Premium Essay

First Amendment and Hate Speech

In: Social Issues

Submitted By GrizzlyKitten
Words 623
Pages 3
The First Amendment and Hate Speech
Unfortunately there are plenty of people out there that still hang dearly to their hate. The First Amendment is a crucial component of our basic human rights in America and there will always be those that abuse these rights. Hate is a part of human nature that some say is simply another facet of love. I do believe that these people have the right to hate speech as long as it does not interfere with others around them. It is the same concept as public disturbance or any laws that protect you when you are out in public doing what you usually do on a day to day basis. Hate speech is just another form of speech. Any and all power that it has over you is power that you inherently grant it. Since it is a form of speech it is protected under our First Amendment. If the person spewing this garbage is doing so among like-minded people, on the internet, or is otherwise leaving alone the targeted groups then it is perfectly legal. Everybody makes a big deal and gets upset every last time something “unacceptable” or out of the “norm” is said. Hate speech can be prosecuted if it turns into more than that. If the people making hate speeches seek out and harass individuals with their words and or actions then it becomes something far uglier and more clear cut in prosecution terms. When it comes down to it everyone is free to do as they wish in a public space as long as it does not violate any of our laws or human rights. If the people around do not like what is being said they are free to remove themselves from the situation. The case that I chose is extremely recent and it is unknown whether or not the expelled students or any students that may be expelled in the future will sue. The first issue is that their hate speeches involved racial slurs stating that they would never accept niggers into their group. This is up to their private…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

The First Amendment

...The First Amendment “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” This was written by James Madison and is the first amendment in the Bill of Rights. Basically, this means that Congress cannot make laws establishing one religion that everyone must follow nor favoring one religion over any others. The government cannot tell people what religion is appropriate or attempt to influence the belief of the citizens. This amendment also guarantees that any American person can speak and/or print what is on his mind without being punished. We also have the right to meet as a group where we chose and we can petition what the government says if we truly believe it is wrong. The first amendment generally the most well known. Most people, at some point, have heard many of the phrases that are used here. This is also what a lot of disagreements are over. The first clause has been a source of much debate. Some people believe that the government should make certain exceptions to religious expression. Other people believe that all religious expressions should be restricted. People interpret laws to mean different things. There have been many judicial proceedings that involve the First Amendment. One really good example is George Daniels v. City......

Words: 903 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

The First Amendment

...Constitutional Law Unit 2 Assignment – The Concept of Free Government Bobbywayne Tillman Professor William Muniak Kaplan University Task: The Concept of Free Government Conditions: Review Chapter 2 and provided links. Define the concept of free government. analyzing how and why the framers of the First Amendment intended to protect freedom of speech and how this relates to the term “free government”. Discuss at least three elements of this freedom. What kinds of speech did they intend to protect? Do you think that they envisioned any limitations on protected speech? If so, what are some of those limitations and their rationales? Standards: Write a two to three page paper, with appropriate references. RE: Amendment I – Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or he right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for the a redress of grievances. [1] There are three elements of the first amendment which are: 1. Separation of Church and State 2. Free Exercise of religion 3. Freedom of Speech Free government is a republican form of government in which the powers are divided between departments; the legislative, executive, and judicial. Each have distinct and independent powers designed to operate as check and balances upon those of the other two co-ordinate branches. [2] ......

Words: 1097 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Reflect First Amendment

...Running Head: THE FIRST AMENDMENT [pic] Reflections on the First Amendment NAME University of Phoenix Online United States Constitution – HIS301 Reflections on the First Amendment Judged by the sheer number of cases brought to the Supreme Court for debate, the First Amendment can be considered one of the most controversial amendments in the Bill of Rights. The First Amendment was written to address three fundamental liberties all citizens have: religion, speech and peaceful assembly. On closer inspection, there are six very different ideals melded together into one defining statement. When the U.S. Constitution was signed on Sept. 17, 1787, it did not contain important freedoms that are now outlined in the Bill of Rights, because many of the Framers viewed some of the freedoms as unnecessary. However, after vigorous debate, the Bill of Rights was adopted. The first freedoms guaranteed in this historic document were expressed in 45 words written by James Madison that we have come to know as the First Amendment. The First Amendment states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” Freedom of expression, artistic or otherwise in the United States is governed by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution...

Words: 2203 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

The First Amendment

... The First Amendment Lori Hardin AED/204 The first amendment in the Constitution of the United States does relate to our educational system. Although it can be challenging and often very complicated like the pledge of allegiance being said at school. The saying of “Under God” has been a topic of dispute. The reference of religious preference is imposed and the first amendment states that it is prohibited to have any law that includes the use of religion. It gets complicated because most schools are funded by our government and they make up the rules. It is kind of a catch 22 when we say the pledge with the words “Under God and the funding from the government it can be seen as unconstitutional to some. I would put as respect for my country not any reference to religion. Another example of the use of religion in school and the complication of the first amendment is the use of prayer before sporting events and before graduation ceremonies. A lot of teams will say the say a prayer in locker room before the big game. Some may see this as a violation of the amendment but I think a player should be able to say it if they so choose and those that don’t is ok as well. It is a form of Freedom of Speech and students have that right as well. Some people view this as the schools sanctioning religion. Schools on the other hand take a similar stance here that they do with regard to prayer at sporting events. They stay out of the situation and leave prayer, or not, up to the students.......

Words: 426 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

First Amendment

...First Amendment protections of speakers’ rights to speech and assembly vary based on the speakers’ chosen forum. The Supreme Court breaks down forums into three types: traditional public forums, designated forums, and nonpublic forums. See Perry Educ. Ass’n v. Perry Educators’ Ass’n, 460 U.S. 37 (1983). Finally, some public property is not a forum at all. Traditional public forums include public parks, sidewalks and areas that have been traditionally open to political speech and debate. Speakers’ in these areas enjoy the strongest First Amendment protections. In traditional public forums, the government may not discriminate against speakers based on their views. This is called “viewpoint discrimination.” The government may, however, subject speech to reasonable, content-neutral restrictions on its time, place, and manner. When considering government restrictions of speech in traditional public forums, courts use “strict scrutiny.” Under strict scrutiny, restrictions are allowed only if they serve a compelling state interest and are narrowly tailored to meet the needs of that interest. Sometimes, the government opens public property for public expression even though the public property is not a traditional public forum. These are designated public forums. After opening a designated public forum, the government is not obligated to keep it open. However, so long as the government does keep the forum open, speech in the forum receives the same First Amendment protections......

Words: 420 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

First Amendment

...Anthony J. D’Angelo once stated that “in order to succeed you must first fail, so that you know what not to do the next time.” This quote resonates greatly with the events that took place in Philadelphia in 1787 since this was when the supreme law of the United States was signed into action. This happening brought about the conclusion of an era in which the federal government was too weak and was replaced with one known driven by The Constitution, a piece of legislation that was adequate and fulfilled the needs of this newly formed country. As a prolonged and arduous war ended against one of the world’s greatest superpowers, the Continental Congress of the United States of America began drafting its first constitution in mid-1776, they became known as the “Articles of Confederation.” Less than a decade later an uprising led by Daniel Shays, a former revolutionary, arose when the people became discontent with the current conditions the country was in and blamed their dissatisfaction on the government. (Curtis) These farmers were in poor and in debt, and although the rebellion was swiftly crushed, it demonstrated how powerless the government really was and proved that imperative action was necessary to rectify the issues that were currently afflicting the young nation. The fact that the Articles of Confederation failed was actually a positive outcome, since it was held in place for 10 years it served as a good guideline for what was needed. It was a big risk since they......

Words: 1005 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

First Amendment

...First Amendment When one is growing up, and is not so knowledgeable about our government you can be sure that every kid knows that they have the freedom of speech. Freedom of Speech is probably one of the things that some kids use the most, when talking about something maybe one of their friends does not want to hear, “I have the freedom of speech I can say whatever I want.” This to a certain extent is true. The first amendment states this: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and petition the government for a redress of grievances”.(Bill) Though some people may try to take advantage of the first amendment, everyone should have the right to religion, free exercise, speech, press, peaceful assembly and the right to petition the government. In 1943 while at war with Germany and Japan, West Virginia wanted to instill American values by forcing Teachers and students to recite the pledge of allegiance. If the teacher or student failed to comply, they would be faced with expulsion. West Virginia’s motive for this rule seems reasonable but the consequences are beyond extreme. When a group of Jehovah’s Witness’ attended the school, “[They] refused to salute the flag because it represented a graven image that was not to be recognized.” (West) When these students refused to recite the pledge,......

Words: 1034 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

First Amendment

...First Amendment Tiffany Berardino, Alanna Cherry, Charlie Ford Paul Patton, Gwyneth Navitsky Law/421 Contemporary Business Law November 10, 2013 Boni Cherelle Introduction On December 15, 1791, the First Amendment Rights were set forth to protect the citizens of the United States and be governing by the Bills of Rights. As time passed and the U.S. changed the First Amendment, it became more of a pillar for free speech, free press and the right to peacefully assemble. The First Amendment, at its early stage, was only applied by laws by Congress but now it has been directed in the process of incorporating a clause through the Fourteenth Amendment – due process. The First Amendment protects as well as gives an understanding of what society can and cannot do as citizens of the United States. First Amendment/Defamation As a team, we are in agreement that the First Amendment protects defamation to an extent. For example, consider the media who report on current events all over the world. Journalists are the most accused of defamation due to the topics which are discussed. This in turn creates a stage that is known to the world as “correct reporting”. Freedom of speech, as characterized in the First Amendment, allows individuals the freedom to say what they want so long as it does not create falsehoods and defames the character of any one individual. First Amendment/Censorship Although the First Amendment gives people or companies the freedom of speech and press,...

Words: 774 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

First Amendment: Freedom of Speech

...First Amendment Research Paper: Freedom of Speech During the time the Constitution was being written, freedom of speech was mainly focused on political speech. People wanted the opportunity to express their ideas and opinions about the government without being reprimanded or unheard. People feared that if the government was able to censor unfavorable viewpoints, they would eventually form a politically powerful population and oppress those who did not share the same mindset. Along with concerns about political speech, freedom of religious speech was a common desire. Previous incidents in English and Colonial history had occurred where certain religious views were prohibited and the people wanted to make sure that they were safe from the government’s restrictions. During his speech to the First Congress on June 8, 1789, James Madison proposed the Freedom of Speech idea to congress. He included several amendments that specifically addressed the concerns of Anti-Federalists that certain rights were not strongly protected by the Constitution. Madison said in his speech, “The people shall not be deprived or abridged of their right to speak, to write, or to publish their sentiments.” Congress agreed with this idea and it became part of the first amendment. Madison continued with, “No state shall violate the equal rights of conscience, or of the press.” Congress did not like this and thought that only the federal government should be prohibited from restricting certain rights,...

Words: 1900 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

The First Amendment

...The First Amendment I believe that the First Amendment was written as a means of protecting the church from the state. The First Amendment is considered the most important amendment in the United States Constitution. It protects the rights to freedom of religion, freedom of expression, freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, and freedom of press from government interference. [1] According to J. Hutson in his book the “Church and State in America”, he states the amendment “prevented the federal government from establishing a national religion and allowed people to freely exercise their religious beliefs and practices.”[2] Basically, the First Amendment gives the people the ability to live their lives the way that they want to, the lifestyle that they choose. This amendment was passed 1789. James Madison, known as the “Father of the Constitution” for his contribution to the Constitution, and proposed twelve amendments, which ended up becoming the first ten amendments of the Constitution. These first ten amendments make up what became known as the Bill of Rights. [3] The purpose of the First Amendment of the Bill of Rights, written mostly by James Madison, with the assistance of Thomas Jefferson, was to address three fundamental freedoms all citizens have: religion, speech and peaceful assembly. According to the Buchanan (2010), when the U.S. Constitution was signed, it did not contain the essential freedoms now outlined in the Bill of Rights, because many of the......

Words: 687 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Reflections on the First Amendment

...Reflections on the First Amendment HIS/301 January 15, 2015 Paul Betancourt Reflections on the First Amendment The First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States protects the freedom of the American people. When asked about the First Amendment, many people would only think of the freedom of speech. However, the amendment reads: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances (U.S. Constitution, amend. I). Over time, these rights have been challenged in various cases, six of which will be discussed in this paper. The common trend in these cases is that the First Amendment rights may always be tested, but in the end, they hold true in court. The freedom of speech and freedom of the press ensure that Congress cannot pass any laws or other amendments that would later take these rights away from the American people. The idea is that all people should be able to speak freely, and news agencies and reporters should be able to speak the truth, whatever it may be, to the citizens of America (Cornell University Law School, n.d.). However, there are times where saying certain things in certain scenarios could cause grave damage to the country, the U.S. government, or even the American people. In these cases, there have actually been exceptions......

Words: 1661 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Hate Speech

...many other countries have laws against hate speech and that such laws have sometime been passed in the United States, although not nationally. I think this is because, as mentioned by Waldron, many countries consider hate laws in Europe and in other countries in which manifestations of hate are prohibited rather than tolerated in the name of free speech. I also think this because other countries in which have these hate laws, their constitutions acknowledge that basic rights, including freedom of expression, are legitimately subject to restriction. I think it isn’t consistent because many states vary in the extent to which they allow their national legislation be guided by international human-rights laws. The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education reviews the narrow definitions of exceptions for the free-speech clause of the U.S Constitution, noting that universities frequently go beyond these exceptions in their speech codes. Those narrow exceptions include: speech that incites reasonable people to immediate violence, so-called “fighting words”, harassment, true threats and intimidation, obscenity, and defamation. I think that universities go beyond these exceptions in their speech codes because of the recent events that have happened. For example, I think the Virginia Tech massacre made a lot of universities scared that something like that could happen at their university, so they started to go beyond exceptions of the free-speech clause to make sure that......

Words: 852 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

First Amendment

...Freedom of Speech The constitution has many important points still valid today, however, the most important point to me is Freedom of speech in the first amendment; without freedom of speech we can’t express what’s going on around you. The freedom of speech reserves democracy. I feel as if the “I had a dream” speech says a lot about the freedom of speech, Martin Luther king Jr, expressed his freedom of speech to promote civil rights and created equal rights. Some citizen’s opposed him but the government was on his side because is a constitutional right even though most of the people did not agree at all. A personal experience in my life was I went to the gay pride parade in Detroit with my best friend that happens to be gay and that parade helped get the law passed for gay marriage at least for my beliefs; I felt that everyone there had a voice and no one was left unheard and it really showed that the freedom of speech does matter. Freedom of speech is the foundation of our country and separates us from being like all the other country’s that we split away from long ago. The constitution is such an important thing, however, I believe the first amendment is the most important because without the rights granted by the First Amendment, all other rights of the Constitution are at risk; We can't insure a free society without freedoms of speech, religion, the press, and peaceable assembly....

Words: 251 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

First Amendment

...Supported by the required readings and presentations of Module/Week 1, post a thread defending 1 of these 2 First Amendment interpretations: 1.The First Amendment was written as a means of protecting the state from the church. 2. The First Amendment was written as a means of protecting the church from the state. The First Amendment was written as a means of protecting the church from the state is the most logical interpretation of the First Amendment to the constitution. Hutson stated in his book “Church and State in America” that the amendment “prevented the federal government from establishing a national religion and allowed people to freely exercise their religious beliefs and practices. The issue in today’s society is not that the people believe that the government should establish a national religion but rather that any reference to any faith (in particular it seems Christian) should be abolished as it “offends” some citizens to see it. In many cases the “offensive” object is not on government property but is rather a private display or decision. If this were ten years ago I might have argued that the issue was keeping the Church out of the State. However, more recently, the focus seems to be the other way around. Now more than ever, it seems that the focus needs to be on keeping the state out of the church setting. Consider these recent cases. In Houston there were five Christian Pastors that were served subpoenas by the city to turn over any sermons that......

Words: 877 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Hate Speech

...Hate Speech Tricia Bilbrey Grand Canyon University PHI 305 September 18, 2011 Hate Speech The studied article reviews several cases where hate speech or “fighting words” were used against minorities. The views of 1st Amendment supporters and those opposed to hate speech were compared. The question still remains: Should hate speech be protected by the US Constitution? The number of hate groups in America today has reached over the thousand marks. That is an increase of 7.5% since 2010. ("CNN U.S.," 2011) This statistic was mind-blowing for me. Maybe it’s because I didn’t want to believe it was true. In the article it is mentioned that protecting this form of free speech would limit government control. Supporters of the 1st Amendment feel that we should combat this issue with groups that oppose hate speech. They fear that if the government is allowed to limit our speech, then we are allowing the government to limit our opinions. There are many valid claims stated in this article supporting the ban of hate speech in the US. Some say that hate speech promotes fear, threats and violence in the lives of minorities. Others agree that protecting this form of free speech encourages inequality and segregation. Does the use of speaking with hatred persuade Americans to get their point across using vulgar and degrading, sometimes even forceful words? I feel that it does all of these things and more. Emotions are at high peaks during a demonstration that comes to...

Words: 438 - Pages: 2