention rejected, and the mitigating circumstances considering his age, meaning he had a constitutional right to the juvenile justice system. PROCEDURAL HISTORY A societal consensus was gathered that a far smaller number of those convicted under 18 have been sentenced to death than over 18. When the Bill of Rights were written, punishments were considered cruel and unusual, therefore the 8th amendment was added to the constitution, Ford v. Wainwright. Or evolving to make society more decent to prove the maturity, Trop v. Dulles. Petitioners have not mentioned that their punishments would have been considered cruel in the 18th century. With the common-law tradition, at least 281 offenders under 18, and 126 under 17, have been executed in this country. Also, with the cases 488 U.S. 887 (1988) and 487 U.S. 1233 (1988), certiorari was......

Words: 365 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Laws of Evidence

...Laws of Evidence Assignment 5 Using just the Federal Rules of Evidence and your knowledge of the hearsay rule and its exceptions, please discuss briefly whether each of the following nine out of court “statements” may be allowed into evidence or whether they are barred by the hearsay rule: 1) The five (5) statements that appear in “Practice Application 12.1" in your textbook, which appears at the end of Chapter 12 (page 323) of your textbook 2) The four (4) statements that appear in “Practice Application 13.1" in your textbook, which appears at the end of Chapter 13 (page 362-363) of your textbook You do not need to cite outside cases for this assignment. I am just looking for a short explanation for each one as to whether it is admissible under the hearsay rule. You may and should ignore all other evidentiary issues other than the hearsay rule! Practice Application 12.1 The Defendant is charged with falsely spreading a bomb scare at his school. At trail, 1. Prosecution offers witness, Marge, who testifies that she was standing in the school hallway when she heard a student walking by say that a bomb had been planted and it would go off at noon. This testimony by Marge would be admissible under the Fed. R. Evid rule 803(3). Which says that “[a] statement of the declarant’s then-existing state of mind (such as motive, intent, or plan) or emotional, sensory, or physical condition (such as mental feeling, pain, or bodily health), but not including a......

Words: 1379 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Case Brief

...INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM CASE BRIEF INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM CASE BRIEF To: Mr. Dudley Knox; Introduction to Law LGLA 1311-51001 From: Monica Holland Date: Friday October 24th 2014 IN RE: Introduction to the American Legal System Eighth Edition; Schulze, Patterson Upper Saddle River, New Jersey ------------------------------------------------- Assignment: I have been asked to brief a criminal case of my choice. It must be briefed on two headnotes, and one dealing with the Penal Code. The case must be 2010 or newer. The format of the brief needs to be like the Bruni case on pages 313 & 314. CITATIONS: DESORMEAUX v. STATE Cite as 362 S.W.3d 233 (Tex.App.-Beaumont 2012). PARTIES: Leo Thomas DESORMEAUX IV, Appellant here, v. The STATE of Texas Appellee here. OBJECTIVES OF PARTIES: The people want to convict and punish defendant for capital murder and injury to a child. Defendant DESORMEAUX wants to appeal the courts decision. THEORIES OF LITIGATION: 1. TRIAL: The People sought to prosecute and punish DESORMEAUX for the conviction and punishment of both crimes in the same trial. (The legal theory that justifies the bringing of both the conviction and punishment is sought in the same trial. The opinion does not list two separate the two crimes, instead they are keeping them combined for one big punishment as opposed to two.) Because DESORMEAUX is appealing the courts ruling, we can assume that the basis and theory of his case is simply that he did......

Words: 693 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Case Brief

...Cheever Case Citation 134 S.Ct. 596, 187 L.Ed.2d 519, 82 USLW 4032, 13 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 13,303, 2013 Daily Journal D.A.R. 16,039, 24 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 492 (Westlaw, 2013) Facts In January of 1995, Scott D. Cheever killed Sheriff Matthew Samuels of the Greenwood County Sheriff’s Department at the residence of Darrell and Belinda Cooper in Hilltop, Kansas (The OYEZ Project, 2014). A few hours before Samuel’s arrived at the Cooper home, Cheever and his friend cooked and smoked methamphetamines. Cheever’s friends told him that officers were en route to his location. Cheever made the decision to attempt to flee the scene but realized his vehicle had a flat tire. He returned to the house and hid in an upstairs bedroom with a loaded .44 caliber revolver. He heard footsteps leading towards his location so he stepped out from his hiding spot and shot Samuel’s. While Cheever was walking back towards his hiding spot he shot Samuel’s once again. He made the decision to also shoot a deputy, a detective, and members of the local SWAT team which had also arrived. However only Samuel’s was shot (Westlaw, 2013). History Cheever was charged with Capital murder in Kansas. Soon after the Kansas Supreme Court determined that the state’s death penalty scheme was unconstitutional. The prosecutor’s chose to dismiss their charges to allow the federal authorities to prosecute him utilizing the Federal Death Penalty Act of 1994, 18 U.S.C 3591 et esq (Westlaw, 2013). Within the federal......

Words: 1478 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Case Brief

...the lack of evidence establishing a medically significant and diagnosable emotional harm. Issue Is the Supreme Court correct in its holding that the Appellee in this case failed to present evidence establishing a medically diagnosable and significant emotional harm as well as a prima facie cause of action for negligent emotional distress? Holding The court ruled the district court’s decision is reversed. The cause is remanded with directions to dismiss. Rationale The court referenced previous case Parrish v. Omaha Pub. Power Dist. in their decision. In that case it was determined for a valid claim of negligent emotional distress the plaintiff must “show that a negligent act of the defendant’s proximately caused her to suffer extreme emotional distress.” In this case, the court ruled that the hospital was negligent and was the cause of the injury. The Appellee however, failed to establish emotional distress; which is both medically significant and diagnosable. Disposition The trial court's judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded with directions to dismiss. Facts Clarence Gideon (Petitioner) allegedly broke into a poolroom intending to commit a misdemeanor. A felony under Florida law, Gideon was charged in a Florida state court. Gideon requested counsel from the court due to financial need citing the Sixth Amendment. The court denied the request for counsel indicating the right of counsel under the Sixth Amendment only applies to cases in which......

Words: 732 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Case Briefs

...Unit 3 Case Brief Jon E. Johnson Kaplan, University Unit 3 Case Brief Case: Mitchell v.Lovington Good Samaritan Center Inc., 555 P.2d 696 (N.M. 1976) Facts: On 6/4/1974 the Petitioner, Zelma Mitchell, was terminated from her employment at Lovington Good Samaritan Center, INC., for alleged misconduct. On 6/12/1974, Mitchell applied for unemployment compensation and was found ineligible due to her being terminated for misconduct. She was found to be ineligible by an Unemployment Security Commission Deputy. Mrs. Mitchell filed an appeal to the Appeal Tribunal, and the referee of the Tribunal, reversed the decision of the Unemployment Security Commission Deputy, and her benefits were reinstated. On September 13, 1974, the Good Samaritan Center INC., appealed the decision of the Appeal Tribunal, to the entire Commission pursuant to s 59-9-6(E), N.M.S.A. 1953, and the Appeals Tribunal’s decision was overruled, and Mrs. Mitchell was again disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits. Mrs. Mitchell then asked for and received a review of the Commission’s decision, from the District Court of Bernalillo County, pursuant to s 59-9-6(K), N.M.S.A. 1953. On 01/16/1976, the District Court overturned the Commission’s decision, and Mrs. Mitchell was again reinstated to receive her unemployment benefits. On June 4, 1974, the Petitioner, Mrs. Mitchell, was caught by Center’s director filling in her time sheet, prior to commencing her shift. When questioned about why she was doing...

Words: 1475 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Case Brief

...Kennedy v Louisiana 554 U.S. 407 Facts: On June 25th 2008, Patrick Kennedy was found guilty of raping and sodomizing his eight year old stepdaughter. The rape was so brutal that the victim needed invasive surgery. When questioned about the crime, Kennedy claimed that two neighborhood boys committed the crime. But when enough evidence was gathered to prove Kennedy’s guilt, he was offered a deal to spare him his life and he finally admitted to his crime. He was then convicted in 2003 and sentenced under a specific Louisiana Law that allowed the death penalty for the rape of a child under the age of 14. Legal Question: Does the Eighth Amendment's Cruel and Unusual Punishment Clause permit a State to use the death penalty to punish the crime of rape of a child? Does Louisiana's capital rape statute violate the Eighth Amendment insofar as it fails genuinely to narrow the class of such offenders eligible for the death penalty? Is the sentence for the death penalty too harsh for solely a child rape? Or is the death penalty no harsh enough for such a heinous crime? Do states violate the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment by imposing the death sentence for the crime of child rape? Decision: Yes (5-4 Justice Anthony Kennedy delivered the opinion of the court) Court’s Rationale: Kennedy was only one of two men facing death row for a crime other than murder. On June 25, 2008 the court was 5-4 on the death sentence held that. Claiming and holding......

Words: 385 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Week 10 Assignment 4: Employment Law Case Brief

...Employment Law Case Brief To purchase this visit here: http://mindsblow.us/question_des/Week10Assignment4EmploymentLawCaseBrief/2782 Contact us at: help@mindblows.us HRM 510 Week 10 Assignment 4: Employment Law Case Brief Due Week 10 and worth 200 points Using the Internet, select and research an employment law case no greater than five (5) years old. Write a three to four (3-4) page brief in which you: 1.Summarize the issue of the case, and then explain the employment law that was violated.. 2.Evaluate the type of impact the violation had on the organization then determine two (2) ways the organization could mitigate the issue. Justify your response.. 3.Based on your research, determine if a policy was or was not in place during the violation. Then, recommend a communication for all employees to enhance the knowledge of the policy. Support your response.. 4.As a HR Manager, explore an organization you worked for or familiar with, then suggest three (3) ways you could make the organization violation free from employment law issues. Justify your response.. 5.Use at least three (3) quality academic resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources.. Week 10 Assignment 4: Employment Law Case Brief To purchase this visit here: http://mindsblow.us/question_des/Week10Assignment4EmploymentLawCaseBrief/2782 Contact us at: help@mindblows.us HRM 510 Week 10 Assignment 4: Employment Law Case Brief Due......

Words: 610 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Case Briefs

...Babatunde White Torts Case Briefs Yania v Bigan 397 Pa. 316 Parties: Plaintiff - Yania (decedent's widow) Defendant – Procedural History: Trial court dismissed the case; plaintiff appeals. Cause of action: Negligence Facts: Bigan engaged in a coal mining operation, and had trenches on his property for this purpose. The trenches were 16-18 feet in height, and contained water of 8-10 feet (water pump not working to take out the water). Yania went to Bigan's property for purposes of business. During his visit, he was taunted andcajoled by Bigan, which induced Yania to jump in the water and he drowned. Bigan made no physical act that caused Yania to fall in, and Yania to not fall in by mistake, but of his own volition Issue: Was Bigan responsible for Yania jumping in the water due to the mental impact he had on Yania? Is Bigan responsible for not acting to save Yania from drowning? - No, No. Holding: No, Order to dismiss affirmed. Reasoning: Yania was an adult of full mental capacity. Bigan's taunts, etc. arenot the reason Yania drowned. Yania jumped in of his own volition. Yania knew or should have known that jumping into the water was very dangerous, and made the decision to do so himself. Bigan had no legal duty to save Yaniafrom drowning, unless it was caused by his own negligence, which it was decidedabove that it was not. Bigan had no legal duty to rescue. Erie R.R. v. Stewart 40 F.2d 855, 1930 U.S. App Procedural History: Tompkins......

Words: 776 - Pages: 4