Free Essay

Compare and Contrast an Agency Protest to a General Accounting Office (Gao) Protest"

In: Business and Management

Submitted By santiago322
Words 3800
Pages 16
Compare and Contrast an Agency Protest to a General Accounting Office (GAO) protest"


Bid protests enhance the integrity and transparency of the federal procurement process by providing offers with an effective tool to challenge federal contract awards and thereby determine whether they conform to federal procurement law and regulation (1). Therefore, when a protest is brought, successful offers must be prepared to intervene in the protest to defend their contract award. A protester is typically a third party aggrieved by the actions of a government agency which result in a contract going to an awardee viewed by the protester as non-deserving. The law permits protests to be resolved through formal as well as informal procedures. The three protests are the procuring agency, the GAO, and the COFC, which all differ considerably as to their rules, procedures, scope of review, and available relief, and being well versed on each forum’s unique aspects can be essential to a successful outcome.

Created by the Budget and Accounting Act of 1921, the GAO became the first external forum for federal bid protests. The GAO was established as an independent governmental agency under the control and direction of the Comptroller General for the United States. Even though the statutes giving GAO jurisdiction to hear bid protests were not enacted until the mid-1980s, the GAO has been hearing bid protests since the 1920s. So what exactly is a bid protest, a bid protest is a formal, written objection to an agency’s solicitation for bids or offers, cancelation of a solicitation, or award or proposed award of a contract. Bid protests only became part of the federal procurement system in the early 20th century, more than 100 years after the federal government began purchasing goods and services. However, Congress has authorized bid protests in recognition of their role in providing redress to disappointed bidders and offers and in ensuring the integrity of the federal procurement process. By statute, three administrative and judicial forums have authority to hear bid protests against the federal government: the procuring agency, GAO, and the Court of Federal Claims. And although, there are different types of bid protests, the information below will discuss agency level and GAO protests. The agency-level protest as a formally recognized procedural option dates from the mid-1990s and derives from an experimental program of the Army Materiel Command (AMC) first implemented in 1991. Government-wide regulatory guidance is now provided at Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 33.103. Most agencies supplement the FAR provision, to a greater or lesser degree, through their own regulations, and the regulations of the agency at issue should be reviewed before commencing an agency-level bid protest before that agency. Who May Protest? A protest may be brought by an “interested party,” defined to mean an actual or prospective offerer whose direct economic interest would be affected by the award of a contract or by the failure to award a contract.
This is the same standard applied by the GAO. What May Be Protested? Matters of Jurisdiction
As a general matter; there are no jurisdictional limitations on an agency protest because an agency is deemed to have inherent authority to consider a protest dealing with all aspects of its own procurements. By statute the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act, however, an agency may not consider a protest of the issuance of task and delivery orders under already existing multiple-award task and delivery order contracts, where the agency has the ability to choose among several contractors when it seeks to place a specific order for goods or services. Instead, the aggrieved party must bring its complaint to the agency’s task and delivery order ombudsman pursuant to FAR 16.505(b)(4). An exception to this “no protest rule” is allowed with respect to orders that increase the scope, period, or maximum value of the contract under which the order is placed. Agency-Level Timeliness Rules - Protests of apparent solicitation improprieties must be filed before bid opening or the closing date for receipt of proposals. In all other cases, the protest must be filed no later than 10 days after the basis for the protest is known or should have been known. Failure to satisfy these timeliness rules inevitably results in dismissal of the protest, although the FAR does allow the agency, for good cause shown, to consider the merits of an untimely protest, but that authority is seldom used. Providing a written submission of the protest grounds to the CO commences the Agency Protest Process - A protest depending upon the agency, the protest will be considered by the CO or by an independent decision authority at a level higher than the CO. If the protest is decided by the CO, the agency is to provide for appellate review of the CO’s decision by an independent decision authority. 
 The FAR imposes no requirement for a written agency report in an agency-level protest, although some agencies pursuant to their own rules do; nor under the FAR does the protestor have an opportunity to reply to whatever response the agency may make to the protest, although again some agencies allow that opportunity. 

There is no entitlement to seek documents relevant to the procurement. The FAR merely advises that the parties “may” exchange relevant information. Hence, there is no use of protective orders to control the treatment of protected information because protected information is not disclosed by the agency. There is no formal procedure available to allow the successful awardee or other offers to “intervene” in the agency protest to present their views, although the agency could invite comments from them if it so desired. Best efforts are to be made to render a decision within 35 days. The decision is provided only to the protester; it is not published. Agency-Level Protest Statistics: 
Very few agencies make available their agency-level bid protest statistics; therefore, government-wide data is lacking from which to track trends and draw conclusions as to agency handling of protests. One noteworthy exception is the AMC, which was the prototype for the current agency-level protest process. According to the AMC, its protest filings during the FY 1999 through FY 2004 period averaged 28 per year, a decline of nearly 60 percent in activity from the earlier years of the AMC program. By comparison, AMC procurements precipitated an average of 68 protests per year directly to the GAO between FY 1999 and FY 2004. The AMC took corrective action in 15 percent of the protests that came before it, although the nature of that corrective action is not necessarily equivalent to the results that would accrue in a sustained GAO protest. The AMC further reports that of the 633 protests it resolved between FY 1991 and FY 2004, 57 or 9% were refilled at the GAO, and of those 57 protests, only four were sustained by the GAO. Because the AMC bid protest forum is staffed by independent legal professionals separate and apart from the CO and the agency’s acquisition personnel, it is not unreasonable to expect that a protester’s chances of success are even less at agencies other than the AMC (1).

The GAO bid protests has been involved with the resolution of disputes concerning the award of federal contracts since the early 1930s, its authority being derived, according to the GAO, from the GAO’s role in reviewing questions of whether federally appropriated funds were properly spent. For many years, the GAO was the sole forum available to aggrieved offers, although the precise source of its authority was clouded. However, any ambiguities were dispelled by the 1984 enactment of the Competition in Contracting Act (CICA), which provides a clear and explicit statutory mandate for the GAO’s bid protest function. In furtherance thereof, the GAO has promulgated regulations governing the bid protest process, which are found at 4 C.F.R., Part 21(3). Protests at the GAO are decided by the Procurement Law Control Group, consisting of approximately 30 attorneys, within the Office of the General Counsel. The protester may, but is not required to, use legal counsel (either in-house or outside). However, unless outside counsel is utilized, access to protected information (which is necessary to develop the protest record fully) will be embargoed. The procuring agency will be represented by agency counsel who, not infrequently, will have played a role in the procurement process. Where there has been an award of the protested contract, the awardee is entitled to intervene, although that does not always occur. From the awardee’s standpoint, the better practice is for the awardee, represented by counsel, to intervene because the agency and the awardee do not always see eye-to-eye on how best to defend the award, with the consequence that the agency may fail to vigorously defend the award or be more inclined to undertake unilateral corrective action in response to the protest that rescinds the award. Who May Protest
- CICA extends the right to protest to an interested party, which it defines as an actual or prospective bidder or offered whose direct economic interest would be affected by the award of the contract or by the failure to award the contract. With respect to “prospective” bidders or offers, the GAO looks to whether a successful protest would allow the contractor to participate as a bidder or offerer going forward, irrespective of whether the protester did so in the first round. If that test is satisfied, the protester qualifies as an interested party. Interested-party status will not be accorded to suppliers or subcontractors, associations, or organizations that do not perform contracts, and persons acting as private attorneys general, because such entities do not have a “direct economic interest.” Further, with respect to direct economic interest, the protester must be in line for award or be able to compete for award if its position in the protest is sustained. The necessary showing required of the protester will depend on the type of competitive procedure being used and the point in the competition at which the protest is brought. A contractor that is ineligible for award does not have a direct economic interest in the award and, thus, is not an interested party unless its protest contests the matter of eligibility. Finally, where multiple contract awards are made in the same procurement, one awardee cannot protest a second award to another party. What May Be Protested — Matters of Jurisdiction. The jurisdictional question has two facets. The first relates to the status of the entity conducting the procurement that is generating the protest. By statute (CICA), the GAO may consider protests of procurements of property or services by a federal agency. Federal agency is defined to include an executive department or independent establishment in the executive branch, a wholly owned government corporation, and certain establishments in the legislative and judicial branches. The GAO’s bid protest jurisdiction is no longer based on the procurement at issue involving the expenditure of appropriated funds. Therefore, the GAO will entertain protests relating to “no cost” contracts and procurements undertaken by a federal agency that do not rely on appropriated funds for its operations such as Federal Prison Industries and the U.S. Mint. The GAO will not consider protests involving procurements of entities that are not federal agencies such as “true” non-appropriated fund instrumentalities (for example, the exchange services of the military departments). Additionally, the GAO will decline to hear protests relating to procurements by federal agencies that have been exempted from CICA by their own authorizing legislation such as the U.S. Postal Service, the Federal Aviation Administration, the FDIC, and, for certain contract actions, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. The second aspect of the jurisdictional question deals with the nature of the transaction being protested. Previously, we noted that an agency-level protest couldn’t be brought against the award of task or delivery orders issued under already-existing multiple-award task and delivery order contracts. This same restriction applied to the GAO’s protest jurisdiction until enactment of the National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2008. As a consequence of that enactment, effective May 27, 2008, the GAO is given exclusive jurisdiction over protests of task and delivery orders valued in excess of $10 million. GAO Timeliness Rules
The GAO’s timeliness rules are found at 4 C.F.R. 21.2 (1) (3). Their stringency is justified as being necessary to ensure that the impact of protests on the procurement process is minimized. Protests based on alleged improprieties in a solicitation, which improprieties are or should be apparent to the protester prior to bid opening or the time set for receipt of initial proposals, must be filed prior to bid opening or the time set for receipt of initial proposals. By way of example, if a qualified small business concern interested in submitting a proposal wished to protest the fact that the solicitation should have been set aside for small business but was not, the protest must be filed before the date set for receipt of initial proposals, because the fact that the procurement is not set aside is evident on the face of the solicitation. 
 Protests not based on defects apparent on the face of a solicitation must be filed within 10 days after the basis of protest is known or should have been known to the protester, whichever is earlier. However, with respect to protests involving best value procurements under which a debriefing is requested and, when requested, is required to be given, meaning the debriefing was requested in writing within three calendar days of learning of the contract award, the protest will be timely if filed within 10 days after the debriefing is given. 
 If an agency-level protest was previously filed, a subsequent protest to the GAO within 10 days of actual or constructive knowledge of initial adverse agency action will be timely, so long as the agency level protest was timely filed. Where the timely agency-level protest involved an alleged solicitation impropriety, a subsequent protest to the GAO will be timely if filed within this 10-day period, even if filed after bid opening or the closing time for receipt of proposals. If award has been made, and if the protest has been filed and notice thereof received from the GAO within 10 days of the date of award or within five days after any debriefing that is requested and, when requested, is required, whichever is later, the agency is to direct the awardee to cease performance so long as the protest is pending. However, the head of the procuring activity within the agency may authorize performance of the contract, notwithstanding the protest, upon a written finding that (i) performance of the contract is in the best interests of the United States, or (ii) urgent and compelling circumstances that significantly affect interests of the United States will not permit waiting for the GAO’s decision in the protest. The Protest Process - A protest is commenced by filing a protest with the GAO’s Procurement Law Control Group. Filing may be accomplished by hand delivery, mail, commercial carrier, fax, or e-mail. Beyond setting forth the basic components of a protest (details of the solicitation, statement of the legal and factual grounds of protest, information establishing the protester’s interested party status, information establishing the timeliness of the protest, and the form of relief requested), a protest filing typically requests the production of documents relevant to the procurement and the protest grounds, asks for entry of a protective order to govern the proceedings, and more often than not requests that a hearing be held. A copy of the protest must be served on the procuring agency within one day of filing at the GAO. GAO telephonic notice to the agency that the protest has been filed is to be accomplished within one day of the GAO’s receipt of the protest. Presuming a protective order has been requested; the protester must file a redacted copy of the protest with the GAO and the contracting agency within one day of the initial filing. The redacted copy is used by the agency to notify potential interveners of the protest. Thereafter in short order comes GAO acknowledgement of the protest, establishment of the deadline for filing the agency report, entry of a protective order, and subsequent processing of applications for entry to the protective order.
A notice of intervention may be filed by other interested offers, notably the successful awardee, if award has been made. Other unsuccessful offers also may protest the same procurement, in which event the protests are “consolidated.”
Agency motion to dismiss some or all of the protest grounds is occasionally filed within the first 10 to 20 days, particularly if untimeliness of the protest is self-evident. If such a motion is filed, the protester is given an opportunity to respond, and then the GAO rules on the motion sufficiently in advance of the due date of the agency report. Shortly before filing the agency report, the agency will provide a listing of the documents it intends to produce in response to the protester’s document requests. If documents are to be withheld, they will be so noted so that expedited proceedings may be held to resolve the production issue. Objections to agency withholding of requested documents must be filed within two days. It should be noted that under GAO rules, the agency could request documents of the protester, although this is atypical. The agency report and documents responsive to the protester’s document requests are filed with the GAO and served on the protester and any intervener 30 days after commencement of the protest. The agency report will consist of an affidavit/memorandum from the CO responding to the protest and a legal memorandum from agency counsel. The protester then has 10 calendar days to file comments on the agency report and to raise any supplemental protest grounds of which the protester is first made aware by the agency report and the documents that have been produced. If the protester fails to respond to the agency’s rebuttal of any protest issue, the GAO will consider that the protester has abandoned that issue. Further document requests also may be filed by the protester, but these are due within two days of becoming aware of the existence of the documents being sought. The GAO will grant modest extensions of the comment period. Note, however, that such an extension does not go to extend the 10-day period in which to raise new or supplemental protest grounds, which deadline will not be extended by the GAO. Thus, in the event the protester secures a three-day extension within which to file its comments, and if those comments are accompanied by a supplemental protest, the supplemental protest will be dismissed as untimely because it was filed more than 10 days after the protester became aware of the basis for its supplemental protest grounds. Meanwhile, should the intervener wish to file comments on the agency report, those comments also are due within 10 days. While denominated as comments on the agency report, in actuality the intervener’s comments are in opposition to the protest and typically in support of the agency. The agency then responds to the protester’s comments, generally within 10 days, and, where applicable, to the new or supplemental protest grounds by way of a supplemental agency report. No specific time limit for the supplemental agency report is pre-ordained, but the timeline is dependent on the detail and complexity of the supplemental protest, although obviously no more than 30 days will be allowed. Theoretically, should the intervener wish to file comments on the protester’s comments and/or on the supplemental protest, it could do so within the time allotted to the agency. Following completion of the comment period, the GAO may hold a hearing to take testimony on disputed factual issues. Hearings are held at the discretion of the GAO. They usually are limited to one day’s duration, and are held at the GAO’s hearing room. All parties are entitled to file comments on the hearing within five days after the transcript is produced, and the protestor must file comments or the protest will be dismissed. 
 The GAO must issue a decision on the protest within 100 days of the protest filing. Where a supplemental protest has been filed, the GAO may extend the deadline by rolling the initial protest into the supplemental protest. However, this is seldom done. It is far more common for the GAO to decide the entire protest (initial and supplemental) within 100 days of the initial protest filing. Available statistics indicate an average decision time of less than 90 days. GAO Protest Statistics - The number of cases closed each year closely tracks the number filed. Merits decisions (published opinions) are rendered in close to 25 percent of total dispositions. The balance is resolved by means of (i) summary dismissal, where, for example, the protest is untimely on its face or the protester is found not to be an interested party; (ii) dismissal for reasons of mootness where the agency takes unilateral corrective action; (iii) alternative dispute resolution (ADR), which occurs in approximately nine percent of cases; and (iv) voluntary withdrawal of the protest, where, for example, a settlement is reached between the protester and the procuring agency. Hearings are held, on average, in approximately 50 protests annually.

Bid protest flowchart

[pic] In conclusion, Effective lines of communication between the contingency contracting office and the supporting legal office are critical to successfully dealing with a bid protest or appeal. As part of deployment preparations, the CCO must identify and know how to work with supporting legal counsel. In addition, protests can sometimes be averted by frank and open communications with the vendors, who might recognize significant errors in solicitations and evaluations overlooked by the CCO because of the pace of the operation. The CCO should encourage vendors to attempt to resolve their concerns with the CCO, pursue an agency protest if the issue is not resolved by the CCO, and then file a protest with the Government Accountability Office (GAO) as a last resort. Although the vendor has complete freedom to protest in any forum, and the CCO is never an advocate of the vendor, the interests of the government can often be best protected when vendor concerns are resolved quickly and at the lowest level.


(1) Nacke, P. (n.d.). Guide to Federal Procurement Protests. [ONLINE] Available at: Accessed March 3, 2013.

(2) CCH (2012). Federal Acquisition Regulation. Chicago, IL: Wolters Kluwer.

(3) U.S. Government Printing Office (n.d.) Code of Federal Regulations. Retrieved at: Accessed March 3, 2013.…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Music of the 60's -Protest Songs problems of their time. In a piece titled “The Times They Are A-Changin’: The Music of Protest,” Robert Rosenstone describes how the decade revolutionized music, not only “breaking down some of the old forms in which it was for along time straight-jacketed,” but inspiring new subject matter (Rosentone 291). Music was no longer just about love anymore. It dealt with the real world in which people live including civil rights demonstrations, drug experiences, war, interracial dating and explicit sexual encounters (Rosenstone 291). Rosenstone explains that the success of these songs in the early sixties prompted others to be written and from the second half of the decade on there was a full efflorescene of such topical songs written by young people for their peers. ​Many of these songs are referred to as protest songs. During this time, many American citizens chose to clearly denounce the United State’s involvement in the Vietnam War. Artists such as Bob Dylan, Creedence Clearwater Revival and Buffalo Springfield addressed their views through their music as a surefire way to raise awareness and bring people together. It is argued that the so-called antiwar anthem of this time was a song titled, “Give Peace a Chance” by John Lennon and I couldn’t agree more. An ideal protest song that is still loved and shared today, Time Magazine even recognized the song in 2011 as one of the top ten protest songs of all-time ​To me, the musical setting of “Give Peace A Chance” is the......

Words: 1203 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

The Art of Social Protest The Art of Social Protest: “The Raft of the Medusa” and “Guernica”   Some people are advocates of the opinion that art designed to influence social behavior is reprehensible, dirty, nothing more than propaganda, and so on. However, it is impossible to present a complete picture of art if we ignore its function of a social protest; the history of art provides us with many examples. Painting can be an extremely powerful form of protest against inequity, atrocity or inequality. Traditionally, painting is usually supportive of the political needs of old-established order because it is backed up and bought by wealthy people, and thus painting is less willing to engage in social controversies. However, certain artists stand out as exceptions. Among them are two great figures in the history of world painting Théodore Géricault (1791–1824), one of the French pioneers of the Romantic movement, exposing a great contemporary scandal in “The Raft of the Medusa”, and an Andalusian-Spanish painter Pablo Picasso (1881–1973), expressing his fury at the bombing of a peaceful town during the Spanish Civil War (1936-1939) in his painting “Guernica”. Although these two painters differ by origin, style, artistic expression, their works mentioned above have very much in common. Géricault’s “The Raft of the Medusa”  and Picasso’s “Guernica” are perhaps the most significant paintings of social protest in our time. Both paintings are based on real tragic events. However, their creators......

Words: 2068 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

African Literature as a Form of Protest

...The definition of "protest literature" is obviously fluid. Deconstructionists might argue that all literary writing is ultimately a form of protest. Social and historical critics might argue that literary protests must contain a specific political aim, such as changing a law. A Marxist critic might argue that literary protest should disturb the social order in terms of the relationship between social classes. A feminist critic might argue that protest does or does not promote a gender bias. A psychologist might see literary protest as a manifestation of the subconscious. A traditional literary critic might argue the moral relationship between aesthetics and the political message of protest literature. In African Literature culture and experience rather than language becomes the essence of literature. Subalternism is clearly evident in African writing as pattern of “slave narrative” writing is seen. The ‘other’ or the colony is mostly representational. The informative and representative function is seen in Leopold Sedar Senghor’s writing as it shows that Africans share certain distinctive and innate characteristics, values and aesthetics. In the poem ‘New York’, Senghor argues that the black community of Harlem should ‘Listen to the far beating of your nocturnal heart, rhythm/ and blood of the drum’ and ‘let the black blood flow into/ your blood’. The word nocturnal is interesting because it refers to the image of night. By using the imagery of night, Senghor is asserting......

Words: 1018 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Protest Definition

...PROTEST A protest is an expression of disagreement or opposition to any kind of situation. Protests can take different structures as speeches, written declarations, informal statements or contradictory actions. They can be mass demonstrations or individual assertions. The Oxford Dictionary defines protest as a “public demonstration expressing strong objection to an official policy or course of action adopted by those in authority” (Press). A protest sometimes involves a march. A march is a historical and geographical non-violent or violent gathering of a group of people that express disapproval or objection against a political entity for unfair policies. Protesters attempt to influence, pressure and persuade public opinion and the government to change these policies One characteristic of protests is that protesters effort to persuade the audience to support their arguments with the use of short messages in big posters, informative brochures and passionate and eloquent speeches. Mrs. Concepcion Martin is a woman that has protested in front of the white House for many years. Surrounded by photographs, posters, newspaper clippings and a small box with informative brochures in different languages she invites the tourists to stop by and hear her discourse. A second characteristic of protests is that they do not have a time limited. World War II began on 1939 and ended on 1945. Mrs Concepcion Martin has been protesting for over 35 years in front of the White......

Words: 384 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Protests in Venezuela

...REPÚBLICA BOLIVARIANA DE VENEZUELA UNIVERSIDAD PEDAGÓGICA EXPERIMENTAL LIBERTADOR INSTITUTO PEDAGÓGICO “RAFAEL ALBERTO ESCOBAR LARA” ENGLISH DEPARTMENT COURSE: READING AND WRITING II Protests in Venezuela Author: Isabela Ron Professor: Ailin Rojas Maracay, April 2014 INTRODUCTION This paper constitutes a complement to fulfill the requirements corresponding to the course Reading and Writing II of undergraduate studies in Education, specialty English as a Foreign Language. In the first section, it is presented the outline of an eight paragraph essay. In the second part, the text has been developed after a process of drafting and writing of outline, first draft, edition and final version. OUTLINE Thesis statement: Venezuelan people are protesting for three main reasons. Supporting sentence 1: The first reason is the high levels of insecurity. Detail 1: Venezuela has one of the highest rates of homicide in the world. -Currently, over a hundred people are killed every weekend. Detail 2: Unfortunately, in 2013, the Venezuelan Violence Observatory reported 79 deaths per 100,000 populations and nearly 25,000 dead Venezuelans violence in a year. Detail 3: Indeed, according to the information of the public ministry, from the protests that it started on February 12, 2014 until now, it has left 37 dead and 461 injured. -Also, it has identified 59 victims of torture. Furthermore, 1.919 people have been detained, mostly under judicial precautionary......

Words: 1565 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Protest Letter

...1612 State Street, Suite 1700 Seattle, WA 98001 August 8, 2010 District Director Seattle Appeals Office Internal Revenue Service 915 Second Avenue, M/S 680, Room 2790 Seattle, WA 98174 Re: Protest of Ican Wright SS No: 555-55-5555 Dear District Director: On behalf of the taxpayer, Ican Wright, protest is hereby made to the adjustments in individual income tax deductions as set forth in March 15, 2010 30-day letter. The following information is submitted in support of this protest. 1. NAME AND ADDRESSES OF TAXPAYER Ican Wright 55555 NE 40th Street Redmond, WA 98051 (555) 555-5555 2. STATEMENT OF APPEAL The taxpayer requests an appeal of the findings of the IRS to the Appeals Office. 3. DATES AND SYMBOLS FROM 30 DAY LETTER Date of Letter: March 15, 2010 Letter 7869 4. TAX PERIOD INVOLVED Ican Wright’s Federal Individual Income Tax Return: 2009 Tax Year 5. ITEMIZED SCHEDULE OF UNAGREED ADJUSTMENTS Increase in adjusted gross income: $15,000.00. 6. STATEMENT OF FACTS The facts relevant to this federal income tax dispute fall into two primary categories: (A) the work-related travel expenses, and (B) the current procedural setting of the case. A. Work-Related Travel Expenses Ican Wright (“Ican”), a Washington state resident is a writer of novels. He has been writing professionally for two years and has published one novel. In 2009 Ican had income of $20,000, which was given to him as an advance on book...

Words: 733 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Compare and Contrast

...Composition G124/ENC1101 Course. I had chosen this essay because; it was one that did not have an opinion. This course paper was one of the compare/contrast essay. I have never done an essay like this before this course and it was challenging. This paper really did take critical thinking and communication to the next level for me. However, challenging that it was for me I did the best that I could with the research that was available to me. FBI & CIA When people think of the FBI and CIA, they think about secret identities, spies, and security. Even when people watch movies, these two agencies are in them. These two agencies seem to work together in the movies also; they actually work together in real life. The FBI and CIA have been around for a long time but, how much do people know about the agencies that are here to protect us. Not a whole lot since they are not very publicly known. People know about these agencies but never actually know why they exist. Even though the FBI and CIA are similar government agencies, they have differences in territory, history, and job duties for the government. In the United States, the FBI has territory in all 50 states. The offices are located in either one major city; or depending on the size of the state, they may have multiple locations. (FBI, n.d.)The FBI has more than a dozen small sub-offices in key cities around the globe that provides coverage to more than 200 countries, territories, and islands. The International......

Words: 1424 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Shanty Town Protest

...Characteristics and Diffusion of the Shantytown Protests: 1985-1990 1. In the research paper “The Student Divestment Movement in the United States and Tactical Diffusion: The Shantytown Protest”, by Sarah A. Soule of the University of Arizona, the focus was on a relatively recent phenomenon of how a single social movement organization could influence other organizations directly or indirectly. It all started in 1985 when news reports from South Africa swamped U.S. newspapers about their government-ordered beatings and shootings of peaceful demonstrators. These events in South Africa resulted in eleven thousand deaths due, in part, to the rising levels of political violence which stretched over a five year period. A concern about repression of political activism in South Africa sparked activist demonstrations in the U.S which spilled on to college campuses. One of the first protests took place in 1985 with a blockade of Hamilton Hall at Columbia University. The importance of the protest was that it got a lot of media coverage which advertised new protest tactics all over the U.S. Shortly after, the number of protests all over the U.S. against apartheid rose sharply, starting at Princeton then to the University of California Santa Cruz, Harvard, University of Iowa, and most importantly, sparking the innovative tactics practiced at Cornell University. At Cornell the students altered the normal sit-ins or camp-ins to the construction of shacks made from wood, tar paper, and......

Words: 1927 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Vietnam Protest

...Vietnam Protest: Government Against Civilians Brian Garcia Introduction to Comparative Politics Midterm March 19, 2015 Political violence has been experienced in every country throughout history, whether the government in place has been a democracy, monarchy, oligarchy, or a hybrid regime. Political violence, or collective political struggles, includes events such as riots, civil wars, revolutions, and peaceful protest movements (Neil, 2013). In 1965 the Vietnam War sparked one of the largest protests, in the United States, the world has ever seen. The United States citizens rose against their government in a public forum, in order to convey their message against the casualties that had resulted due to the war in Vietnam. After World War I, Vietnam created the nationalist movement, which formed separate states for each nation. During World War II, Japan invaded Vietnam, causing the Vietnamese leader, Ho Chi Minh, to liberate his people. Minh used guerilla warfare, private non-state affiliated men to attack the Japanese (Neil). Upon Minh’s win, he attained the territories once belonging to France and created a new nation under the communist government, a political system that “eliminates individual freedom to achieve equality” (Neil). Because of Vietnam’s government as a form of communism, the United States was not able to help finance them after the revolutionary, instead, President Truman helped fund France and provided them with militarily aid. Eventually after......

Words: 1526 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Protests Music History

...political songs to aid the labor movement. Joe Hill strongly believed that music is a powerful way promote or spread political messages. Joe hill compose his songs in a very unique way. For example, he utilized traditional popular American songs and changed to his own lyrics in order to promote political messages. Many of his songs consist of irony, which directly convey political messages. His musics are very engaging, and creating a strong influence for many workers. The film clip of Bound for Glory is a perfect example of how protest songs are “magnetic” and their functionality. The goal of protest songs is to attract outsides into the movement and recruit new members for the union. This clip portrays Joe Hill’s music performance. The movie clip took place during great depression, where poor workers gathered together seeking for work opportunity. Joe Hill’s role in this film clip is to bring his political songs to live. The scene shows how the protest song brought these isolated workers into attention and they are very passionate about his music and they soon form into an organization. Musical forms such as spiritual, work songs, field-holler and blues have similar background and origins. These form of music are very similar to each other and they typically reflect to the conditions in which the song creators were born and experienced. Mostly enslaved African Americans create this form of music and these forms of music can be trace back to the traditional African......

Words: 514 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Smart Meter Protest Letter

...recording and transmission capabilities of the smart meter, or the extent of the data that will be recorded, stored and shared, or the purposes to which the data will and will not be put.

I forbid, refuse and deny consent of any installation and use of any monitoring, eavesdropping, and surveillance devices on my property, my place of residence and my place of occupancy. That applies to and includes "Smart Meters" and activity monitoring devices of any and all kinds. Any attempt to install any such device directed at me, other inhabitants, guests, my property or residence will constitute trespass, stalking, wiretapping and unlawful surveillance, all prohibited and punishable by law through criminal and civil complaints. All persons, government agencies and private organizations responsible for installing or operating monitoring devices directed at or recording my activities, which I have not specifically authorized in writing, will be fully liable for any violations, intrusions, harm or negative consequences caused or made possible by those devices whether those negative consequences are justified by "law" or not.. 

This is legal notice. After this delivery the liabilities listed above may not be denied or avoided by parties named and implied in this notice.

Notice to principal is notice to agent and notice to agent is notice to principal. All rights reserved.


Name of energy user and/or customer...

Words: 681 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Essential Vietnam Protest Songs

...Essential Vietnam War Protest Songs Bob Dylan: With God on Our Side - Lyrics Bob Dylan: With God on Our Side - original recording Bob Dylan: Masters of War lyrics Bob Dylan: Masters of War original recording Bob Dylan: Blowin in the Wind lyrics Bob Dylan: Blowin in the Wind original recording Bruce Springsteen: Born in the USA lyrics Bruce Springsteen: Born in the USA original recording Creedence Clearwater Revival_ Fortune Son lyrics Creedence Clearwater Revival_ Fortune Son recording Creedence Clearwater Revival_Run through the Jungle recording Creedence Clearwater Revival_Run through the Jungle lyrics The Doors - Unknown Soldier recording The Doors - Unknown Soldier...

Words: 251 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Ethics of Protest

...Ethics of Protest Moral force protest has a greater chance to succeed than a physical force protest. Discuss in relation to our contemporary world and the ever-changing issues. In the modern world today, there is a vast diversity of global issues which are constantly being dealt with. Moral force protest and physical force protest are utilized in hope of achieving a purpose and proving a point. For both of these acts of protest, there must be a considerable amount of facts and evidence supporting it. Both protests, in any way that it is done, both are in some way seeking for the support of the ‘leaders', most of the time, the ‘leaders' being a public agency or even the government. Moral force protest involves logical and persuasive speeches which are fighting for a cause within the boundaries of laws and regulations. It is doable to legally get enough support for a cause and ultimately win by not ever once using any sort of violence. In some cases, hunger strikes by the protestors or collecting signatures are some of the peaceful strategies that protest take in consideration. Aside from persuasive speeches, and collecting signatures and hunger strikes, the refusal to obey certain laws and the passive resistance, that is, resisting to incoming violence usually from the government, are some other ways to morally protest without any physical violence. Sometimes due to the refusal to abide to certain laws and regulations the protestors may find abusive, the......

Words: 1769 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Protests in Russia 2012

...political activist and opposition since 2009, when he started to publish blogs exposing corruption among the members of the ruling party. His LiveJournal blog became the most readable source in RU-net. Years before Navalny, members of Russian opposition would hardly attract any public attention. There was no chance for the opposition leaders to get on central television and small public protests would typically be dispersed by heavy-handed riot police. For Navalny, social networking made everything much easier: • Nobody can shut down his account, even though several DoS attacks were performed on LiveJournal and other blogs during latest elections. • He immediately gets access to millions of people: Russia has the largest Internet audience in Europe, with number of unique users close to 51 million. • And finally, with the power of numbers, he quickly became so widely known that his popularity is protecting him from any threats and persecution by the government. His example encouraged many around the country. People massively started to share various offences from the government agencies. Growing online activity quickly received a response in a real world, in the forms of unions and human rights organizations, which, meanwhile are preserving and enhancing their online presence. For example, Russian online “Car Owners Society” helped many to press charges against the infamous corrupt road police. What happened during the parliamentary elections was inevitable. Social......

Words: 700 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Tiananmen Square Protest of 1989

...Tiananmen Square Protest of 1989 The photograph known as “Tank Man” was taken by Jeff Widener but also four other known photographers took a photo of the same man that all encompass one thing, rebellion, against oppression and against the will to succumb. The photo portrays a man blocking the path of tanks as they try to leave Tiananmen Square. The Tiananmen Square protest of 1989 was a series of protests that started out with students in China mourning the loss of communist leader Hu Yaobang in and near Tiananmen Square in Beijing. Students began to congregate in and outside of Tiananmen Square in mid April on the day of Hu Yaobang’s death. Over a period of nearly two months the people protested for political reform, conducted hunger strikes and made monuments in spirit of overthrowing the government but they were defeated on June 4th when The People’s Liberation Army stepped in to take control of the square. They were told by China’s leaders to clear out the square which escalated into a ruthless massacre of China's citizens. The Tiananmen Square Protest of 1989 was a cultural backlash that sought to better the state of China but instead led to a slaughter of its citizens in which the voice of its people was ignored. The death of one man, who had many great ideals and hopes for his country, created one of the largest acts of military brutality against civilians seen in the last two decades. That man was Hu Yaobang. Hu Yaobang was General Secretary of the State for the......

Words: 6074 - Pages: 25