Premium Essay

Antitrust Practices

In: Business and Management

Submitted By ladale15
Words 348
Pages 2
Principles of Economics

Antitrust Practices
By:
Bryan Williams
July 25, 2013

In this case I think Dell was a little selfish and thought they could get credit for all of the work done! In this article they are talking about a patent that was not approved which Dell implemented but later was enforced against various VL-bus manufacturers. The mechanism transfers instructions between a computer's central processing unit and its peripheral devices. In the article it states that the patent was a violation. Due to all parties being members of the Video Electronics Standards Association (VESA) they had their fair share of credit in the development of this mechanism.
In the next case a patent was placed by the plaintiff and the defendant ignored the law and now is being sued for violation. Personally I don’t understand why the law couldn’t be abided by and I can understand that the law had to be enforced. The defendant eventually filed a counterclaim for alleged improper conduct on the plaintiff. It’s rightfully so because it seems as if the plaintiff was trying to be sneaky in their attempts to put a patent in place. The case was investigated under the Sherman Act and said the plaintiff had denied access to its technology. In the end the courts refused the defendants counterclaim and said that the plaintiff’s actions did not cause alleged injury to competition. I’m sure if the plaintiff had come to the defendant on different terms they could’ve come to a decision that would’ve been best for both parties. Sometimes when seeking legal action it can cause bad blood between parties.
In conclusion, I think that having a monopoly society can affect the economy because they can set prices or do things as they please do to no competition like Google. In a oligopoly society is beneficial because they compete on a level playing field such as Health Insurance.…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Antitrust Law

...Competition law, known in the United States as antitrust law, is law that promotes or maintains market competition by regulating anti-competitive conduct by companies.[1] The history of competition law reaches back to the Roman Empire. The business practices of market traders, guilds and governments have always been subject to scrutiny, and sometimes severe sanctions. Since the 20th century, competition law has become global. The two largest and most influential systems of competition regulation are United States antitrust law and European Union competition law. National and regional competition authorities across the world have formed international support and enforcement networks. Modern competition law has historically evolved on a country level to promote and maintain competition in markets principally within the territorial boundaries of nation-states. National competition law usually does not cover activity beyond territorial borders unless it has significant effects at nation-state level.[1] Countries may allow for extraterritorial jurisdiction in competition cases based on so-called effects doctrine.[1][2] The protection of international competition is governed by international competition agreements. In 1945, during the negotiations preceding the adoption of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) in 1947, limited international competition obligations were proposed within the Charter for an International Trade Organisation. These obligations were not......

Words: 259 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Antitrust Practices and Market Power

...Antitrust Practices and Market Power | DeVry University | Eva Wise | Antitrust Policy consists of laws and government actions designed to prevent monopoly and promote competition. On June 23, 2011, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission initiated an antitrust probe into Google, the world’s largest search engine. FTC’s investigation entailed a broad probe into Google’s business practices and weather it was abusing its search power to drive traffic to its own properties over rival sites and services. After a nearly twenty month high-profile investigation, the federal government announced on January 3, 2013, that its dropping an “exhaustive” probe into Google as it found no evidence the company was abusing its search power. Google was investigated under violating the Sherman antitrust act. “The definitive antitrust statute, passed by Congress in 1890, that prohibits monopolies or unreasonable combinations of companies to restrict or in any way control interstate commerce. Specifically outlawed is two or more persons engaging in monopolistic practices, such as price fixing, although it does not outlaw price-fixing per se. It was amended in 1914 by the Clayton Act, which outlaws interlocking directorates and deals with acquisitions that aim to restrain or eliminate competition. (Your Dictionary Law)” “For example, one element of a duty-to-deal claim under the Sherman Act is proving that Google’s treatment of rival websites harms consumers; even the cleverest economist would......

Words: 550 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Antitrust

...Antitrust Practices Michael D. Kelley Chamberlain College of Nursing Principles of Economics Econ-312N Allison Thomas March 24, 2013 Antitrust Practices The search for a current antitrust case has led me to the Department of Justice (DOJ) website and to something near and dear to my heart, beer. Upon reading a few articles, it has been proposed by the DOJ that Anheuser-Busch has requested to buy Modello, the third largest brewer in the country, therefore threatening competition and subsequently changing the marketplace economics. Since there are two main producers of beer in the United States of America (USA) namely Anheuser-Busch (39%) and MillerCoors (26%) accounting for 65% of the marketplace, the merger of Anheuser-Busch and Modello, could potentially violate section & of the Clayton Act. Section & of the Clayton Act state when one company gain’s sufficient stock in an opposing company to the extent that competition would suffer as a whole, then the company acquiring the smaller competitor would be in violation of the Clayton Act, specifically Section 7. In this particular instance, Anheuser-Busch has part ownership in the Modello company, as is. If it is allowed to acquire the remaining portion of the company, it will be able to have such a market share in the beer industry; it can potentially drive up beer prices and upset the entire market. Anheuser-Busch claims it would sell its shares to the competitor, Constellation Corporation, allowing......

Words: 824 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Antitrust Laws

...Who Enforces the Antitrust Laws? The antitrust laws are enforced by both public and private parties. A. Government Enforcement The United States Department of Justice Antitrust Division (“DOJ”) and the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) share responsibility for investigation and litigation of cases under the Sherman Act; and, review potentially anticompetitive mergers under the Clayton Act. There is not a formal system by which the DOJ and the FTC divide enforcement responsibilities, the agencies devote resources to particular industries where they have investigated or litigated in the past. Typically the DOJ will review mergers in transportation industries, such as airlines or railroads, as well as the telecommunications industry. The FTC focuses its enforcement responsibility in the oil and gas, pharmaceutical, and health care industries. State attorneys general have authority to enforce federal and state antitrust laws. States investigating a matter arising under the federal antitrust laws will jointly investigate with either the DOJ or the FTC, or may conduct a separate investigation. Individuals or businesses that violate antitrust laws are subject to civil penalties that vary by state per violation for individuals, and vary by state per violation for corporations. In addition, state attorneys general have authority to seek restitution on behalf of the citizens of their states as a result of violations of either the federal or state antitrust laws. Some states allow......

Words: 3102 - Pages: 13

Premium Essay

Antitrust Practices and Market Power

...source: Academic Center for Evidence-Based Practice Location of source (URL): http://www. Acestar.uthcsa.edu Owner or publisher: The university of Texas health science center at San Antonio Describe (in your own words) the research database or collection of research including the purpose and the subject matter it covers: The purpose of this site is to provide the most up to date research and education to its users. It also provides health care knowledge to nursing and health care practices. This database is also dedicated to bringing research into the practice of improving care, outcomes and safety. The site is again free to users. Explain how the source relates to your topic of interest: This source provides me a place to educate myself to evidence based practice. It also gives me the most up to date site when researching my area of interest. This site has many useful articles associated to my chosen topic. #4 Database (or collection) (30 possible points): Title of source: American Nurses Association Location of source (URL): http://www.nursingworld.org Owner or publisher: American Nurses Association Describe (in your own words) the research database or collection of research including the purpose and the subject matter it covers: The database provides nurses a site that has collection of material on nursing practices. It has a code of professional nursing attached to it; The ANA welcomes nursing practice and is tthere for all nurses......

Words: 927 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Antitrust Law

...Antitrust law is the law of competition, and it is perhaps the least understood law of all. This article provides an overview and explanation of the essential principals of antitrust law, along with comments on certain recurring themes and recent developments in the voluminous case law by which the courts have struggled to give meaning and practical effect to the principal antitrust statutes. What Is Antitrust Law? Broadly speaking, antitrust laws seek to promote fair competition on the merits and to protect consumers and wronged competitor businesses from anti-competitive business practices — practices undertaken in effort to undermine competitive commercial behavior in a given market or line of commerce. The antitrust laws therefore forbid the wrongful acquisition or preservation of monopoly power, the abuse of monopoly power in order to establish a new monopoly, and concerted restraints of trade (i.e., business practices undertaken by two or more firms that improperly stifle or suppress “competition on the merits” in a given market). They also govern proposed mergers and acquisitions that are sufficiently large to constitute a threat to competition, and they address commercial practices that pose an arguable danger to competition on the merits in a properly defined antitrust market. The Principal Antitrust Offenses. Antitrust law is the law of competition. It is concerned with wrongs committed against competition on the merits in a given line of commerce or market. It......

Words: 5498 - Pages: 22

Premium Essay

Antitrust

...Contents Introduction …………………………………………………………..page 1 Microsoft Antitrust Investigation……………………………………..page 2 Market Structures……………………………………………………..page 3-4 Disadvantages of Monopoly Market………………………………….page 4 Advantages of Monopoly Market…………………………………….page 4-5 Conclusion…………………………………………………………….page 5 References…………………………………………………………….page 6 Introduction The purpose of this paper is to identify an antitrust investigation for a firm, to discuss the reason for the investigation, and the impact its impact on the firm. The paper also identifies the practices and power of monopoly and oligopoly market structures. It also discusses the advantages and disadvantages of monopoly market. Microsoft Antitrust Investigation According to CNN Money News, the European Union found Microsoft guilty of breaching a 5 years commitment to providing EU customers a choice of browser (Thompson, 2013). This verdict came after an antitrust investigation of the company. Antitrust law is one that was put into place to help foster competition in market and to prevent large companies from breaching these agreements. In the case of Microsoft, the EU utilized the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914. McConnell and Campbell (2012), describe this Act as one that outlaws techniques that firms use to develop monopoly power. The EU ruled that Microsoft’s behavior did give customers a choice thereby decreasing competition. Microsoft like Google operates under a monopoly market system meaning that they......

Words: 1048 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Antitrust Practices and Market Power

...Antitrust Practices and Market Power Antitrust Practices and Market Power Content Introduction…………………………………………………………………………..Page 2 Case for Antitrust Behavior……………………………….……….…..…………….Page 2 Antitrust and Market Power…………..……………………………………………...Page 3 Benefit of Monopoly………………………………………………………….……...Page 4 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………….......Page 4 References………………………………………………………………………........Page 5 Antitrust Practices and Market Power Introduction First of all, what is antitrust? It was first introduced and advanced by the neoclassical economists. We also call the antitrust law as the "competition laws". The main purpose of developing the antitrust law is to ensure fair competition in an open market economy, thus protect the consumers and maximize social welfare. Case for Antitrust Behavior I consider the case of Microsoft as the perfect antitrust law case of the antitrust police. On May 18 1998, United States of Department of Justice initiated the lawsuit towards Microsoft Corporation. Microsoft was accused of becoming a monopoly and engaging in abusive practices contrary to the Sherman Antitrust Act 1890 sections 1 and 2. The accuser alleged that Microsoft was being monopolistic because its product Windows requires bundling IE, Intel, and MSO which are all it’s own products. In other words, people that wants to use Microsoft Windows has to buy all the sub-products in order to make the whole system run normally. The settle...

Words: 572 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Antitrust Practices and Market Power

...Market Power The Congress passed antitrust laws in effort to protect competition in the market, as well as consumers whom are the ultimate recipients in the market (Novak, 2007). The case that will be discussed in this paper will be a company that was found guilty of violating section 2 of the Sherman Act, which focuses on people that are trying to monopolize the market for their own benefit, or someone that is trying to get complete control within an area of the economy. With the Sherman Antitrust Act in place, monopolization is very illegal and the act tries to prevent it from happening and protect competitors in the market (Novak, 2007). Dentsply International is a company that makes dental products, but their main product sold is false teeth. The company sells product in over 100 countries, so it is a very large company. The company sells its products to dealers, who then sell the false teeth and other products to dental labs. These labs then distribute the product to dentists with the supplies they need. If you don't include false teeth, the company supplies buyers with millions of dollars of products and dominated the artificial teeth market since they had close to 80 percent of the market share at the time they were being sued (Novak, 2007). Dentsply told their dealers that they had tell sell their supplies and deal primarily with them. When the Dentsply did that, it made many dealers unhappy, and was the reason for the antitrust action the government brought......

Words: 549 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Antitrust Practices

...1. Why was the firm investigated for antitrust behavior? Back around 2003 there were complaints made by dentists to the North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners about non-dentists that were providing teeth whitening services at low cost. The Board, after hearing the complaints, issued cease and desist letters to all twenty nine teeth whitening providers who weren’t dentists. This effectively ousted all non-dentists from the teeth whitening market. 2. Identify some of the costs (pecuniary and non-pecuniary) associated with the antitrust behavior (firms having power in the market). Additionally, note the specific antitrust act (Sherman Act, Clayton Act, etc.) under which the violation was investigated. When it comes to antitrust with the sense of a dollar figure, it can be a bad when it comes to fix pricing. Back in the day it was a big problem when companies were monopolized over things such as steel, tobacco, railroads, etc. The Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914 is being violated in this case as making the non-dentist teeth whitening’s prohibited; it was an unfair method of competition. The dentists didn’t like the competition and thus removed them entirely to make sure that only they could provide the service this would also give them the choice of whatever price they wanted if they so choose. 3. Given your research and findings, are monopolies and oligopolies (firms demonstrating power) always bad for society? Be sure to provide real world examples of where......

Words: 569 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Antitrust

...Dealing with Today’s Antitrust Behaviors​​4 Dealing with Today’s Antirust Behaviors DeVry 2014 Economics Professor Sasser Antoinette Ellis November 23, 2014 Introduction Healthcare and medical practices are trending more towards the use of oligopoly. Most healthcare organizations and health insurance companies are now consolidation to offset unforeseen costs as a result of the Healthcare Reform. A complaint filed by the FTC in early August 2014 against Idaho-based St. Luke Healthcare system received a lot of attention. St. Luke’s initiated the acquisition of the largest independent medical group Saltzer Medical Group in Idaho. Why is it antitrust behavior? Since the antitrust act was investigated the Idaho federal judge emphasized that the consolidation is still subject to limitations on the market place. Many citizens and people of the area feel that the consolidation will result in a healthcare monopoly. There is a great fear of price inflation and limited healthcare options. As a result “the U.S. District Judge B. Lynn Winmill ordered Boise, Idaho-based St. Luke's Health System to unwind its acquisition of Saltzer Medical Group (Kutscher, 2014).” The Chairwoman Edith Ramirez of the FTC gave a written statement in response to the judge’s ruling preventing the trade. She wrote, “Keeping healthcare costs low and quality high by ensuring vigorous competition between providers is, and will continue to be, a top priority (Kutscher,...

Words: 593 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Antitrust Laws and Competitive Business Practices

...Antitrust Laws and Competitive Business Practices The fair, balanced and competitive application of U.S. laws as applied to business practices Introduction Several laws have been enacted to provide protection to businesses in our free-trade market. There are times when trading within the free market does not demonstrate the fair, balanced and ethical conduct deserved in competitive business. Trying to compete in a market where practices aren’t regulated deprives businesses the benefits of competition, resulting in higher prices for products and services which in turn affect the economy. Unfair trade practices have been around for as long as trade itself. Unfair practices were under scrutiny as early as 470 B.C. Grain was so vital to Greece’s population that trade laws were enacted. A percentage of grain was taken by the state therefore taxes were applied to anyone not importing directly to Athens. Death applied to anyone restricting imports (http://www.ancient.eu/article/115/). The latter was definitely extreme but regulations now cover a broader range of violations with less severe consequences. The federal government enforces three major antitrust laws. These laws address unfair practices that deprive businesses the benefits of interstate and international trade. Federal antitrust laws apply to virtually all industries and to every level of business, including manufacturing, transportation, distribution, and marketing. The Sherman......

Words: 1264 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Antitrust Law

...| ANTITRUST LAW | | Name -Manpreet Kaur [Date] | “The mission of the Antitrust Division is to promote economic competition through enforcing and providing guidance on antitrust laws and principles”. Antitrust laws have been developed to create the strong foundation of a free & open market of a vibrant economy. Market is so competitive now a days, there are so many options available for products & services, which is the result of antitrust laws. Antitrust is developed to help both consumers & business owners. “These laws promote vigorous competition and protect consumers from anticompetitive mergers and business practices” Antitrust laws are developed by the U.S. Government, also commonly known as "competition laws". Antitrust law was put in place by U.S. Government to protect consumers from being vulnerable to exploitery business practices. Government protects consumers by ensuring that the competition which exists in the market is fair, & would also ensure that enforcement leads to an open-market which is consumer friendly. ANTITRUST LAW-GOAL & HISTORY The goal set by government is to protect the end user, consumer, antitrust laws “is to protect economic freedom and opportunity by promoting free and fair competition in the marketplace”. Consider being in a market with one option, what it would offer to consumers, technically nothing, because there are no options. Antitrust law ensure that the “Competition in a free market benefits......

Words: 2734 - Pages: 11

Free Essay

Antitrust Laws

...Antitrust Laws After much research and investigations on Antitrust Laws, and reading up on individual cases, I think that overall Antitrust Laws are effective and good for the people. Without the Sherman, Clayton, and Federal Trade Commission Act, there would be a monopoly of every industry, trade, marketing, and services. This would in-turn lead to higher prices for the consumer, lower quality products, less innovation, and poor service. As I mentioned in my opening sentence, I will bring up two individual cases that the DOJ (Department of Justice) is pursuing when it comes to Antitrust Laws. I would like to begin by quoting the DOJ’s mission statement. Mission “The mission of the Antitrust Division is to promote economic competition through enforcing and providing guidance on antitrust laws and principles. Antitrust Laws The goal of the antitrust laws is to protect economic freedom and opportunity by promoting free and fair competition in the marketplace. Competition in a free market benefits American consumers through lower prices, better quality and greater choice. Competition provides businesses the opportunity to compete on price and quality, in an open market and on a level playing field, unhampered by anticompetitive restraints. Competition also tests and hardens American companies at home, the better to succeed abroad. Federal antitrust laws apply to virtually all industries and to every level of business, including manufacturing, transportation,......

Words: 918 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Monopoly and Antitrust

...18. May 2012 Final Journal Topic: Monopoly and Antitrust The market power of either buyers or sellers, harms buyers who may have the opportunity to buy at competitive prices. It also reduces the production, which causes a deadweight loss. Excessive market power also raises issues of equity and justice, because if a company has too much monopoly power, it makes profit at the expense of consumers. A monopoly is a situation in which there is a single supplier or seller of a good or service for which there are no close substitutes. Economists and others have long known that unregulated monopolies tend to damage the economy by (1) charging higher prices, (2) providing inferior goods and services and (3) suppressing innovation, as compared with a competitive situation (i.e., the existence of numerous, competing suppliers of the good or service).[1] In theory, the Government or State could collect the excess profits that the company obtained through taxes and then redistribute it among the buyers of the product. However, this redistribution is usually not feasible. It is difficult to ascertain what proportion of the profits of an enterprise is attributable to monopoly power and it is even more difficult to locate all buyers and reimburse them an amount proportional to their purchases. How can society, then, limit the market power and prevent the anti-competitively use of it? In the case of a natural monopoly, i.e. an......

Words: 2628 - Pages: 11