Premium Essay

Aspeon Capital Structure Case

In: Business and Management

Submitted By kbbb
Words 1460
Pages 6
1.a.) Business risk is the equity risk arising from the nature of the firm’s operating activity, and is directly related to the systematic risk of the firm’s assets. Financial risk is the equity risk that is due entirely to the firm’s chosen capital structure. As financial leverage, or the use of debt increases, so does financial risk and, hence, the overall risk of the equity. Business risk depends on a number of factors, including competition, liability exposure, and operating leverage.

b.) In the total risk sense, one common measure of business and financial risk is the variability of ROE, also known as the standard deviation.

c.) An unlevered firm's beta depends on the firm's business risk, but the use of financial leverage causes the firm's beta to increase. Thus, within a market risk framework:
Total market risk = Business market risk - Financial market risk
d.) Business risk is the single most important determinant of a firm's capital structure. The greater the risk inherent in a firm's assets, then, at any debt level, the greater the probability of financial distress for the firm.

2. a.) ( In the table)
b.) (In the table)
c.) . From the calculations, changing capital structure of the firm increases the risk of the firm so that leveraged firm has a wider range of ROE and a higher standard deviation of ROE .Thus, in the expected(base) case and in the expansion case, leveraged firm has higher returns(ROE) which implies higher profitability.

3.a.) Financial leverage adds risk to the firm’s equity. As compensation, the cost of equity rises with the firm’s risk. R0 is a single point whereas RS, RB, and RWACC are all entire lines.
b.) First of all Aspeon should announce its recapitalization plans to avoid possible lawsuits, then investors would reassess their views concerning the firm’s profitability and risk to estimate a new value for the…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Capital Structure

...CapStrMktPower I M Pandey CAPITAL STRUCTURE AND MARKET POWER I. M. Pandey Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad Vastrapur, Ahmedabad 380015 India E-mail: impandey@iimahd.ernet.in W. P. No. 2002-03-01 March 2002 i CapStrMktPower I M Pandey CAPITAL STRUCTURE AND MARKET POWER I M Pandey ABSTRACT This paper provides new insights on the way in which the capital structure and market power and capital structure and profitability are related. We predict and show that capital structure and market power, as measured by Tobin’s Q, have a cubic relationship. That is, at lower and higher ranges of Tobin’s Q, firms employ higher debt, and reduce their debt at intermediate range. This is due to the complex interaction of the market conditions, agency problems and bankruptcy costs. We also show saucer-shaped relation between capital structure and profitability because of the interplay of agency costs, costs of external financing and debt tax shield. To our knowledge, we are the first to uncover these results. Key words: capital structure; market structure; market power; Tobin’s Q; riskshifting; moral hazard; agency problems; pecking order; trade-off theory; asset substitution. ii CapStrMktPower I M Pandey CAPITAL STRUCTURE AND MARKET POWER INTRODUCTION In corporate finance, works of Modigliani and Miller (1958; 1963) about capital structure irrelevance and tax shield advantage paved way for the development of alternative theories and a series of...

Words: 6718 - Pages: 27

Premium Essay

Capital Structure

...Assignment #2: Business Financing and the Capital Structure Marquis C. Saddler Professor Jason Powers FIN100 December 1, 2013 Business Financing and the Capital Structure Explain the process of financial planning used to estimate asset investment requirements for a corporation. Explain the concept of working capital management. Identify and briefly describe several financial instruments that are used as marketable securities to park excess cash. A corporation having a financial plan in place to estimate its assets investment requirement is important. It’s important because their assets can be used as an advantage for securing loans and can be used to calculate their ability to repay debts. A corporation’s sales are a key compelling force of future asset requirements. As sales steadily increase it creates a need for increase in assets. In other words, asset needs have a propensity to stem from sales increases. For example, if you were to estimate that sales for a corporation will be $40million for a given year, and it is know that in that specific industry that assets have a propensity to be about 40% of sales, then you could estimate that the corporation’s asset requirement will be $16million (40% x $40,000,000). Another good way to estimate asset requirements is to use the percentage-of-sales technique, which is a technique use for forecasting financial data. “Working capital refers to that part of the firm’s capital, which is required for financing......

Words: 988 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Capital Structure

...UNDERSTANDING CAPITAL STRUCTURE As discussed in the previous section, a DCF requires a discount rate. The discount rate is a function of the risk inherent in any business and industry, the degree of uncertainty regarding the projected cash flows, and the assumed capital structure. In general, discount rates vary across different businesses and industries. The greater the uncertainty about the projected cash stream, the higher the appropriate discount rate and the lower the current value of the cash streams. STEP 6 – EXTRACT THE CAPITAL STRUCTURE FROM ANNUAL REPORT For calculating the discount rate, we require the proportion of Equity and Debt in the capital structure using our ABC example. For the capital structure calculations, annual reports of ABC have provided us with the following information on Debt and the Equity related items from the footnotes. The capitalization table of ABC company is as per below. ($ in MM) Short term Borrowings Revolver Bonds Of which Convertible Bonds Convertible Preferred Stock Due Date 15-Aug-09 31-May-10 31-Dec-12 31-May-10 1-Aug-12 31-Mar-14 31-Dec-10 5.2 14.2 80.0 12.0 7.0 Notes 3.2% coupon Due 5/31/2010 7.5% coupon, amortizing Bond Amortizing portion 4.5% coupon, conversion price $25, 1 bond of Fair value $100 converts into 4 shares 9.0 3% coupon, conversion price $20, 1 preferred stock of Fair value $18 converts into 1 share UNDERSTANDING THE CAPITAL STRUCTURE OF THE FIRM Short Term Borrowings: Short term borrowings is an......

Words: 2396 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Capital Structure

...Factors Influencing Corporate Capital Structure in Three Asian Countries: Evidence from Japan, Malaysia and Pakistan Muhammad Mahmud and Gobind M. Herani and A.W. Rajar and Wahid Farooqi KASBIT, KABIT, Sindh University, Indus Institute of Higher Education 20. April 2009 Online at http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/15003/ MPRA Paper No. 15003, posted 4. May 2009 07:34 UTC Indus Journal of Management & Social Sciences, 3(1):9-17 (Spring 2009) http://indus.edu.pk/journal.php Economic Factors Influencing Corporate Capital Structure in Three Asian Countries: Evidence from Japan, Malaysia and Pakistan Muhammad Mahmud*, Gobind M. Herani** A. W. Rajar*** and Wahid Farooqi**** ABSTRACT This study is an attempt to determine the factors that influence a firm’s choice of capital structure in three Asian countries: Japan, Malaysia and Pakistan. The specific objective is to investigate if country’s economic factors play a significant role in determining capital structure between markets. These countries are chosen in order to represent three different stages of economic development. Literature review reveals that considerable research has been made in the industrialized countries on the similar topic. Capital structure is one of the most complex areas of strategic financial decision making due to its interrelationship with macroeconomic variables. This study reveals that per capita GNP growth for Japan and Malaysia is significantly related to capital structure of firm and......

Words: 4126 - Pages: 17

Premium Essay

Capital Structure

...Theory of Capital Structure Relevance Under Imperfect Information Author(s): Robert Heinkel Reviewed work(s): Source: The Journal of Finance, Vol. 37, No. 5 (Dec., 1982), pp. 1141-1150 Published by: Blackwell Publishing for the American Finance Association Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2327840 . Accessed: 19/05/2012 14:37 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. Blackwell Publishing and American Finance Association are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal of Finance. http://www.jstor.org THE JOURNAL OF FINANCE * VOL. XXXVII, NO. 5 * DECEMBER 1982 A Theory of Capital Structure Relevance Imperfect Information ROBERT HEINKEL* under ABSTRACT Firms raise debt and equity capital to finance a positive net present value project in perfectly competitive capital markets; firm insiders know the function generating the random firm cash flow but potential capital suppliers do not. Taking into account the incentives of insiders to misrepresent their firm type,......

Words: 4499 - Pages: 18

Premium Essay

Capital Structure

...In 1958, Franco Modigliani and Merton Miller revolutionized the whole area of corporate finance with their article “The cost of capital, corporate finance and the theory of investment”. Before Modigliani’s and Miller’s article, literature on the topic mainly focused on descriptions of methods and institutions. Theoretical analysis was very rare (Pagano 2008). Under the assumption of perfect capital markets, the Modigliani-Miller Proposition I states that “the average cost of capital to any firm is completely independent of its capital structure and is equal the capitalization rate of a pure equity stream of its class” (Modigliani, Miller 1958). In Proposition II, Modigliani and Miller argue that “that the expected yield of a share of stock is equal to the appropriate capitalization rate for a pure equity stream in the class, plus a premium related to financial risk equal to the debt-equity ratio times the spread between” the capitalization rate and the return on debt. The most important implication of this theory is that if there is an optimal capital structure for a firm, this has to be the result of market imperfections. The Modigliani-Miller Theorem has thus become a starting point for further research and a benchmark for testing new theories on capital structure, that incorporate the impact of different market imperfections. The following text will focus on two of these theories, the static trade-off theory and the pecking order theory. The first part will contain a......

Words: 1173 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Diageo Capital Structure Case

...Case Study 3 “Diageo, Plc.” Introduction บริษัท Diageo ถูกก่อตั้งขึ้นในปี 1997 จากการควบรวมกิจการระหว่างบริษัท Grand Metropolitan plc. กับบริษัท Guinness จนกลายเป็นบริษัทอาหารและเครื่องดื่มที่ใหญ่เป็นอันดับ 7 ของโลก หลังจากการควบรวมกันเป็นบริษัท Diageo ต้องการจะเน้นไปที่เครื่องดื่มแอลกอฮอล์เพียงอย่างเดียว จึงตัดสินใจที่จะขายธุรกิจอาหารไป ได้แก่ Pillsbury โดยขายให้กับ General Mills และต้องการจะออกจากธุรกิจ fast food โดยการออกขายหุ้น IPO ของ Burger King นอกจากนี้ บริษัท Diageo ยังเข้าซื้อกิจการประเภทแอลกอฮอล์ ได้แก่ Seagrams ทำให้บริษัทขยายใหญ่ขึ้นและมีความแข็งแกร่งทางด้านธุรกิจแอลกอฮอล์ ก่อนที่จะมีการควบรวมกิจการนั้น Guinness กับ Grand Metropolitan มี rating อยู่ที่ AA และ A ตามลำดับ แต่พอหลังการควบรวมกิจการเป็นบริษัท Diageo ทำให้มีถูกลด rating เหลือเพียง BBB โดยRating Agencies ได้แก่ Standard and Poor’s และ Moody’s เนื่องจากเกิดความไม่แน่นอนของนโยบายทางการเงินของบริษัท บริษัท Diageo จึงต้องควบคุม Capital Structure ให้มีประสิทธิภาพ โดยการรักษาระดับของ interest cover ratio ไว้ 5-8 เท่า และคงระดับของ EBITDA/Total Debt ให้อยู่ที่ 30% - 35%ถ้าบริษัท Diageo ต้องการรักษา rating ให้อยู่ที่ระดับ A+ นอกจากนี้บริษัทจะต้องใช้นโยบาย Trade-off Theory ซึ่งเป็นการเลือกระหว่างความเสี่ยงและผลตอบแทน กล่าวคือบริษัท Diageo ต้องเลือกระหว่างต้นทุนความล้มเหลวทางเงิน (Financial Distress)และผลประโยชน์ทางภาษี (Tax Shield) โดยสามารถคำนวณจากผลประโยชน์ทางภาษีในแต่ละปีและการประเมินความน่าจะเป็นที่จะเกิดความล้มเหลวทางการเงิน บริษัทมีการใช้ Monte Carlo Analysis......

Words: 828 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Capital Structure

...Capital Structure Stewart C. Myers The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 15, No. 2. (Spring, 2001), pp. 81-102. Stable URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0895-3309%28200121%2915%3A2%3C81%3ACS%3E2.0.CO%3B2-D The Journal of Economic Perspectives is currently published by American Economic Association. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/journals/aea.html. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. The JSTOR Archive is a trusted digital repository providing for long-term preservation and access to leading academic journals and scholarly literature from around the world. The Archive is supported by libraries, scholarly societies, publishers, and foundations. It is an initiative of JSTOR, a not-for-profit organization with a mission to help the scholarly community take advantage of advances in technology. For more information regarding JSTOR,......

Words: 12907 - Pages: 52

Free Essay

Capital Structure

...Global Economic Review Vol. 37, No. 1, 107Á123, March 2008 Performance and Capital Structure of Privatized Firms in Europe ´ ´ MARIA JOSE ARCAS & PATRICIA BACHILLER Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Department of Accounting and Finance, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain ABSTRACT The objective of this paper is to analyze whether there are differences in performance between private firms and recently privatized firms in the European Union, as well as to determine whether ownership (state-owned versus private) and regulation affect capital structure. Focusing on economic reasons that justify privatizations, we analyze whether there are differences between recently privatized state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and private firms in their profitability, leverage and efficiency during the period 1999Á2002. Also, we analyze the determinants of the capital structure of these firms. Contrary to previous studies, our results show that privatized firms are not less efficient than firms with private ownership. KEY WORDS: Privatization, efficiency, capital structure, regression, Wilcoxon test Summary In recent decades, the privatization of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) has been one of the most common policies carried out in economies worldwide and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries have also been involved in this phenomenon. Many studies have focused on the impact of privatization on the performance of the privatized......

Words: 7717 - Pages: 31

Premium Essay

Capital Structure

...Capital Structure Capital Structure is the proportion of debt, preference and equity capitals in the total financing of the firm’s assets. The main objective of financial management is to maximize the value of the equity shares of the firm. Given this objective, the firm has to choose that financing mix/capital structure that results in maximizing the wealth of the equity shareholders. Such a capital structure is called as the optimum capital structure. At the optimum capital structure, the weighted average cost of capital would be the minimum. The capital structure decision influences the value of the firm through its cost of capital and can affect the share of the earnings that pertain to the equity shareholders. Introduction to Capital Structure Theories There are 4 basic Capital Structure theories. They are: 1. Net Income Approach 2. Net Operating Income Approach 3. Modigliani-Miller (MM) Approach and 4. Traditional Approach Generally, the capital structure theories have the following assumptions: 1. There are no corporate taxes (this assumption has been removed later). 2. The firms use only 2 sources of financing namely perpetual debts ad equity shares 3. The firms pay 100% of the earnings as dividend. This means that the dividend pay-out ratio is 100% and there are no earnings that are retained by the firms. 4. The total assets are given which do not change and the investment decisions are assumed to be constant. ...

Words: 8178 - Pages: 33

Premium Essay

Capital Structure

...FINC 5000 LESSON NOTES – WEEK 7 CHAPTER 15 Capital Structure Introduction: Capital Structure Theory - Capital Structure refers to the proportion of debt and equity being used to finance a firm’s assets: Assets = Debt + Equity Capital Structure - In this lesson we will examine the notion that capital structure affects the value of the firm. That is, the value of the firm might change with the amount of debt that is present. - This would occur because the cost of financing with debt (AtRd) is normally lower than the cost of financing with equity (Rs), which means the WACC for the firm will be different at different blends of debt and equity financing (which means the value of the firm will be different at different blends of debt and equity financing) You can see the effect in the WACC formula: WACC = Wd(ATRd) + Ws(Rs) (no preferred stock in this example) If AT Rd = 6% and Rs = 12%: At zero debt: WACC = 0(.06) + 1.00(.12) = .12, or 12% At 50/50 debt and equity WACC = .50(.06) + .50(.12) = .09, or 9% - Furthermore, as the amount of debt financing in a firm rises, AtRd and Rs themselves will rise, because of the increasing degree of riskiness present: At zero debt: WACC = 0(.06) + 1.00(.12) = .12, or 12% At 50/50 debt and equity WACC = .50(.08) + .50(.14) = .11...

Words: 1413 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Capital Structure

...Bachelor of Finance & Banking Thesis -------------------------------------- The impact of capital structure on profitability of listed construction companies on Hanoi Stock Exchange from 2008 to 2013 FALL 2014 Instructor Mr. Tran Viet Dung Group members Nguyen Thi Thanh Tam (FB00464) Nguyen Thi Viet Chinh (FB00405) Hoang My Linh (FB00073) Dang Thi Hong Hanh (FB00253) Nguyen Thi Kieu Trang (FB00078) Hanoi, December 2014 Table of Contents List of tables 3 List of figure 4 Abstract 5 Chapter 1: Introduction and Thesis Outline 6 1. Background 6 2. Research objective 8 3. Research question 8 4. Data and methodology 8 4.1 Data 8 4.2 Methodology 9 5. Thesis outline 9 Chapter 2: Literature Review and theoretical models 10 1. Theorem review 10 1.1. Modigliani- Miller theorem review 10 1.2. Agency theory 12 1.3. Trade-off theory 14 1.4 Pecking Order Theory 19 1.5 Market-timing theory 20 2. Variable review 22 2.1. Return on Asset and Return on Equity 22 2.2. Capital structure 23 3. Empirical studies 24 3.1. Relationship between capital structure and firm performance 24 3.2. Empirical studies of relationship between determinants of capital structure and profitability 28 4. Summary of the empirical studies 30 Chapter 3: Methodology 31 1. Introduction 31 2. Data collection methods 32 2.1. Sampling techniques 32 2.2. Data collection procedure 34 3. Variables and......

Words: 20311 - Pages: 82

Premium Essay

Capital Structure Case

...Store | |Income Statements for the years ended March 31, | | |2009 |2008 | |Revenue |$417,250 |$368,425 | |Cost of sales |258,695 |225,845 | |Gross Margin |158,555 |142,580 | |  | |  | |Expenses | |  | |Depreciation of capital assets |32,000 |34,200 | |Interest |15,200 |17,400 | |Utilities |14,700 |13,900 | |Other |7,500 |6,200 | |Advertising and promotion |6,200 |4,500 | |Salaries and wages |2,000 |2,200 | |Repairs and maintenance |4,150 |2,750 | |Income taxes |12,565 |5,400 | |Total expenses ......

Words: 641 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Capital Structure

...FINC 5000 LESSON NOTES – WEEK 7 CHAPTER 15 Capital Structure Introduction: Capital Structure Theory - Capital Structure refers to the proportion of debt and equity being used to finance a firm’s assets: Assets = Debt + Equity Capital Structure - In this lesson we will examine the notion that capital structure affects the value of the firm. That is, the value of the firm might change with the amount of debt that is present. - This would occur because the cost of financing with debt (AtRd) is normally lower than the cost of financing with equity (Rs), which means the WACC for the firm will be different at different blends of debt and equity financing (which means the value of the firm will be different at different blends of debt and equity financing) You can see the effect in the WACC formula: WACC = Wd(ATRd) + Ws(Rs) (no preferred stock in this example) If AT Rd = 6% and Rs = 12%: At zero debt: WACC = 0(.06) + 1.00(.12) = .12, or 12% At 50/50 debt and equity WACC = .50(.06) + .50(.12) = .09, or 9% - Furthermore, as the amount of debt financing in a firm rises, AtRd and Rs themselves will rise, because of the increasing degree of riskiness present: At zero debt: WACC = 0(.06) + 1.00(.12) = .12, or 12% At 50/50 debt and equity WACC = .50(.08) + .50(.14) = .11...

Words: 1413 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Capital Structure

...Capital Structure – Chapt. 16 in text Does Capital Structure affect firm value? MM Proposition I (No Taxes): The value of a levered firm is equal to the value of an unlevered firm. VL = VU. i.e., Financing Choices do not add value. Why? Because you can create homemade leverage if you wish. • Unlevered Firm vs. a Levered Firm with the same assets. Recapitalization of Trans Am Corporation. Debt issue of $4,000,000 at 10% to buy back equity. Alternatively, you may view them as two companies that differ only in their capital structure. Current Proposed Assets $8,000,000 8,000,000 Debt 0 4,000,000 Equity 8,000,000 4,000,000 Shares Outstanding 400,000 200,000 Share price $20 $20 Trans Am Corporation - without debt Recession Expected Boom Earnings: 400,000 1,200,000 2,000,000 Interest: 0 0 0 Earnings after interest: 400,000 1,200,000 2,000,000 Return on equity (ROE): 5% 15% 25% EPS: $1.00 $3.00 $5.00 Trans Am Corporation - with debt Recession Expected Boom Earnings: 400,000 1,200,000 2,000,000 Interest: 400,000 400,000 400,000 Earnings after interest: 0 800,000 1,600,000 Return on equity (ROE): 0% 20% 40% EPS: $0 $4.00 $8.00 Payoffs with Levered Firm and Homemade Leverage Recession Expected Boom Buy 100 shares of Levered Equity at Cost of $2,000 EPS ......

Words: 1526 - Pages: 7