Free Essay

A. Outline at Least Two Defections of the Term Miracle. Examine Key Reasons for Believing in Miracles. B. Comment on the View That These Reasons for Believing in Miracles Are More Persuasive Than Potential Critiicisms.

In: Religion Topics

Submitted By Chloees
Words 1397
Pages 6
a) Outline at least two definitions of the term miracle. Examine key reasons for believing in miracles.

The term miracle is queried over constantly for the reason that there are various definitions all consisting of why we should believe miracles to be true. Two of which belong to Thomas Aquinas’ and Richard Swinburne. Each poses reasons for why one should believe in miracles and whether they do really and truly exist. Firstly Aquinas posits his suggestion that miracles are ‘Those things…which are done by divine power apart from the order generally followed in things’. He sets out his definition with three main aspects; starting with the idea that events are done by God which nature could never have the capability of doing. One example used to support this is that it’s logically impossible to stop the Sun yet God with his divine power can. Therefore if this is broken and an act goes against it, it is thus a miracle. The second proposition is that things that are done by God which nature can do but not in that order also qualify as being a miracle. The final idea that Aquinas puts forward is that the events done by God that nature can do but God does without the use of natural laws also are deemed to be miracles. The significant thing about Aquinas’s definition of a miracle is that he allowed for the possibility of miracles to occur within the system of natural activity. Moreover he allowed for the possibility that God’s activity with the natural realm may be part of the normal order of things. His definition didn’t limit a miracle to a violation of a natural law and so is therefore identified by God’s intervention. A miracle is an act of God according to him which is purposed to be beneficial to the particular person. Overall a miracle may perhaps break a natural law however it doesn’t always have to. This view suggests that God can do what he wants with his creation. Another definition to miracles is Swinburne’s which essentially argues that instances like water turning into wine can happen naturally or with the assistance of chemicals. What he believes to be a miracle is something that happens in a certain way. That it’s not about what is defined as a miracle. He puts forward the argument that events should not be seen as miracles unless they have a deeper meaning and greater significance to them. The very fact that something has simply broken a law of nature doesn’t thereby mean it’s a miracle; it needs more to it, as to define it as a miracle. Swinburne also believes it’s important we don’t ignore miracle claims just because they aren’t scientific because there is a still a chance they can occur. Ockham’s razor can be used to back up his point because it states the simplest explanation is the best which suggests if we have no way of explaining why an event has occurred after being thoroughly investigated then the simplest and perhaps more justified way of explaining it, is to say it’s a miracle. Swinburne’s other idea is that as humans we should and need to be less skeptical otherwise when doing certain things in life for instance, getting a train which says its going to London, if we never believed anything, we would spend time questioning and evaluating whether the train is actually going to London. There are others also which define miracles in very different forms, for instance Hume is very much at the other end of the spectrum to philosophers like Swinburne and Aquinas and strongly believes miracles do not exist. He defines miracles as ‘a transgression of a law of nature by a particular volition of the deity...’ the basis of his argument feels there is no objection as such to miracles but however, he does have an epistemological problem with miracles. Essentially putting forward the notion that we don’t actually know a miracle has happened when a rational person has no understanding that a miracle has occurred. First and foremost if the laws of nature are violated, there is reason to believe a miracle has taken place. The other important aspect of his argument to remember is that ‘No testimony is sufficient to establish a miracle unless it is such that the falsehood would be more miraculous’; equally, one has to weigh up the evidence and according to him, there has never been a miracle found on reliable information to be accepted as valid. Briefly, Hume postulated four other objections as part of his philosophical argument which are important when arguing against the existence of miracles. Finally there are many reasons why we should in fact believe in miracles, and one of which is the bible. It has been on this Earth and known by humans for an incredibly long time, and is still referred today when it comes to proving religious arguments. One example is that there have been many reported miraculous appearances by the Virgin Mary. And the bible consists of Jesus constantly practicing his miracles on disabled or extremely disadvantaged people.

b) Comment on the view that these reasons for believing in miracles are more persuasive than potential criticisms.

I believe when evaluating the reasons for believing in miracles and the potential criticisms that the reasons for are in fact a great deal more persuasive. Whilst the arguments against them appear to be coherently out together, the very idea that we still have liable reasons for them existing means we mustn’t discard the occurrence of miracles so easily. The first point I will make is that the while Hume has constructed his criticisms for believing in miracles in a way that one could be convinced, it stands to mind that his views on miracles seem to be slightly close-minded and offensive. For instance, his idea that miracles occur to the uneducated most often seems rather harsh and can come across as an unnecessary sweeping statement. For a philosopher to commit to such a statement as this, I don’t believe it to start his argument off well at all. Without a doubt miracles have occurred to those with substantial education thus providing them with enough sense and knowledge to see reason behind the fallacies of miracles. Furthermore, Hume merely postulates a philosophical argument and fails to explore the possibilities of miracles taking place but instead defines them out of existence. Other reasons why the criticisms to believing in miracles appear to be less persuasive is that When it comes to commenting on the view that reasons for believing in miracles is more persuasive, I believe Holland’s argument could be seen as a much more realistic outlook on miracles. That is because he postulates the idea that even events which don't break the law of nature may be considered miraculous if the sense of divine purpose and significance is strong enough. 'A coincidence can be taken religiously as a sign and called a miracle'. I find this reason for believing them a great deal more persuasive for the reason that the very existence of miracles is seen as less 'miraculous' if you like because once could wish to call something a miracle if they believe the significance and purpose of the very act is significant enough. Another reason why they seem more to exist is that Hollands defentition is subjective thus meaning one mans miracle is anothe mans coincidence. Despite this generally being a downside of his detention, it can equally mean that if one man believes a miracle to exist, it has. Thereby suggesting the existence of miracles is actually rather possible according to holland. In conclusion, I believe that the reasons for believing in miracles is noticeably more persuasive than the potential criticisms posed against miracles. For instance, as well as Hollands definition of miracles I believe that there have been such occurrences recorded in the past that have been perceived as miracles. These that have taken place have not only happened in non religious areas or been sighted by non religious believers but have been witnessed by others as well. So the very fact that miracles have actually been known to occur since the very age of B.C and still do now, it doesn't come as a surprise to me, that miracles are know to exist in this world.…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Asian Miracle

...Economic Miracle: The Wisely Chosen Economic Policies and The Economic Trend of 20th Century Van Nguyen Keystone College Abstract: Asian economic miracle refers to three groups of East Asian countries making miracle in transforming their economies from the third world to the first world ranking. There are three generations of Asian miracle. Starting with Japan, the first generation of what called Asian miracle, following with the second generation including South Korea, Hong Kong, Singapore, and Taiwan, and final generation consists of some Southeast Asian countries such as Thailand, Malaysia. This paper is going to talk about the second generation of Asian economic miracle. By showing their economic achievement, illustrating their economic policies, and analyzing how the economic trend of 20th century reflected on those policies, this paper will argue that Asian miracle was the result of the wise choices of how to manage an economy. Furthermore, developing countries should learn the lessons of how to choose the right economic policies to make economic miracle. Asian Economic Miracle: The Wisely Chosen Economic Policies and The Economic Trend of 20th Century Introduction According to the East Asian Miracle (EAM, World Bank, 1993), “East Asia has a remarkable record of high and sustained economic growth. From 1965 to 1990 the twenty-three economies of East Asia grew faster than......

Words: 6857 - Pages: 28

Premium Essay

Reasons for and Against Believing in Accuracy:

...Reasons for and against believing in accuracy: For: 1. All we really can make statements about is that which we, personally, perceive. Whenever there is nothing contradicting our believes, there would be no reason to believe that which we are perceiving to be inaccurate. Otherwise it would be impossible for anything to make a statement about anything and be able to say anything about the accuracy or truth of that statement. Against: 2. All sensory information is eventually judged by individual people. We all look at things subjectively, however hard we want to believe that we are objectively judging a phenomenon. Cognitive and other psychological biases should make us cautious in making statements about the truth values of any claim of accuracy. 3. Communication is never without any noise nor is it exact. Even if claims would accurately represent when they are interpreted in a manner that is deemed to be regular, we cannot a priori assume that these assumptions are inherent to the claims in the manner they are communicated. Statements might be interpreted different by other people or they may be distorted. Contributors to accuracy of sensory data: 1. Repeatability 2. Mathematical tools to assess accuracy and reliability 3. Use of a tested and accepted methodology and toolset that complies to the standards of the scientific community For the matter of nature and nurture, there are a couple of things to say. Through nurture us humans have developed the scientific......

Words: 315 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Sign Miracle

...Sign Miracles Paper | BIBL 323 D17 201240 | Rev. Abdue L. Knox, I L22937066 | And truly Jesus did many other signs in the presence of His disciples, which are not written in this book; but these are written that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that believing you may have life in His name. John 20:30-31 NKJV Everywhere Jesus went people were amazed at His miraculous powers. The Apostle John uses Jesus miracles as an organizing principle in his gospel. He calls them semeia, or “signs” indicating that each miracle was a concrete demonstration of Jesus’ divinity and messiah ship. The purpose of the signs were to produce belief as they did for the disciples at the wedding at Cana (John 2:11) and the household of the Nobleman (John 4:53). But these same miracles would incite anger and violence as in the case of healing the man born blind in John 11. (Earl D. Radmacher 1997) The first sign miracle Jesus performed in John’s Gospel was changing water into wine found in John 2:1-12. Jesus and His new disciples arrived at a wedding celebration that had already begun. Mary the mother of Jesus came to Him and told Him that the wine had run out. “Mary was simply informing him of the need, not ordering Him. Her statement is in fact much like a prayer made to Jesus. She knew he could do something.” (Towns 2002) Jesus directed the servants to fill six water pots, which he then turned into wine. “The changing of water into wine is surely meant...

Words: 1556 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Comment on the View That Arguments Against Miracles Are Stronger Than Those Arguments in Support of Them

...Comment on the view that arguments against miracles are stronger than those arguments in support of them David Hume proposed his definition of a miracle but in spite of this Hume had criticisms claiming that it was not reasonable to believe in miracles as the evidence was totally unreliable. He stated two weaknesses to the belief in miracles: 1) Based on our large experience of natural laws, it makes more sense to say that there is some other explanation for example that we cannot know every natural law. For example, had Jesus been crucified in our time and come back to life after three days. Overall this could be regarded as a miracle today but it might not be considered as a miracle in the future 2) The evidence of miracles often comes from the testimony of others.  We should not rely on such second-hand accounts, because accounts of others cannot be trusted. For example in Fatima thousands of witnesses claimed to have seen the sun spin and fall out of the sky however the witnesses may have been deceived because of their excitement.   Firstly, Hume challenged the testimonies of miraculous occurrences on the ground that there were not enough reliable witnesses. There have never been enough a miracle which has been witnessed by a sufficiently large number reliable, objective witnesses. For example there will never be a large enough amounts of educated, reasonable, trustworthy and respected men for us to believe their testimony the resurrection of Jesus was seen......

Words: 1540 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Miracle

...Historical Film Prompt: Miracle The film Miracle is about the U.S men’s ice hockey team winning the 1980 gold metal for the Winter Olympics, led by head coach Herb Brooks. Miracle was fairly accurate with its historic content during the course of the movie. The director Gavin O’Connor did a good job tying in historical and political background that brought the film together, which made it unique to other sport films. In the beginning of the film there was a sequence highlighting the historical events that lead up to the 1980 Winter Olympics. Miracle specifically opened up with the historical footage against the Vietnam War in the 1960s. Our country endured the time where it was divided because of the support of the Vietnam War. To make things worst, the 1970’s was also a hard time for the United States. The United States had to deal President Richard Nixon’s Watergate Scandal during the year of 1974. A scene in the movie showed a headline saying “5 were arrested in connection to GOP.” Later stating that President Richard Nixon had resigned from office, making him the first president to step down. And the following years lead up to another problem known as the hostage crisis in Iran during 1979 to the 80’s. The film also accurately portrayed the oil crises in the film multiple times. The oil crisis was mentioned early on in the film and in the middle when the coaches were at a gas station filling up their bus. At the gas station there was a sign that announced that the gas......

Words: 1430 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Assess Hume’s Reasons for Rejecting Miracles. (35 Marks)

...Hume was a verificationist and approached miracles from an empirical view, relying on probability as a basis for his reasons for rejecting miracles. Hume defined miracles as a ‘violation of the laws of nature’, he believed that the laws of nature were set in stone, through the use of a posteriori knowledge Hume identified them as being universal and unchanging. Hume observed that some Biblical miracles, such as Jesus walking on water, violated those laws of nature. He then went on to identify the probability that a violation of these laws could occur, Hume argued that if the probability of an event occurring was low then there was little chance that the miracle had actually occurred. This would be true in the event of a baby falling from a 3rd floor window and escaping unscathed, the probability of this happening is extremely low thus Hume would state that a report of it happening was false and it probably did not happen. Through using the principle of probability a miraculous event should be labelled as a miracle only where it would be unbelievable for it to be anything less. Upon following this principle it is less likely that the testimony is false than the miracle occurred should you have a prior belief, however if you do not believe in a deity and the probability of a miracle occurring then the miracles happening is less likely than the testimony being false. This argument used by Hume is not an effective argument as there are cases in which the laws of nature have......

Words: 793 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Miracle

...Miracle Miracle Introduction The movie that I have chosen to write about was the movie “Miracle”. The movie miracle has many different types of cultural differences that are not that easily seen at a first glance. However, when you watch the movie more than once you can begin to see the cultural differences that occur in the movie. The cultural differences that I was able to see from this movie were Jim Craig’s miscommunication with coach, Jim Craig’s father’s miscommunication, the different styles of play between the Soviet’s and the US, and the difference between USA and Soviets players. The first cultural difference that occurred in the movie was easy to see and hear. Jim Craig, who was the goaltender, had his mother pass away leaving just his father to support him. In the opening scene in the movie, the hockey committee is having tryouts to form together a hockey to team to compete in the Olympics. When Herb Brooks, the head coach of team USA, is scouting his players, the assistant coach says, “Why is Craig starting over Janacek, his mother died and his game has been off ever since” (O’Connor)? Herb then replies, “Have you ever seen him when his game is on” (O’Connor). As the movie goes on, Jim Craig makes the team and Herb Brooks has everyone take a test, to see how hard he can push them. However, Craig does not take the test. When Herb goes to Craig’s room to ask him why he didn’t take the test, Herb could tell that something wasn’t......

Words: 982 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Miracle Economies

...Miracle Economies Introduction: India’s record GDP growth of 8.49% per year in the five-year period 2004-09 is a case of improved productivity and | growth in states trickling up and aggregating into rapid growth at the national level. The acceleration did not originate in New Delhi. It originated in the states, especially the large, poor ones, and then trickled up. We have long viewed some states like Gujarat and Maharashtra as naturally fast-growing, and others like Bihar and Uttar Pradesh as irredeemable failures. We are used to thinking of Kerala as having good social welfare without growth, and of Punjab as the main economic dynamo north of the Vindhyas. Growth of Miracle economies: India achieved record annual GDP growth, averaging 8.45%, in the five years, 2004-05 to 2008-09. Historically, the chronically poor states were Orissa plus the BIMARU quartet (Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh), of which three have been sub-divided. These eight poor states participated in India’s boom. Indeed, five of India’s eight ultra-poor states have become miracle economies, defined internationally as those with over 7% growth. The best news comes from Bihar, historically the biggest failure. From 2004-05 to2008-09, Bihar averaged 11.03% growth annually. It was virtually India’s fastest growing state, on par with Gujarat (11.05%). That represents a sensational turnaround. Other poor states have done very well too. Uttrakhand (9.31%), Orissa (8.74%), Jharkhand......

Words: 1559 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Outline Two Definitions of the Term ‘Miracle’. Examine Key Reasons for Believing in Miracles

...Dasein and the quest for authentic Being-in-the-world Essay Two 'I am Condemned to be free': Sartre, Freedom and Bad faith Essay Three 'Hell is other people': Sartre and being-for-others Essay Four Generating a meaningful existence: A Nietzschean based interpretation back [pic] Mary Jennings: Associate Award Essay One Doubt, certainty and knowledge in Descartes and Merleau-Ponty Essay Two Justice and the Other in Levinas Totality and Infinity Essay Three Heidegger's Dasein and Cartesian scepticism Essay Four Heidegger's notion of Befindlichkeit in Being and Time back [pic] Andrew Watson: Associate Award Essay One Plato's view of the fine arts in the Republic Essay Two Plato's theory of divine inspiration (mania) Essay Three A Comparison of Plotinus' philosophy of art and beauty with that of Plato Essay Four Mimesis in Aristotle and Pollock back [pic] Kenneth Head: Associate Award Essay One Does Life Have a Meaning? Essay Two The Status of Religious Language Essay Three Moral Complexity in the Making and Keeping of Promises Essay Four Personal Autonomy and Individual Moral Growth back [pic] Stuart Hopkins: Associate Award Essay One Justice and Morality in Plato's Republic Essay Two Kant and the 'Morality of Anger' Essay Three Hobbes and Absolute Sovereignty Essay Four Locke's Theory of Resistance back [pic] Tony Bellotti: Associate Award Essay One Descartes' Method of Doubt Essay Two Problems that arise from the incompatibility of Subjective......

Words: 1030 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Hume on Miracles

...Evaluate the claim that belief in miracles leads to a belief in a God who favours some but not all of his creation. 35m The definition of the word ‘miracle’ has not been unanimously agreed upon by scholars and thinkers. Hume famously defined miracles as ‘violations of the laws of nature by a particular volition of the deity.’ It can be argued that Hume would agree that belief in miracles would lead to a God who favoured some but not all of his creation as they are defined by him as exceptions to the norm based purely on the ‘volition’ (or will) of God. In this sense God would therefore decide when and where to intervene. The fundamental problem with this position is the anthropomorphic language which is used to describe God, many would argue that God does not act from volition because He does not have human attributes or limitations. Maurice Wiles argued that a God who intervenes selectively would not be worthy of worship due to his failure to act on a wider scale. Wiles argue that such a God would be guilty of being arbitrary (acting on random choices) and partisan (seeming to support a certain party or group). Wiles is concerned that a God who performs miracles, in the traditional sense, is picking and choosing who to perform miracles for, relieving suffering for some and allowing it to happen to others. He argues that the believer is subsequently left with two choices: to reject belief in miracles and petitionary prayer, or to accept that God is morally culpable for......

Words: 862 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Miracles

...Hume defines miracles as ‘violations of the laws of nature’ which leads him to reject their existence, as by definition, they are beyond the realms of reasonable belief. In defence of miracles, Swinburne challenges some of Hume’s practical arguments. Hume claims miracles only occur among uneducated and ignorant people, suggesting a lack of convincing testimony. Swinburne questions how you define when people are educated and what level of education is required to give ‘reliable’ testimony of a miracle, underlining Hume’s vagueness. It could mean that people lack a familiarity with science as Hume suggests, but this fails to explain why many people who are clearly educated still attest to experiencing miracles. However, historical evidence is used to support Hume’s case. It is evident that as the nation develops and becomes more educated, the number of reported miracles disappear. Swinburne also criticises Hume’s proposition that contradictory reports of miracles occurring in different religions cancel each other out. Swinburne condemns the view that miracles in any religion prove the truth of one religious belief correct over another. He points out the majority of reported miracles by theists involve God helping someone, for instance through healing. Instead of this being contradictory, they perhaps simultaneously verify the belief in a common benevolent God, validating miracles. Furthermore, Hume’s definition of a miracle is criticised as he places emphasis on the fixed...

Words: 458 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Miracles

...(a) Outline the key concepts of miracle and examine the main reasons to believe in miracles The world miracle derive from the Latin word ‘miror’ which means I wonder at. Miracles is a posterior and inductive argument. There are three key concepts of miracles which are it should break the law of nature, it must have purpose and significance and it should be open to religious and spiritual understanding. The definition associated with miracles comes from David Hume stating “a miracle is a transgression of a law of nature by a particular violation of the deity”. One key concept of miracles comes from Thomas Aquinas a 13th century philosopher whom believed in a realist view of miracles and states “things that are done occasionally by divine power apart from the order generally followed in things”. He proposed three categories, the first rank which are events done by god that nature and humans can logically not do such as Jesus walking on water. The second rank are events done by god that nature could do but not in that order for example the resurrection of Jesus. The third ranks are events done by god that nature can do but god does without the use of natural laws such as the healing of Peter’s mother-in-law in the chapter of Nark in the bible. This is one of the key concepts of miracles as Aquinas ranks are consistent with religious tradition. There are two concepts of miracles one of which is a realist view where miracles actual do have to have happened to be meaningful and......

Words: 543 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Outline Two Definitions of the Term ‘Miracle’. Examine Key Reasons for Believing in Miracles.

...Background * Right and left hemispheres mirror each other, there are distinct areas dealing with speech production and comprehension showing their functional localization. It exists because Broca’s and Wernike’s areas are only found in left hemisphere. * Primary cortex is situated in frontal lobe; areas in right hemisphere receive information from and are concerned with activities on left side of body. * Sperry believes studies involving split-brain patients reveal ‘true’ nature of two hemispheres because commissurotomy disconnects the two hemispheres. This means they only work independently. * Previous research on animals showed behavioral effects. * Other research by Sperry on humans and monkeys suggested the behavioral effects of the surgery might be less severe than other forms of cerebral surgery, e.g. frontal lobotomy. * Akelaitis (1944) found that there were no important behavioral effects of surgical section of corpus callosum in humans, provided other brain damage was excluded. Research Method Aim and Hypothesis * Aim of the study was to investigate if each brain hemisphere: (i) Possesses an independent stream of conscious awareness (ii) Has its own separate chain of memories that are......

Words: 500 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Asses Humes Reason for Rejecting Miracles. (35) 

...Asses Humes reason for rejecting miracles. (35)  Hume defines a miracle as a transgression of a natural law by a particular volition of the deity. This does not imply that a miracle is an extraordinary event but it is one that breaks the natural law and that it is brought about by the action of God. Other two definitions would be that a miracle is an event that has religious significance and this does not need to have broken the laws of nature to be regarded as a miracle but it needs to reveal something about God. The last definition of a miracle is a view of Thomas Aquinas who defines miracles as an event caused by God. In this essay I will be discussing why Hume rejects miracles and arguments for and against his theories. Hume was an empiricist, so he believed that it was more likely that the report of a miracle was mistaken than the laws of nature were violated. He did not say that miracles did not happen, but that it would be impossible to prove them. Hume’s argument is based on the principle of induction, which is the suggestion that future events will take place based on previous evidence. This is because evidence from people’s experience of observing the world showed the laws of nature to be fixed and unvarying. For example, the sun has risen every day in the past, so it is very likely that it will rise again and not stand still in the sky. However, Hume did accept that whatever happened countless times in the past did not guarantee such would happen again in...

Words: 703 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Assess Hume’s Reasons for Rejecting Miracles

...,ASSESS HUME’S REASONS FOR REJECTING MIRACLES Hume’s rejection of miracles comes from his theory that there are laws of nature which are based on past experience, a posteriori, and appear to be unvarying and universal. During this essay I will put forward Hume’s approach before assessing his reasons for the rejections of miracles and what other philosophers have said about his rejection. According to the dictionary definition, a miracle is defined as: ‘a highly improbable or extraordinary event that is not explicable by natural laws and is considered to be divine’. Hume’s definition of a miracle is not that different from the dictionary definition, defining them as: ‘a transgression of a law of nature by a particular volition of the Deity, or by the interposition of some invisible agent.’ He puts forward two separate arguments against miracles; one being a priori and the other being a posteriori. The first of his arguments is based on the lack of probability and is a priori. Hume argues that miracles are violations of the laws of nature and a ‘firm and unalterable experience’ has established these laws of nature. He did not deny that these events, miracles, would not happen; but instead said that they are the least likely event possible, and improbable events need witnesses of higher credibility than witnesses required for more probable events. Hume argued that even the most impressive testimony will at most counterbalance the unlikeliness of the event. Clearly, a serious...

Words: 1207 - Pages: 5