Free Essay

Examine the View That Childhood Is Not a Fixed Universal Experience.

In: Other Topics

Submitted By Flint209
Words 370
Pages 2
Childhood has never been a fixed universal experience; it is not considered a universal experience because everyone lives in a different environments. They deal with parents single, together, or in the middle of divorce.

In some cultures children to be married and forced into having children before they even turn 13. Because in that society are not considered as children when they hit a certain age, even if it is only around 10 or 12. In some tribes the parents stop providing for the child when it turns five years old, at that age it is expected to look after themselves and if it cannot and is eaten by a predator they do not care as it as the infants responsibility to look after itself. In other tribes around the world women who have children and become a mother do not enjoy the role, they barely keep their children alive and most of the time hopes for a wolf to take it away. So that they are no other burdened by a child.

All parents raise their children differently to the next. People are raised with different morals cultures, beliefs, influences and norms. Each culture has their opinions on what is considered to me expected and accepted. Not only that, but as we grow, we form our own identities. Through out our teen years we start to disagree with our parents, even before that we have friends and peers who influence our decisions as well as people we meet as a result. Think of childhood as something with no absolutes. Childhood cannot be fixed because everyone leads different lives, surrounded by people with different experiences. While there can be similarities between experiences, there are rarely any people who lead exactly the same life.

As you can see childhood is not a fixed universal experience because there are many different cultures around the world and they have different norms and values from us. For us a child is not an adult and cannot make any independent decisions before the age of 18 and therefore have a long childhood. Whereas in some countries and tribes infants don’t have the luxury of a childhood and have to be independent before their time.…...

Similar Documents

Free Essay

“Examine Mcewan’s Presentation of the Experience of Loss in ‘the Child in Time’”

...During the novel ‘The Child in Time’, the main character Stephen experiences a great deal of loss and/or grief. When one experiences grief, they experience it by going through five stages. These stages are as follows, (not necessarily in chronological order), disbelief, yearning, anger, depression and acceptance. With these two points in mind, I shall be producing an essay that examines how Stephen experiences these five stages through times in the novel. Disbelief, this is defined as the inability or refusal to accept that something is true or real. Stephen under goes this first stage of grief during a very imagery rich part, in the beginning of the novel. He loses Kate in the supermarket and when he goes home to tell Julie, he cannot believe that it has actually happened, he is still in shock. From this we are able to establish that Stephen is about to embark on the long journey through grief. I find it interesting that McEwan situates Stephen undertaking disbelief towards the start of the novel. I feel that he is foreshadowing to the readers that Stephen is going to be a character, which leads a rocky life, through loss of many things. Yearning, the word portrays Stephen’s craving for something in the novel consummately. I would describe yearning as having an intense feeling of longing for something. That ‘something’ for Stephen is two very important people in his life, Kate and Julie. We know that Stephen longs for his daughter. There is no specific reference needed......

Words: 913 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Sociology - Childhood

...Examine the effects of social change in the position of children Sociologists see childhood as socially constructed, this means they see it as something created and defined by society itself. They believe we can see the position that children occupy in society is not fixed but differs between different time, places and cultures by comparing the western idea of childhood today with the childhood in the past and in other societies. It is accepted in our society today that childhood is a special time of life and that children are different from adults. They are seen as physically and psychologically immature and not yet able to run their own lives. Jane Pilcher (1995) notes the most importance feature of the modern idea of childhood is separateness. Childhood is seen as a clear and distinct life stage and children in society occupy a different status from adults. However this view of childhood as a separate age status, children and adults being different, is not found in all societies. Stephan Wagg (1992) says “Childhood is socially constructed. It is, in other words, what members of particular societies, at particular times and in particular places, say it is. There is no single universal childhood, experienced by all. So, childhood isn’t ‘natural’ and should be distinguished from mere biological immaturity”. This means that, while all human beings go through the same stages on physical development, different cultures construct or define this process differently. Ruth......

Words: 905 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Examine Different Sociological Views on Changes in the Experience of Childhood in the Past 50 Years or so. (24)

...Many sociologists see childhood as socially constructed; as something created and defined by society. Many argue that what people mean by childhood, and the position that children occupy in society, is not fixed but differs between different times, places and cultures. It can be seen that by comparing the western idea of childhood today with childhood in the past and other societies. It can be determined by many sociologists that there have been many changes in society that have affected children over the last 50 years, however there are several there are several different sociological views on whether these changes have been beneficial to children or not. Functionalist sociologists have the “March of progress” view, as they believe that the experience of childhood has massively improved over the last 50 years. They take the view that childhood is socially constructed and vary between times, places and cultures. There are important differences between childhood in western societies today as compared with both present day Third World countries and European societies in the past. For example, in the middle ages, child labour was basic fact of life for almost all children, while schooling was available only to the wealthy. These differences raise the question of whether the changes in the status of childhood that we looked at earlier represent an improvement. The “March of progress” view argues that, over the past few centuries, the position of children in western......

Words: 717 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Examine the Marxist View of the Family

...Examine the Marxist view of the family Marxists believe that the nuclear family is dominant in capitalist’s society. They see the family as performing essential functions, but negative functions. These functions benefit the minority in power (bourgeoisie) and the economy. The functions disadvantage the working class society (proletant). Marxists believe that the family is a unit of consumption. Family members go out to work to earn money. With their wages/salary they purchase goods such as food, clothing and electrical goods, from capitalist manufacturers. The bourgeoisie make a profit from this. Zaretsky (1976) backed this theory up by saying that when a man returns home form work he is the ‘king of his castle’. This helps him to accept his low work status by allowing him to believe he has a high status at home. However, whilst men think that they are the ruler of the home, Morgan (1996) argues that the source of power with in the family is food. Whilst the man may bring home the money, the mother’s typical role is to shop for food, unpack it, decide on a meal and cook it. This shows that the mother is ruling the household as she is determining what the family eats and when they eat. Marxists also believe that the family socialise children to accept capitalism and levels of hierarchy through the use of authority of parents and obedience of children. This will teach children that in working life, someone will always be higher up in the hierarchy than you. ...

Words: 906 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Examine Different Sociological Views on the Family move back in with their parents because they do not have the money to afford their own living arrangements yet. Whatever type of family you have there are different perspectives in which to view it. While the perspectives differ greatly from one another, the family still remains one of the most important social institutions along with health-care, religion, education, mass media, politics, and economy. Family is defined as, 'a basic social unit consisting of parent and their children, considered as a group, whether living together or not.' While every family is unique, there are similarities and differences within each family, no matter what perspective you are using. Each theory shows a different type of assumptions and defines a certain way of understanding a social institution, from all four unique perspectives. Functionalists believe that society is based on a value consensus, into which society socialise its members. They regard society as a system made up of different parts or sub-systems that depend on each other. Functionalists often compare society to a human body – without one organ, the body wouldn’t function, without basic functions of society, society wont perform.  In the 1940s Murdock examined 250 societies in different cultures. He found that the family is universal and inevitable as no society had a substitute for the family. He concluded the ‘nuclear family’ is the ideal model and this model achieves four distinct functions: Sexual – the family......

Words: 1750 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Examine the View That Morality Is Dependent on Religion.

...Examine the View that Morality is Dependent on Religion. (21 Marks) There are three main views for Morality and religion: Morality is dependent on religion, morality is Independent of religion and morality is opposed to religion. There is a myriad of reasons for and against each of these statements. Many people do believe that morality does depend on religion for reasons such as that western law was originally based on Biblical principles, for example stealing and murder. For many however the question is how morality should be linked with religious faith, even though this causes problems between secularists and religious believers. The view I’m going to explore mainly in this essay is the view that ‘morality is dependent on religion’. People who believe that religion and morality are linked would argue that you cannot have morality without religion and that all rules come from God as he is the source of Religion. This is backed up by the fact that even social laws created to run western countries are taken from religious books such as, the Bible. Many people who believe the statement morality is dependent on religion would be Absolutists and believe that we should never question moral codes or there is ever a time when moral codes should be lenient. Absolutists would have no emotion to a situation and would therefore condemn situation ethics as they would believe the answer to a problem is always the same no matter the situation. This is because an absolutist......

Words: 1039 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Early Childhood Experience, an Indicator for Distress?

...Early childhood experience, an indicator for distress? We live in a busy world with all kinds of life events competing for our attention. It is no wonder that we drop the occasional ball when juggling different needs. Sometimes stressors converge and can overwhelm us. We are unable to bring the usual resilience to meet the challenges we are faced with. It may be that home and work life stressors are just too much to bear and we need the help of outside agencies. This bucks our natural tendency to shoulder the problems and work through them independently to bring about successful solutions and outcomes. Just talking through our problems with a good friend can be enough to support us through but on occasions resorting to a counsellor and sometimes medication is necessary and helpful. What neuroscientists are finding is that there are some people who are more susceptible to stress than others. Brain imaging techniques [functional Resonance Imaging (fRMI)] show that structures in the limbic system of the brain associated with emotional responses , can suffer damage. This predisposes some individuals to significantly more emotional affects by stressors. The HPA axis controls our reactions to stress and comprises of the hypothalamus, pituitary gland and adrenal glands. When a perceived threat is experienced the HPA axis produces a number of hormones to engage the body in “flight or fight “mode. Exposure to chronic stress will cause neuronal damage in structures......

Words: 451 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Examine the New Right View of the Role of Education

...Examine the New Right view of the role of education. (20 marks) The New Right perspective have a more political view on education which could be named as old fashioned compared to functionalists. They believed that education is for socialising and preparing young children for the world of work however they say that the state cannot meet peoples needs. The New Right are similar in many ways to functionalists as they believe that some people are naturally more talented than others. They believe that education should socialise pupils into shared values, such as competition so the most talented people can get the best jobs and instil a sense of national identity. They broadly favour an education system run on meritocratic principles of open competition, and one that serves the needs of the economy by preparing young people for work. However, unlike functionalists, the New Right do not believe that the current education system is achieving these goals as according to New Right, the reason for their failure is that its run by state and that instead we should be encouraging competition through different forms of private education.   A central principle of the New Right is the belief that the state cannot meet people’s needs and that people are best left to meet their own needs and that people are best left to meet their own needs through the free market. A number of the principles of the New Right are based on the theories of market forces. They felt that the British economy was...

Words: 991 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Examine Marxist Views of the Role of the Family.

...Examine Marxist views of the role of the family. (24 marks) Marxist sociologists believe that the family is shaped by the requirements of capitalism and serves to support and maintain this unjust and exploitative system. They believe that the family exists to reproduce labour power, to consume the products of capitalism and to provide emotional support for workers to help them cope with the harsh reality and to accept their inequalities. Engels, a Marxist sociologist, believes that family was only needed when private property emerged and that monogamous families were a means of passing on private property to heirs as they provided proof of paternity. Zaretsky, another Marxist sociologist, supported Engels’ theory but also believed that family helps workers to live with their oppression by giving them a measure of control over their own lives. Functionalism is similar to Marxism as they are both macro-theories which means they look at society as a whole rather than at specifically one aspect. They are also both structural theories which means that they view the family as part of a system and that people are products of this system. However, functionalism differs to Marxism as functionalists believe that the family works harmoniously and that value consensus exists within society whereas Marxists believe that conflicting views are normal. Functionalists also believe that the family benefits everyone in society whilst Marxists believe the family only benefits the......

Words: 1359 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Childhood Is Shown as to Be a Bitter Experience in Wuthering Heights

...Jade Li English Literature Childhood is Shown as to be a Bitter Experience in Wuthering Heights The experience of childhood is one that is extremely importantly in everyone’s lives. Childhood is generalised as the happiest and carefree times, however in Wuthering Heights childhood is not portrayed as that. In order to effectively judge childhood being a unpleasant experience in Wuthering Heights, various methods that Emily Bronte must be looked at, as well as characters such as Heathcliff, Edgar, Isabella and Catherine may be analysed as examples. In particular, Bronte’s use of setting, dialogue, narrative voice as well as her exceptional and imaginative language choices. In the same way an analysis of the bitter childhood experiences will be explored in The Colour Purple. The first significant portrayal of bitter childhood in Wuthering Heights is with Heathcliff. Upon entering the Earnshaw household as a child Heathcliff is immediately faced by questions of his parentage. Which ultimately leads to Heathcliff being characterised as devilish and is inhumanely referred to as “it”, his body language is “gibberish” and his dark features thus gives him the name calling of “gypsy”. Being a foundling and a resentful son Heathcliff had a tough childhood, always not having the feeling of being wanted. On top of being resented, Heathcliff was ultimately rejected by Catherine I which adds on to the bitterness of his childhood. Emily Bronte uses methods such as imagery and......

Words: 748 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Examine the View That Religion Has Positive Functions for Society

...Examine the view that religion has positive functions for society (18 marks) Functionalists demonstrate a positive view of religion, they see religion as a fundamental factor in the maintaining of consensual values. Without religion, Functionalists believe that society would break down. Durkheim suggests that religion is not a belief in Gods, spirits or supernatural but rather a factor that separates the sacred and the profane. Sacred things are believed to hold value and are treated with awe whereas profane objects, activities or people hold no significance and are considered ordinary and mundane. Durkheim concluded that sacred objects, for example the cross in Christianity, are only sacred because they represent or are symbolic of particular groups. Because such objects are given meaning based on the collective values of society, Durkheim ultimately believed that religion is society worshipping itself. Durkheim argued that religion serves two cognitive functions, firstly, religion helps maintain social solidarity where societies members can unite over common beliefs and values. The second function religion fulfills is the creation of ‘collective consciousness’ this is the idea that religion acts as a ‘glue’ that maintains social integration. These functions are seen to be positive as they suggest religion preserves society rather than disrupts it. Parsons offers another positive view of religion, he outlined three positive functions that religion successfully......

Words: 612 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Examine the Marxist View on the Role of the Family

...the family preforming three key functions to keep the capitalist class in power. Inheritance of property so property will always be privately owned and will never return to the ‘primmitive communism’ The family preform key ideological functions such as socialising children that inequality is inevitable and the importance to follow orders off hierarchies. Also the myth of ‘haven’ where it looks like the workers are out of control of the harsh exploitation of capitalism. The final function is a unit of consumption where the capitalist class are making a profit by selling goods more then it pays them to produce. This keeps the capitalist class in power and does not benefit family members. However these views have been criticised by feminists for ignoring patriarchy in society. The view has also been criticised by functionalists for forgetting the benefits of the family such as intimacy and support, also by the fact the Marxists tend to think the nuclear family is dominant and forget about other family stuctures....

Words: 582 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Examine the Differences in Ethical and Religious Views Concerning Homosexuality

...Examine the differences in ethical and religious views concerning homosexuality. Homosexuality has been the topic of ethical debates for many years, concerning the rights of homosexuals, and whether or not they should be treated equally. In the modern day homosexuality is comparatively far more tolerated than in the past, when it had been at least somewhat illegal until progressive thinking led to the 1957 Sexual Offences Act, which set the wheels in motion towards ending the inequality between homosexuals and heterosexuals. One of the focal points of the issue is whether homosexual marriage should be permitted in the same way as heterosexual marriage – it can be argued that the introduction of Civil Partnerships in 2004/5 was, although progressive and still offering equal rights to those of married couples, still disrespectful to not allow homosexuals to be specifically ‘married.’ This kind of view suggests that ethical attitudes towards homosexuality are progressive and accepting, reaching a conclusion that would satisfy homosexuals in their quest for equal rights. Discrimination against homosexuality, however, is still fairly prominent, and the lack of ease in passing laws relating to homosexuality suggests that there is still a lot of unease surrounding the topic. It cannot yet be said that to see a homosexual couple canoodling in public is considered to have as subtle an effect as a heterosexual couple doing the same. John Harris, however, states that homosexuality is...

Words: 632 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Examine Different Sociological Views on Changes in the Experience of Childhood in the Past 50 Years or so. (24 Marks)

...who believes children are more protected, valued and cared for today, compared to the past where they were forced to work and treated as ‘mini adults’. However, Postman (1994) disagrees with this and believes ‘childhood is disappearing at a dazzling speed’ due to the rise in television culture and the decline in the written media. When the written media was introduced, not many children were able to read or write, allowing their parents to control what their children could know. Within the past 50 years, the rise of the television culture has allowed children to learn these things without their parents telling them, causing a blur in the distinction between what a child and an adult knows. Palmer (2006) agrees with Postman and believes there is an emergence of ‘toxic childhood’. This is caused by technology, fast food, parents working longer hours to earn money and more tests being given to children while in education. Despite this argument, organisations such as Save the Children are protecting children in 3rd world countries who are involved in events such as war. This is an example of the west imposing their ideas of childhood on the rest of the world. This suggests childhood is not disappearing, but becoming more widespread. Hillman (1993) believes childhood has not improved for girls over the past 50 years. They are taught to do ‘girl’ things when growing up such as housework to help their mother out, whereas boys are allowed to go out on their bikes and play......

Words: 510 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Childhood Experience

...Experience is that kind of stuff which every human be gain since be born. There are two kind of experience which is bad and good. Therefore, about experience everyone can talk and talk and never finish talking. In the other hand almost everyday of everyone life is experience. In my whole life I have gained and still make new experiences. I learnt how important is to listen other people and how to make a difficult decisions. Also I learnt to start new life once again. When my dad past away I was very close to my grandfather, in fact he took a place after him. When my mom went to Canada I was living with him and with my brother. He took part in the war and he used to try telling me about his experience, but I did not listen to him. In this case I was only 13 year old and for me that stuff was boring. In fact my friends were more important than to listen to him. I did not take to myself that will come a day that he wills not anymore walking on this earth. However, when he past away I realized my big mistake when I did not listen to him. In other words, his death taught me that listen other people is very important, even when this person is telling stuff that are boring. Definitely, if I only listen it would be great beneficial for me. That year when my grandfather died my mom did surprise for me telling me that I am coming to her for vacation to Canada. I was so happy, because I knew that I will see her after one year that she left me and my brother. On the whole......

Words: 742 - Pages: 3