Free Essay

How and Why Should Parliament Be Made More Effective?

In: Other Topics

Submitted By oldfieldhenry
Words 1983
Pages 8
How and why should parliament be made more effective?

Parliament is the sovereign body in the United Kingdom and so it is vital, for the wellbeing of democracy, that parliament not only exists but is also effective. Parliament plays the role of the Legislative and, as a result, is required to be as effective as possible to assure that laws are well thought out, benefit the whole of society and most of all maintain democracy. However, many people feel that certain aspects within Parliament limit its effectiveness and they feel these features need to be reformed in order for Parliament to carry out its function correctly.
Firstly, the most obvious way to make Parliament more effective would be to reform the electoral system. Currently, Westminster elections use the system of First-past-the-post where the candidate with the most votes in a constituency wins the seats. However, this system is highly disproportionate in both terms of the word as it exaggerates winning votes for example, the Conservatives received 36.1% of the vote and won 47.1% of the seats in the 2010 general election, whereas it penalises small parties such as the Liberal Democrats who won 23% of the vote but gained only 8.8% of the seats. Particularly as FPTP produces landslide majorities, it makes Parliament less effective as the party that wins the general election forms the government and therefore has a large majority in most cases. If MPs belonging to the party vote along party lines all the time, in theory Parliament is rather ineffective when it comes to making decisions as well as scrutinising the government in an attempt to hold it to account. However, I feel if the electoral system changed to one which was more proportionally representative in terms of the votes to seats ratio, such as the Supplementary Voting System which was used in the London Mayoral elections when Boris Johnson was elected, Parliament would be more effective, and the electorates wishes would carried out more effectively because the vote to seat ratio would be much closer. Therefore the electorate would be better equipped to scrutinise the government because there would be less of such a large majority, this would also reduce executive dominance, which I feel is key in strengthening Parliaments effectiveness. Also, electoral reform would increase the likelihood of government coalitions, such as the Con-LibDem coalition which currently governs the UK, especially including smaller parties if the general election results are close. This would result in a stronger Parliament, a weaker executive and the government’s mandate would not be questioned. I also feel that the commons does not resemble society, which adds to its ineffectiveness. Critics point out that the House of Commons cannot hope to properly represent society whilst the majority of its members continue to be white, upper class men. Over 40% of current MP’s attended fee-paying schools, even though public schools educate just 7% of the population and I feel Parliament cannot be wholly effective if the commons do not reflect society, however, supporters claim that the 650 MP’s are the best people to effectively carry out the job.
Another way in which Parliament could be made more effective is by reforming Question time. Question Time occurs Monday to Thursday and is when ministers of the ruling party answer questions from the opposition and other MP's. The Prime Minister is also required to attend a single session a week lasting at least half an hour in which he must answer questions. This measure is partly effective because other MP's can directly confront ministers from the ruling party on the policies or decisions they have made. Question time can help to expose weaknesses within ruling parties. Backbenchers are also invited to question time, giving everyone the chance to hold the government accountable. However, Question time has been criticised as being only mildly effective because all questions that are to be asked have to be sent in a week in advance if the MP is to answer it. This allows the ministers to prepare their answers in advance, which means they could prepare answers that avoid the main point. Also the party whips give MP's of the ruling party questions to ask that do not really serve a purpose i.e. Why do you think your policy worked well? This demeans the whole point of question time. I feel question time, specifically PMQ’s should be extended to more than 30 minutes in order for the government to be properly held to account, which in turn would make Parliament more effective.

A third reform which would make Parliament more effective would be a reform to the House of Lords. Currently there are 787 Lords all of whom are unelected, 90 are hereditary peers and 25 are bishops. The House of Lords should become more legitimate via the removal of certain peers e.g. the 90 hereditary Peers removed and also by removing the 25 bishops who sit in the Lords. The UK is multicultural country and so the Lords should not have 25 unelected bishops, this does not at all represent society. I also feel that the House of Lords should have a complete overhaul and, like the Commons, should be elected. This would make the peers in the House of Lords more effective because as elected peers, they would have a mandate from the electorate, they would also be more effective within their role, particularly when it comes to scrutinising government policy. The Lords are, however, quite effective in their present state as they are able to freely block and scrutinise bills proposed by parliament, apart from economic bills, which is how parliament got the recent NHS bill through the lords. However, the House of Lords should not be entirely abolished, as if the Lords were abolished, all of its current workload would be shifted to the Commons, where MP’s already complain of being overworked.
The EU makes legislation mostly concerning the economy and trade, however, it is a huge threat to parliament and makes it hugely ineffective. Parliament is supposed to be sovereign yet, EU law takes precedent and the European Court of Justice is the highest court in the UK legal system. Laws made by Parliament can be overruled by the European Union and so this makes Parliament hugely inefficient and stops parliament representing the views of the electorate. An example of this is when Karen Murphy was fined £8000 by a British court for showing Premier League football matches in her pub whilst breaching copyright, But the European court backed Mrs Murphy and said the Premier League’s stance was ‘contrary to EU law’ on the freedom of trade. A reform would be for the UK to exercise opt-outs more frequently, however the only way to fully stop the EU undermining Parliament is to leave the union.
Another reform which would make Parliament more effective would be to introduce an entrenched Bill of Rights and or Human Rights Act. Currently in the UK, the Bill of Rights and HRA are not entrenched, meaning that it is fairly easy for the executive to bypass Parliament. However, if the UK Bill of Rights or HRA became entrenched, it would mean that the actions of the government would be stipulated in such a way that they would be unable to breach the bill, it would also make government more accountable for their actions; meaning Parliament could be more effective when holding the government to account as well as effective scrutiny. Another reform of is to have a stronger separation of powers as part of codified constitution. Whilst a codified constitution would limit government, perhaps in a similar way to which an entrenched Human Rights Act would, I feel that having a real separation of powers would make Parliament more effective as there would be better scrutiny with both houses being both separate and independent with equal powers. A separation of powers is similar to the US government as the House of Representatives and the senate are independent, have equal powers and are elected. However, a problem with this would be legislative gridlock, which is common is the US and policies can’t be agreed on. This would mean having no one person in more than one pillar of the three within the institution and instead being entirely separate, so someone such as the Lord Chancellor wouldn’t be a part of all three pillars. This would make Parliament more effective as they wouldn’t have conflicting interests when part of either the executive or the legislature.
Another way to make parliament more effective is to create more powerful select Committees. Whilst the Conservatives created more Select Committees in 1979 and New Labour gave more funding for Select Committees to conduct more extensive research into proposals such as the Terror Bill, I feel that Select Committees are still flawed. Instead, when scrutinising, Select Committees should have more specialist advice, and more summoning power to force government ministers and other people regarding the proposals and to call them to account. In the past, ministers such as Edwina Currie have refused to answer questions regarding proposals. Likewise, Select Committees should have more power, which the Powers Report also suggested, to act against these people who do not turn up or refuse to answer questions and instead be able to effectively call them to account. Also, after Select Committees produce a report, the Committees should be able to exert more pressure on Government to act on these reports, and gain a response from government sooner, rather than within 60 days as is the current rule. These reforms regarding Select Committees would make Parliament more effective as they would be stronger at scrutinising government policy if they had more power.
I also feel it is important to reform the whips, the MPs who have influence and pressure on other MPs by saying how to vote on proposals in some cases. Although whips can be seen to make Parliament efficient, by telling MP’s which way they must vote, they irradiate the views of the electorate and destroy democracy, thus making parliament ineffective. Reducing the power whips have would make Parliament more effective as there would be less sycophant MPs voting along party lines if there is less influence from the Whips who also encourage bias thinking. The whips now have no influence when stating who should be appointed to be a part of a Select Committee, backbenchers now chooses who to appoint. Likewise, other committees such as Standing Committees should be given more time to scrutinise legislation clauses which would make Parliament more effective, as if more time was given, it would be better to see the flaws within the legislation which could be changed therefore strengthening the legislation in the long term, particularly when being used, this would also tighten up ineffective loopholes within legislation. Members of a Standing Committees should become more permanent as it would mean they would be more experienced on matters specific to the committee and therefore more effective when scrutinising legislation and new proposals.
On the other hand, although reform is necessary in order to make Parliament more effective, I feel it is important to not destroy important traditions which are part of the institution that is Parliament.

To conclude, I feel there are many reforms that could be implemented to make Parliament more effective, such as reforming the House of Lords, irradiating Whips, giving more power to select committees and making parliament more representative. However, I feel the most important reform is to change the electoral system, as the current system does not clearly represent the electorate’s wishes and so makes parliament ineffective. However, a referendum held in 2010 resulted in the electorate choosing to keep First-Past-The-Post over The Alternative Vote, and so this is unlikely anytime soon, as the current system overwhelmingly benefits the two parties.…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Should Smoking Be More Strict?

...Furthermore, to the public the contents of secondhand smoke contain dangerous carcinogens affecting the person’s health. Secondhand smoke is when a non-smoker breaths in nicotine and the other chemicals in a cigarette, cigar, or pipe that is exhaled by the smoker. The smoke going to fellow people causes more damage to their lungs by breathing it in. There has been claim stating that secondhand smoke is even more dangerous than smoking. Eliminating smoking will control the exposure people get from secondhand smoke, even if it was just a little exposure. Cigarettes pose a wide variety of health risks. Setting more regulations on smoking in public places will allow the reduction of risk factors to a minimum. Lastly, all smokers are at a risk for many health consequences of smoking. Smoking harms nearly all of the organs in the body. Cigarettes can contain over 1000 ingredients, which kills the body’s cells and systems of the human body. “During 1995-1999, smoking caused approximately 440,000 premature deaths in the United States annually” (Martin). Lung cancer and many forms of cancer may be contributed from smoking. A key ingredient that is in cigarettes that makes them more addictive is the inclusion of reconstituted tobacco. Smoking leads to the development of diseases. “Smoking cost the United States over $193 billion in 2004, including $97 billion in lost productivity and $96 billion in direct health care expenditures, or an average of $4,260 per adult......

Words: 648 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Should Cars Be More Efficient

...Should Cars be more efficient? David Hayes Dependence of man on the environment (SCI207) Jacqueline Poole March 4, 2013 There are many things that have gone into shaping the society we live in today. The fabric of our culture has changed and changed again in response to new additions which have woven their way into our lives. But, none has affected our society as deeply as the automobile. From the way we work and play to how we design the buildings we call home, the automobile has created in many ways a car culture with its own status symbols. However, while the automobile has changed the lives of us all in a positive light; this does comes with a price, and the price is our environment. Currently “cars and other highway vehicles continue to emit some 60 million tons of carbon monoxide per year. Motor vehicles also emit as much as 50 percent of our carcinogenic and toxic air pollutants, such as benzene and formaldehyde. And heavy vehicles, particularly diesel-powered buses and freight trucks, constitute a significant source of soot and other unhealthy fine particles that, when inhaled, lodge in and damage human tissue.” (Turk, J & Bensel, T 4.3) In this paper, I am going to debate why cars should be made more efficient for the sake of saving the environment in which we live in. I will then give the different options as to how cars can be built to be more efficient; and then, debate as to why these options would not be a wise decision for some. Even with all the......

Words: 1353 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Why Prostitution Should Not Be Legalised.

...WHY PROSTITUTION SHOULD NOT BE LEGALISED Introduction The issue of legalisation of prostitution remains a highly controversial and debatable one. A lot many times the questions put forth demand to know whether legalisation will really stop the harm to prostitutes or the so-called ‘morally-secure’ society. A stronger element of agnosticism emerges in the proposals for legalisation when it’s on ground effect depicts a consternating increment in the very same issue it seeks to check- human trafficking. Total legalisation makes prostitution, the epitome of human rights violation, as much of an occupation as any other, albeit it remains clearly distinctive from other low-status and abusive forms of employment by the vice of being the worst one. Legalisation indubitably renders the economically and socially decumbent and vulnerable position of prostitutes- bolstered. It is true that the struggle for economic survival pushes people to extreme measures where in their choice of work appears justifiably consensual. But a deeper understanding reveals that the women engaged in prostitution for economic survival are in it by ‘coerced choice’ instead of a real one. In most cases, the prostitute is poor and traumatized even before she enters such a profession. Prostitution is a deranging and extreme form of gender discrimination. It not just affirms, but backwashes male supremacy. A violation in its most characteristic forms, legalised prostitution is nothing but an infringement to......

Words: 2346 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

A Personalised Induction Will Always Be More Effective

...Always Be More Effective" When a client goes to see a hypnotherapist for a session it is an essential key to find out clues about them, to see what are there likes and dislikes and how they process. A hypnotherapist will usually in the first session try to get to know the client by having a general chat so that they can use an induction in the PMR which will be suitable for the client and make the experience more enjoyable. Clients should know that hypnothercapy is not a therapy but a process where a therapy can be effectively delivered. Humans are unique and have very different value systems. Value systems represent what people believe in, their own moral code, a sense of right and wrong, good and bad, their priorities and also what they experience to be positive and negative. Prevailing social and cultural ideas influence people. In addition, a persons upbringing and individual life experiences will influence their value system. There are several techniques which hypnotherapists can employ which alter the language we use to suit the personality and individuality of the client. These are language (the words that we utter,) body language, tone and volume. However, body language is not one that hypnotherapists can use because the client will usually have their eyes shut. I personally agree with the essay statement, a personalised induction will always be more effective......

Words: 1817 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Why Marijuana Should Be Legal?

...basic reason that marijuana should be legal is that there is no good reason for it not to be legal. Some often ask “why should marijuana be legalized?" but we should ask "Why should marijuana be illegal?" From an abstract point of view, we as individuals deserve the right to make choices for themselves. There is no logic why someone would be pushed to take legal drugs that are proven to sometimes be potentially worse for one’s body and mind. “Marijuana is far less subject to abuse than most drugs used to treat the same conditions. It is also less addicting. Dr. Lester Grinspoon, an associate professor at Harvard Medical School, says that “Marijuana is safer than most drugs used to treat the same problems.” Since there is no known case of lethal marijuana overdose, that would mean marijuana is safer than aspirin. According to John Marx, one thousand people a year die of aspirin overdose. The side effects of aspirin can also harm young children. The estimated ratio of lethal to effective dose is 40,000 to 1. The second major reason that marijuana should be legal is because banning it does not help the country in any way, and causes a lot of problems. There is no good evidence that supports that banning marijuana decreases drug use, it might actually increase drug use because many people like to do the opposite of what they are told. Anyways, one unintended effect of marijuana prohibition is that marijuana is very popular in American high schools. Why? It is readily available......

Words: 1208 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Why Steroids Should Be Legalized?

...Kori Bogard Dr. Karin Mendoza Intermediate English Composition (ENGL-2989-076) 29 March 2013 Word Count: 1,766 Steroids should be legalized Abstract The use of steroids and illegal performance-enhancing drugs appears to be growing in professional athletics. More and more high profile athletes are being busted for their use and consequently ostracized by fans and those in the athletic community. Beyond that, there are thousands of other professional and amateur athletes who have resorted to these drugs as well. As someone who has found a passion for all things fitness, and aspires to open up my own gym and train athletes someday, this issue is of high importance to me. Although many have accepted steroids as illegal and a type of cheating, these drugs should be legalized in sports. While it is widely accepted that performance-enhancing drugs pose health risks, I think it is the athletes’ own choice whether or not these risks are worth the benefit. In this research, I will argue why it makes sense to lift the current ban on steroids in professional sports. The effects of steroids are well known. They will help increase athletic performance and they also come with negative side effects. In a study done by clinical biochemists, it was found that use of anabolic steroids combined with exercise was highly effective. This research took 43 volunteers and divided them into four groups. One group of people took a placebo pill and exercised, one group took a placebo with no......

Words: 1973 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

How Effectively Does Parliament Fulfil Its Functions?

...How effectively does Parliament fulfil its functions? Parliament has several functions. It debates major issues of current interest, it makes legislation, it scrutinises the executive whilst simultaneously sustaining the government, and it represents the people and redresses their grievances. In many aspects, Parliament is usually effective in fulfilling its functions, but there are occasions where it is not as diligent in doing so. Parliament’s scrutiny function is mainly carried out through four methods; Prime Minister’s Questions, Select Committees, back bench MPs and the House of Lords. Prime Minister’s Questions are a weekly opportunity for the opposition and backbenchers to scrutinise the Prime Minister and by extension the government, and to highlight government failings or simply ask a question. This is a good way of scrutinising the Prime Minister as it puts him/her under pressure to justify their actions, and answer potentially awkward questions regardless of whether they have been pre-submitted. The main weakness of this form of scrutiny is that the questions are often submitted to the Prime Minister some time before Prime Minister’s Questions, allowing him/her to come up with an answer beforehand that might let him/her to actually evade proper scrutiny within the House of Commons. Select Committees in both Houses of Parliament investigate the work of government and produce reports on policy proposals. They can call witnesses in the course of their......

Words: 1434 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Discuss the Arguments That Parliament Is an Effective Check on the Executive.

...Discuss the arguments that Parliament is an effective check on the executive. Parliament is an effective check on the executive as it has the process of ‘opposition days’ or ‘supply days’. This is when the majority opposition is given a specific 20 days out of the year to challenge the executive on specific issues. For example on the 29th of April 2009 the labour party government was defeated in an opposition day motion from the liberal democrats over whether Ghurkhas should have the rights to settle in the UK. This makes parliament effective as there is specific time set out for both the biggest opposition party (17/20 days) and the second biggest opposition party (3/20) days) to scrutinize the government on any particular issues that they feel the current government are not dealing with well. Parliament is also an effective check on the executive as they allow both question time and prime ministers question time. Question time is a topical debate in which guests from the worlds of politics and the media answer questions posed by members of the public. Prime ministers question time is held in the House of Commons for 30 minuets every Wednesday where the opposition party and other members in office are allowed to question the prime minister on specific issues. This is an effective check on the executive as it weekly scrutiny. It is filmed and broadcasted publicly meaning that the government must present themselves and their policies correctly. They must show that they......

Words: 606 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Why Gun Ownership Should Be Held More Strictly:

...Omar Farah English 3 Part 2: Why gun ownership should be held more strictly: I, Omar Farah, certify that I have personally completed this assignment based on my own personal efforts. I understand if I use outside sources, I must properly give my source(s) credit using the APA format and my paper should not include more than 20% of direct quotes from other sources. I understand if I do not provide proper credit to outside sources, I will be documented for plagiarism and be required to resubmit a new assignment. I will not divulge the content of this assignment or any of my work, generally or specifically, to any current or future James Madison High School students. 1/4/2015 I chose the topic “Why gun ownership should be held more strictly” because most of our daily news flashes say at least someone was shot and killed or shot and injured. I don’t like this; it is senseless and very sad. We are losing people every day, because someone is using their gun recklessly or leaving it where someone else has access or easily found. I don’t get why people kill people it is just inhumane and against our morals. Guns have very high danger to our country as well as other countries. That is why I pick or chose to write about this topic for my persuasive essay because that is what I see in guns and want people to see it too. I have one question to my reader; do you think guns should be under a stricter law? Honestly, I believe that we should have more stringent gun laws that tell......

Words: 894 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

How Effective Is Parliament

...How effective is parliament? Parliament in the UK is mainly made up of the House of Commons and the House of Lords. The ‘executive’ refers to the Government. The effectiveness of parliament is judged by how effectively the government is held to account by the Commons and Lords. One of parliament’s main functions is holding the government to account. One of the effective ways parliaments hold the government to account is it forces government ministers to justify their policies and explain why they were developed as well as explain the future effects of these policies. Debates are a perfect opportunity to hold the government to account they provide an open floor for Mps to speak and question members of the government, however this is usually unreliable seeing as PM’s get pre-prepared questions. The opposition party and everyone else within parliament have the duty to criticise and scrutinise government bills. This works to keep the government in check as it forces them to reconsider their decisions, make changes if necessary and defend their ideas from the oppositions criticism. This then works to ensure that policy is well thought out, and discussed before it is passed through the House of Lords. It is Parliaments ability to question that allows them to keep the power of government in check; this suggests that parliament is effective on government to a large extent. An example of a governments defeat would be the Hunting with dogs’ act 2001. However, Parliament is limited......

Words: 1083 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

House of Lords More Effective?

...the chamber in 1999. But the House of Lords is perpetually seen as “unreformed", with proposals for change having been made for over a century. This means the opportunity has often been missed to study the chamber as it is, and its impact on the policy process. Given that the next stage of reform may, like previous ones, be long delayed, such study is important. This project therefore focuses on the contemporary House, and particularly on how it has changed since the 1999 reform. Publications in the first phase of the project (2004-2007) asked questions about the strength and confidence of the House of Lords, perceptions of its "legitimacy", and the real policy impact of government defeats. Research methods included study of parliamentary records, questionnaire surveys and interviews with peers, and public opinion surveys. A complete record of all members and all "divisions" (votes) in the chamber since November 1999 has been compiled in database form. The second phase of the project (2008-2011) continued the collection of some of this data, and generated new publications. These included broader analyses of the impact of Lords reform in 1999 on the British parliament, and its lessons for bicameralism in a comparative sense, as well as discussing the new policies pursued by the coalition government formed in 2010.  Readers interested in the House of Lords should also check the pages for our past project on lessons from overseas and our Lords reform commentaries.  Online......

Words: 308 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Why We Should Be More Cautious When Handling Money

...Courtney Tweed Public Health Microbiology Video project essay Why We Should Be More Cautious When Handling Money When eating at some restaurants, employees handle food and money, without ever washing their hands in between. Some businesses require gloves, but then workers will handle money with those gloved hands. This can cause a high risk of cross-contamination. This can cause sporadic cases of infectious intestinal disease among customers (Michaels). Earliest studies showed 13% of US coins and 42% of paper money had potential pathogens. They identified E. coli, P. aeruginosa, Klebsiella, Proteus, and Staphylococcus species.Studies after that saw that 18% of coins and 7% of currency tested had organisms that could be disease producing. E. coli and salmonella enteritidis were shown to transport pathogens even a few days after contact (Michaels). E. coli could survive up to 11 days on some coins, and contaminate other surfaces. The US government takes soiled and tattered notes out of circulation. The important variable depends on where the money has been, as well as activities performed before handling it. It stands to reason that money will bare the microbial imprint of previous activities. The more recent the activity, the higher the microbial count. Also depending on where the study took place, the levels of intestinal disease could be quite high. Old Nigerian currency was found to be so contaminated it was considered a health risk for treasury workers due to......

Words: 1281 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

How Effective Are Backbench Mp's?

...How effective are backbench MP’s? How effective are backbench MP’s? Backbench MP’s are members of Parliament that are not in either the cabinet or the shadow cabinet. Backbench MP’s may be seen to be effective in some ways in the British Political system because they can do things such as scrutinise the government and hold them into account through numerous ways. Their role in Parliament in Westminster ensures that there may be democratic legitimacy of UK government and gives them a right and authority to exercise political power and may possibly increase the representation, overall, through Parliament. However, there is a growing fear that there is now ‘executive dictatorship’ in the UK and because of this, backbench MP’s have little power in calling the government into account due to the party system, which ensures that MP’s are dictated by the whips system, reducing the effectiveness that MP’s can then call people into account. Therefore, there are both reasons for and against that would suggest MP’s are or are not effective as seen. Firstly, backbench MP’s are key in calling the government of today to account, making them answerable for their actions and policies. This is achieved through questions to the Prime Minister and questions to other ministers as well as other forms of scrutiny such as debates and all of these methods are effective because they raise public awareness for issues and may possibly increase the media pressure on the government, causing them to act...

Words: 2008 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

How to Give an Effective Presentation

...HOW TO GIVE AN EFFECTIVE PRESENTATION I. DEVELOP YOUR PRIMARY AIM. A. Ask Yourself Questions. 1. What am I seeking to achieve? (Lomas 2009, p .6) 2. Why is this presentation being made? (Lomas 2009, p. 6) 3. Have I done the appropriate amount of research? (Keshavana, Tandonb, 2012, p. 360) 4. How would I recognize success? (Lomas 2009, p .6) B. Questions Concerning the Audience. 1. What kind of reaction am I trying to elicit from the audience? (Keshavana, Tandonb, 2012, p. 360) 2. What is the question I am trying to answer and why is it important? (Keshavana, Tandonb, 2012, p. 360) 3. What will the audience take away from the presentation? (Keshavana, Tandonb, 2012, p. 360) II. KNOW THE CONTENT AND UNDERSTAND YOUR GOALS. A. Identify the core message. (Keshavana, Tandonb, 2012, p. 360) 1. Grasp the material covered in the presentation. (Keshavana, Tandonb, 2012, p. 360) 2. Give core message and supporting messages a logical structure. (Keshavana, Tandonb, 2012, p. 360) 3. Make your ideas resonate with the audience. (Keshavana, Tandonb, 2012, p. 360) B. Clearly identify the principal idea. (Lehman, DuFrene, Walker, 2014, 6-b) 1. Prepare procedural messages that ensure consistent application. (Lehman,DuFrene, Walker, 2014, 6-b) 2. Present sufficient supporting details in logical sequences. (Lehman, DuFrene, Walker, 2014, 6-b) III. PREPARATION FOR PRESENTATION. A. Presentation Etiquettes.......

Words: 1114 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Why Should I

...for law enforcement (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall. All electronic materials are available on the student website. Week One: The Communication Process | | Details | Due | Points | Objectives | 1.1 Describe the process and components of communication. 1.2 Describe the flow of communication in organizations. 1.3 Identify how barriers to effective communication can be overcome. 1.4 Explain the role of types of listening in oral communication. | | | Readings | Read Ch. 2–4 of Written and Interpersonal Communication.Read this week’s Electronic Reserve Readings. | | | Participation | All Week: Remember to participate in the class discussions by posting 2 replies on 4 out of 7 days during the week. Once you have satisfied the current week’s participation requirements, you may post replies to previous week’s discussions. Make sure that your replies are both quantitative and qualitative in content and do not merely state in a couple of sentences that you “agree” or “disagree” with your fellow learner. Your reply should include new content that expands upon the response to your fellow learner and include outside sources to substantiate your viewpoints and claims. For further details on substantial participation replies please review the Feedback Icon message posted in the Course Materials forum. Please make sure to use the proper APA formatting for in-body citations and references. | 4 out......

Words: 3116 - Pages: 13