Free Essay

Groupthink

In: English and Literature

Submitted By chevy5spd68
Words 756
Pages 4
The term "groupthink" was a theory developed by psychologist Irving Janis. The theory was intended to explain bad decisions and outcomes made by governments and businesses, which Janis sometimes called "fiascoes." (Vore, 2013) He was really interested in situations where pressure with the group seemed to result in a failure to think clearly. Janis defined groupthink as "a quick and easy way to refer to a mode of thinking people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' striving for unanimity override their motivation to realistically appraise alternative courses of action. Groupthink refers to a deterioration of mental efficiency, reality testing, and moral judgment that results from in-group pressures." (Groupthink, 2013) Groupthink can occur when a group of people disagrees with their boss and want to create conflict in the face of the powerful boss. The idea of groupthink offers an explanation of reasons that groups sometimes make poor decisions. Groups are thought to be better at making complex decisions than individuals because they contain a variety of different views. (Vore, 2013) Groups not only bring new ideas into the discussion but also can act as device to correct errors. Groups can also provide social support which is very important when creating new ideas. This issue with groupthink comes when new viewpoints are not accepted. Even though groups can work to support effective conclusions, the same processes that boost the group's plan can also backfire, which can lead to an outcome that’s unfavorable. (Rose, 2011) There are four problems that can cause the groupthink phenomena to come into effect. The first is overestimation of group power and morality. This occurs when a group feels too good about itself or they feel invulnerable and optimistic. The second is when the group feels morally right. This can then cause the group’s “closed-mindedness”. (Groupthink, 2013) When this happens, people with different views are cast out, warnings are ignored, and stereo-typical views of opponents are created and used which only fuels the groups’ self-riotousness. The third is when uniformity and acceptance cause those individuals with questions to remain silent. If a question does happen to go against the group then the pressure is put on that individual to get them back into the group’s mindset once again. (Groupthink, 2013) This in turn creates the final problem when the group develops “guards” which make sure that the thoughts are consistent among the group members. These are “members who protect the group from adverse information that might shatter their shared complacency.” As a group stays tight knit, the members grow to like each other. When this happens there will be more pressure not to discuss information that might destroy the cohesiveness. The group wants to maintain the good feelings that come from cohesion and becomes part of the group's "hidden agenda." (Groupthink, 2013) The lack of unbiased leadership is another major cause. This is when powerful leaders want to have it their way and they pressure the group into agreement. Agreement then seems like the easier alternative. If your boss screams at you for a few minutes, you will become embarrassed which then causes you to desire their approval, regardless of if they are right or wrong. When this happens in a group, “groupthink” is just about unavoidable. Lastly the group may not have had a template or procedure for decision making, and norms for such a method were also missing. There are many ways to avoid “groupthink” from occurring. You must make sure your employees follow good meeting processes, an example would be the development of a schedule. The business should also target a proper and balanced staff. (Rose, 2011) The staff must present opposing views and attend to correlative meeting issues like fatigue. (Groupthink, 2013) Groupthink has caused many issues in the past to become unresolved. Most of us have been involved in groupthink without understanding that we were wrong. It is human nature to want to be accepted but when it comes down to it, you have to be sure you are not being pressured into the decision.

References
Vore, K. (2013). Understanding groupthink. Small Wars, Retrieved from http://smallwarsjournal.com/jrnl/art/understanding-groupthink
Groupthink. In (2013). Encyclopedia of Business (2 ed.). Advameg. Retrieved from http://www.referenceforbusiness.com/encyclopedia/Gov-Inc/Groupthink.html
Rose, J. D. (2011). Diverse perspectives on the groupthink theory – a literary review Emerging Leadership Journeys, 4(1), 37-57. Retrieved from http://www.regent.edu/acad/global/publications/elj/vol4iss1/Rose_V4I1_pp37-57.pdf…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Groupthink

...these decision sometimes members of the team tend to agree with each other with out considering other factors and alternatives. This paper outlines Irving Janis’ theory of “groupthink”, which explains how group mentality can stifle effective decision-making. Groupthink is the phenomena whereby the cohesiveness of groups leads to peer pressure which inhibits debate and encourages self-censorship (Janis I L, 1982). As a result, alternative solutions and the implications of certain decisions are not fully explored. There are a number of ways in which this type of mentality can be countered, leading to more effective decision- making. Armed with these strategies, groups will be able to make the best decisions, benefitting from the diversity of perspectives a team brings and managing the disadvantages of groupthink. Since Irving Janis first presented the outline of his theory of groupthink, the theory has received a great deal of attention. According to Janis, groups experiencing groupthink reach poor decisions because group members try to conform and avoid deviation, hampering critical thinking. Groupthink may result in an incomplete survey of objectives, inadequate research, limited discussion alternatives, and a failure to examine significant costs and risks of preferred alternatives. In other words, Groupthink occurs when a person's thought process and decision-making capabilities become influenced by peer pressure. This may cause the group to overestimate their power and......

Words: 296 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Consumer Behavior- Groupthink

...Abstract This paper will give brief introduction to the deep meaning behind the word groupthink and the extent to which it is prevalent in our society today , at home, work places, institutions, entertainment places and its effect on consumer buying behavior. Then there will be an elaborate discussion on one of the well documented form of Groupthink in behavioral psychology called Bandwagon effect and its contribution in shaping consumer behavior by looking from different aspects of marketing and products. This effect relates to the spread of different beliefs among people even without any strong evidence and affects the psychology and personality of the person. This mainly helps people to identify themselves and categorize into groups which eventually become the reference group for all their behavior , adaptations and decisions. This forms the basis of the formation of groups, societies pertaining to which is a major part of the social psychology. At last but not the least some real life examples can be will be added to give insights from a practical dimension rather than just theoretical perspective to help understand and develop the idea even more. These examples will never occur to us until we try to think in this particular perspective and realize than since childhood we have been a part of them. Introduction Human being is a social animal. We cannot survive alone that is the reason that over the years they have developed thousands of such bonding and relationships...

Words: 1379 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Teams and Individuals

...Managing the Work of Teams and Individuals Thomas Wingham 8th December 2011 Contents * Introduction * Groupthink * Causes * Remedies * General Group Problem Solving (GGPS) Model * Risky Shift Phenomenon * Causes * Remedies * Conclusion * Recommendations * Reference List * Appendices Introduction In this report there will be an evaluation of Groupthink. Janis eight causes of Groupthink and what the remedies are. Aldag and Fuller’s model of groupthink and how it is different from Janis’s model. There will also be an evaluation of Risky Shift Phenomenon, this will include the causes and the remedies of Risky Shift Phenomenon. Groupthink Irving Janis says Groupthink occurs when “a group makes faulty decisions because group pressures lead to a deterioration of “mental efficiency, reality testing, and moral judgment”” (Janis, pg 9.) Groupthink - Causes According to Janis there are eight causes of Groupthink. Illusion of invulnerability; creates too much confidence that encourages extreme risks. Collective rationalization; members warned about something but do not take any notice. Belief in inherent morality; members believe in their goal and ignore all moral consequences. Stereotyped views of out-groups; negative views of enemy make effective responses to conflict seem unnecessary. Direct pressure on dissenters; members cannot argue with group views without being under pressure. Self-censorship;......

Words: 1761 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Groupthink

...Groupthink is the concept of having many people go along in agreement with a decision essentially because, either someone of authority has spoken and others are afraid to contradict their idea, or because in the silence of a discussion, each individual believes that others agree with the “apparent” consensus and don’t want to demolish the group cohesiveness . For example, have you ever thought about raising an issue or question in a group meeting, but then abstained because you didn’t want to destroy the consensus view the team had spent considerable time forming, or because you didn’t want to appear to be the only unsupportive member of the team? Conversely, have you ever been a manager who has had to force a team through change when clearly the team was hesitant and not expressing their true opinions? or have you ever been in a situation where you have a team school project and all of you just agree with a certain suggestion because you just want the meeting to be done as soon as possible? The answer to these questions is groupthink. Along with this, the only thing that can help managers combat the groupthink effects is staying aware of the number of key indicators, or symptoms that this mentality presents. The four main symptoms of groupthink are:  illusion of invulnerability, self censorship, direct pressure and an illusion of unanimity. One of the most dangerous symptoms of groupthink is the illusion of invulnerability, in which the entire group believes to have...

Words: 534 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

The Theme of Groupthink in “the Sisterhood of the Night” and “the Lottery”

...Name: Instructor’s Name: Course Details: Date of Submission: The Theme of Groupthink in “The Sisterhood of the Night” and “The Lottery” In “The Sisterhood of the Night” by Steven Millhauser and “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson, groupthink is a central theme that authors used to explain their main idea. Groupthink is a phenomenon in psychology occurring to individuals where their desire for conformity within their group results in a deviant outcome. This means that the members consider minimizing their conflict while trying to reach a consensus decision without evaluating the alternatives critically. “The Sisterhood of the Night” and “The Lottery” presents this concept in details with relevant examples trying to depict the use of the theme. “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson is a fiction story explaining the idea of the modern community in arbitrarily stoning one of their own for the purpose of satisfying a ritual. Their idea, in real situation, is unbelievable. From the setting, “The Lottery” is in unidentified American town having some annual tradition. Every year, residents of the town play a lottery that happens in the main square. The residents of the place have no memory of the exact procedure followed or the origin of the process (The Dangers in Human Group Animal Instinct). Likewise, they do not bother replacing the decaying black box used for many years containing the lottery tickets. They are too lazy to enquire on the situation but rather...

Words: 894 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Groupthink

...In 1897, the occupants of a small Pennsylvania village live in fear of nameless creatures in the surrounding woods. They have constructed a large barrier of oil lanterns and watch towers that are constantly manned to keep watch for "Those We Don't Speak Of." It is explained that the villagers have a long-standing truce with the monsters; the villagers do not go into their woods, and the creatures do not enter their village. After the funeral of a seven-year-old boy, Lucius Hunt (Joaquin Phoenix) asks the village elders for permission to pass through the woods to get medical supplies from "the towns". His request is denied, and later his mother, Alice (Sigourney Weaver), admonishes him for wanting to go to the towns, which the villagers describe as "wicked places where wicked people live". The Elders seem to keep dark secrets of their own in black boxes, whose contents they keep hidden from their own offspring. After Lucius makes a short venture into the woods, the creatures leave warnings around the village in the form of splashes of red paint (referred to by the villagers only as "the bad color") on all the villagers' doors. Meanwhile, Ivy Elizabeth Walker (Bryce Dallas Howard), the blind daughter of the chief Elder, Edward Walker (William Hurt), informs Lucius that she has strong feelings for him, and he returns her affections. They arrange to be married, but things go horribly wrong when Noah Percy (Adrien Brody), a young man with an apparent developmental and......

Words: 782 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Groupthink

...Groupthink is a concept that was identified by psychologist Irving Janis. It refers to faulty decision-making in a group. Janis defines groupthink as: "a mode of thinking people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' striving for unanimity override their motivation to realistically appraise alternative courses of action. Groupthink refers to a deterioration of mental efficiency, reality testing, and moral judgment that results from in-group pressures." (Borchers) When groups engage in groupthink, they all agree with one another instead of bringing their own ideas into the discussion. Groupthink interferes with creativity and independent thinking. It occurs when the staff is more concerned with seeking the approval of others than coming up with breakthrough ideas. Normally when groups get together to resolve an issue or generate ideas, different points of view are generated. This is good because the more ideas and solutions are available to consider, the better the outcome will be. In other words, the best ideas are not from an individual, but from the experience of several. Groupthink members find a solution without weighing all other options first. With a groupthink situation, the leader usually verbalizes their opinion, sells the idea and no one disagrees. “Groupthink usually happens when one or a few vocal members are highly persuasive or assertive in pushing for their ideas and points of view, making it somewhat......

Words: 575 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Group Think

... What is Groupthink? Groupthink occurs when a decision is swayed within a group based on bias or opinions of particular entity or subset. Many decisions in an organization are made not by an individual, but rather by groups of individuals (Sauter, 2010). The goal of groups is to help make decisions within a company based on research, discussions and brainstorming various ideas to come up with the ideal solution based on reasoning. When groupthink occurs, members ignore limitations or impropriety of their analyses as well as possible consequences of their choice process (Sauter, 2010). Decisions become swayed towards the bias despite personal knowledge or feelings and in many cases simply because of an underlying friendship. Hoggs and Haines (1998) wrote that “research has failed to clarify the causal role of group cohesiveness in groupthink because of a failure to distinguish cohesiveness from friendship”. An example of this occurred recently in a decision support group. The group is made up of various department heads and some of their supervisors. The topic of what departments charge activity should be listed on the weekly flash reports was brought up by the billing director. She noticed that the report was missing a few departments and wanted to get the group to agree that the missing departments needed to be included. The billing supervisor even agreed and was very disappointed that three departments were not included on the report for the past year. As everyone......

Words: 1041 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Focus Groups Should Use the Role of the Devil’s Advocate to Ensure Groupthink and Unethical Behavior Doesn’t Occur Among Group Members. • 1500 Words

...relationship between groupthink and unethical behaviour among group members. The first part of this essay will define unethical behaviour and the phenomenon of “groupthink”. It will describe how groupthink arises from extreme elevated negative group cohesion. It will outline the behaviour of groupthink dynamics (such as self-importance, over commitment, and excessive devotion to the group) and how groupthink dynamics contributes to unethical behaviour. Next, the essay will identify how groupthink has contributed to the unethical behaviour in the highest levels of decision making. The second part of this essay will identify the role and definition of the devil’s advocate, and how the devil advocate promotes positive communication. Finally, the essay will discuss the importance and the effectiveness of utilizing the devil’s advocate within group decisions for changing unethical behaviour within groupthink. Belonging to a group can promote negative cohesion as it promotes the probabilities of low quality decision making resulting in unethical behaviour among group members. The Oxford University Press (2015) defines unethical behaviour as “lacking moral principles; unwilling to adhere to proper rules of conduct”. Decision making in groups can be hindered by elevated cohesiveness and conformity resulting in the phenomenon called “Groupthink” it can transpire in the highest levels of decision making to the basic levels of social association (McCauley, 1989). Groupthink is......

Words: 1849 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Groupthink

...Groupthink in a Family Trust This is a concept application paper of the term groupthink as applied to the decision making process of a family trust. The paper is broken into to three major parts. First section of the paper is to explain the concept of groupthink, what it is defined to be. The second part of the paper is an analysis of my personal experience with groupthink within a family trust. The third part of the paper proposes a remedy other than argument and debate which would act as a “group antihistamine” against this phenomenon called groupthink. Defining Groupthink Groupthink as defined by Irving Janis in his book entitled Victims of Groupthink, in it is stated to be “the tendency of a group to conform to ideas simply because the general sense of the group has moved in a particular direction and members of the group feel committed to continue in the same unchallenged line of thought.” Consequently it is the practice of thinking and making decisions in a group in a way that discourages creativity or individual responsibility. Groupthink is an occurrence where by a group comes to a unanimous decision about a possible action despite the existence of facts that points to another more fruitful corrective course of action. In groupthink the members of the group place emphasis on everyone agreeing therefore there is a threat when a member is not in consensus. Unfortunately it results in more optimum solutions not being fully considered because of intimidation......

Words: 2087 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Groupthink

...Soviets would remove their missiles from Cuba. Attorney General Robert Kennedy suggested that the United States ignore the second letter and to only respond to the first letter. On October 28, 1962, Khrushchev announced that the Soviets would remove their missiles from Cuba and after additional negotiations the United States agreed to not invade Cuba, thus ending the Cuban Missile Crisis. The crisis was the closest the world had come to nuclear war. The Cuban Missile Crisis was only a little over a year after the attempted U.S. invasion of Cuba at the Bay of Pigs, and the same key advisors worked in both situations (Janis, 1982). The group of advisors was more effective during the Cuban Missile Crisis, and had fewer symptoms of groupthink (Janis, 1982).When the President found out about the missiles he quickly formed the Executive Committee of the National Security Council and he made it clear that giving in was not an option. He instructed the group to develop a plan to get the missiles out of Cuba before they became operational (Janis, 1982). The President let the Executive Committee decide how to get rid of the missile threat (Janis, 1982). Following the Bay of Pigs fiasco, President Kennedy set up a commission of inquiry to find out exactly what had gone wrong (Janis, 1982). Following the recommendations of the commission and his own opinions, the President introduced a series of changes in the decision making procedures of this team (Janis, 1982).......

Words: 1185 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

The Groupthink Theory

...The Groupthink Theory “Researchers have studied the influence of group pressure on individual members” (Byars and Rue, 2007, 238). As defined by Byars and Rue “when group members lose their ability to think as individuals and conform at the expense of their good judgment, groupthink occurs. Members become unwilling to say anything against the group or any member, even if an action is wrong” (Byars and Rue, 2007, 238). “Keeping a group together under any circumstance is a goal in itself. Groups with this goal believe that the group is indestructible and always right. Group members justify any action, stereotype outsiders as enemies of the group, and pressure unwilling members to conform (Byars and Rue, 2007, 238). In 1972, Irving L. Janis presented a set of hypothesis that he extracted from observing small groups performing problem-solving tasks; he collectively referred to these hypotheses as groupthink (Janis, 1972). He defined groupthink as “a quick and easy way to refer to a mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members’ strivings for unanimity override their motivation to realistically appraise alternative courses of action” (Janis, 1982, 9). Groups are usually successful because group members bring varied ideas, collective knowledge, and they tend to be focused while working together. Groups can be advantageous to both individuals and businesses. They are valuable to individuals because they are......

Words: 1199 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Groupthink

...Abstract Groupthink can have has its positives and its negatives depending on who you ask and the mindset of the people working together. Groupthink happens most often when the group is already cohesive, is isolated from conflicting opinions and where the leader is open and directive. Groupthink is what takes place when group work happens. Groupthink happens most often when the group is already unified, is isolated from disagreeing sentiments and where the leader is open and directive. External opinions should be taken seriously or even having external people included in meetings. The group should be split into subgroups for reporting back and discussion. Individuals should be privately polled for personal opinions. “Antecedent factors such group cohesiveness, structural faults, and situational context play into the likelihood of whether or not groupthink will impact the decision-making process.”(Wikipedia) [1] According to Irving Janis, a research psychologist from Yale University performed the majority of the initial research on groupthink. His original definition of the term was, “A mode of thinking that people engage in when they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, when the members' strivings for unanimity override their motivation to realistically appraise alternative courses of action” (Janis, 1972). [2] Some say Groupthink will not always work out for the best results because this eliminates personal creativity and ones own thinking. On the other hand......

Words: 284 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Groupthink

...Janis’s model of groupthink is arguably the most widely publicized application of psychological principles to high level military, political and technical group decision- making in the history of experimental psychology. This had to have pleased its author who offered this formulation as a compelling bridge between principles documented by laboratory research and “real life” problems (e.g., Janis, 1971). As such the model “legitimized” the importance of decades of academic research on social influence and group process much of which focused upon perceptual and attitudinal judgments having little or no material consequence for participants1. The model has been widely cited (cf. Fuller & Aldag, 1998), and is still described as a valid model in most texts within social psychology (e.g., Baron & Byrne, 2003; Forsyth, 1999; Lord, 1997; Aronson, Wilson & Akert, 2003) and many introductory psychology texts as well (e.g., Myers, 2003). The longevity of this broad coverage both reflects and contributes to the common acceptance of groupthink as a valid and verified phenomenon not only by the lay public but by many academic psychologists as well (Fuller & Aldag, 1998, Turner & Pratkanis, 1998). As a result, it is disconcerting to find that there is substantial skepticism regarding this model among those involved scholars who have offered detailed reviews of the groupthink and group decision making literature (e.g., Aldag & Fuller, 1993; Esser, 1998; Hogg, 1992; Kerr & Tindale, 2004;......

Words: 1384 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Groupthink

...How to Avoid Groupthink We like people that agree with us; it makes us feel good. But there is a condition that develops when likeminded people agree and reaffirm each other’s decisions and beliefs. It’s called groupthink. It’s a term that was coined by psychologist Irving Janis. Per BusinessDictionary.com (2011), groupthink is defined as “Tendency of the members of a group to yield to the desire for consensus or unanimity at the cost of considering alternative courses of action.” Thompson, (2008) states, “Groupthink occurs when team members place consensus above all other priorities” (p. 172). Groupthink has been identified as a contributing factor to many political and corporate events including the 2002 US invasion of Iraq, the Bay of Pigs, and the AMA allowing Sunbeam to use their name for product endorsement (Thompson, 2008). The next few paragraphs describe five different methods for avoiding groupthink. One method for avoiding groupthink is Devil’s Advocate. This is a role that can be assigned to a member of the group. Harris (2010) wrote, “This should be a different person for each meeting” (para. 5). Implementing this responsibility will aid in identifying risks in the decision making process as well as arguing against the proposed group solution or decision. Ultimately this position would help create more alternative solutions and spawn the idea creativity of the group. What’s important with this role is that the opposing position be genuine......

Words: 784 - Pages: 4