Free Essay

Causes of the Six Day War

In: Social Issues

Submitted By Luthando
Words 4159
Pages 17
What were the causes of Israel-Palestine war?
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABSTRACT
AANALYSIS
THE CAUSES OF ISRAEL/PALESTINE CONFLICT:
THE FIRST INTIFADA 1987-93
DIVIDING THE MAP
THE 1948 WAR
ZIONISM
1967/OCCUPATION
THE ARABS, TERRORISM & SECURITY: “NO SOLUTION”
THE WALL/FENCE/BARRIER
DELEGITIMIZING
THE STATEHOOD DECLARATION BY PALESTINE
THE IMPACT OF SCARCE WATER RESOURCES ON THE ARAB-ISRAEL CONFLICT
CAMP DAVID FAILURE
THE ISRAEL-PALESTINE CONFLICT IS CENTRAL TO THE MILITANTS’ CAUSE
Abstract
The notion of this research essay is to discuss the causes of the Israel-Palestine war. The first priority of the paper is to address the war in detail by describing the war. Another perspective that the essay will take in answering the causes of the Israel-Palestine war is to address the period of the war and how it emerged. The Israel-Palestine war is also denounced as the primary consequence that has formed the Israel-Arab war. The nature of the war is somehow a contagious form of war as it is fundamental in the creation of the upheaval of the Arab states conflict. The essay will also discuss the causes in the different sequence. This will be done by stating which cause took place before the following cause emerged. The principal ideology of the essay is to come to a founding cause that resulted to the war preceding other causes. Therefore the research paper will discuss the causes of the Israel conflict with the aim of establishing the causes that formed the Israel-Palestine war. The emergence of the Israel-Palestine war started when the Israel Declaration of the Establishment of the State of Israel on 14 May 1948, when the Arab League decided to intervene on behalf of Palestinian Arabs, filing their powers into previous British Palestine, this was the start of the main period of the 1948 Arab-Israeli War.

Analysis
In demanding to comprehend the contemporary absurd situation, it is essential to look at the changing aspects of the stubborn conflict in which Palestinians and Israeli Jews are sheltered. According to Oren and Bar-Tal (2007:112), For a period of about 100 years, the two states have challenged one another over aims and interests such as social identity, geographic region, natural resources, the superiority, the core state, religious fundamentalism, economic prospects, private and shared security, as well as human values. These are the fundamental aspects that determine the nature of the war and what is required to solve it. The Israel conflict started in the mid-20th century until present. It is an ongoing debacle that has spurred other institutional arrangements. However the principal cause of the conflict is that both states are fighting over the peace of land. Both groups believe they have the right to the land given to them by God. Another fundamental aspect is that this claiming of land is based on the assumptions of religious fundamentalism founded on the bible. Another perspective is that Great Britain had control over the Palestinian land and decided to give the Jews consent to emigrate, however this notion was annulled as uprisings from the Arab people became progressively vicious and aggressive.

The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict as a Structural Asymmetric Conflict.
This conflict can be the origin of the conflict rests not in specific matters or issues that might split the gatherings, even though in the actual assembly of whom they are and the connection between them (Gallo & Marzano, 2009:43).
Suicide Terror in the Palestinian-Israeli Conflict:
On 16 April 1993, Tamam Nabulsi, a member of the Hamas organization (Islamic
Resistance Movement) committed one of the suicide bombings by bombing his car up nearby an Israeli bus parked near the settlement of Mechola, in the Jordan Valley and it was later discovered that two passengers were killed and five wounded. However this was the first suicide attack committed inside the borders of Israel by a Palestinian organization. Furthermore there was no answers about this attack would mark a new era of brutal terror: that is suicide bombing in Israel (Kimhi & Even, 2010:817).

Al Qaeda
Another key concept in the study of Israel-Palestine war is that of Al Qaeda which is an international terrorist organization more of an ideology than an organization. According to Burke (2004:1) in 1987, Abdullah Azzam, the forefront dialogue for contemporary Sunni Muslim fundamental advocates, instigated for al-Qaeda al-sulbah which is a frontline of the robust. The notorious leader envisioned an ideology about men acting autonomously, as the route that will lead the all of the Islamic society and therefore stimulate the umma which refers to worldwide community of believers against its oppressors. The al Qaeda endorses the general rule of terrorism.

Concept of delegitimization
According to Oren & Bar-Tal (2011:112), in broad, delegitimization refers to stereotypes with tremendously bad meanings that is used to label a particular instance of group categorization. Furthermore the scholar states that it is based on tremendously negative outgroup classification and targeted at depriving the other group’s humanity.

Yasser Arafat
Arafat, President of the Palestinian Authority (PA), decided that the new State of Palestine should be drove in blood and fire thus he released Palestinian militants instead of accepting a discussed resolve of the encounter (Jansen, 2003:1). According to Jansen (2003:16), the Arafat and the Palestinian authorities wanted an outburst of viciousness the scholar further stated that the Palestinians were deprived of what they were after at Camp David, thus they vehemently understood forcefulness would bring upon Israel into further concessions. However another view is that this justification is that being seen as the leader of a new intifada would rescue Arafat from being viewed as a hindrance to reconciliation in the stir of the failed summit at Camp David in July 2000.
Ariel Sharon
Sharon, who was the commander in chief of the Israeli opposition, started the intifada by engaging on an deliberately challenging visit to the Temple Mount on 28 September 2000.

THE FIRST INTIFADA 1987-93
The First Intifada (1987-1993), in specific, caused tremendously significant developments as first, it was obvious that Israel and the Palestinians were the only two applicable characters of the conflict (Gallo & Marzano, 2009:41). It was further acknowledged that no solution was to be reached except the Israelis were eager to contemplate the Palestinians as a political community with state political rights and except the Palestinians would agree to take the existence of the state of Israel. Furthermore the scholar states that somewhat in response to the first Intifada and fairly because of prevention over the effectiveness of armed violence, an official Palestinian cooperate with position developed with the declaration made on November 15, 1988 by the PLO that was based in Tunis announcing an independent Palestinian state and indirectly recognizing the presence of Israel.

The initial outbreak of the conflict between Israel and Palestine is due to various reasons that caused the conflict. When Israel took over some of the land that belong to the indigenous people of Palestine that cause a catastrophic conflict between the two countries. According to Pressman (2003:114), he acknowledges that from 1993 to 2000 many facets of the Israel livelihood of the West Bank and Gaza Strip worsened instead of decreasing. This was a spur of more to cause the conflict as the Palestinians were imagining their lives to progress by means of freedom of movement and socio-economic standing. As the notion suggest that the Palestinians were discontent and this was more fueled by the failure of the Camp David summit in July 2000. Hence this laid the foundation for popular support for a more confrontational approach with Israel. Furthermore the scholar articulates his views by stating that organizing of both Israel and Palestine groups prepared for violence due to the opposing side also preparing for violence. The Palestine military however noticed that this may take longer and drag so they decided to instigate violence alarming Israel that if they do not barge to the negotiations then violence will follow suit.

The conflict further progressed as there was more than what meets the eye such as Sharon and Arafat helped shift the status quo from a tense situation to a violent one. There is also a perspective that Sharon’s visit stimulated the violence as it set the second intifada into motion (Pressman, 2003:115), also mentions that it was a match in a dry forest and should be regarded generally amid an array of distinct proceedings that assisted as initiations for key hostilities. However Arafat did not instigate the intifada, although he and a portion of other Palestinian leaders decided not to try to rein in the violence once it started. Hence when the intifada was instigated, Arafat wrongly presumed that he will have the chance to use the violence to improve the Palestinian position.

DIVIDING THE MAP
Another cause of the conflict was the dividing of the map. According to Wallach (2011:362), supporters of this basis claimed that the conflict can only be solved through regional cooperation. Hence the international community conceded that there will be a two-nation state that will be defined and established by borderlines. As this is the foundation of the conflict the notion is that no state wants to compromise their belief. Israel believed that they had a right to the land through the use of the bible connotations and Palestine believed that the land was rightfully theirs through natural creation. However the map they used was the same as they shared common geographic territories until the declaration in 1947. This was therefore complex as Palestine and Israel were a single state prior to the 1947 declaration.
As these were not separate countries the map that geographically describes and labels them was one. After the declaration they both used the same map and this led to the conflict of who is legitimate in the territories that are on the map.

THE 1948 WAR
After Israel declare itself as state fighting between Jews and Palestine erupted in Palestine right after the United Nations partition plan was approved in 1947. This is confirmed by Van Evera, (1996:2), where the scholar states that the Arab neighboring states Palestine--Egypt, Jordan, Syria, Iraq, and Lebanon all attacked Israel quickly on its declaration of statehood on May 15, 1948. Their motives were mixed as some felt that Jordan should only extend the Palestine state. However these neighboring countries also fueled more violent as they also attacked Israel with the perspective that Palestine had the rightful stake of the land.
The declaration by Israel as statehood marked the beginning of the conflict and this led to many persisting events that followed the 1948 war. The Israel was earlier not recognized as a state when Palestine was then a state. This also another notion why there has been popular calls for two-nation state.

ZIONISM
According to Halper, Johnson and Schaeffer, (2009) they acknowledged that for the past 1400 years, the country “belonged to” the Muslims, Arabs for the greatest share, even though a lot of people came and went. The scholars also state that the Jews have no superior nor a limited right to live in the land than all the other groups who occupy it. However with the Zionism’s assertion that the Jews are the “returning natives,” the Palestinians claim that they signify the combined total of all the native populace who have lived there in an continuous stability. Therefore there is a claim from each side and both claims are valid and have a significant premise to what they believe is rightfully theirs.
The Palestine’s are rooted on the belief that they are the natives of the land thus the land belong to them as the legitimate occupiers.

1967/OCCUPATION
Israel’s claim that it has no Occupation and that the territories it took in 1967 are merely “disputed” or “administered” is supported neither by international law nor the international community (Halper, Johnson and Schaeffer, 2009). According to the scholars Israel contends that occupation only happens when one sovereign country overcomes the land of another sovereign country, and since there was never a sovereign power over the West Bank, East Jerusalem or Gaza (Jordan and Egypt also having taken them in 1948), no one has a claim. Hence therefore this notion puts Palestine in a dead end situation as the connotation does not favor them when it comes to the international community and the accepted definition of occupation. Therefore Palestine do not have effective control of territories beyond their recognized borders.
Israel denies that it occupies the land it took from Palestine and states that the land initially belonged to them. Israel justifies themselves by means of Jerusalem connotation in the bible as the founding stance on why they took the land and declared themselves as a state.

THE ARABS, TERRORISM & SECURITY: “NO SOLUTION”
There is also another fundamental cause which is that of social conflict that breeds between Arabs as they are all fond of terrorism which will make it impossible for terrorists to share territory. However Halper et al. (2009) denounces this notion as they acknowledge that these Arab groups are found in almost all countries, then how can this be a problem when they share land. Another perspective is that in other countries they may operate under the rule of that sovereign state, however in their territories there might be a clash of who is the ruler and whom is ruled. Therefore this perspective can have some weight when considering of contemporary conflicts between homogenous groups

The religion fundamental can thus be propelled as the main culprit in the notion of these groups being in conflict with one another. However the general consensus on the issue is that the conflict is on the basis of politics not merely on civilization grounds. Therefore the ideology of common social context should be overlooked as it is unfound that these natives cannot occupy the same land. This could apply when the groups are heterogeneous as in the case in South Africa and U.S.A. who are both tolerating their indifferent races.

THE WALL/FENCE/BARRIER
The issue of the wall is also another perceived aspect of the causes of Israel-Palestine conflict. Helper et al. (2009) also mentions that the wall prevents the Palestinians from accessing roads, schools, hospitals, places of employment, government services, family members, holy sites and their capital, Jerusalem. Hence this wall has become one of the major causes as it is a subsidiary of a land dispute between the two states. Furthermore, this very same fence has been built in order to remove huge sectors of land from the Palestinian Territories, in breach of international law. Therefore the declaration has not brought any solution rather than a paradox of continuous upheaval that these states fight for. The use of the term fence is somehow misleading as it breeds connotation of protection whereas the use of barrier should be more suitable as this is a form of stopping the Palestines from access of the means they need.

DELEGITIMIZING
Delegitimization, as a severe case of negative stereotyping, it does not appear in every intergroup conflict. According to Ore and Bar-Tal (2011) this process inclines to arise especially in all violent conflicts when the disputed objectives are apparent as far-reaching, unfounded, and compromising the important goals of the group. With this notion it is approved that this can be applied in the case of the Israel-Palestine conflict as there is also conflicting ideologies about who is legitimate to occupy the land. Furthermore, the scholars state that the two groups involved in conflict are substantially and on a social basis detached, regardless that they live in the same territory, such as the Israel Jews and Palestinians in the Middle East. This might be found as the contributing factor of the conflict even though it cannot be singled out as a primary cause as it emerged from social civilization rather than political civilization. Israel and Palestine are fighting about who is legitimate by what and therefore each group is trying to delegitimize the other.

Therefore delegitimization can be identified as the cause of the conflict as each state is fighting over legitimacy of occupying land lawfully. Therefore each group does not want to concede to the other as the delegitimizing but instead use religion and geographic territories as the excuse of the legitimate occupation of the land. The manner in which these groups are negatively fighting each other on the basis of native history and faith is also another form delegitimizing.

THE STATEHOOD DECLARATION BY PALESTINE
According to Benoliel and Perry (2010) on January 22, 2009, the Palestinian National Authority filed a declaration identifying the authority of the Court with detail to acts that were orchestrated on the territory of the Palestinian Authority since July 1 2002, without indicating the Gaza Strip in particular. This was noted as one other particular cause for the conflict as they were denied as the first of these quarrels is that from 1988 there has been a Palestinian state, following the Palestinian Declaration of Independence and its worldwide acknowledgement by states worldwide. Furthermore the second stance is that the statehood declared by the Palestine National Council in 1988 was not of a new statehood instead it was a declaration of an existing state. Moreover the scholars further argued that Israel never demanded sovereignty over its occupied Palestinian territories, hence its sovereignty is not affected by the existence of a Palestinian state. One other argument is that of Israel it has acknowledged the Palestinian state. Finally the fifth claim is that Israel’s recognition was unspoken and in agreement with the accustomed rule where a state recognition need not be expressed in a formal document was not accounted for. Therefore this statehood declaration also caused the conflict between these two groups.
The self-declaration of statehood has also entrenched some further uneasy on Israel who have managed to take a portion of the land from Palestine. This is due to that Palestine might gain authority that will lead to acknowledgement by the international community. Therefore Israel did not accept the declaration by Palestine to avoid the forthcomings that involves the international community.

THE IMPACT OF SCARCE WATER RESOURCES ON THE ARAB-ISRAEL CONFLICT
With the state of natural resources in the Middle East the scarcity of water as another contributing cause to the war cannot be overlooked. Even though it might not be the main cause the association of the importance of water and how they have been recharged from the Jordan River is hard not to consider. This notion is also further entrenched on Jordan River watershed that is included inside the borders of countries and territories each of whose water intake is presently potentially at a crisis (Wolff & Ross, 1992:921). Another factor is that the area is also predominantly unstable politically, with five Arab-Israeli wars since 1948, and many persistent issues yet unsolved. Therefore every aspect that is found to be associate with the territory of these countries can cause a conflict as these are sensitive issues to these constituency. Hence the region is identified as a volatile due to its notorious upheavals and conflict that took place in the past.

Considering that natural resources are very much the pro focus on the Middle East’s wealth and survival it is inevitable that water can be excluded as the cause of the conflict even though it is not the founding cause. The Jordan River forms part of the territory that these groups fight about hence water from the Jordan River are also important to consider.

CAMP DAVID FAILURE
It is also founding feature that the Camp David failure to reach a final arrangement at the Camp David summit in July 2000 also added to the view on both sides that the parties were bound to resort to a military path. (Pressman, 2003:130), hence for Israelis, Arafat rejected a generous Israeli offer because the Palestinians opted for a violent, not a subtle, solution. Thus for Palestinians, the many restrictions of Israel’s offer at Camp David strengthened the notion that Israel was using the final status negotiations to make the occupation of land permanent. Therefore neither representation was precise, however they imagined that the diplomatic route has been exhausted so military was the sole remaining option left.

The Camp David Summit was supposed to provide the two groups in conflict with a diplomatic platform of negotiating and compromising their subsequent decisions on the issue of land sharing. However instead it brought upon meaningless solutions that led to misconception of counter analyzing each other’s decision. This also manifested the role of violence being inflicted as the primary solution to either side.

THE ISRAEL-PALESTINE CONFLICT IS CENTRAL TO THE MILITANTS’ CAUSE
The predominant popularity of the Arab and Middle East countries as the instigators of terrorism is not far from linking Al Qaeda as contributing cause in the Israel-Palestine conflict. According to Burke (2008:3), the roots of contemporary Sunni Islamic militancy cannot be reduced to any form other than Al Qaeda’s religious fundamentalism in the justification of fighting against western ideologies of government. As Israel is pro-western ideologies Al Qaeda will deem necessary to protect the Arab countries by ensuring that Palestine is not overthrown or defeated due to the US and UK foreign policy that supports Israel as the legitimate state to occupy the land.
When US and UK are involved as in the case of Israel support the militants in the Arab countries will feel that the umma is under attack. This will lead to Al Qaeda to instigate violence and terrorism on Israel as they are western most obvious outposts. It is inevitable that Al Qaeda will back the pro-Arab state which in this case is the Palestine.

In sum the Israel/Palestine conflict emerged when Israel Declaration of the Establishment of the State of Israel on 14 May 1948, the Arab League decided to intervene on behalf of Palestinian Arabs, marching their forces into former British Palestine, beginning the main phase of the 1948 Arab-Israeli War. This conflict is founded on territorial boundaries however it has emerging sub conflicts that followed as the causes through which the Israel and Palestine were trying to reach an agreement. The process of compromise by means on negotiations has fallen through in several times. Even with the aid of the international community there has not been much results that can be announced as the initial outcome of the negotiation process. The negotiation process on its own does not yield any prospects as both parties’ refuses to compromise on their initial stance. The causes of the Israel/Palestine conflict are complex as some paint a grey picture due to the nature of their undertakings. Every tried peacemaking process does not bring upon the prospect of agreement between the two groups instead it causes more upheavals. From Camp David summit to statehood declaration none seems to be the ideal solution of the conflict. The 1948 war through to the Occupation, Zionism and “Wall of Israel” all these were some of the upheaval that took place during the ongoing conflict. The Al Qaeda terrorism ideology is also drafted in as it stand to fight against western ideologies by US and UK. US and UK foreign policies supports Israel as the legitimate occupation in the conflict. It is up to date that all platforms and forms of resolutions have reached a stalemate with either state refusing to compromise. Therefore the contemporary identification of the Israel/Palestine conflict has led to the use of the “two-nation state” labeling which states that the Israel has never compromise in giving Palestine what they claim as theirs. Hence

REFERENCES

Burke, J. (2004). “The Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Is Central to the Militants' Cause” http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story

Benoliel, D., & Perry, R. (2010). Israel, Palestine and the ICC.

Even, S., & Kimhi, S. (2004). Who Are the Palestinian Suicide Bombers? Terrorism and Political Violence, Vol.16, No.4 (Winter 2004), pp.815–840

Gallo, G., & Marzano, A. (2009). The Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflicts: The Israeli-Palestinian Case. Journal of Conflict Studies

Halper, J., Johnson, J., & Schaeffer, E. (2009).The Israel-Palestine conflict: Challenging Slogans Through Critical Reframing

Oren, N., & Bar-Tal. D. (2007). The detrimental dynamics of delegitimization in intractable conflicts: The Israeli–Palestinian case. International Journal of Intercultural Relations

Pressman, J. (2003). The Second Intifada: Background and Causes of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. The Journal of Conflict Studies

Van Evera, S. (1996). Causes and Prevention of War. World Social and Military Expenditures. Washington DC: World Priorities

Wallach, Y. (2011). Trapped in mirror-images: The rhetoric of maps in Israel/Palestine. Political Geography 358-369

WOLF, A., & ROSS J. (1992). The Impact of Scarce Water Resources on the Arab-Israeli Conflict. Natural resources.…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

American Civil War: Causes

...Many people believe that the major cause of the Civil War was because of slavery. In reality there were several factors that including about regional diversity, differing interpretation of the constitution, slavery, state's right, sectionalism, especial territorial expansion, led to the Civil War. States’ right is one of the most symbols of the American Civil War. States’ Right refers to the struggle between the federal government and individual states over political power. Since the time of the Revolution, two camps emerged: those arguing for greater states’ rights and those arguing that the federal government needed to have more control. At the Constitutional Convention and create, in secret, the US Constitution, many felt that the new constitution ignored the rights of states to continue to act independently. They felt that the states should still have the right to decide if they were willing to accept certain federal acts. And this resulted in the idea of nullification, whereby the states would have the right to rule federal acts unconstitutional. The federal government denied states this right. When nullification would not work and states felt that they were no longer respected, they moved towards secession. The Northern and Southern sections of the United States developed along different lines. The South was mostly rural and agricultural. With invention (sang che’) of the cotton gin in 1793,cotton farming becoming the most profitable (loi nhuan) business in the South....

Words: 856 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

The War Cause

...injection reactions | Soreness where the shot was given Temperature of 99.9°F, Pruritus | The client did not appear to have any pain from the injection NPASS score 0, no irritation or signs of infection at injection site. | 5.Normal Dose___________ | | | | | | | 6.Normal Dose__________ | | | | | | | Add more rows or duplicate if more space is needed. Clinical Learning Packet (CLP): Diagnostic/Laboratory Summary SheetInstructions * Review and record the below information for any diagnostic tests your patient underwent today. * Please include previous and/or future tests if it is relevant to primary medical diagnosis (For example, Dx pneumonia. Please include a description of chest x-ray, even if it were performed 2 days ago…). * Submit weekly to your Clinical Instructor (see Clinical Assignment Overview for details). | General Diagnostic/Laboratory Testing Information | Definition of Test | Describe the Procedure | Clinical Implications – Why is it often ordered by physicians? | Nursing Responsibilities | Desired Outcome or Normal Result | Resource & Page # | Transcutaneous Bilirubin Test | Take the small device and press it against the skin of the infants sternum 3 x in quick succession. | To assess for hyperbilirubin levels in infants that indicate jaudice | Preform the test at predetermined intervals per agency protocol record the findings and report any abnormal levels to the physician | 1-12mg/dl | Laboratory and Diagnostic......

Words: 2687 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Cause and Effect of War

...April 29, 2013 Cause and Effect of War The Vietnam War was during the years of 1964-1975. This is the longest military conflict in U.S. History. Around 85,000 Americans were killed during this war. This war cost over 150 billion dollars. The war involved the North Vietnamese army and the National Liberation Front on one side against the United States and the South Vietnamese army. The war was fought in South Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, and a little in North Vietnam. One cause of the war was that the Vietnamese had struggled for their independence from France which was a result of the First Indochina War. As a result of this war, the country was divided into North and South Vietnam. The United States got involved in Vietnam because U.S. authorities thought that if the whole country fell under communist control, this would cause a domino effect and communism would spread through all of Southeast Asia. This was the reason to get involved in Vietnam. When the Japanese finally surrendered on September 2, 1945 in the First Indochina war, Ho also declared independence for Vietnam. The French refused to accept Vietnam’s independence, and later drove the Viet Minh into the north of the country. In 1965, the United States sent troops to help maintain the Southern Vietnamese government. Unfortunately, their plan didn’t work and in 1975 Vietnamese was under Communist control. The United States demanded for Japan to leave Indochina, or else they would be forced to use military action.......

Words: 1350 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Six Day War Research Paper

...Evan Reyes 5.29.13 Mr. O’Malley AVID 6th Period “What Were the Causes and Effects of the Six Day War?” The Israeli death toll is nearly twenty times less than that of their opposition in the Six Day War. The Six Day War was fought in June, 1967. It was fought between Israel and a coalition of Arab forces including Egypt, Syria and Jordan. The United States and Soviet Union were both involved. The U.S. supported Israel and the U.S.S.R. supported the Arab forces. Countries like France and Great Britain were also involved but tried to remain neutral. The war was caused by the mutual distrust, mounting tension and military build up on each side. The war led to more conflict and tension in the Middle East. The Six Day War was caused by the history of war between Israel and Arab countries. Before the Six Day War, there had already been two wars involving Israel and a neighboring Arab country. Israel was involved in the Arab-Israeli War and the Suez Crisis. Israel won both wars, securing their spot in the Middle East. Israel also had numerous armed conflicts with Arab forces. In between major armed conflicts, there were terrorist attacks committed by Arabic. Groups like the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) and Arabic guerrillas from countries like Syria, Egypt and Jordan committed these attacks. Another cause of the Six Day War was the mounting tensions on each side. Although Arabic guerrillas already conducted attacks on Israel, the formation of the PLO in 1964......

Words: 1431 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

The Six-Day War of 1899: Hong Kong in the Age of Imperialism

...In 1899, a year after the Convention of Peking leased the New Territories to Britain, the British moved to establish control. This triggered resistance by the some of the population of the New Territories. There ensued six days of fighting with heavy Chinese casualties. This truly forgotten war has been thoroughly researched for the first time and recounted in lively style by Patrick Hase, an expert on the people and history of the New Territories. After brief discussion of British Imperialism in the 1890s and British military theory of that period on small wars, the heart of the book is a day-by-day account of the fighting and of the differences of opinion between the Governor of Hong Kong (Blake) and the Colonial Secretary (Lockhart) as to how the war should be fought. Dr Hase uses his deep knowledge of the people and the area and to give a full picture of the leaders and of the rank-and-file of the village fighters. New estimates of the casualties are provided, as are the implications of way these casualties are down-played in most British accounts. As a small war of Imperial Expansion, fought at precisely the high-point of Imperial thinking within the British Empire, The Six-Day War of 1899 is of interest, not only to historians of Hong Kong and China, but also to historians of the British Empire and the British Army, and to general readers interested in military, imperial and Hong Kong history. About the Author: Patrick H. Hase (PhD, Cambridge, FSA,......

Words: 337 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

The Causes of the First World War

...The causes of the FIRST WORLD WAR 1_ The assassination at Sarajevo. (political murder) On 28th June Franz Ferdinand and his wife visited the Town of Sarajevo. The Archduke was the heir to the throne of the Empire of Austria-Hungary. As the car passed along the street, someone threw a bomb at it. The bomb bounced off the back of the car and exploded, injuring an officer in the car behind. The Archduke and his wife were unhurt. Later that day the Archduke said that he wanted to change his plans and visit the injured officer in hospital. He set off again by car, but the driver was not told the route had change. Some minutes later a man called Gavrilo Princip shot them and died. 2_ The great powers in 1914. If see the map the six most important and powerful countries in Europe were split into two armed groups. The triple Alliance. Central powers. Germany: was made up of many small states that had united and become one country only as recently as 1871. Otto von Bismarck, who was the Chancelor of the newly united Germany, firmly believed that all questions of the day could be solved by military strength by blood and iron. The stong national feeling in Germany and its wealth from industry made the Germans keen to play a leading part in world affairs. Kaiser Wilhelm II was impatient to make Germany the leading country in Europe. Austria-Hungary: the empire of Austria-Hungary was Germany´s oldest ally. German was the language of Government, but each group spoke its own......

Words: 3793 - Pages: 16

Premium Essay

Causes of the Vietnam War

...Oswald Antoinette Countryman English 152 22 February 2014 The Causes of the Vietnam War The Vietnam War is now considered as one of the most distressing moments during the 20th Century. The Vietnam War was caused by many factors that contributed to the war in Vietnam during the years of 1959 to April 30, 1975. This war just prolonged the struggles between nationalist forces attempting to unify the country of Vietnam. Most of the factors that contribute to the war were the beliefs by a lot of people who wanted to prevent Vietnam of becoming an Independent Country. There are many people who suffered a lot due to this war going on and still due to this day people still picturing how they fought the war. What were the causes of the Vietnam War? Why did the United States become involved in this war? Why did the Vietnam War have such a huge impact both on the Vietnam and the United States? What was the impact that Ho Chi Minh had during the War? One of the most important features when describing the Vietnam War was why the United States became involved in the war, and their reasons for conflict amongst the Vietnamese in the North of the 17th Parallel. It is known that the US was involved for many reasons, particularly their belief in the Domino theory where if one country fell to Communism, the rest of South-East Asia would fall along with it. There are many other reasons why the United States became involved in this war. There are many reasons why the United States became......

Words: 2042 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Causes of Civil War

...Causes of the American Civil War (Colonial America to the 1850s) A lot of important events and people have paved the way towards the American civil war. Each event that ever happened within the time period of 1790 to 1850 all lead to the civil war. Some example of key people and events would be the following: the bill of rights being ratified, the fugitive slave act, the cotton gin, Tennessee, John Adams, George Washington, Gabriel's Rebellion, Ohio, the Louisiana Purchase, the Embargo act, the International slave trade, James Madison, the Battle of New Orleans, Reverend Allen, Missouri compromise, Demark Vesey's Conspiracy, Africans losing their boats, Monroe Doctrine, Nat Turner's revolt, The Alamo, Gag rule, Trail of tears, Harriet Tubman, California. All of these are some major events that caused the civil war itself. All of these events had also contributed to the rise of the English colony and the break off point from the mainland in Europe. All of the events/ people mention previously are going to be used to tell how the American civil war started and how each led to a chain reaction of other events that occurred. These events will each tell a story of its own and slowly build up to the civil war itself. Other events along the way will show up as a result of an event occurring. Both the north and the South had different events which lead up to the civil war but we will mostly focus on the more major events that took place. The Rise......

Words: 3043 - Pages: 13

Premium Essay

Causes and Effects of the Pelopponsian War

...Athens and Sparta had cooperated during the Persian War, but relations between these powerful states declined throughout the years. The Athenian pursuit of equality in their city combined with their growing domination abroad allowed Athens to attempt to create a land and maritime empire. This was one of the main causes for the First Peloponnesian War. The Delian League was initially established as a naval alliance among the Greek nautical states. Overtime, the aggressive policies of Athens converted the voluntary allies of the Delian League into the involuntary subjects of an Athenian naval empire. When Athens tried to expand their kingdom to the Greek mainland they encountered a series of battles with Sparta and its allies, which started the First Peloponnesian War. After a succession of defeats for the Athenians, their land empire began to collapse and they agreed to a thirty year peace treaty with the Spartans. Athens began to use the Delian League as its own empire. They eventually increased their control over it by gaining power of its treasury. The Athenian Pericles was responsible for taking Delian League funds for various projects. He constructed the “long walls” with these reserves enclosing Athens as well as the port of Piraeus. The Spartans saw this piece of land as an important part of their defenses and believed this gave the Athenians an unfair military advantage. Athens did not allow members of the League to leave their alliance. Each ally was charged a fee......

Words: 711 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Causes of the Revolutionary War

...Causes of the Revolutionary War 1754-1763 French and Indian war A war that would go on to last for a total of seven years broke out between the British and the French over the Ohio River. The war ended with the British being victorious but also with a debt that was too deep to fix alone. The demanded more revenue from the colonies by taxing anything they could. The colonies had to pay money for the debt of the French and Indian war. A lot of the colonist didn’t want to pay the money because they thought that they should pay less if they lived in small colonies. So the king would send troops to the colonies to kill who ever didn’t pay. 1763 – Proclamation of 1763 This stated that nobody could settle beyond the Appalachian Mountains. Many of the colonists where upset with this order but they British said that they never intended to hurt them. The colonist became upset with the law because they couldn’t get to the fertile soil along the Ohio River valley. A lot of the colonist had already bought land west of the Appalachians and it was a waste of their money because they weren’t able to use it. In result the colonist didn’t respect the Native Americans and did not keep their land healthy. The ignored the law and continued to move up and about the Appalachians. 1764 – Sugar Act It was passed by the English parliament to pay off the war debts from the war. The act raised revenue by taxing all sugar from the West Indies that was being imported. The......

Words: 603 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

1967 the Six Day War - Air Campaign

...1967 THE SIX DAY WAR - AIR CAMPAIGN INTRODUCTION 1. The 1967 Arab-Israel six day war was the 3rd major struggle faced by the Israel in order to maintain its existence since it became a state in 1948[1]. The war can be considered as one of the most perfect military operations in the modern period. Surprisingly in just six days, the Israel Defence Force (IDF) managed to defeat the armed forces of the three major Arab countries and conquered Sinai, The West Bank and The Golan Height. The victories gave Israel more security from attack and secured a dominant military position in the region[2]. The combination of three major (Air, Land and Maritime) strike planned by the Israel has resulted the victory for Israeli. Even though the war involved three main elements, this paper will just focus on the air campaign which can be considered as the main factor for the victory of Israel and the failure for the Arabs’ allies. 2. The purpose of this paper is to provide a general brief on the background of the war and will focus more on the air campaign as the decisive factor that lead to the Israel victory. The flow of this paper will start with the genesis of the war which will provide the background of the six days war followed by the comparison of the Order of Battle (ORBAT). The comparison of ORBAT will give the summary of the assets involved and destroyed in the war and its effects on the outcome of the war. Series of the event from the first day of war until......

Words: 5080 - Pages: 21

Premium Essay

Causes of the American Civil War

...Causes Of The American Civil War Four years of American bloodshed on American soil. Why? The reasons are varied. From the formation of America to 1860, the people in this country were divided. This division was a result of location and personal sentiments. Peace could not continue in a country filled with quarrels that affected the common American. There is a common misconception that the American Civil War was fought only over slavery, when in fact there were several other reasons for why the War Between the States was fought. The Civil War (or the War of the Rebellion as it is officially known) lasted for four years, from 1861-1865. It was between the American people; primarily the northern states vs. the southern states. The South was called the Confederate States of America (also known as the Rebels) and was led by President Jefferson Davis. The North was still known as the United States of America, or the Union, and the people were called the Yankees or sometimes the Federals. They were led by president Abraham Lincoln. If one were to ask the average person the causes of the War Between the States, that person would most likely answer with one word: slavery. But this was not the only cause. Slavery had been a historical problem before the war. Slavery came up in debate during the making of the American Constitution, and both Northern and Southern states held slaves. In 1611, a group of Scottish women and children were sold as the first slaves in America,......

Words: 1571 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

The Six Day War

...Title: Formal Report Student Name/Number: Hakeem Bolarinwa Front cover Title Page Title: Formal Report on high turnover at Fastfood Ltd. Report by: Hakeem Bolarinwa (Head of Human Resources). Report for: Senior Management. Date of Submission: 20/09/2015. Introduction Fastfood Ltd just built a new factory in an exciting location on the outskirts of Dublin but this relocation has seen a huge amount of staffs leaving the company. The main purpose of this report is to find out the reason why there has been a high turnover within Fastfood Ltd since the recent relocation. I was asked by the senior management to write this report to find the cause of this high turnover and suggest what action can be taken in order to reduce this turnover. This report is mostly based on primary research as I spoke to current staffs and previous staffs of Fastfood Ltd and carried out surveys. I also carried out secondary research by looking at previous data within Fastfood Ltd. Findings Work overload Work life balance......

Words: 253 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Causes of War

...Causes of the First World War This document was written by Stephen Tonge. I am most grateful to have his kind permission to include it on the web site. Europe Before 1914: the Main Powers Triple Entente | Name | Head of State | Allies | Disputes | Britain | King George V (1901-1936) Constitutional Monarchy | France, Russia | Naval arms race economic rivalry with Germany | France | President Raymond Poincaire Parliamentary Democracy | Britain, Russia | Wanted the return of the provinces of Alsace and Lorraine from Germany | Russia | Tsar Nicholas II (1894-1917) Monarchy | Britain, France | Rivals with Austria for control of the Balkans Strained relations with Britain. | Triple Alliance | Germany | Kaiser William II (1888-1918) Constitutional Monarchy | Italy, Austria- Hungary. | Rivals with France over Alsace, Britain over her navy. | Austria- Hungary | Kaiser Franz Joseph (1848-1916) Constitutional Monarchy | Italy, Germany | Rivalry with Russia over the Balkans, Territorial disputes with her ally, Italy | Italy | King Victor Emmanuel III (1900-1946) Constitutional Monarchy | Austria, Germany | Disputes with France in North Africa  large Italian communities lived in the Austrian Empire. | The direct cause of WWI was the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand at Sarajevo on 28 June 1914. However historians feel that a number of factors contributed to the rivalry between the Great powers that allowed war on such a wide-scale to break out. A......

Words: 2354 - Pages: 10

Free Essay

Causes of War

...The Causes of War Summer Hansborough POL 300 004016 What causes opposition? Imperialism, nationalism, Social Darwinism, and militarism are causes of war, and I narrowed it down to the following; freedom, money, ideologies, race, religion and land. Although these are causes of war, in most cases, the ultimate cause of war is an elitist mentality. One believing their ideologies, race, policies and beliefs are superior to those that do not fit in or follow that particular system. What are the causes of war? An age old question that no one has yet to give a definitive answer. What is war? One definition explains war as an aggressively armed battle between conflicting people. Another definition explains war as fighting between nations, or groups in a nation, using weapons. To sum it all up, war is a condition of active animosity or contention and it is not exclusive to people. There are many kinds of war, such as is the war on drugs, the war on terrorism, political wars, and the war on AIDS. The war on AIDS is interesting, because it’s not a war apposing people, but a virus, a disease. According to the bible, our war is not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, wickedness and power in high places. (bible, 2005) A system, which is designed to bring order and uniformity, is an attribute to the causes of war. A system is vital to administer order to society. In the early days, before America established its own money system, America......

Words: 3707 - Pages: 15