Premium Essay

Comparing the Results of Victor and Hamlet’s Choices

In: Novels

Submitted By Frolov31
Words 1575
Pages 7
Though the feeling of revenge is meant to motivate a person to retaliate towards someone who did them wrong, it often harms themself in the process. In the novel Frankenstein, by Mary Shelley and the play Hamlet by William Shakespeare, Victor’s devotion to acting on his revenge leads to his death, while Hamlet’s refusal to do so leads to being killed by a man who does take action. This reveals that a person devoted to revenge causes their own death as well as the deaths of people who take too long to act. After Victor creates a monster a spurns it for his appearance, it kills several people close to him, including his brother, best friend and wife. Hamlet meanwhile, discovers via his father’s ghost that his father was murdered by his uncle, now king Claudius. Both promise that they will get revenge. Despite this, Hamlet constantly delays his revenge, while Victor often chooses to act on his feelings. Eventually, Hamlet acts on his revenge when he realizes he is dying nonetheless, contrasting with Victor, who dedicates his life to fulfilling his revenge after his wife’s death. Because of his late action, Hamlet is killed by his uncle, who takes action before he does, unlike Victor who eventually wears out and dies because of his own long quest for revenge. Hamlet and Victor’s fates are first determined by their decisions as to whether or not to act on their feelings of revenge. After agreeing to create a mate for his monster, Victor takes his first action of revenge on the monster when he decides to destroy the new creation, seeing its dangerous potential after the first monster’s murders. While in his laboratory putting the finishing touches on his second monster, Victor recalls that the first creation’s “unparalleled barbarity [has] desolated [Victor’s] heart and filled it forever with the bitterest remorse” and that the new monster may “delight, for its own sake,…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Hamlet's Third Soliloquy

...Module B: Critical Study of Texts In the context of your critical study of Hamlet, to what extent does your response to this section of the soliloquy inform your judgment of this play as a whole? In your response, make detailed reference to Hamlet. The third soliloquy primarily explores Hamlet’s struggle to take action and avenge his father’s death. This inner conflict creates a dramatic tension that is sustained throughout the play and contributes to the textual integrity. The themes of Hamlet’s self-loathing, his resistance to action, and revenge, dominate this soliloquy and recur consistently for the duration of the play. They reveal Hamlet’s weak and procrastinating character which only changes towards the very end when he overcomes his cowardice and takes revenge for his father’s death by finally killing Claudius. The audience’s attitude towards Hamlet develops through the third soliloquy as they are informed to a large extent about what the core of the drama is about. This in turn shapes their judgement of the play as a whole. Hamlet’s self-loathing arises from his frustration in not having avenged his father’s death. This is constant throughout the play because it is the character’s prime focus. His inner conflict of feeling he is incapable of killing Claudius, and then hating himself for it, begins in the first line of his soliloquy, when he uses direct speech to the audience, referring to himself as a ‘rogue and peasant slave’. This juxtaposes the image of......

Words: 1116 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Hamlet's Madness

...Hamlet also contributes to the dismay of Ophelia. In these ways, Hamlet's insanity contributes to the overall tragedy of the play. Hamlet is so grieved by his father's death that he begins to think of suicide. “O,tht this too too soid flesh would melt thaw and resolve itelf into a dew!” (Act 1, Scene 2, Lines 129-130). This passage is used to see how disgusted Hamlet seems to be with himself and the situations surrounding him. Hamlet's next thought to be mad when he begins to follow the ghost. Horatio attempts to tell Hamlet not to follow the ghost, Horatio questions him to about what might happen if the ghost “assume some other horrible form Which might deprive your sovereignth of reason. And draw you into madness”(Act 1, Scene 4, Lines 72-74). This translates into "What if it tempts you towards the water, my lord, or to the end of the cliff or assumes some other horrible form which drives you insane?" Horatio fears that if Hamlet does follow the ghost of his father, the insanity will only drive him deeper. Throughout the play Hamlet seems to act insane then sane again. His comment to his friends best describes his madness when he says, “I am but mad north-north-west: when the wind is southerly I know a hawk from handsaw” (Act 2, Scene 2, Lines 378-379). Hamlet is insane only when he thinks it is best for him to be insane. He uses his insanity as a way to vent his feelings toward others in the play. Hamlet’s "act" of insanity allows him to prove that Claudius......

Words: 1932 - Pages: 8

Free Essay


...(2012) 424–427 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Behavioural Processes journal homepage: Short report Discounting the freedom to choose: Implications for the paradox of choice Derek D. Reed ∗ , Brent A. Kaplan, Adam T. Brewer University of Kansas, United States a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Organisms prefer to make their own choices. However, emerging research from behavioral decision making sciences has demonstrated that there are boundaries to the preference for choice. Specifically, many decision makers find an extensive array of choice options to be aversive, often leading to negative emotional states and poor behavioral outcomes. This study examined the degree to which human participants discounted hypothetical rewards that were (a) delayed, (b) probabilistic, and (c) chosen from a large array of options. The present results suggest that the “paradox of choice” effect may be explained within a discounting model for individual patterns of decision making. © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Article history: Received 5 December 2011 Received in revised form 14 February 2012 Accepted 27 March 2012 Keywords: Choice Choice overload Discounting Paradox of choice Search costs As described by Catania, “Whatever else is involved in the concept of freedom, it at least involves the availability of alternatives” (p. 89; 1975). Thus, within a behavioral framework, freedom may be loosely......

Words: 3187 - Pages: 13

Premium Essay

Hamlet's Othelia

...Hamlet’s Ophelia: Muted Autonomy Through Madness The issue of whether or not Hamlet’s Ophelia is able to achieve a public voice rests largely on how we are to define the characteristics of which a public voice is composed. It is first pertinent to consider the distinction between public and private. The internal thoughts, musings, and expressions of a human, unbeknownst to the external world, may be thought of as characteristics of the private – and thusly, of the private voice. The public voice, on the other hand, is expressed to a public audience – large, or small. A defining characteristic of the public voice may be thought of as the necessity of the voice to affect its audience in some way – on a continuum of possible, emotional interpretation. The successful public voice must then consider the nature of the interpreters themselves, and whether or not they register what is being said to them (even if they misinterpret it completely!) rather than simply dismissing what they hear. If the concept of public voice is to be largely dependent on this feature, this paper then seeks to examine and prove Ophelia’s inability to completely achieve a successful form of public voice throughout the play with the characters that surround her – the majority of whom are male! As mentioned, a public voice may be thought of as necessitating some affect on its audience. Even from Ophelia’s entrance in the play, her various audiences go largely unaffected by the things she voices. When we......

Words: 1343 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

"Hamlet's Ghost- to Believe or Not to Believe”

...Vickie Shipley Professor Marek ENC 1102, SEC 87 27 October, 2013 Drama Essay: "Hamlet's Ghost- To Believe or Not to Believe” Of all the plays written by William Shakespeare, Hamlet is the most intriguing. As the plot develops, themes such as indecision, deceit and revenge become apparent. As is expected, questions about the characters' motives arise as these themes are portrayed. Questions regarding Hamlet's love for Ophelia or his sanity arise. However, these questions develop throughout the story. The most important question arises at the beginning of the story in Act 1, and affects Hamlet’s every thought and action thereafter. Is the King's ghost a good spirit, merely seeking justice or an evil spirit sent to corrupt Hamlet? Perhaps the ghost is genuinely that of the dead king, but the fact that the ghost uses Hamlet to exact revenge and demands he commit the mortal sin of murder, clearly shows it to be an evil, malicious demon from hell. During the era in which Hamlet was written, there was a common belief of demonic intrusion, and corruption by the devil. Even today, it is not too difficult to find people who will agree that specters are evil demons, sent up from the bowels of hell to corrupt and destroy the living. In fact, a recent CBS poll reveals that almost half of all Americans believe in evil spirits, and that the dead can return in certain places and situations (Alfano). Because of this belief, the appearance of the spirit, along with the assumption of......

Words: 1944 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

The Moral Immoralities of Victor Frankenstein

...The Moral Immoralities of Victor Frankenstein In the novel Frankenstein, the author Mary Shelley portrays the limitations of man in his pursuit of scientific creativity. She illustrates Victor Frankenstein’s attempts and success at creating a human being in his laboratory as an immoral attempt to play the role of God. Shelley repeatedly shows the monster’s harmful effects on society and often places blame on Victor for the Monster’s detrimental actions. In order to emphasize the immorality and mistakes in Victor’s attempts to play God, Shelley constructs a recognizable parallel to the story of Genesis when God creates man and woman. In order to show her disapproval of such an endeavor, Shelley intentionally causes Victor to fail. This deviation from the parallel in Genesis demonstrates that man cannot exceed his natural limitations, or mimic the role of God. The story begins with Victor’s decision to create the Monster. Victor says that he “[s]ucceeded in discovering the cause of generation and life; nay, more, [he] became capable of bestowing animation upon lifeless matter” (Shelley 43). Immediately, a parallel is drawn to the creation of man in Genesis. This parallel continues when Victor discloses to the reader that he, “[c]ollected bones from charnel-houses and distrusted, with profane fingers, the tremendous secrets of the human frame” (Shelley 45). Shelley portrays the creation of Victor’s monster in a subtle but similar way that God created man. Her intention is......

Words: 1477 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Victor Brand

...Victor Brand presents analyses of the management case by academicians and practitioners DIAGNOSES ANALYSIS CASE ANALYSIS I Venaik Sunil Venaik Assistant Professor, Marketing Area Indian Institute of Management, Ahmedabad e-mail: T he objective of this case is to review Victor India Ltd.’s (VCIL) past decisions and prepare an action plan that will enable the company to survive and grow successfully in the future. VCIL is in three types of cocoa-based product businesses. First is the industrial products business of semi-processed cocoa used in different stages of chocolate manufacturing. Second is the chocolate business where it competes with large, established brands owned by multinational companies. Third is the cocoa-based beverage business. The focus of the case is mainly on VCIL’s cocoa-based beverage business. THE BEGINNINGS The company set up a plant with large production capacities to produce and market chocolates under its own brand name. The capacity utilization for the various product lines in 2000 ranged from 9 per cent to 40 per cent. On closer examination, it is seen that the highest capacity utilization is in the industrial product lines of cocoa bean crushing and cocoa powder (40% and 30% respectively). The capacity utilization for the consumer product lines ranges from 9 per cent for the moulded chocolate line to 23 per cent for the Victor Plus beverage line. Due to the low capacity utilization, especially in its......

Words: 12309 - Pages: 50

Premium Essay

Hamlet's Lov

...eRenee Levy S. AP English Hamlet Essay To Love or Not to Love? That is the question. Hamlet, by William Shakespeare, is a tragic play; it’s full of uncertainties and revenge. One of the biggest doubts I had while reading the book was: Did Hamlet really loves Ophelia? This question popped up in my mind many times as I read the novel. Although there is much evidence that makes us think he just wanted to use her and he didn’t really love her, there is even more evidence that disprove those ideas. Through different actions like sending her a letter, being jealous, and declaring his love to her directly, is how Hamlet shows Ophelia that he is truly in love with her in his own way. The first time we saw Hamlet’s love for Ophelia was in Act 3, Scene 1 (page 147). In this part, Hamlet confesses his love directly to her by saying: “I did love you once.” That is our first piece of evidence. Some readers may think that he didn’t love her anymore because he retracts himself by saying “I loved you not.” However, this is because of the fact that Hamlet knew that Polonius was spying on them. We are sure about this because he after asks her: “where’s your father.” This demonstrates that Hamlet wanted Ophelia to know that he loved her but he is retracting his words in order to make Polonius think that he has nothing to do with her daughter anymore. Why did Hamlet wanted Polonius to think that way? The reason was because he knew that Claudius and Polonius were planning......

Words: 914 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Hamlet's Loss of Faith

...There comes a time in one’s life when he loses faith in his beliefs or in his relationships. In Shakespeare’s play, Hamlet, Hamlet’s uncle Claudius, murders Hamlet’s father to inherit the crown of Denmark and the love of Hamlet’s mother, Gertrude. Throughout the play there are six soliloquies that reveal the character of Hamlet and others. In more than any other Shakespearean play, the audience is painted a better picture of Hamlet’s mind. Shakespeare questions the social and Christian institutions in the face of tragedy with the usage of several ambiguous phrases. Through word play and tone shifts, Hamlet’s collapsing sanity is reflected and shows the deconstruction of his views towards the Church and its values and his family. Hamlet’s questionable sanity is first reflected in the Church and its teachings. During the Elizabethan Era, most people practiced Catholicism, and it was not until later in the 1500s that the Catholic religion was called into question by another developing religion at the time, Protestantism. Not only does society begin to doubt the teachings of the Church, Hamlet does as well because he has lost complete faith in Christian values. According to Hamlet, those values have the cause of Claudius murdering his own brother and marrying his wife. Hamlet is unable to accept this unfortunate fate, and in turn, exclaims to the heavens, “O God! O God” (I.ii.132)! Hamlet has lost faith in the Everlasting because he is disgusted that God would let such an......

Words: 1336 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Hamlet's Dilemma

...convincing and the most read play and it lives up to expectations, too. Hamlet can be better seen by analyzing Hamlet's soliloquies. The majority of Hamlet's monologues demonstrate Hamlet's self-loathing and even a readiness to bite the dust. The soliloquy "To be, or not to be: that is the question" shows up in Act 3 Scene 1. It is, maybe, one of the best-known soliloquies by Hamlet in the play, which produces significant scholarly investment even today. Hamlet is feeling profound agony and distress in light of his father's passing. It appears that he is not able to acknowledge this partition. He would like to live. Considering suicide, he doubts himself rationally in the event that it is legitimized to live with so much agony and anguish or if finishing his own particular life is the best conceivable choice. "To be, or not to be: that is the question" Hamlet makes this a stride further and works on the supposition that everybody would rather be dead than living, and is alive simply because he has a trepidation of slaughtering himself. Hamlet is no more addressing whether he needs to die, yet just whether or he finds himself able to slaughter himself, on the grounds that murdering himself clashes with his religion. Hamlet’s sadness over his father's demise and his mother's snappy marriage made him wish for death even before he discovered that his uncle killed his father. In Hamlet's first soliloquy, he wishes that his "too too sullied flesh would melt!"(1.2.129), and that......

Words: 752 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Hamlet’s Revenge

...and has to get to you. Revenge is a common human emotion that is usually negative and destructive. This destructive aspect of revenge is evident in the play, Hamlet. The main character of the play, Prince Hamlet, is the principal character who struggles with seeking revenge. For Hamlet, revenge becomes a chain reaction in the play causing him to commit acts of violence against others both intentional and accidental. Other characters in the play like Laertes, Hamlet’s dead father’s ghost, Fortinbras, and King Claudius also look for revenge. Overall, the play Hamlet portrays revenge as a destructive and powerful emotion that negatively influences the characters. The first incident where revenge is brought up in the play is at the beginning when Hamlet confronts the ghost of his father. Horatio, Hamlet’s friend, is the one who tells Hamlet that there is a ghost that Hamlet needs to see. Intrigued by this thought, Hamlet goes with Horatio to see this ghost. As it turns out, the apparition is the ghost of Hamlet’s dead father. The revenge is mentioned when the ghost commands Hamlet to “revenge his foul and most unnatural murder.” (1.5.31) The ghost does not hesitate to mention revenge; it is a natural act that Hamlet should commit to honor his father. Hamlet is told that his father was murdered by Claudius and Winston 2 now must seek revenge for that murder. According to David Kastan, “To be Hamlet, to deserve the name, at least as far as the Ghost is......

Words: 2581 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Victor Frankestine

...Date: How could Victor Frankenstein have helped the creature he created so it could acclimate and be accepted into society? What would you do? Victor Frankenstein is a man who comes from an affluent family and is obsessed in undertaking scientific advancements. Finally, he is able to create a living creature that does not conform to the human nature. The creature hence is excluded from the society due to its nature and tries to learn the language used in communication so that it can fit in the society. However, the creature is met with violent rejection. In order for victor to diffuse this rejection, he should not refer to the creature as a lifeless thing. This is because the phrase is extremely inhuman as it could refer to anything from a chair to any form of garbage in the house. This does not help in anyways the acceptance of the creature in the society. Therefore, Victor should give the creature a human name so that the society might view the creature differently. Victor begins the exclusion of the creature by referring to the creature as ambiguous, therefore Victor should give the creature a purpose in life and not just a successful experiment. Consequently, people can view the creature differently. Another important aspect to note is when the creature is lying at Victor’s feet. This means that Victor believes that the creature is physically below him. Victor feels superior to the creature both figuratively and literally. Victor should not......

Words: 548 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Hamlet's Melancholy

...Hamlet’s Melancholy Critics of Shakespeare’s Hamlet have debated, discussed, and thoroughly pondered the meaning of Hamlet’s inaction in the play and what drives him in his thoughts and actions. Many speculate that Hamlet’s inaction is caused by a number of obstacles throughout the play, but through careful inspection of Hamlet at his very worst and very best, one can see that obstacles are not the problem with his inability to act—it is the constant state of melancholy he is thrown into by the events that ultimately ruin his life. Hamlet, having just lost his father, is not given time or sympathy for his much-needed grieving; and this, in turn initiates his melancholic state that controls his actions and motives to the very end of the play (Kirsch 17). Throughout the play one can see that Hamlet never once loses possession over those qualities that make him such a noble character. Even in his most tumultuous state he has healthy and positive feelings: a strong love of his father, longing for revenge, and disgust of his uncle and the deed he committed (Bradley 142). So, though Hamlet is not in his normal state, he is not distressed beyond reason and any obstacle that would not prevent him from acting before certainly should not now. The conclusion is inevitably that Hamlet is in a state of melancholy because of what has just happened. His healthy motives combined with the overwhelming feelings of melancholic aversion and lethargy create a seemingly unattainable mode...

Words: 2686 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Hamlet's Fatal Flae William Shakespeare in which Hamlet is depicted as Shakespeare's tragic hero due to his flaw of indecision and inability to take action along with deep self-doubt, these are significant factors which ultimately lead to his downfall. The characters and the plays events significantly impact Hamlet constantly pushing him towards vengeance. Hamlet’s uncertainty between action and inaction are a direct result of the character’s sense of obligation and convenience. Hamlets toying with madness and indecision resolve in tragedy. Hamlet and his behaviours that are neither actions or inactions symbolise the fundamental flaw in his character, indecision. The beginning of Hamlet’s journey for revenge is displayed through the use of death imagery in Act 1, Scene 5, when the Ghost tells Hamlet, “Revenge his foul and most unnatural murder”. Hamlet’s instructions to avenge his father's death represents an essential moment in the plot as the play then begins to focus around revenge and justice. Hamlet’s most honest and fatal character weakness is exposed. That weakness being his major inability to take decisive action. This inaction is shown in Hamlet’s first conversation with the Ghost, Hamlet shows his persistence to pursue revenge for his father’s death “Haste me to know’t, that I with wings as swift as meditation or the thoughts of love, may sweep to my revenge.” (1.5.29) This supports the concept of a determined Hamlet corrupted with desperate human emotions. Laertes opposes the......

Words: 1104 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Crime Is a Result of an Indivuals Choice

...the result of an individual’s choice Crime is the result of individual’s choice ENG 090 Writing Fundamentals Professor Laruth A Ensley Strayer University Kamala Buck March 6,2011 Crime is the result of an indivuals choice. An indivual chooses to commit a crime at there own free will. I feel that individuals choose to commit crimes to prove points or to stand out in a crowd. Some individuals try to blame the crimes that they will commit on society and other social factors to justify the reason why they do the things that they do. Some of those social factors are lack of employment, education, father and even the environment that they were raised in. However at the end of the day it is not society that made that indivual go and rob the bank or rape the 12-year-old girl or even go and kill someone. I believe that crime starts from when a person is a child and how they are thought to respect others and know the difference from rite and wrong. I will like to explain my own personal opinion on why I feel crime is a result of an indivuals choice. How can someone say that I killed this person because my mom was a drug addict and my father was in and out of jail all of my life? It just does not make sense too me because the same living environment that that individual grew up in so did another individual that turned out to be a very respectful social work in the community. From my own personal experience I have seen allot of individuals make stupid choices to......

Words: 454 - Pages: 2